簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳寶山
Murugan, Prasanth
論文名稱: 無人機高升力裝置的模擬
COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION OF A HIGH LIFT DEVICE FOR DRONE
指導教授: 陳世雄
Chen, Shih-Hsiung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 航空太空工程學系
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 100
外文關鍵詞: Lifting body profile, CFD, Pressure gradient, Coanda effect.
相關次數: 點閱:82下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • The increasing demand for the good performance of aircraft aerodynamics, from the fundamental understanding of flight, requires an enhanced lift. The current study aimed at appraising the high lift duct fan system for VTOL design.
    High lift devices for drone of a ducted fan configuration in hovering conditions is computationally investigated using a three dimensional, steady, Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes flow based on unstructured grid technology and it is based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) using ANSYS CFX. Hence, a complete performance comparison of the Ducted fan only body and the modified Models body profile was carried out in this research.
    The Models are designed in order to improve the pressure distribution over the body, hence low-pressure region is formed over the upper surface and higher pressure over the lower surface. In addition, net thrust can be generated on the duct lip due to the fan suction effect.
    Suction peak (negative pressure) occurs over the duct lip will result in pressure difference reaction force (lift) of the system giving a greater performance in thrust output which satisfies the design
    The lift force is the main outcome of this investigation. Parametric study of different design in various configurations has been performed to distinguish the effect of geometric parameters to the performance of the system. The results proved that the Model 3 body profile has been significantly improved. The maximum amount of lift force contribution was found to be 90% of extra lift generated by the body when compared to the ducted fan only. This is mainly because of the flow passing through upper body surface and creates a negative pressure.
    Coanda Effect also takes place along the curve design of the body profile model. These have evolved to generate lift forces in a more efficient manner.
    Overall the contribution of the lift takes place by pressure difference at the upper and lower surface, and duct lip. This study may provide a viable technology to improve the aerodynamic performance of ducted fan in hovering conditions.

    ABSTRACT............I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......... III TABLE OF CONTENTS.......... IV LIST OF TABLES........... VIII LIST OF FIGURES...........IX NOMENCLAUTURE................XIV CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION........1 1.1 Research Background..............2 1.2 Propulsion for UAV........5 1.2.1 Fixed wing Propulsion........5 1.2.2 VTOL Propulsion.... ....6 1.2.3 Multirotor................7 1.3 Multirotor UAV Endurance.......9 1.4 Helicopter Endurance and Improvement......9 1.5 Literature Review.........10 1.6 Ducted Rotor..........14 1.6.1 Benefits of Duct........17 1.7 Coanda effect...........18 1.8 Improvement in Design........20 1.9 Configuration and methods........21 1.10 Objective and scope of study........21 1.11 Research preview........22 CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL ANALYSIS........24 2.1 Momentum Theory.........24 CHAPTER 3 SIMULATION APPROACH.........29 3.1 Governing equations.........29 3.1.1 Continuity equation........29 3.1.2 Momentum equation........30 3.1.3 Energy equation........31 3.2 Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes Equation.....31 3.2.1 Reynolds form of continuity equation.....32 3.2.2 Reynolds form of momentum equation......32 3.2.3 Reynolds form of energy equation.......33 3.3 Turbulence model........33 3.4 Wall Function..........36 3.5 Numerical discretization technique.......39 3.5.1 Shape function.........41 3.5.2 Control volume gradients.......44 3.5.3 Advection term.........44 3.5.4 Diffusion term.............45 3.5.5 Pressure gradient terms........45 3.5.6 Mass flows..........46 CHAPTER 4 COMPUTATIONAL MODELING.......47 4.1 Geometry..........47 4.2 Geometry description.........48 4.3 Mesh generation.........50 4.4 Simulation setup..........56 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS..........62 5.1 Convergence...........62 5.2 Computations residual history.......61 5.3 Stage 1 Performance assessment of the drone fan only.....64 5.3.1 Ducted Fan Only.........65 5.4 Stage 2 Performance assessment of the ducted fan and body add-on designs..68 5.4.1 Model 1..........68 5.4.2 Model 2..........72 5.4.3 Model 3..........76 5.4.4 Model 4.........80 5.4.5 Model 5.........84 i. Pressure contour.......85 ii. Velocity contour.......86 iii. Velocity streamlines.......87 iv. Velocity vector.......87 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS.....92 6.1 Conclusion....................92 6.2 Concluding remarks.........95 6.3 Recommendation for future works.......95 REFERENCES............97

    [1] Unadkat, L., Kumbhar, O., “Unmanned Aerial Systems”, International Journal of
    Engineering and Applied Sciences Vol.4, pp. 75-78, 2017.
