| 研究生: |
許智湟 Hsu, Chih-huang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
客戶鋰電池推薦規格之排序--TOPSIS方法之應用 Ranking Lithium Ion Battery Product Specification for Customers - An Application of TOPSIS |
| 指導教授: |
王泰裕
Wang, Tai-Yue |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Industrial and Information Management (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 45 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 鋰離子電池 、TOPSIS 、多屬性決策 、AHP層級分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | lithium ion battery, TOPSIS, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, AHP |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:93 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著目前科技的進步,市場上有越來越多的智能裝置與智慧產品,這些產品的應用都要使用到關鍵零組件之一的鋰離子電池,從鋰離子電池的產品規格來看,可以說是智能產品的心臟一樣重要,在從客戶對於鋰離子電池的產品應用需求下,在不斷的創新與滿足使用者的需求下,對於鋰離子電池特性功能條件的要求也越來越高,隨著鋰離子電池的應用面越來越廣且複雜,為了符合市場對於鋰離子電池的應用條件需求,開發規格種類也越來越多樣,相對在公司的研發設計成本也會越來越高,如何從現有的產品規格設計特性面,排序選擇讓客戶使用最佳符合市場的應用產品,來降低鋰離子電池公司的開發成本,一直以來都是棘手的問題,本文將利用多屬性的決策方法,從現有生產的鋰離子電池產品規格容量、價格、特性功能、材料成本等屬性進行決策,來選擇比較符合客戶的需求產品,並可以大幅降低鋰離子電池在多種類開發產品的成本。
本研究將利用TOPSIS理想解偏好順序評估法,從目前量產產品規格來進行排序選擇適合客戶應用條件產品規格,並藉由公司決策者與各部門主管意見對於市場政策調查,將意見資訊彙整後再利用AHP層級分析法採兩兩比較的方式取得可以量化的權重值,再利用這些權重值來計算鋰離子電池相關屬性距離,來評估以現行規格產品最理想滿足客戶的需求產品,結果顯示排序選擇的產品規格不但可以讓客戶降低成本還可以延長保固時間,可以增加市場的競爭優勢。
Technology has been continuously developing over time. There are more and more smart mobile devices and smart products on the market. The key component used in the application of these products is the lithium ion battery. We reviewed the product specifications of lithium-ion batteries and the demand for products from customers using lithium-ion batteries. The requirements of the functional conditions of lithium-ion batteries are also increasing in order to match the market demand for its applications. Development specifications are also becoming more diverse relative to a company’s R&D design costs, which are becoming higher. So how about designing features from current product specifications? The options for customers to use the best market applications are ranked in order to reduce the development costs of lithium-ion battery companies. This research will make use of multi-attribute decision making methods to rank the specifications for the customers to select. Decisions are made based on properties such as capacity, price, special functions, and the material costs of existing lithium-ion battery products. Choosing from products that better meet the needs of customers may also reduce the cost of lithium-ion batteries in a variety of development products.
This study uses the TOPSIS solution evaluation method. Current mass production product specifications are ranked in order to meet customer applications through market policy investigations by company policy makers and department heads. The AHP analysis method is also used to obtain the quantifiable values of weights by means of comparison. These values of weight are used to calculate the relative property distance of the lithium-ion battery attributes. This is done by evaluating products that meet the needs of customers with current specifications. The results show that the product specifications of the ranking selection not only allow the customer to reduce costs but also to extend the warranty time and to increase the competitive advantage on the market.
中文文獻
呂學隆(2008)。鋰電池正極材料技術與產業趨勢。電子材料智庫.
張彥博、陳金銘、郭信良、鄭季汝(2009)。鋰離子電池高容量負極材料技術。工業材料雜誌267期.
洪雅純(2011)。人造石墨負極材料表面改質對鋰離子電池之電性影響。中華科技大學碩士論文.
李守仁、白立文(2011)。鋰離子電池用碳負極材料的最新趨勢。工研院材料世界網.
李治宏、龔丹誠(2015)。鋰電池隔離膜發展趨勢與近況。工業材料雜誌339期.
葉定儒、陳金銘、廖世傑(2013)。鋰電池電解液產氣機制研究。工業材料雜誌314期.
吳其胜、戴振华、張霞(2012)。新能源材料。東華大學出版社.
張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估及統計。台灣五南圖書出版社.
簡禎富(2005)。決策分析與管理。台北市:雙葉書廊.
蔡孟娟(2008)。外資醫療機構進入中國區評選模型之建構。銘傳大學管理研究所博士論文.
曾國雄、鄧振源(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報:第27卷第六期5-22.
曾國雄、鄧振源(1989)。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)。中國統計學報:第27卷第七期1-20.
葉靜蓉(2011)。一個結合TOPSIS與AHP的網路服務信任評估機制。交通大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文.
張譯方(2017)。應用層級分析(AHP)探討消費者選擇中華電信MOD方案的決策準則。中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文.
英文文獻
Whittingham, M.S (1976), “Electrical energy storage and intercalation chemistry”, Journal of Science, Volume192, 1126-1127.
Goodenough, J.B. Padhhi, A.K. Nanjundaswamy, K.S. (1997), “Phospho‐olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries”, Journal of the electrochemical society, 1188-1194
Ching-Lai Hwang, Kwangsun Yoon. (1981),“Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey”, Springer-Verlag , New York,
Janic, M.(2003), ” Multicrteria Evaluation of Hight-speed Rail, Transrapid Maglev and Air Passnger Transport in Ecrope Transportation Planning and Technology”, 26(6),491-512
Frish, R.(1926), ”Foundation of modern econometrics: the selected essays of Ragnar Frisch”, US: Edward Elgar, Brookfield.
Dennis M. Buede, Daniel T.Maxwell. (1995), “Rank disagreement: A comparison of multi-criteria methodologies”, Volume 4, issue 1, page1-21.
Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P.C.,Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, k.(2008), ”Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accmplishments and What Lies Ahead. Management Science”, 54(7), 1336-1349
Thomas L. Saaty, (1990), ”Decision Making for Leaders: the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World”, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Deng.H., Yeh, C.-H., & Willis, R.J.(2000), “Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights”, Computers & Operations Research 963-973, 27(10), 963-973
Athawale, V.M. & Chankraborty, s.(2010), “A TOPSIS Method-based Approach to Machine Tool Selection”, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations management. Dhaka, Bangladesh
Ghosh, D.N.(2011), “Analytic Hierarchy Process & TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Faculty Performance in Engineering Education”, UNIASCIT, 63-70
Liu, P.(2011), “An Extended TOPSIS Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Based on Generalized Interval-valued Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers”, Informatics, 35, 185-196
Wang, Y.J. & Lee, H.S.(2007), “Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making Computers and Mathematics with Applications”, 53, 1762-1772
Kahraman, C., Buyukozkan, G. & Ates, N.Y.(2007), “A tow phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction”, Information Sciences, 177, 1567-1582
Chin, K.S., Chiu, S. & Tummala, V.M.R.(1999), “An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001-based EMS. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management”, 16(4), 341-361.
Cha, S.H.(2007), “Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density functions. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences”, 1(4), 300-307.
Vargas L.G.(1990), “An Overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.48, P2-8.
參考網站
工研院IEK產業情報網
(http://ieknet.iek.org.tw/)