鄉村地區整體規劃作為國土計畫法施行後所建立之法定計畫工具，其推動過程涉及中央與地方政府、規劃專業團隊，以及在地居民、產業經營者等多元權益關係人之協作。然而，現行規劃實務於決定何人應參與規劃過程之環節，主要仍依賴規劃團隊之個人經驗與既有人脈進行判斷，缺乏一套具共同標準、可重複操作之評估機制。本研究立基於此制度既已確立、持續運作之前提，聚焦於規劃理論中之程序論取向，探討如何強化權益關係人辨識之操作品質，而非另行提出一套脫離現行制度之理想化主張。
本研究採理論建構、專家共識、實證探索的研究流程。第一階段以規劃理論中之程序論立場為理論定位，聚焦於規劃領域內部之權益關係人理論發展脈絡，以顯著性模型為核心理論基礎，萃取二十六項候選評估因子，建立目標、構面、指標、 因子四個層級之初步評估架構。第二階段邀集產業界五人、學術界二人與公部門三人，共十位專家，透過兩輪模糊德爾菲問卷，依共識重要程度值之平均數 6.47 為篩選門檻，篩選出具共識之因子，並以層級相對權重值法計算各因子之相對權重。第三階段以臺南市左鎮區為示範性探索場域，透過深度訪談、現場觀察與文件分析，將評估架構應用於觀光發展與農業發展兩項議題，探索並記錄架構於實務情境中之運作樣貌，並據以提出建議。
經專家共識程序篩選後，本研究確立之評估架構由核心屬性與支持屬性兩個構面、權力、影響力、合法性、緊迫性、鄰近性與立場六項指標、十五個評估因子構成，各因子全域權重介於0.062至0.072之間，呈現均衡分佈。其中，公平性、提出要求等規範性因子，以及知識、經驗、技能、教育等背景指標因子，於專家共識程序中未能通過篩選門檻。本研究依循程序論立場，將此結果詮釋為鄉村地區整體規劃實務操作中規範性與情境性視角容易被邊緣化之現象。於左鎮探索中，架構之排序結果與實際規劃過程之參與邀請呈現高一致性；同時，探索過程亦揭示鄰近性指標之操作定義、合法性指標之價值衝突處理，以及立場指標之表態立場與真實偏好辨別之三項課題。
本研究之研究貢獻，在於將顯著性模型之管理者視角侷限，由抽象之概念提醒轉化為可具體觀察、可追溯成因之實證現象。實務貢獻則在於為現行《鄉村地區整體規劃作業手冊》提供一套具體可行、可與既有程序銜接之權益關係人辨識輔助工具。本研究亦指出其限制：本研究僅以左鎮此山區、高齡化型鄉村作為示範場域，架構於平原型、人口成長型等其他鄉村類型之適用性，有待後續多場域驗證；專家樣本之領域分佈及田野資料蒐集之時間範圍，亦構成方法論上之限制。未來研究可朝跨場域比較、縱貫性追蹤，以及潛在權益關係人系統性辨識之發展等方向推進。

As a legal instrument established under Taiwan's Spatial Planning Act, rural planning requires collaboration among central and local governments, planning teams, residents, and industry stakeholders. However, current practices primarily rely on personal experience and networks of planning teams to select participants, lacking a standardized and replicable method for stakeholder identification. Grounded explicitly in the procedural approach of planning theory, this thesis develops a stakeholder identification assessment framework designed to enhance, rather than replace, the existing institutional process. Employing a three-phase approach: theoretical construction, expert consensus, and empirical exploration. Twenty-six candidate factors derived from Mitchell and others’ salience model were organized into an initial four-tier framework. This framework was then evaluated by ten experts (five from industry, two academics, and three government officials) through two rounds of the Fuzzy Delphi Method, with weights assigned using a relative-weighting technique. The final framework comprises two dimensions, six indicators, and fifteen factors, with normalized weights ranging from 0.062 to 0.072, totaling 1.000. When applied experimentally to tourism and agricultural issues in Zuojhen District, Tainan, the framework's rankings closely aligned with actual participation in workshops and interviews, while also identifying areas for improvement related to the proximity, legitimacy, and position indicators. This study offers a practical enhancement to the current rural planning operational manual.

一、中文文獻
內政部（2018）。全國國土計畫。
內政部（2025）。鄉村發展總體檢檢討及如何提升城鄉發展韌性之規劃方向報告〔立法院第11屆第3會期經濟委員會第5次全體委員會議報告〕。立法院。
內政部營建署城鄉發展分署（2019）。直轄市、縣（市）國土計畫規劃手冊。
內政部國土管理署（2023）。「權益關係人公共對話的共同書寫」鄉村地區整體規劃的操作模式［第 6 場座談會簡報］。111年度「鄉村地區整體規劃作業顧問團」委託專業服務案。
內政部國土管理署（2023）。宜蘭縣壯圍鄉鄉村地區整體規劃示範案例實作委託專業服務案：民眾參與改進機制（定稿版）（委託案編號：110A–062）。城鄉潮間帶有限公司；境群國際規劃設計顧問有限公司；城市說話數位工作室。
內政部國土管理署（2025a）。鄉村地區計畫規劃作業手冊。
內政部國土管理署（2025b）。過渡時期鄉村地區計畫擬定指引。
王文誠、方偉達、林俊全、李素馨、張長義（2024）。淺山生態系服務：治理、永續與前瞻。五南。
行政院（2018）。全國國土計畫—確立國土新秩序。行政院全球資訊網。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/90200f69-7dd0-428f-accc-d17934caf86d
國土計畫法（2025）。中華民國法務部全國法規資料庫。
國土計畫法施行細則（2019）。中華民國法務部全國法規資料庫。
莊皓雲（2018）。鄉村再生：從產業跨域到社群經濟的翻轉年代。國土及公共治理季刊，6(2)，88–93。
郭蕙如、鍾怡婷（2021）。社區特質與鄉村發展政策資源分配的關聯：以《鄉村再生計畫》為例。臺灣鄉村研究，(16)，47–85。
陳姿伶、林子閎（2018）。淺論國土計畫法施行歸屬於農業發展地區鄉村區的分類態樣暨土地使用管理策略。土地問題研究季刊，17(3)，54–64。
楊之遠、吳俊儀、邱嘉川（2017）。臺灣鄉村社區低碳永續發展策略比較與實例探討。華岡農科學報，(40)，1–14。
臺南市左鎮區公所（2026）。認識左鎮。取自 https://web.tainan.gov.tw/ZuojhenDistrict/cl.aspx?n=41228
臺南市玉井戶政事務所（2026）。左鎮區人口統計資料。取自 https://yujing-house.tainan.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=12274
臺南市政府都市發展局（2026）。鄉村地區整體規劃。臺南市政府都市發展局全球資訊網。https://hometown.tainan.gov.tw/
二、英文文獻
Aapaoja, A., & Haapasalo, H. (2014). A framework for stakeholder identification and classification in construction projects. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2(1), 43–55.
Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. J. (2008). Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 749–757.
Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179–196.
Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Beiderbeck, D., Frevel, N., von der Gracht, H. A., Schmidt, S. L., & Schweitzer, V. M. (2021). Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX, 8, Article 101401.
Belton, I., MacDonald, A., Wright, G., & Hamlin, I. (2019). Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 72–82.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236.
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. (2005). Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management Decision, 43(5), 649–660.
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. (2006). Visualizing stakeholder influence—Two Australian examples. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5–21.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239–246.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.
Chinyio, E., & Olomolaiye, P. (2009). Introducing stakeholder management. In E. Chinyio & P. Olomolaiye (Eds.), Construction stakeholder management (pp. 1–12). Wiley-Blackwell.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331–338.
Dawood, K. A., Sharif, K. Y., Ghani, A. A., Zulzalil, H., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2021). Towards a unified criteria model for usability evaluation in the context of open source software based on a fuzzy Delphi method. Information and Software Technology, 130, Article 106453.
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Elias, A., & Cavana, R. Y. (2000). Stakeholder analysis for systems thinking and modelling. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 178–184.
Ellis, G. (2004). Discourses of objection: Towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36(9), 1549–1570.
Faludi, A. (1973). Planning theory. Pergamon Press.
Faludi, A. (Ed.). (2013). A reader in planning theory (Vol. 5). Elsevier.
Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2), 226–243.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
Forester, J. (1980). Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 275–286.
Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the face of power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), 67–80.
Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Gaspers, A., Hathaway, S., Lundheim, S. H., Øverjordet, I. B., & Pujol, M. (2025). Investigating the characteristics of stakeholder identification and engagement: A systematic review of the marine and coastal restoration literature. Restoration Ecology, 33(7), Article e70124.
Gaur, S., Dosapati, S., & Tawalare, A. (2023). Stakeholder assessment in construction projects using a CRITIC–TOPSIS approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(2), 217–237.
Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan.
Hoare, V., Hinson, C. E., Reyniers, B. M., O'Shea, R., & Howe, C. (2023). Maptkit: An environmental management decision‐tool for inclusive, equitable and representative stakeholder attribute mapping. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 4(2), Article e12235.
Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
Hujainah, F., Bakar, R. B. A., Al-Haimi, B., & Abdulgabber, M. A. (2018). Stakeholder quantification and prioritisation research: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 102, 85–99.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer.
Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189.
Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472.
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241–253.
Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135–158.
Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., Spekkink, W., & Warsen, R. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector (1st ed.). Routledge.
Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., Spekkink, W., & Warsen, R. (2025). Governance networks in the public sector (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. SAGE Publications.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. SAGE Publications.
Lemke, L. K.-G., Hanger-Kopp, S., Schinko, T., & Harris-Wai, L. (2024). Exploring procedural justice in stakeholder identification using a systematic mapping approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 162, Article 103900.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks—a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4), 407–419.
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3), Article e64848.
Newton, A., & Elliott, M. (2016). A typology of stakeholders and guidelines for engagement in transdisciplinary, participatory processes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, Article 230.
Odu, G. O. (2019). Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management, 23(8), 1449–1457.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 1–12.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388.
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382.
Preble, J. F. (2005). Toward a comprehensive model of stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 407–431.
Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 22(6), 501–518.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.
Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sharpe, L. M., Harwell, M. C., & Jackson, C. A. (2021). Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 282, Article 111719.
Sisto, R., Lopolito, A., & van Vliet, M. (2018). Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support local action groups in complying with CLLD requirements. Land Use Policy, 70, 442–450.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.
Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J. M., & Johnson, J. W. (2009). Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 387–399.
Triantaphyllou, E., & Sánchez, A. (1997). A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decision Sciences, 28(1), 151–194.
Wood, D. J., Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Bryan, L. M. (2021). Stakeholder identification and salience after 20 years: Progress, problems, and prospects. Business & Society, 60(1), 196–245.
Woods, M. (2011). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. SAGE Publications.
Yang, R. J., & Shen, G. Q. (2015). Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(4), Article 04014064.
Yang, R. J., Wang, Y., & Jin, X. H. (2014). Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviors, and decision‐making strategies in construction projects: Importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74–90.
Yiftachel, O. (1989). Towards a new typology of urban planning theories. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(1), 23–39.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zou, Z. H., Yun, Y., & Sun, J. N. (2006). Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18(5), 1020–1023.