在科技日新月異，新興科技蓬勃發展的今日，消費性電子、電信、工業和汽車產業對於半導體的需求持續增加，IC設計需求的種類及變化激增，在未來IC設計公司和晶圓代工廠必須從過去主要以上下游分工的模式，轉變成從晶片設計到量產的全程合作。為了加快產業的加速與創新，許多科技大廠紛紛在策略上做出改變。從過去半導體的垂直整合及水平分工模式到近年來進行一連串的技術整合、共同協作、資源交換的方式，來加速推動半導體產業的技術與發展。因此，本研究將藉由質性研究方法中的單一個案研究法，透過「生態系統」與「價值共創」之理論基礎，以台積電創建的開放式創新平台(OIP)作為研究標的，來分析台積電與多利害關係人(Multiple stakeholders)在平台中如何進行資源交流與協作。
本研究以「台灣半導體產業的龍頭廠商台積電」為主要的個案研究對象，研究目的旨在以價值共創觀點深入探究台積電作為協調者(Orchestrator)，藉由價值主張為號召，吸引產業的多利害關係人(Multiple stakeholders)一同加入生態系統，有效促進生態系統參與者之能動性。同時，透由台積電與其利害關係人之活動與互動，進一步分析如何透過多方利害關係人進行集體性協作以共創價值，最後共同演化成一個相互依賴且持續創新與進步的生態系統。

Today, with the rapid development of technology and the vigorous development of emerging technologies, the demand for semiconductors in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, industrial and automotive industries continue to increase. In the future, IC design companies and wafer foundries must change from the past. The mode of division of labor between upstream and downstream is mainly transformed into full cooperation from chip design to mass production. To accelerate the acceleration and innovation of the industry, many big technology companies have made changes in their strategies.
From the vertical integration and horizontal division of labor of semiconductors in the past to a series of technology integration, cooperation, and resource exchange in recent years, the technology and development of the semiconductor industry have been accelerated.
Therefore, this research will use the single case study method in the qualitative research method, take the open innovation platform created by TSMC as the research object, and analyze the relationship between TSMC and multiple companies through the theoretical basis of "ecosystem" and "value co-creation". How stakeholders communicate and collaborate on resources in the platform.
This research takes "Taiwan Semiconductor Industry's Leading Manufacturer TSMC" as the main case study object. The purpose of the research is to deeply explore TSMC as a coordinator from the viewpoint of value co-creation. With the value proposition as the call, it will attract multiple stakeholders in the industry to work together. Join the ecosystem and effectively promote the initiative of ecosystem participants. At the same time, through the activities and interactions between TSMC and its stakeholders, it further analyzes how to create value through collective collaboration among multiple stakeholders, and finally co-create into an interdependent ecosystem of continuous innovation and progress.

方世杰. (2020). 價值共創策略.
陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
潘淑滿. (2003). 質性研究: 理論與應用. 臺北市: 心理出版社.

Adler PS, C. C. (2011). Combining creativity and control: Under-standing individual motivation in large-scale collaborative cre-ativity. Accounting, Organ. Soc.36(2):63–85.

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review,84(4), 98–107.

Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. New York, NY: Portfolio Penguin.

Adner, R. (2016). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable
Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58.

Adner, R. a. R. K. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal

Autio, E., & Thomas, L. . (2014). Innovation ecosystems. The Oxford handbook of innovation management.

Baldwin, C. a. K. C. (2000). The Power of Modularity. Management Science, 45, 1613–630.

Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal.

Bosse, D. A., & Coughlan, R. (2016). Stakeholder Relationship Bonds. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1197-1222.

Boudreau, K. (2008). Opening the platform vs. opening the complementary good?
The effect on product innovation in handheld computing. HEC Working Paper available on SSRN.

Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 229-251.

Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise soft-ware. MIS Quarterly,36(1), 263–290.

Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. . (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal,34(11), 1331–1350.

[Record #83 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]

Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 159-201.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review.

Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California management review, 45(4), 35-51.