    [2] Dempsey, Martin E. “Eyes of the Army – U.S. Army Roadmap for Unmanned
    Aircraft System Service Demand 2015–2035 Technical Report, 2013.
    [3] China Dominate the Drone Market. Accessed on 2017.
    https://dronelife.com/2017/01/14/will-china-dominate-the-drone-market
    [4] Nicolas, T., Christian, B, and Adams, N.A., “Numerical and Experimental Analysis
    of a Generic Fan-In-Wing Configuration” Journal of Aircraft, Vol.46, pp.656-666,
    2009.
    [5] Kruger, W. “On Wind Tunnel Tests and Computations Concerning the Problem
    of Shrouded Propellers.” NACA Technical Memorandum, 1944.
    [6] Weir, Robert J. “Aerodynamic Design Considerations for a Free-Flying Ducted
    Propeller.” AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Washington, D.C.,
    pp. 420-431, 1988.
    [7] Multirotor Vs Fixed Wing Aircraft Accessed on 2017.
    blog.dronedeploy.com/choosing-the-right-mapping-drone-for-your- business-part-
    multi-rotor-vs-fixed-wing-aircraft.
    [8] Basset, A. and Tremolet, T. “Rotary Wing UAV Pre-Sizing: Past and Present
    Methodological Approaches”, Journal Aerospace Lab, issue 8, Vol.3, pp. 1-12, 2014.
    [9] Case Study Fixed vs Rotary wing Accessed on 2018.
    www.questuav.comstudy/fixed-wing-versus-rotary-wing-for- UAV- mapping.
    [10] Vincenz, P. C., & Mauro, G., “Design and Prototyping High Endurance Multi-
    Rotor”, PhD thesis, Universita di Bologna 2015.
    [11] Mian A. A. and Wang D., “Nonlinear Flight Control Strategy for an Underactuated
    Quadrotor Aerial Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing
    and Control, pp. 938–942, Sanya, China, 2008.
    [12] Martin D., Demo J. Giulianetti and Daniel C. “The History of the XV-15 Tilt
    Rotor Research Aircraft: From Concept to Flight” NASA, 2000.
    [13] Ioannou, S., Dalamagkidis, K., Valavanis, K.P. and Stefanakos, E.K., “Improving
    Endurance and Range of a UGV with Gimballed Landing Platform for Launching
    Small Unmanned Helicopters”. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Vol.53,
    pp.399-416, 2008.
    [14] Mort, K. W. and Gamse, B. “A Wind Tunnel Investigation of a 7-Foot- Diameter
    Ducted Propeller” Technical Report NASA TND-4142, 1967.
    [15] Graf, W., Fleming, J. & Ng, W., “Improving Ducted Fan UAV Aerodynamics in
    Forward Flight” 46th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting p.430-441, 2008.
    [16] Akturk, A. and Camci, C. “Computational Study Around 5-inch Ducted Fan
    v/stol UAV”. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p-332-349, 2009.
    [17] Collins, B. “Coanda Flight Controls”, Eighteenth International Conference
    Bristol University UK, 2003.
    [18] Barlow, C., Lewis, D., Prior, S.D., Erbil, M.A., and Collins, R., “Investigating
    the Use of Coanda Effect to Create Novel Unmanned Aerial Vehicles”, 2009.
    [19] Mirkov, N. and Rašuo, B., “Numerical Simulation of Air Jet Attachment to Convex
    Walls and Application to UAV”. In Boundary and Interior Layers, Computational
    and Asymptotic Methods-BAIL, Vol.108, pp.197-207, 2014.
