簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴昱彤
Lai, Yu-tung
論文名稱: 以離散事件模擬結合精實方法求解非固定式單件流之生產系統-以漁網生產為例
The use of discrete-event simulation and lean methodologies in solving variable unit-load production system-A case study of fishing nets production
指導教授: 楊大和
Yang, Taho
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 製造工程研究所
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 108
中文關鍵詞: 系統模擬田口方法理想解類似度順序偏好法VSM拉式方案非固定式單件流精實生產
外文關鍵詞: Lean production, Variable unit-load, Simulation, Taguchi method, VSM, Technique for preference by similarity to ideal, Pull strategy
相關次數: 點閱:83下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 精實生產方式其最終的目的,就是要滿足顧客的需求;因此當生產型態的轉變由以往的「大量生產」轉變為「少量多樣」,創造生產線的彈性變成重要的問題,精實生產發展出來的生產系統,即利用管理手法檢視生產線上的浪費,進行各種以改善為核心的降低成本活動,力求提高生產力、提升品質而提供消費者喜好的多樣化產品,進而提高公司獲利及企業競爭優勢。目前汽車產業為引進精實生產方式的標竿,本研究欲探討汽車業成功導入精實生產的流程、涵義與形成條件,將其成功經驗移植到非固定式單件流生產上。探討其在實務經驗的運作方式,設計專屬的精實生產系統。
    本研究選擇漁網產業做為非固定式單件流的代表,以系統模擬為工具,結合田口直交表與理想解類似度順序偏好法 為主體尋找多屬性模擬模式的最佳方案,並歸納其實施成效的差異及其可能原因,以規劃其後續方案的改善方向以提供現場管理者做為決策上的依據。
    本篇論文同時提出結合精實思考法與精實價值流指導原則的程序,用以導入此精實拉式生產方案與平準化排程。此程序從定義產品價值開始,經由現況價值流圖的繪製找到改善的契機,一直到利用模擬最佳化求解最佳方案,並繪製未來理想狀態價值流圖作為改善方案的依據。
    利用系統模擬建構案例,導入精實拉式生產方案後,比較現況價值流圖與未來價值流圖發現,在無額外投資且不變更任何實體設施的前提下,平均前置時間從原先的9.45天縮小至2.07天,改善了78%。而在廠內的在製品由原先的57753.84公斤降為8813.31公斤,約改善84.73%;進一步提出提升瓶頸站產能之初步規劃,力求貫徹「There is always a better way」的精神。

    The final purpose of the lean production system is to satisfy customer's needs. Therefore, the flexible of production lines becomes a critical issue after production pattern has been changed from mass production to small-volume with large variety production. The manufacturing system of lean production is using management methods to survey the waste of production lines, to execute some kinds of improvability actions of reducing the cost, and to elevate productivity and quality to support various customization productions. By using lean production system, industries not only can earn profits but also can raise competitive advantage. As the automobile industry is the benchmark of applying lean production nowadays, we will discuss the procedures, meanings and conditions of applying lean production in successful cases. Furthermore, we will also apply the successful experiences to variable unit-load production. By analyzing those successful experiences, we can design an exclusive and variable lean production system in unit-load production.
    We select the fishing nets production as a case in this study and in this research we use simulation methods as tools, and combine Taguchi method with technique for preference by similarity to ideal solution to find optimum solution. We also generalize the differences and possible reasons from a collection of experiments to plan the improvement directions of following strategies and use them as basis of policy decision.
    We also propose to combine Womack’s lean thinking and Rother’s 7 guiding principles procedure in this paper to apply the lean pull strategy and leveling scheduling into cases. The lean production procedure begins from defining value, addressing the adequate improvement time through the current value stream mapping, obtain the optimal solutions by using simulation optimization, and drawing the future value stream mapping as an implement of improved alternative.
    We implement the proposed procedure to a real-world fishing nets production process. After we compared current-state map and future-state map, the results indicate the improvement could reduce the average cycle time from 9.45 days to 2.07days as well as the work in process could reduce 84.73% without any extra investment or facilities shifting. As a result, we can have a further plan of increasing the capacity of bottleneck workstation and fulfill the spirit of “There is always a better way” completely.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 致謝 iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 x 1. 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程 2 1.4 論文架構 4 2. 文獻探討 5 2.1 精實生產系統 5 2.2 精實系統思考法 10 2.3 平準化排程 18 2.4 漁網產業簡介 19 2.5 單元負載 25 2.6 迴歸分析 27 2.7 田口方法 29 2.8 理想解類似度順序偏好法 30 3. 研究方法 35 3.1 現況分析與建立現況模擬模式 35 3.2 導入精實生產方案與建立未來理想狀態模擬模式 39 3.3 執行實驗並確認最佳可行方案 45 3.4 進行第二次改善與分析 47 4. 實例說明 49 4.1 現況分析與建立現況模擬模式 49 4.2 導入精實生產方案與建立未來理想狀態圖 66 4.3 執行實驗並確認最佳可行方案 82 4.4 依據實驗結果決定最佳方案 83 5. 結論與建議 97 5.1 結論 97 5.2 未來研究與建議 97 參考文獻 99 附錄A 價值溪流符號說明 101 附錄B 實驗參數設定 102

