| 研究生: |
郭志揚 Kuo, Chih-yang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
結合系統化佈置規劃與層級分析法求解設施佈置設計問題-以薄膜太陽能廠為例 A Systematic Layout Planning / Analytic Hierarchy Process On Plant Layout Design Problem For Thin-film Solar Industry |
| 指導教授: |
楊大和
Yang, Ta-ho |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班 Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2009 |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 77 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 設施佈置 、薄膜太陽能 、層級分析法 、系統化佈置規劃 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | analytic hierarchy process, systematic layout planning, facilities layout, Thin-film solar, AHP, SLP |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:117 下載:67 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
太陽能產業近年來已快速地發展,在生產上皆以技轉方式(Turn-key solution)快速複製經驗,故現階段為同質性高的產業,若要提升競爭力莫過於要從製程技術的提升及生產成本的有效降低著手,生產成本的降低又以廠房設施佈置為基礎。廠房設施佈置(Layout)一向對於製造系統的績效有重大的影響。一般的設施佈置方法多以搬運距離來衡量設計的好壞,這些方法並不能有效的考慮多目標決策問題,也因此無法確保設施佈置問題在多目標考慮下的求解品質。從實務上來看,廠房設施佈置問題本質上就是一個需要強調溝通協調與如何整合多數人意見的多目標決策性問題,對此,多數的文獻皆在強調求解方法,鮮少對團體決策過程及架構有清楚地交代,故如何有效結合群體決策與邏輯性架構找出一個易於應用且適用於薄膜太陽能產業的方法為本研究所要探討的。本論文結合系統化佈置規劃(Systematic layout planning, SLP)及層級分析法(Analytic hierarchy process, AHP),以中央脊柱式佈置為基礎,用以解決薄膜太陽能產業設施佈置設計問題。首先,由系統化佈置規劃之步驟展開,以從-至圖(From-to chart)求得搬運成本為定量化指標;以作業關聯圖發展為工作底稿,並由工作底稿結合專家意見加入實際限制及修改得出多個替代方案,再由檢核表(Check list)進行篩選,得到三個較佳的替代方案。最後擬定決策目標,透過層級分析法計算相對權重及一致性,評估出一個最佳佈置方案並進行敏感性分析。結果也顯示出本方法的實用性及適用性和開啟新興產業於設施佈置的應用,為本論文之價值所在。
Solar energy industry has been developed rapidly in recent years. They are required in the production technology to the way (Turn-key solution) that copy the same experience rapidly, so at this stage for the industry with high homogeneity. If we want to enhance our competitiveness nothing is better than from the manufacturing process is upgraded and lower production costs are reduced effectively .It is also base on plant facilities. Plant facilities layout (Layout) is always for the performance of manufacturing systems have a significant impact. The general layout of the facilities solutions are measured the quality of design on transport distance, these methods can not be considered effectively on multi-objective decision-making problem, so cannot ensure the problem solution quality on multi-objective. From the practical point of view, the plant layout problem in essence is a need to emphasize communication and co-ordination and how to integrate the views of the majority of the multi-objective decision-making problems, the majority of literature are almost emphasis on solution method and rarely on the group decision-making process give a clear explain. Therefore, how to combine effectively the group decision-making structure and logic to find an easy application and suitability methods for thin-film solar industry is the key point of this paper. This paper combined with a Systematic Layout Planning(SLP)and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP), used on the central spine layout to solve the facilities layout design problem for thin-film solar industry. First, by the SLP steps to do and use from - to chart to achieve transport cost for quantitative indicators; to operate and develop relationships to the working data. The working data are combine the expert suggestions and join the actual constraints to gain a number of alternatives and then by the Check List to confirm and find three better alternatives. Finally, to draw up the decision-making objectives. Then use AHP method to calculate of relative weight and consistency to estimate the best layout and carry out sensitivity analysis. The results show this method practicality and applicability for thin-film solar industries application of facility layout, it is the value of paper-based.
