簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃彥植
Huang, Yan-Jhih
論文名稱: 基於振動之擋土牆性能評估技術研究
A study on techniques for performance assessment of retaining structures based on vibration
指導教授: 柯永彥
Ko, Yung-Yen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 161
中文關鍵詞: 擋土牆性能評估微振量測性能指標有限元素法縮尺模型試驗
外文關鍵詞: performance assessment of retaining structures, microtremor measurement, scale model test, performance index, finite element analysis
相關次數: 點閱:75下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 為能在擋土結構性能下降但未達破壞前及時掌握而防範於未然,本研究針對常用之重力式與懸臂式擋土牆,量測其微振反應,透過頻譜分析展現牆─土互制系統之動力特性,藉此反映其擋土性能之變化;並引入基於振動之性能指標,藉此具體量化擋土牆性能變化程度。首先,利用有限元素法分析軟體PLAXIS 2D建立擋土牆數值模型,模擬牆趾土壤開挖、基礎土壤弱化、背填土弱化或主動破壞等情境對於擋土牆振動特性之影響;接著,進行室內縮尺模型試驗,以印證數值分析之結果;進一步針對台南市南化區與龍崎區擋土牆案例進行現地量測,驗證所提出方法應用在實際擋土牆之可行性。在數值分析與縮尺模型中,振動顯著頻率與頻譜尖峰振幅之變化能有效展現擋土牆弱化之情形,且性能指標確實有助於量化擋土之性能弱化程度;其中,又以牆趾土壤開挖與背填土弱化之影響較為明顯;現地試驗中,因條件較為複雜,牆體的自然頻率較難以清楚判別,南化區擋土牆案例中,由嚴重開裂牆體振動轉換函數值較輕微開裂者上升之情況,仍有助於展現擋土牆性能弱化之影響。龍崎區擋土牆案例中,能藉由轉換函數頻譜,發現舊有牆體較新建牆體呈現較明顯之高頻振動反應,可能代表其有局部受損之現象;並驗證H/V與平均頻譜等方法於實際應用之成效,證明基於振動之擋土牆性能評估具有實務應用之潛力。

    To detect the degradation of retaining structures before failure is caused so that the follow-up slope disasters can be prevented, this study aimed to assess the stabilization performance of the widely used gravity and cantilever retaining walls based on their vibration response, which can reveal the dynamic characteristics of the wall-soil interaction system. In addition, vibration-based performance indices were introduced to quantify the performance variation of retaining walls. The finite element software PLAXIS 2D was used for the numerical simulation of the influences of the excavation beside the toe of the retaining wall, the weakening of foundation soil and the weakening and active failure of backfill on its vibration characteristics. 1/25 scale model tests were conducted to validate the results of finite element analysis (FEA). The practical feasibility of the proposed idea was further examined by the field vibration measurements of retaining walls at two sites in Tainan. The results of both FEA and scale model tests showed that the change of the predominant frequency and the peak amplitude of the vibration spectrum of the wall-soil system helped to exhibit the performance degradation of the retaining wall, and the degradation can be quantified by the use of vulnerability indices. Concerning the field measurements, the natural frequency of the retaining wall was difficult to be clearly identified, yet the more damaged or aged walls generally had more significant response at higher frequencies; the H/V spectral ratio and time-averaging spectrum was also verified effective in characterizing the vibration of the wall. To sum up, the potential of vibration-based performance assessment of retaining walls for engineering practical application was demonstrated.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT iii 致謝 vii 目錄 ix 圖目錄 xiii 表目錄 xxiv 符號總表 xxv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景 1 1.2研究目的 1 1.3研究方法與流程 2 1.4論文架構 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1常見擋土牆形式與擋土牆破壞模式介紹 5 2.1.1擋土牆形式 5 2.1.2擋土牆破壞模式 7 2.2基於振動之結構損傷評估 9 2.3擋土設施之動態有限元素模擬 14 第三章 實驗與分析方法 17 3.1 PLAXIS 2D 軟體介紹 17 3.2室內縮尺模型試驗 19 3.3現地試驗 19 3.3.1台南南化邊坡擋土牆 19 3.3.2台南市龍崎區邊坡擋土牆 20 3.4振源與量測設備 22 3.4.1振源 22 3.4.2振動感應器 22 3.4.3集錄系統 22 3.5振動訊號分析方法 24 3.5.1傅立葉轉換 24 3.5.2轉換函數 24 3.6基於振動之性能指標 25 3.6.1簡化懸臂結構模型與自然頻率 25 3.6.2基礎旋轉阻抗 26 3.6.3 Nakamura損傷指數 27 第四章 PLAXIS 2D 有限元素分析 29 4.1 邊坡模型與參數設定 29 4.2 模擬情境 32 4.2.1牆趾土壤開挖與基礎土壤弱化之情境(有背填土) 32 4.2.2牆趾土壤開挖與基礎土壤弱化之情境(沒有背填土) 32 4.2.3背填土弱化情境 32 4.2.4背填土主動破壞 32 4.3分析結果 35 4.3.1牆趾開挖與基礎弱化之情境(有背填土) 35 4.3.2牆趾開挖與基礎弱化之情境(沒有背填土) 45 4.3.3背填土弱化情境 59 4.3.4背填土主動破壞 69 4.4本章小結 83 第五章 室內縮尺模型試驗 85 5.1試驗概述 85 5.2試驗配置 85 5.2.1試驗用砂 85 5.2.2重力式擋土牆模型 85 5.2.3懸臂式擋土牆模型 86 5.2.4試驗容器與邊坡試體製作 86 5.2.5量測儀器與配置 86 5.3試驗情境 93 5.3.1坡面降雨入滲與背填土主動破壞 93 5.3.2牆趾開挖與基礎土壤弱化(無背填土) 93 5.3.3牆趾開挖(有背填土) 94 5.4試驗成果 100 5.4.1坡面降雨入滲與背填土主動破壞之影響 100 5.4.2牆趾開挖與基礎土壤弱化之影響(無背填土) 112 5.4.3牆趾開挖與背填土壤弱化之影響 118 5.5 本章小結 125 第六章 現地案例 127 6.1案例位置與量測情境介紹 127 6.1.1台南市南化區南179線4K路段 127 6.1.2台南市龍崎區市道182線25.9K路段 127 6.3台南市南化區南179線4K路段 136 6.3.1量測儀器與配置 136 6.3.2試驗成果 136 6.4台南市龍崎區市道182線25.9K路段 145 6.4.1量測設備與配置 145 6.4.2第一次試驗成果 145 6.4.3第二次試驗成果 146 第七章 結論與建議 157 7.1結論 157 7.2 建議 159 參考文獻 160

    1. 王楷霖,碩士論文,岩楔微振動模型實驗探討,國立臺北科技大學,2018。
    2. 內政部,建築物耐震設計規範及解說,臺北市,2011。
    2. 李德河、林宏明、楊沂恩,“泥岩邊坡之穩定處理”,地工技術,第94期,41-52頁,2002。
    3. 柯永彥、張為光、陳正興,「橋墩基礎裸露對橋梁結構振動反應之影響」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第 23 卷, 第 1 期,第 103-110 頁 ,2011。
    4. 柯永彥、張為光、陳家漢,結構基礎損傷評估技術發展 (II),國家地震工程研究中心研究報告,NCREE-11-017 ,2011。
    5. 柯永彥、陳家漢、張為光,地工構造損傷評估技術發展,國家地震工程研究中心研究報告,NCREE-13-024,2013。
    6. 洪如江,“台灣順向坡滑動災害的回顧與災害防治的原則”,土木水利,第37卷,第3期,1-7頁,2010。
    7. 紀俊成,碩士論文,混凝土拱壩之系統識別與結構動力分析,國立交通大學,2007。
    8. 張鈞誠,碩士論文,利用振動頻率判別橋墩基礎裸露之可行性研究,國立交通大學,2012。
    9. 葉祥海、呂良正,以微振量測探討鋼筋混凝土建築物之補強成效,內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫成果報告,MOIS 912025,2002。
    10. 劉得笙,碩士論文,以加速度反應譜探究加勁邊坡動態數值模擬合宜性,國立宜蘭大學,2018。
    11. 歐陽,解說基礎工程,文笙書局,臺北市,2018。
    12. 蔡政任,碩士論文,拱壩之系統參數識別,國立中興大學,2005。
    13. 謝明志、林雅雯、陳正興、黃富國、徐松圻、邱俊翔、 鄭魁香、葉錦勳、簡文郁、柯永彥、許尚逸、楊鶴雄、 張毓文,港灣地區地震潛勢及港灣構造物耐震能力評 估之研究(2/4),交通部運輸研究所 ,2009。
    14. Brincker, R., Zhang, L., and Andersen, P., “Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition,” Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 441-445 ,2001.
    15. Dey, A., Rainieri, C., Laorenza, C., Lanzano, G., di Tullio, M., Gargaro, D., Brigante, D., Piccolo, G., Fabbrocino, G., Santucci de Magistris, F., “Dynamic analysis of a fully instrumented embedded retaining wall:preliminary interpretation”, Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference,2011.
    16. Das, B. M., Principles of Foundation Engineering, 7th edition, Cengage Learning, 794 Pages ,2011.
    17. Doebling, S. W. and Farrar, C. R., “Effect of measurement statistics on the detection of damage in the Alamosa Canyon Bridge,” Proceedings of 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, pp. 919-929 ,1997.
    18. Ko, Y. Y., Chang, W. K., Liu, K. Y., Hung, H. H., and Chang, K. C., “Damage evaluation for RC bridge piers using vibration measurement,” Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1501-1515 ,2015.
    19. Nakamura, Y., “A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface,” Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 25-33 ,1989.
    20. Nakamura, Y., “Seismic vulnerability indices for ground and structures using microtremor,” World Congress on Railway Research, Florence ,1997.
    21. Rytter, A.,Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures, PhD Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark,1993.
    22. Samizo, M., Watanabe, S., Fuchiwaki, A., and Sugiyama, T., “Evaluation of the structural integrity of bridge pier foundations using microtremors in flood conditions. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 153-157 ,2007.
    23. Shigetaka, T., Takashi, S., Manabu, K., Hiroyuki, H., ‘‘Dynamic Characteristics of Seismic Retrofit Building with Base Isolation System before and after Retrofitting using Micro-tremor Measurement’’,Technical Research Report of Sumitomo Mitsui Construction, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2016.
    24. Wu, Y., Prakash, S., “Seismic Displacements of Rigid Retaining Walls- State of the Art”, 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, CA,2001.
    25. Zhao, J., and Zhang, L., ‘‘ Structural Damage Identification Based on the Modal Data Change’’ I.J. Engineering and Manufacturing, 4, 59-66, 2012.

    下載圖示
    2024-08-31公開
    QR CODE