簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江寶珠
Chiang, Pao-Chu
論文名稱: 台灣企業社會責任投資組合之股價報酬研究
The stock return of CSR Investment Portfolio in Taiwan
指導教授: 林軒竹
Lin, Hsuan-Chu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班
Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 37
中文關鍵詞: 企業社會責任社會責任投資股價報酬投資組合
外文關鍵詞: CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility), SRI(Social responsibility investment), Stock returns, Investment Portfolio
相關次數: 點閱:213下載:53
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著CSR成為席捲全球潮流,社會責任投資(Socially Responsible Investment, SRI))因應而生,機構投資人及一般投資人選擇CSR較好的公司作為其投資標的之比例亦逐年上升,企業的經濟利益與CSR並不衡突。本研究以2014至2020年DJSI及天下CSR得獎企業,依入選年數多寡區分不同投資組合,並以等權、市值加權及年數加權三種不同資產配置,探討入選合計年數最多之CSR投資組合,其股價報酬是否高於入選合計年數較少之投資組合?且其股價報酬是否顯著優於大盤及台灣50?另也探討DJSI投資組合股價報酬是否高於天下CSR投資組合?
    實證結果顯示,在等權及年數加權之資產配置下,入選合計年數最多的投資組合,其股價報酬未高於入選合計年數較少之投資組合,亦未高於大盤及台灣50報酬指數。在市值加權資產配置下,僅DJSI投資組合中之入選年數最多的投資組合,其長期股價報酬顯著優於大盤報酬指數。在等權、市值加權及年數加權資產配置,DJSI投資組合股價報酬未顯著高於天下CSR投資組合。

    As CSR has become a global trend, Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) has emerged accordingly. The proportion of investors choosing companies with better CSR as their investment targets has also increased year by year, and the economic benefits of the company has no conflict with CSR. This research chooses DJSI and CommomWeath Magazine CSR award-winning companies from 2014 to 2020. These companies are distinguished different investment portfolios based on the number of award-winning years , besides also used three asset allocations that equal weight, market value weighted and years weighted to study following questions. (1) Is the stock price return of the investment portfolio with the most numbers of award-winning years higher than that of the investment portfolio with less award-winning years? (2) Is the stock price return of the investment portfolio with the most numbers of award-winning years higher than TAIEX Total Return Index (TAIEX Index) and FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Total Return Index (Taiwan 50 Index)? (3) Is the stock price return of DJSI portfolio higher than CommomWeath portfolio ?
    The empirical results show that under equal weighting and years weighted asset allocation, the stock price return of the portfolio with the most numbers of award-winning years is not higher than the investment portfolio with less award-winning years, nor is it higher than TAIEX Index and Taiwan 50 index. Only under the market value-weighted asset allocation, the DJSI portfolio with the most numbers of award-winning years has a long-term stock price return significantly better than TAIEX Index. Among the three asset allocations, the stock price return of DJSI portfolio is not significantly higher than CommonWealth portfolio .

    第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的2 第二章 企業社會責任與文獻回顧4 第一節 企業社會責任發展概述4 第二節 社會責任投資發展概述6 第三節 台灣CSR報告書編製概況8 第四節 文獻回顧8 第三章 研究方法11 第一節 研究對象及樣本描述11 第二節 投資績效衡量指標13 第三節 資料來源14 第四章 實證結果16 第一節 個股公司在市場評價16 第二節 標準差分析17 第三節 年均報酬率分析19 第四節 夏普值分析23 第五章 結論 28 參考文獻29 附錄31

    中文文獻
    1.池祥萱、繆文娟、莊瀅臻(2014)。企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球500大公司的證據。管理學報,民103年31卷1期,第1-19頁。
    2.周鄉絮(2017)。股價與財務評分投資組合之研究-以張紫凌軟體為例。國立屏東大學應用數學系碩士論文。屏東。
    3.陳文魁、曹耀鈞(2008)。有社會責任會有較好的股價嗎?財務與股價連結研究。證券櫃檯,第136期,第106-121頁。
    4.陳振遠、洪世偉(2013)。企業社會責任指數投資績效之研究。證券櫃檯,第165期,第88-97頁。
    5.陳郁文(2014)。企業社會責任與股價報酬的關聯性。國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。臺北。
    6.陳俊雄,「買一捐一公益回饋的社會企業經營模式」,服務創新電子報,2015/7/14,https://goo.gl/AgqpPT
    7.陳振遠、洪世偉、李臻勳(2016)。台灣推動企業社會責任及其股價績效之研究。證券服務,第647期,第25-35頁。
    8.陳勝源、李坤璋、崔靜菱、王昱凱(2017)。亞洲公司治理評鑑與各國股價指數之關係。會計審計論叢,第7卷第1期,第105-132頁。
    9.張元(2011)。社會責任公司有較高的股價報酬嗎?輔仁管理評論(社會企業專刊),民100年18卷1期,第79-118頁。
    10.許銘峻(2017)。台灣上市股票社會責任投資績效探討。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。桃園。
    11.莫冬立(2021)。公司治理3.0-編製企業永續報告強化ESG資揭露。會計研究月刊,第2021/01期,第75-81頁。
    12.蕭秋銘(2020)。企業社會責任因子是否能解釋股票報酬橫斷面變異?以台灣股票市場為例。台灣銀行季刊,第七十一卷第三期,第33-57頁。
    13.鍾雨辰(2012)。台灣社會責任投資之績效分析。國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。桃園。
    14.經濟日報2019企業社會責任年鑑。
    15.麥可.波特(Michael Porter) ,為何企業能更好地解決社會問題?,TEDGlobal2013,
    https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_porter_the_case_for_letting_business_solve_social_problems
    16.CSR@天下網站
    英文文獻
    1.Bauer R., J. Derwall and R. Otten 2007, “The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate:New Evidence from Canada”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.70 No.2 pp.111-124
    2.Bowman E.H. and M.Haire 1975, “A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate Social Responsibility”, California Management Review Vol.18 No.2 pp.49-58
    3.Gregory A. and J. Whittaker 2007, “Performance and Performance Persistence of ‘Ethical’ Unit Trusts in the UK”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol.34 No.7&8 pp.1327-1344
    4.Hamilton S., Jo H. and Statman M., “Doing Well while Doing Good ? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds ”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49, No.6, pp.62-66, November-December 1993.
    5.Jones S., S.V. Laan., G. Forst and J. Loftuns 2008, “The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia ”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 80, No.2, pp.181-203
    6.Kempf A. and Osthoff P., “The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance”, European Financial Management, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 908–922, 2007.
    7.Luther R.G., Matatko J. and Corner D.C., “The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 5, No.4, pp.57-70, 1992.
    8.Moskowitz M. 1972, “Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks”, Business and Society Review Vol.1 pp.71-75
    9.R. Edward Freeman (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.
    10.Renneboog L., Horst J. T. and Zhang C., “The Price of Ethics and Stakeholder Governance: The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No.3, pp.302-322, June 2008.
    11.Sparkes R. and C.J. Cowton.2004, “The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.52 No.1 pp.45-57

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE