| 研究生: |
林佳靜 Lin, Chia-ching |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
使用滾輪於新式手機文字輸入裝置之設計與評估 Design and evaluation of a new text input device by using scroll wheel for the mobile phone |
| 指導教授: |
吳豐光
Wu, Fong-gong |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 61 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 滾輪 、輸入設備 、產品設計 、文字輸入 、手機 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | text input device, product design, scroll wheel, text entry, mobile phone |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:130 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科技的發展,手機的功能更是日新月異,並朝著「行動電腦」的趨勢前進,而文字的輸入,將不再僅只於發送簡訊,像是收發信件、文書處理等都需要依賴文字輸入,但為了追求寬大的螢幕,手機按鍵卻朝向迷你化發展,也帶給了許多使用者在操作上的不便。
本研究透過產品設計程序,將滾輪運用於手機文字輸入裝置中,並和現有手機進行輸入比較,實驗結果證實應用滾輪於手機文字輸入裝置能增進輸入速率且學習時間短,使用者也給予相當的肯定。
研究提出兩款新式手機輸入裝置,分別使用二向及四向滾輪,而實驗分成兩個階段,且輸入裝置比較分為二向滾輪、四向滾輪以及模擬現有手機輸入的裝置共三種。在實驗階段一中,使用者必須在不知如何操作的情況下,依直覺進行輸入;實驗階段二則是在了解操作方式後,經過練習,在進行輸入測試,最後填寫問卷。
實驗階段一結果發現,二向滾輪在輸入速率有顯著優於模擬手機的表現。以平均來說,二向及四向滾輪都優於模擬手機。
而實驗階段二結果雖然三種手機間的輸入效率無顯著差異,但以平均來說,二向及四向滾輪都優於模擬手機。而問卷方面,績效與滿意度的部分,二向和四向滾輪也都有顯著優於模擬手機的表現。
As technology develops; the functions of mobile phones advances accordingly. It moves in the direction of “Mobile Computing”. The input of texts is not restricted to the input of short instant messages. Word processing relies on text input as well. However, the trend of bigger display screens moves in the trend of smaller buttons which causes many inconveniences on the operation of the user.
This study using scroll wheel into the text input system through product design process. This is compared to existing input system and the experiment shows that the usage of scroll wheels does shorten the input time and receives positive feedbacks from the users.
This study proposes two types of new input system namely two-way and four-way scroll wheels. The experiment consists of two stages and there are three input systems which are the two-way and four-way scroll wheel and an emulation of the existing input system. In the first experiment, the user does not learn the usage of the device and proceeds intuitively. In the second experiment, the users learn how to use the devices and after practice, input texts and fills in a questionnaire at the end.
In the first experiment, the input speed of two-way scroll wheel performed better than the emulation of existing mobile phones with the significant differences.
In the second experiment, there are no significant differences on the input rate between the three devices. However, on average, two-way and four-way scroll wheel performed better than the emulation of existing mobile phones. In the questionnaire, concerning satisfaction on the devices, two-way and four-way scroll wheel also showed significant improvement than the emulation of existing mobile phones.
英文部分:
1. Bardini, T., Friedewald, M., 2002. Chronicle of the Death of a Laboratory: Douglas Engelbart and the Failure of the Knowledge Workshop. History of Technology 23, p193.
2. Buxton, W., 2002. Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories. Techniques and Technology, chapter 6: case study 2: Chord Keyboards. p. 6.1-6.13.
3. Byrne, M., John, B., Wehrle, N., Crow, D., 1999. The Tangled Web We Wove: A Taskonomy of WWW Use. In Proceedings of CHI'99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 544-551.
4. Conrad, R., Longman, D., 1965. Standard typewriter versus chord keyboard: An experimental comparison. Ergonomics 8: P77-88.
5. Faulkner, X., Culwin, F., 2005. When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging, Interacting with Computers. p167–185.
6. Fitts, P.M., 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (6), 381–391.
7. Friedman, Z., Kirschenbaum, A., Melnik, A., 1984. The Helpwrite Experiment: A Human Factors Application for the Disabled. Unpublished Manuscript, Technion Israel Institute of Technology.
8. Green, N., Kruger, J., Faldu C., Amant, R. S., 2004. A reduced QWERTY keyboard for mobile text entry, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems.
9. Grover, D.L., King, M.T., Kuschler, C.A., 1998. Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer. US Patent 5818437. Tegic Communications, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
10. Ha, R.W., Ho, P.H., Shen, X.S. 2004. SIMKEYS:An Efficient Keypad Configuration for Mobile Communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, p163-168.
11. Hare, C.B., 2002. Redefining user input on handheld devices. 3G Mobile Communication Technologies:388-393.
12. Hick, W.E., 1952. On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4,11–26.
13. Hinckley, K., Cutrell, E., Bathiche, S., and Muss, T., 2002.Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques. Proc. CHI,65-72.