    江瑞坤、大野義男、侯東旭,民96,豐田的三位一體生產系統,初版,財團法人中衛發展中心,臺北市。
    陳順宇,民87,多變量分析,初版,華泰,台南市。
    蘇朝墩,民92,品質工程,第二版,中華民國品質學會,台北縣。
    Abdulmalek, F.A. and Rajgopal, J., 2007, Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: a process sector case study, International Journal of Production Economics, 107, 223-236.
    Askin, R. G., and Standridge, C. R., 1993, Modeling and Analysis of ManufacturingSystem, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    Chankonk, V., and Haimes, Y. Y., 1983, Multiobjective decision making – Theory and
    methodology, Elservier Science Publishing Co, New York.
    Feld, W.M., 2001, Lean Manufacturing: Tools, Techniques, and How to Use Them, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
    Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making- Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., and Sturrock, D.T., 2007, Simulation with Arena, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Liker, J.K. and Meier, D., 2004, The Toyota Way Fieldbook: a Practical Guide for Implementing Toyota's 4Ps, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Little, J.D.C., 1961, A Proof of the Queueing formula L = λ W, The Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 9, 383-387.
    Marchwinski, C. and Shook, J., 2003, Lean Lexicon: a Graphical Glossary for Lean Thinkers, Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline.
    Monden, Y., 1998, Toyota Production System: an Integrated Approach to Just-in-Time, 3rd edition, Engineering and Management Press, Norcross.
    Nicholas, J. and Soni, A., 2006, The Portal to Lean Production: Principles and Practices for Doing More with Less, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton.
    Ohno, T., 1988, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press, Portland.
    Pegden, C.D., Sadowski, R.P., and Shannon, R.E., 1995, Introduction to Simulation Using SIMAN, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Ravald, A. and Gronroos, C., 1996, The value concept and relationship marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 30, 19-30.
    Rother, M. and Shook, J., 1998, Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate Muda, Version 1.3, Lean Enterprise Institute, Brookline.
    Rother, M. and Harris, R., 2001, Creating continuous flow :an action guide for managers, engineers and production associates, Version 1.0, Lean Enterprise, Brookline.
    Smalley, A., 2004, Creating Level Pull: A Lean Production-System Improvement Guide for Production-Control, Operations, and Engineering Professionals , Lean Enterprise Institute, MA.
    Sweeney, J.C. and Soutar, G.N., 2001, Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale, Journal of Retailing, 77, 203-220.
    Vaughan, T.S., 2007, Cyclical schedules vs. dynamic sequencing: replenishment dynamics and inventory efficiency, International Journal of Production Economics, 107, 518-527.
    Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T., 1994, From lean production to the lean enterprise, Harvard Business Review, 72, 93-103.
    Womack, J.P. and Jones, D.T., 1996, Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Simon and Schuster, New York.
    Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., and Roos, D., 1990, The Machine That Changed the World, Harper Collins, New York.
    Yang, T., and Chou, P., 2005, Solving a multiresponse simulation-optimization problem with
    discrete variables using a multiple-attribute decision-making method, Mathematics and
    Computers in Simulation, 68, 9-21.
    Zeithaml, V.A., 1988, Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.

    下載圖示 校內:2009-09-10公開
    校外:2011-09-10公開
    QR CODE