DIGITIMES科技網網頁,http://tech.digitimes.com.tw/print.aspx?zNotesDocId=0000063917_A5H4PX8G692JQ5
TNGAF
尤如瑾,民96,世界太陽光電產業現況與展望,機械工業期刊263期。
林明獻,民97,太陽能技術入門,第二版,全華圖書,台北縣。
莊嘉琛,民97,太陽能工程-太陽能電池,第二版,全華圖書,台北縣。
簡禎富,民96,決策分析與管理:全面決策品質提升之架構與方法,第一版,雙葉圖書,台北。
涂明安,民90,彈性製造系統部門佈置和物料搬運路徑之整合設計,國立成功大學製造工程學系,碩士班論文。
郭鈞偉,民90,結合層級分析法與資料包絡分析法求解設施佈置設計問題,國立成功大學製造工程學系,碩士班論文。
楊敦傑,民93,運用並比較各種區塊佈置方法於筆記型電腦生產設施規劃,私立華梵大學工業管理學系,碩士班論文。
AutoCAD® User’s Guide, Version 2008, Autodesk, USA.
Armour, G.C., and Buffa, E.S., 1963, A heuristic algotithm and simulation approach to relative location of facilities, Management Science, 9(2), 294-309.
Bozer, Y.A., Meller,R.D.and Erlebacher, S.J.,1994, An improvement-type layout algorithm for single and multiple-floor facilities, Management Sience, 40(7), 918-932.
Clemen, R.T.,1996, Marking Hard Decisions(2nd edition),Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
Cambron, K.E. and Evans G.W., 1991, Layout design using the analytic hierarchy process, Computer Industrial Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 211-229.
Deisenroth, M.P., and Apple, J.M., 1962, A Computerized Plant Layout Analysis and Evaluation Technique (PLANET), Technical Papers, American Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA.
Expert Choice® ,Quick Start Guide and Tutorials, Version2000, USA
Tompkins,White,Bozer and Tanchoco, 2003, Facilities Planning(3nd edition),John Wiley & Sons, New York..
Goetschalckx, M., 1992, An interactive layout heuristic based on hexagonal adjacency graphs, European Journal of Operational Research, 63, 304-321.
Kusiak, A. and Heragu, S.S., 1987, The facility layout problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 29, 229-251.
Kamoun, M., and Yano, C.A., 1996, Facility layout to support just-in-time, Transportation Science, 30, 315-329.
Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H.(1993),Decisions with Mulitiple Objectives:Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lin, L.C. and Sharp, G.P., 1999a,Quantitative and qualitative indices for the plant layout evaluation problem, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, pp. 100-117.
Lin, L.C. and Sharp, G.P., 1999b, Application of the integrated framework for the plant layout evaluation problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, pp. 118-138.
Muther, R. ,1973, Systematic Layout Planning, 2nd edition, Cahners Books, Boston, MA.
Meller, R.D., and Bozer, Y.A., 1996, A simulated annealing algorithm for the facility layout problem, International Journal of Production Research, 34(6), 1675-1692.
Saaty, T.L.,1986,Axiomatic Foundation of Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, Vol.32,No.7,pp.841-855
Sahni, S. and Gonzalez, T., 1976, P-complete approximation problem, Journal of Associated Computing Machinery, International Journal of Production Research ,23(3), 555-565.
Tam, K.Y., 1992, A simulated annealing algorithm for allocating space to manufacturing cells, International Journal of Production Research, 30, 63-87.
Wei, J.C., Chien,C., and M.J. Wang, 2005,An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection, International Journal of Production Economics,Vol.96,No.1,pp.47-62
Yang, T, Su, C.-T., and Hsu, Y.-R., 2000, Systematic layout planning: a study on semiconductor wafer fabrication facilities, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol.20, No.11, pp. 1360-1372.
Zahedi, F., 1986, The analytic hierarchy process- a survey of the method and its application, Interface, Vol. 16, pp. 96-108.