Farjoun.M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev.35(2):202–225.

Fonti, F., Maoret, M., & Whitbred, R. (2017). Free‐riding in multi‐party alliances: The role of perceived alliance effectiveness and peers' collaboration in a research consortium. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 363-383.

Friedland, R., & Alford, R. A. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 232-263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European journal of marketing.

Goossens, A. (2018). Healthcare collaborations A qualitative study about the best practices in a collaboration between a hospital and a home care organization.

Gummesson, E. (1995). Truth and myths in service quality. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(6), 18.

Hancock, B. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. National Institute for Health Research.

Hawley, A. H. (1986). Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay. University of Chicago Press.

Henderson, R. a. K. C. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9–30.

Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation,and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Jacobides, M. G. (2019). In the ecosystem economy, what’s your strategy? . Harvard Business Review, 97(5), 128-137.

Jacobides, M. G., C. Cennamo and A. Gawer. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal.

Jonathan Wareham, P. B. F., Josep Lluís Cano Giner. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science.

[Record #78 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]

Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. . (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology invest-ments. Strategic Management Journal,34(3), 274–296.

Kazadi, K., Lievens, A., & Mahr, D. (2016). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Journal of business research, 69(2), 525-540.

Kotler, P. (2002). Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Luo, J., & Kaul, A. (2019). Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 476-502.

Lusch, R. F. (2007). Marketing's evolving identity: Defining our future. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 26(2), 261-268.

Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Tanniru, M. (2010). Service, value networks and learning. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(1), 19-31.

Lusch, S. L. V. R. F. (2015). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Academy of Marketing Science.

Lusch, S. L. V. R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update
of service-dominant logic. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. (2016) 44:5–23.

Lusch, V. a. (2011). It’s all b2b and beyond…: toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.

Mindruta, D. (2013). Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management Journal.

Moll, F. L., Powell, J. T., Fraedrich, G., Verzini, F., Haulon, S., Waltham, M., van Herwaarden, J. A., Holt, P. J., van Keulen, J. W., & Rantner, B. (2011). Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 41, S1-S58.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Havard Business Review, 71 (3) (1993), pp. 75-83.

Moore, J. F. (1996). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. . New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation. Harvard Business Review, 65–77.

Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83-96.

Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. . (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(31), 83-96.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy.

Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in
value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. doi:10.1002/dir.20015.

Prahalad, C. K. a. R., V. (2004a). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 4-9.

Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84,196-205. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027.

Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018a). Offerings as digitalized interactive platforms: A conceptual framework and implications. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 19-31.

Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018b). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of business research, 84, 196-205.

Reypens, C., Lievens, A., & Blazevic, V. (2021). Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundaries. Organization Studies, 42(1), 61-83.

Rochet, J.-C. a. J. T. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (4), 990–1029.

Roelofsen, A., Boon, W. P., Kloet, R. R., & Broerse, J. E. (2011). Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: Learning how and what? Research Policy, 40(3), 341-354.

Schneider, T., & Sachs, S. (2017). The impact of stakeholder identities on value creation in issue-based stakeholder networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 41-57.

Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92-121.

Stoelhorst, F. B. J. W. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships and Social Welfare: A Behavioral Theory of Contributions to Joint Value Creation. The Academy of Management Review 41(2):229–251.

Stoelhorst, J. (2021). Value, rent, and profit: A stakeholder resource‐based theory. Strategic Management Journal.

Storbacka, K., Brodie, R. J., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P. P., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3008-3017. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.034.

Tansley. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strate-gic Management Journal,28(13), 1319–1350.

Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in
organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3): 801-843.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. The service dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 43–56).

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It's all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management, 40(2), 181-187.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2014). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. In The service-dominant logic of marketing (pp. 21-46). Routledge.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.

Venkat Ramaswamy, K. O. (2018b). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. journal of Business Research, 84, 196-205.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London UK: Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research. American Journal of Evaluation.

Zeng, M., & Chen, X.-P. (2003). Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 587-605.