簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林麗芳
Lin, Li-Fang
論文名稱: 總統選舉對股價報酬率和波動率影響之探討:以台灣為例
The Impact of Presidential Election on the Stock Returns and Volatilities: a Case Study of Taiwan
指導教授: 蔡群立
Tsai, Chun-Li
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 總統選舉股價報酬率波動率台灣
外文關鍵詞: presidential election, stock returns, volatilities, Taiwan
相關次數: 點閱:135下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文以2004年、2008年和2012年總統選舉期間台灣股市的大盤加權股價指數和八大類股加權股價指數的報酬率和波動率為研究對象,探究總統選舉及其相關的政治類變數對股市之影響。
    在對大盤指數報酬率的實證中,我們發現大盤指數報酬率的迴歸結果較不理想,原因可能在於大盤指數報酬率變化趨勢不穩定,我們的模型難以捕捉其規律。在對大盤指數波動率的實證中,我們得出以下結論:第一,選舉結束後的大盤指數波動幅度顯著大於選舉前的大盤指數波動幅度,即總統選舉導致股市波動幅度增大;第二,若當選者和落選者得到的支持率相差越大時,大盤指數波動幅度越小,即選舉形勢越明朗,股市受總統選舉的衝擊越小;第三,選舉時若發生政黨輪替,大盤指數波動幅度會增大;第四,隨著選舉的結束,大盤指數波動幅度逐漸減小。在對八大類股加權股價指數波動率的實證中,我們發現機電類的股價波動受總統選舉的影響最顯著,原因可能與台灣的主要產業支柱是機電行業有關。

    This paper uses the stock returns and volatilities of Taiwan’s weighted stock market index and eight industrial group stock indexes during presidential elections in 2004, 2008 and 2012 to investigate the impacts of presidential elections and related political variables on the stock returns and volatilities.
    We find the regression results of stock returns are not satisfactory, the reason may be that the trend of stock returns is unstable, so it’s difficult for our models to capture its law. We also find the following conclusions in the regressions of stock volatilities. First of all, after the presidential elections, the volatilities of stock market index are significantly greater than before, so the presidential elections increase the stock market volatilities. Secondly, if the differences of approval ratings between two presidential candidates are larger, the volatilities of stock market index are smaller, which means if the political uncertainty about election is less, the impacts of the stock by presidential election is small. Thirdly, if the ruling parties have changed after election, the volatilities of stock market increase. Finally, the volatilities decrease gradually with the end of elections. What’s more, the regression results of eight industrial group stock indexes show that the stock of electromechanical industry is most sensitive to the presidential elections. It may be explained by the pillar industry of Taiwan is electromechanical industry.

    第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討 10 第一節 國外關於選舉與股價的相關文獻探討 10 第二節 台灣地區關於選舉與股價的相關文獻探討 14 第三章 資料與模型設定 18 第一節 資料來源 18 第二節 變數解釋 19 第三節 模型設定及影響方向測定之探討 23 第四章 實證結果 26 第一節 敘述統計 26 第二節 選舉前後大盤指數報酬率與波動率差異性t檢定 35 第三節 實證結果分析 48 第四節 穩健性檢定 58 第五節 行業類股指數分析 64 第五章 結論 71 參考書目 75 一、中文部分 75 二、英文部分 76