14. Hyman, R., 1953. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45, 188–196.
15. Ingmarsson, M., Dinka, D., Zhai, S., 2004. TNT – A Numeric Keypad Based Text Input Method, Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), pp 639-646.
16. Kltringer, T., Isokoski, P., Grechenig, T., 2007. TwoStick: writing with a game controller, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 234 archive Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007 table of contents P 103 – 110.
17. MacKenzie, I.S., 2002. KSPC (keystrokes per character) as a characteristic of text entry techniques. Proc. Mobile HCI ’02. Springer-Verlag, 195-210.
18. MacKenzie, I.S., 2002. Mobile text entry using three keys. Proc. ACM NordiCHI ’02, 27-34.
19. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W., 2002. Text entry for mobile computing: models and methods, theory and practice. Human–Computer Interaction 17 (2/3), 147–198.
20. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W., 2003. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. Ext. Abstracts CHI’03. ACM Press, 754-755.
21. Mankoff, J., Abowd, G. D., 1998. Cirrin: a word-level unistroke keyboard for pen input, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.213-214.
22. Mayzner, M. S., Tresselt, M. E., 1965. Tables of Single-Letter and Diagram Frequency Counts for Various Word-Length and Letter-Position Combinations, Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, pp. 13–32.
23. Nielsen, J., 1993. Usability Engineering. New York: AP Professional.
24. Oniszczak, A., MacKenzie, I. S., 2004. A comparison of two input methods for keypads on mobile devices, Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, p.101-104.
25. Oyama,H. Shiramatsu, N., 2002. Smaller and bigger displays. Displays ,Volume 23, Issues 1-2, P 31-39.
26. Perlin, k., 1998. Quikwriting: continuous stylus-based text entry, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.215-216.
27. Proschowsky, M., Schultz, N., Jacobsen, N. E., 2006. An Intuitive Text Input Method for Touch Wheels, Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), pp 467-470.
28. Sanders, MS., McCormick, Ej., 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill Inc., N.Y.
29. Silfverberg, M., Mackenzie, I.S., Korhonen, P., 2000. Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones. CHI2000 Letters 2 (1), 9–16.
30. Smith, G., Schraefel, M.C., 2004. The radial scroll tool: Scrolling support for stylus- or touch-based document navigation. In Proc. of UIST 2004 User Interface Software and Technology Symposium. Santa Fe, USA, 53—56.
31. Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S., 1995. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing a stylus and soft keyboard. Behaviour and Information Technology 14, 370–379.
32. Wherry, E., 2003. Scroll ring performance evaluation. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Ft. Lauderdale, USA, 2003, 758—759.
33. Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R., 2003. TiltText: using tilt for text input to mobile phones, Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.81-90.
34. Wigdor, D., 2004. Chording and Tilting for Rapid, Unambiguous Text Entry to Mobile Phones.
35. Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R., 2004. A Comparison of Consecutive and Concurrent Input Text Entry Techniques for Mobile Phones, Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), pp 81-88.
36. Wobbrock, J. O., Chau, D. H., Myers, B. A., 2007. An alternative to push, press, and tap-tap-tap: gesturing on an isometric joystick for mobile phone text entry, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
37. 37. Wobbrock, J.O., Myers, B.A., Kembel, J.A. 2003. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proc. UIST ’03. ACM Press, 61-70.
38. 38. Zhai, S., Smith, B.A., Selker, T., 1997. Improving Browsing Performance: A study of four input devices for scrolling and pointing tasks. Proc.Interact ‘97: The 6th IFIP Conf. on HCI, 286-92.
中文部分:
1. 上羽康夫, 1985. 手部的機能和解剖. 東京: 金方堂。
2. 李祥,2001,十鍵之內輸入法的商機,http://www.cccl.com.hk/cnet%2D03.htm
3. 胡明一,陳懿慧,謝慧瑛,孫穆乾,2000,人體解剖學(2th edn),台北: 藝軒圖書出版社。
4. 張一岑,1998,人因工程學,台北: 揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
5. 許勝雄,謝光進,楊文鐸等,1996,手部動作分類研究,中國工業工程學刊13, p.145-155。
6. 陳俊宇,2004,行動資訊產品之整合輸入設備研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學
參考網站:
1. http://www.rsi.org.uk/datapage.asp?ref=59, The Repetitive Strain Injury Association, Text messaging. 2006年10月15日取得.
2. http://www.text.it/mediacentre/press_release_list.cfm?thePublicationID=83E7AB71-FB6A-62C1-56C04C5FF069169B, Mobile Data Association, 2006, Smashing September For Text Messages. 2006年10月15日取得.
3. http://about.virginmobile.com/aboutus/media/news/2006/2006-02-21/,
Virgin Mobile Telecoms Ltd. 2006年10月15日取得.
4. http://www.dgt.gov.tw/chinese/About-dgt/Publication/95/22.htm,交通部電信總局. 2006年10月15日取得.