    [20] Lee, H., Kim, Y.B., Song, S.H. and Choi, H.R., “Design Optimization, Modeling,
    and Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Lifted by Coandă Effect”. IEEE/ASME
    Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol.22, pp.1327-1336. 2017.
    [21] Kruger, W. “On Wind Tunnel Tests and Computations Concerning the Problem
    of Shrouded Propellers.” NACA Technical Memorandum 1202, January 1944.
    [22] Weir, Robert J. “Aerodynamic Design Considerations for a Free-Flying Ducted
    Propeller”, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Washington, D.C.,
    Vol.8, pp.420-431, 1988.
    [23] McCormick, B. W., “Aerodynamics of V/STOL Flight”, Dover, New York, pp. 1-
    10, 1999.
    [24] Graf, W., Fleming, J., and Gelhausen, P., “Ducted Fan Aerodynamics in Forward
    Flight,” AHS International Specialists,’ Meeting on Unmanned Rotorcraft,
    American Helicopter Society pp.1-10, 2005.
    [25] Graf, W., “Effects of Duct Lip Shaping and Various Control Devices on the Hover
    and Forward Flight Performance of Ducted Fan UAVs,” M.S. Thesis, Virginia,
    Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA, 2005.
    [26] Pereira, J.L., “Hover and Wind-Tunnel Testing of Shrouded Rotors for Improved
    Micro Air Vehicle Design”. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park
    2008.
    [27] Mouille, R., “The Fenestron, Shrouded Tail Rotor of the SA.341 Gazelle”. Journal
    of American Helicopter Society, Vol.4, pp. 31-37, 1970.
    [28] Vuillet, A., and Morelli, F., “New Aerodynamic Design of the Fenestron For
    Improved Performance." 12th European Rotorcraft Forum pp.1-10, 1986.
    [29] Fleming, J., Jones, Gelhausen, P., & Enns, D. “Improving Control System
    Effectiveness for Ducted Fan VTOL UAVs operating in crosswinds”. AIAA
    Conference and Workshop Exhibition, pp.1-11, 2003.
    [30] Ohanian, O.J., 2011. “Ducted Fan Aerodynamics and Modeling, with Applications
    of Steady and Synthetic Jet Flow Control”, Ph.D. thesis, Virginia State University,
    2011.
    [31] Graf, W., Fleming, J., “Improving Ducted fan UAV Aerodynamics in Forward
    Flight,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibition 2008.
    [32] Fowler, H., “Some Tests of 12-in. Diameter Model VTOL Ducted Fans”,
    National Research Council of Canada Aeronautical Report, pp.1-104, 1962.
    [33] Circiu, I. and Boscoianu, M., “An Analysis of the Efficiency of Coanda-NOTAR
    Anti-Torque Systems for Small Helicopters”, Vol.2, pp.81-88, 2010.
    [34] Coanda, H, “Procede et dispositif pour faire devier une veine de fluide penetrant
    dans un autre fluide”, Brevet invention France, pp.14-20, 1934.
    [35] Dyer, K.G., “Aerodynamic Study of a Small Ducted VTOL Aerial Vehicle”, MS
    thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June 2002.
    [36] Reynolds, O. “On the Dynamical Theory of Incompressible Viscous Fluids and The
    Determination of The Criterion”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
    Vol.186, pp. 40-45. 1894.
    [37] Wilcox, D. C., “Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries”, La Canada,
    California . pp. 1-18, 1998.
    [38] Menter, F. R. 1994. “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for
    Engineering Applications”. AIAA Journal, Vol.32, pp. 1598-1605, 1994.
    [39] Launder, B. E., & Spalding, D. B. “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent
    Flows”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol.3, pp. 269-
    289, 1974.
    [40] Sondak, Douglas L., “Wall Functions for the k-ε Turbulence Model in Generalized
    Nonorthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates”, Ph. D thesis, Iowa State University, 1992.
    [41] Barth, T. J., & Jespersen, D. C. “The Design and Application of Upwind Schemes
    on Unstructured Meshes”, pp.1-13, 1989.
    [42] ANSYS Inc., Release 17.2, “ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide”, 2016.

    下載圖示 校內:2022-07-24公開
    校外:2022-07-24公開
    QR CODE