    一、中文部分
    王志成. (2007). 台灣政治選舉事件對股價指數的影響. 臺中科技大學事業經營研究所學位論文, 1-0.
    卓世傑. (2004). 台灣股市選舉行情之實證研究: 1989─ 2004年.成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-103.
    林彙桓. (2013). 台灣總統大選股市慶祝行情之實證研究: 2012 年.成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程 (AMBA) 學位論文, 1-61.
    張佑宗. (2006). 選舉事件與選民的投票抉擇: 以台灣 2004 年總統選舉為分析對象.東吳政治學報, 22,121-159.
    張倉耀, 蘇志偉, 張旭玲, & 朱曉萍. (2006). 從展望理論看台灣總統選舉對股票市場之效應分析.選舉研究, 13(1), 87-118.
    張貴婷. (2006) 總統及北高市長選舉事件對股市報酬率之影響.嘉南學報 (人文類), 32, 350-363.
    溫育芳. (2011). 國內股市定錨效應之研究─ 以 2008 年總統大選期間為例.創新與管理, 8(4), 101-137.
    蔡昕俞. (2013). 台灣總統大選與經濟成長的政治景氣循環—1996-2012.臺灣民主季刊, 10(1), 36-69.
    二、英文部分
    Allvine, F. C., & O'Neill, D. E. (1980). Stock market returns and the presidential election cycle: implications for market efficiency. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(5), 49-56.
    Białkowski, J., Gottschalk, K., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1941-1953.
    Chiu, C. L., Chen, C. D., & Tang, W. W. (2005). Political elections and foreign investor trading in South Korea's financial markets. Applied Economics Letters, 12(11), 673-677.
    Döpke, J., & Pierdzioch, C. (2006). Politics and the stock market: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 925-943.
    Durnev, A. (2010, December). The real effects of political uncertainty: Elections and investment sensitivity to stock prices. In Paris December 2010 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-AFFI.
    Foerster, Stephen R. (1994). Stock market performance and elections: Made-in-Canada effects? Canadian Investment Review, summer: 39-42.
    Foerster, S. R., & Schmitz, J. J. (1997). The transmission of US election cycles to international stock returns. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-27.
    Forsythe, R., Frank, M., Krishnamurthy, V., & Ross, T. W. (1995). Using market prices to predict election results: the 1993 UBC election stock market. Canadian Journal of Economics, 770-793.
    Gärtner, M., & Wellershoff, K. W. (1995). Is there an election cycle in American stock returns? International Review of Economics & Finance, 4(4), 387-410.
    Gärtner, M., & Wellershoff, K. W. (1999). Theories of political cycles: lessons from the American stock market. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 46(4), 613-630.
    Gemmill, G. (1992). Political risk and market efficiency: tests based in British stock and options markets in the 1987 election. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16(1), 211-231.
    Goodell, J. W., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). US presidential elections and implied volatility: The role of political uncertainty. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(3), 1108-1117.
    Gwilym, O. A., & Buckle, M. (1994). The efficiency of stock and options markets: tests based on 1992 UK election opinion polls. Applied Financial Economics, 4(5), 345-354.
    Huang, H. H., Chan, M. L., Huang, I. H., & Chang, C. H. (2011). Stock price volatility and overreaction in a political crisis: The effects of corporate governance and performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(1), 1-20.
    Huang, R. D. (1985). Common stock returns and presidential elections. Financial Analysts Journal, 41(2), 58-61.
    Hung, L. C. (2011). The Presidential Election and the Stock Market in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 6(2), 36-48.
    Lin, C. T., & Wang, Y. H. (2007). The impact of party alternative on the stock market: the case of Japan. Applied Economics, 39(1), 79-85.
    Nippani, S., & Medlin, W. B. (2002). The 2000 presidential election and the stock market. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26(2), 162-169.
    Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 169-190.
    Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D. A., & Turtle, H. J. (2000). Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: the international evidence. Journal of banking & finance, 24(10), 1575-1604.
    Santa‐Clara, P., & Valkanov, R. (2003). The presidential puzzle: Political cycles and the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1841-1872.
    Umstead, D. A. (1977). Forecasting stock market prices. The Journal of Finance, 32(2), 427-441.
    Wang, Y. H., & Lin, C. T. (2008). Empirical analysis of political uncertainty on TAIEX stock market. Applied Economics Letters, 15(7), 545-550.
    Wong, W. K., & McAleer, M. (2009). Mapping the Presidential Election Cycle in US stock markets. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79(11), 3267-3277.
    Yu, W. Y. (2005). A Study on the Relationship between of Political Election and Stock Market.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE