簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曹鶴騰
Cao, He-Teng
論文名稱: 需量反應中的可行性分配:評估激勵措施對負荷減少目標的適當性
Feasible Allocation in Demand Response: Assessing Incentive Adequacy for Load Reduction Objectives
指導教授: 莊坤達
Chuang, Kun-Ta
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 資訊工程學系
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 45
中文關鍵詞: 需量反應 、基因演算法 、約束放寬 、獎勵計劃優化 、蒙地卡羅模擬
外文關鍵詞: Demand Response, Genetic Algorithm, Constraint Relaxation, Reward Plan Optimization, Monte Carlo Simulation
相關次數: 點閱:95  下載:1 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著電力需求在高峰時段的不斷增長,需量反應(Demand Response)成為了一種常見的負載管理方式。然而,基於激勵的需量反應計劃存在不穩定性以及不確定性。因此,過去經常利用直接控制負載或用戶設備的方式來確保能夠達成需量反應目標。然而,該種方法在普通住宅間無法普遍實施,因此本文討論了藉由僅給予住宅降載激勵及降載訊號的方式下,如何評估當中的不穩定性和不確定性,並提出尋找可行計畫的演算法。
    本研究中,提出了一種兩階段基因演算法,旨在最大化給定預算內負荷減少量的實現概率。通過引入約束放寬和基因修復技術,找出可行性初始族群以及提升算法的效率,從而確保需求響應計劃的有效性。

    With the continuous growth of electricity demand during peak periods, demand response(DR) has become an effective tool for load management. However, incentive-based DR programs have instability and uncertainty. Therefore, in the past, direct control of loads or user equipment was often used to ensure DR targets were met. However, this method cannot be widely implemented in ordinary households. This paper discusses how to evaluate the existing instability and uncertainty by only providing load reduction incentives and signals to households and proposes an algorithm to find feasible plans.
    This paper proposes an innovative 2-phase Monte Carlo Simulation Genetic Algorithm (2P-MCSGA) to maximize the probability of achieving load reduction within a given budget. Our research focuses on combining Monte Carlo simulation with genetic algorithms and introducing constraint relaxation and gene repair techniques to improve solution feasibility and algorithm efficiency, ensuring the feasibility and effectiveness of the DR plan.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Overview of the Electricity Market 2 1.3 Feasible Demand Response Plans 4 1.4 Challenges 4 2 Related Works 6 2.1 Demand Response 6 2.2 Stochastic Knapsack Problem 7 2.3 Genetic algorithms 7 3 Problem Formulation 9 3.1 Preliminary 9 3.2 Problem Statement 10 4 Methodology 12 4.1 Gene Design 12 4.2 Fitness Function 14 4.3 Constraint Relaxation 17 4.4 Gene Repair 19 4.5 Summary 21 5 Experiment 24 5.1 Dataset 24 5.2 Experimental Setup 24 5.3 Demand Response Experiment 25 5.4 Performance Comparison 26 5.4.1 Baseline 27 5.4.2 Experiment Result 27 5.5 Sensitivity Analysis 28 5.6 Numerical Analysis 29 5.6.1 Impact of times of Monte-Carlo Simulation 29 5.6.2 Comparison with optimal solution 30 6 Conclusion 32 References 33

    [1] “Energy conversation initiatives,” https://www.sbpower.co.jp/action/sdgs/demand-response/?lang=ja.
    [2] A. S. Al-sumaiti, A. K. Banhidarah, J. Wescoat, J. L., A. K. Bamigbade, and N. Hoach,“Data collection surveys on the cornerstones of the water-energy nexus: A systematic overview,” IEEE ACCESS, vol. 8, pp. 93 011–93 027, 2020.
    [3] Australian Government, “Smart-grid smart-city customer trial data,” https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-dga-4e21dea3-9b87-4610-94c7-15a8a77907ef/details, 2022.
    [4] A. D. Bintoudi, N. Bezas, L. Zyglakis, and G. Isaioglou, “Incentive-based demand response framework for residential applications: Design and real-life demonstration,” Energies, vol. 14, 2021.
    [5] P. Bradley, A. Coke, and M. Leach, “Financial incentive approaches for reducing peak electricity demand, experience from pilot trials with a uk energy provider,” Energy Policy, vol. 98, pp. 108–120, 2016.
    [6] California ISO, “Demand response - proxy demand resource,” https://www.caiso.com/library/demand-response-proxy-demand-resource.
    [7] K. Chen and S. M. Ross, “An adaptive stochastic knapsack problem,” European Journalof Operational Research, vol. 239, no. 3, pp. 625–635, 2014.
    [8] R. Chen, B. Yang, S. Li, and S. Wang, “A self-learning genetic algorithm based on reinforcement learning for flexible job-shop scheduling problem,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 149, 2020.
    [9] L. Gkatzikis, I. Koutsopoulos, and T. Salonidis, “The role of aggregators in smart grid demand response markets,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31,no. 7, pp. 1247–1257, 2012.
    [10] L. Guan, A. Abbasi, and M. Ryan, “A simulation-based risk interdependency network model for project risk assessment,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 148, 2021.
    [11] S. H. Hong and R. Lu, “Incentive-based demand response for smart grid with reinforcement learning and deep neural network,” Applied Energy, vol. 236, pp. 937–949, 2019.
    [12] X. Huang, S. H. Hong, and Y. Li, “Hour-ahead price based energy management scheme for industrial facilities,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp.2886–2898, 2017.
    [13] S. Jo, J. Oh, J. Lee, S. Oh, H. S. Moon, C. Zhang, R. Gadh, and Y. T. Yoon, “Hybrid genetic algorithm with k-nearest neighbors for radial distribution network reconfiguration,”IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2614–2624, 2024.
    [14] B.-G. Kim, Y. Zhang, M. van der Schaar, and J.-W. Lee, “Dynamic pricing and energy consumption scheduling with reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2187–2198, 2016.
    [15] S. Kosuch and L. Abdel, “Upper bounds for the 0-1 stochastic knapsack problem and a b&b algorithm,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 77–93, 2010.
    [16] D. Liu, Z. Qin, H. Hua, Y. Ding, and J. Cao, “Incremental incentive mechanism design for diversified consumers in demand response,” Applied Energy, vol. 329, 2023.
    [17] Ministry of Economic Affairs, “Promoting demand bidding management is a global trend, which is more economical and environmentally friendly than increasing the number of peak-load units,” https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu id=40&news id=108056, 2023.
    [18] P. Nanakorn and K. . Meesomklin, “An adaptive penalty function in genetic algorithms for structural design optimization,” Computers & Structures, vol. 79, no. 29–30, pp. 2527–2539, 2001.
    [19] B. Parrish, P. Heptonstall, R. Gross, and B. K. Sovacool, “A systematic review of motivations, enablers and barriers for consumer engagement with residential demand response,”Energy Policy, vol. 138, 2020.
    [20] Qdr, Q. J. U. D. E., “Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them,” US Dept. Energy, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep., 2006.
    [21] I. Rahimi, A. H. Gandomi, F. Chen, and M. Efren, “A review on constraint handling techniques for population-based algorithms: From single-objective to multi-objective optimization,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 2181–2209,2023.
    [22] O. B. Tokdemir, H. Erol, and I. Dikmen, “Delay risk assessment of repetitive construction projects using line-of-balance scheduling and monte carlo simulation,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 145, no. 2, 2019.
    [23] U.S Energy Information Administration, “Use of electricity,” https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/use-of-electricity.php, 2023.
    [24] F. Wang, X. Ge, K. Li, and Z. Mi, “Day-ahead market optimal bidding strategy and quantitative compensation mechanism design for load aggregator engaging demand response program,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 5564–5573,2019.
    [25] D. L. Woodruff, Advances in Computational and Stochastic Optimization, Logic Programming, and Heuristic Search, 1998.
    [26] T. Zheng, H. Li, H. He, Z. Lei, and S. Gao, “An adaptive strategy-incorporated integer genetic algorithm for wind farm layout optimization,” Journal of Bionic Engineering, vol. 21,no. 3, pp. 1522–1540, 2024

    下載圖示
    2026-09-01公開
    QR CODE