面對當代都市在技術轉型下的整體系統性危機，建構一個以人工智慧為核心驅動力的城市生命有機體模型勢在必行。隨著自動駕駛與演算法治理的興起，若都市規劃依然停留於優化交通運行的技術層面，將難以突破既有「汽車文明」（automobility）所導致的空間破碎與生態斷裂之結構限制。本研究主張應將視角從單一載具技術，擴展至整體都市代謝系統的重構，進而重新定義人、自然與科技的共生關係。
為回應此缺口，本研究以 Arup 提出的《2050 Scenarios – Four Plausible Futures》為基礎，試圖在既有願景上挑戰並補充其未曾預見的技術與倫理轉向。以「後人類世」（Post-Anthropocene）為世界觀，將城市視為一個具感知、代謝與調節能力的生命體，創建一座全新的「城市生命有機體」模型。AI 扮演城市數位神經系統的角色，透過對交通、物流與能源流的動態協調，使原本佔據地面層的基礎設施重新配置。從而釋放地面空間，回歸以人與自然為優先的公共生態層次，使地面層重新成為生活、交往與自然共存的場域。
在設計方法上，採用「推測設計」（Speculative Deisgn）進行操作，以一個三代家庭為敘事軸線，建構八個「敘事原型」，模擬從單元住宅、街道中介空間至城市基礎設施的跨尺度場景，同時敘說 AI 系統如何在城市日常生活中運作。在此過程中 AI 作為研究共構的「思辨代理」，與研究者共同撰寫文本與創建圖像。
整合推測設計的過程與結果後，進一步提出「雙聲敘事引擎」為設計方法，作為探勘未來空間型態與都市規劃的新途徑。透過 AI 與人的協作，預演未來城市中人與智能如何共創一套新生活模式，並指出 AI 城市的韌性並非來自全自動化的完美運行，而是建立於系統中保留的「可協商性」——亦即人類得以介入、調整與重新定義 AI 治理的可能性。促使人類在與 AI 的協作過程中，重構價值與責任的邊界，並最終將 AI 城市指向具倫理意識與共創能力的共生生命有機體。

This study constructs a "City as a Living Organism" model driven by artificial intelligence to address the systemic crisis of contemporary cities under technological transformation. It moves beyond technical optimizations of traffic operations to reconstruct the urban metabolic system, challenging the structural limitations of spatial fragmentation and ecological rupture caused by "automobility." Grounded in the "Post-Anthropocene" worldview, the research redefines the symbiotic relationship between humans, nature, and technology. Methodologically, it employs Speculative Design and AI Collaboration to simulate how AI acts as a central nervous system coordinating traffic, logistics, and energy. The study concludes that urban resilience stems not from perfect automation, but from the system's "negotiability"—the capacity for human intervention to redefine AI governance.

1. Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2023). Barcelona Superblock. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/superilles/en
2. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
3. Anguelovski, I., Honey-Rosés, J., & Marquet, O. (2023). Equity concerns in transformative planning: Barcelona’s Superblocks under scrutiny. Cities & Health, 7(6), 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2207929
4. Arup. (2019). 2050 scenarios: Four plausible futures [Report].
5. Arup. (2022). Future of urban logistics [Report].
6. Arup. (2024). Regenerative design: Towards living in harmony with nature [Report].
7. Arup. (2025). AI for future cities: Urban planning and design [Report].
8. Bartmanski, D., Kim, S., Löw, M., Pape, T., & Stollmann, J. (2023). Fabrication of space: The design of everyday life in South Korean Songdo. Urban Studies, 60(4), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221115051
9. Bull, F. C., Al-Ansari, S. S., Biddle, S., Borodulin, K., Buman, M. P., Cardon, G., Carty, C., Chaput, J.-P., Chastin, S., Chou, R., Dempsey, P. C., DiPietro, L., Ekelund, U., Firth, J., Friedenreich, C. M., Garcia, L., Gichu, M., Jago, R., Katzmarzyk, P. T., … Willumsen, J. F. (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(24), 1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
10. Burry, M. (2011). Scripting cultures: Architectural design and programming. Wiley.
11. Cook, P. (1973). Archigram. Praeger Publishers.
12. de Wit, W. (2009). The papers of Yona Friedman. Getty Research Journal, 1(1), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1086/grj.1.23005376
13. Eurostat. (2021, December 10). A fifth of road freight kilometres by empty vehicles. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20211210-1
14. Evolutionary Urbanism. (2017, May 17). Metabolism 1960. https://evolutionaryurbanism.com/2017/05/17/metabolism-1960/
15. Ferrer-Ortiz, C., Marquet, O., Mojica, L., & Vich, G. (2022). Barcelona under the 15-minute city lens: Mapping the accessibility and proximity potential based on pedestrian travel times. Smart Cities, 5(1), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010
16. Friedman, Y. (1958). L'architecture mobile. Published by the author.
17. Fuller, R., Landrigan, P. J., Balakrishnan, K., Bathan, G., Bose-O’Reilly, S., Brauer, M., Caravanos, J., Chiles, T., Cohen, A., Corra, L., Cropper, M., Ferraro, G., Hanna, J., Hanrahan, D., Hu, H., Hunter, D., Janata, G., Kupka, R., Lanphear, B., … Yan, C. (2022). Pollution and health: A progress update. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(6), e535–e547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0
18. Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution: An introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. H. Fertig.
19. Harrouk, C. (2020, January 8). BIG designs Toyota Woven City, the world’s first urban incubator. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/931468/big-designs-toyota-woven-city-the-worlds-first-urban-incubator
20. IEA. (2024). Global EV outlook 2024 – Analysis [Report]. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024
21. IFEZ. (2025). Incheon Free Economic Zone. https://www.ifez.go.kr/world/content/view.do?sn=501
22. INRIX. (2024). Global traffic scorecard [Report]. https://inrix.com/scorecard/
23. Ito, H., & Kato, K. (2025). Redefining Toyota’s Woven City as a "glocal" innovation ecosystem for integrated sustainable development. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00488-7
24. Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sharifi, A., & Sadeghi, A. (2023). The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods. Cities, 132, 104101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104101
25. Koolhaas, R., Obrist, H. U., Ota, K., Westcott, J., & Daniell, T. (2011). Project Japan: Metabolism talks. Taschen.
26. Kurokawa, K. (1977). Metabolism in architecture. Studio Vista.
27. Lin, Z. (2010). Kenzo Tange and the Metabolist movement: Urban utopias of modern Japan. Routledge.
28. Lin, Z. (2016). Vertical urbanism: Re-conceptualizing the compact city. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368007663_Vertical_Urbanism_Re-conceptualizing_the_Compact_City
29. Lin, Z., & Solà-Morales, J. L. G. (Eds.). (2018). Vertical urbanism: Designing compact cities in China. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351206839
30. Mathews, S. (2006). The Fun Palace as virtual architecture: Cedric Price and the practices of indeterminacy. Journal of Architectural Education, 59(3), 39–48.
31. Mueller, A. S., Cicchino, J. B., & Zuby, D. S. (2020). What humanlike errors do autonomous vehicles need to avoid to maximize safety? Journal of Safety Research, 75, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.10.005
32. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Khreis, H., Cirach, M., Andrés, D., Ballester, J., Bartoll, X., Daher, C., Deluca, A., Echave, C., Milà, C., Márquez, S., Palou, J., Pérez, K., Tonne, C., Stevenson, M., Rueda, S., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2020). Changing the urban design of cities for health: The superblock model. Environment International, 134, 105132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132
33. National Association of City Transportation Officials. (2016). Global street design guide / Global Designing Cities Initiative, National Association of City Transportation Officials. Island Press.
34. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1998). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press.
35. OECD. (2024). OECD regions and cities at a glance 2024. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f42db3bf-en
36. Prakash, D. (2025). Why do smart city projects fail to create impact? Understanding decision-making in smart city policy implementation. Urban Governance, 5(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.004
37. Price, C. (2003). Re CP (H. U. Obrist, Ed.). Birkhäuser.
38. Price, C., & Littlewood, J. (1968). The Fun Palace. The Drama Review: TDR, 12(3), 127–134.
39. Rueda, S. (2019). Superblocks for the design of new cities and renovation of existing ones: Barcelona’s case. In M. Nieuwenhuijsen & H. Khreis (Eds.), Integrating human health into urban and transport planning (pp. 135–153). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_8
40. Sánchez-Díaz, I., Georén, P., & Brolinson, M. (2017). Shifting urban freight deliveries to the off-peak hours: A review of theory and practice. Transport Reviews, 37(4), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1254691
41. Schalk, M. (2014). The architecture of metabolism: Inventing a culture of resilience. Arts, 3(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts3020279
42. Scott, F. D. (2007). Architecture or techno-utopia: Politics after modernism. MIT Press.
43. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00276
44. United Nations. (2019). World urbanization prospects 2018 (No. 978-92-1-148319-2).
45. WHO. (2016). Urban green spaces and health [Report].
46. WHO. (2023). Global status report on road safety 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240086517
47. World Economic Forum. (2024). Transforming urban logistics: Sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery in cities [Report].
48. Zappa, G. (2023, November). The city? It is a living organism: The ecological design of biourbanism. InfraJournal. https://www.infrajournal.com/en/w/biourbanism-design
49. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2019)。推測設計：設計、想像與社會夢想（洪世民譯）。何樵暐工作室。
50. Harari, Y. N. (2014)。人類大歷史：從野獸到扮演上帝（林俊宏譯）。遠見天下文化。
51. Jacobs, J. (2007)。偉大城市的誕生與衰亡：美國都市街道生活的啟發（吳鄭重譯）。聯經。
52. Tharp, B. M., & Tharp, S. M. (2021)。論述設計：批判、推測及另類事物（池思親譯）。何樵暐工作室。
53. 李開復、陳楸帆 (2021)。AI 2041：預見 10 個未來新世界。遠見天下文化。
54. 賀昭恩 (2023)。自駕城市主義：建築空間組構與城市生活風格之重思 （碩士論文）。國立成功大學建築學系。