當前的城市設計規劃流程欠缺了與兒童與青少年的溝通媒介，常陷於專業者主觀的價值與認知，忽略了兒少真正的使用需求。本研究旨在創造一套城市空間改造的參與過程，實驗並探討公共空間的多元性與實踐需求。設計師將轉為策略性角色，透過實際行動讓特定的社會主體相互溝通、協同合作並進行共識的整合，藉此方式推動以兒童與青少年所主導的參與式空間設計。

本研究先以文獻回顧瞭解兒童與青少年參與城市空間設計的優勢與技術困境，並探討以新興科技作為突破口的潛力。接著運用Unity作為遊戲引擎，開發一套使用擴增實境技術的建構性遊戲，將抽象的建築設計手法可視化、遊戲化。最後，組建參與式工作坊的架構，尋求合適的參與者，並透過活動的實踐，對不同向度的因素進行記錄與調查，進而修正、優化。

這項研究的目標是為兒童與青少年設計一套新型態的參與式空間設計流程，並透過真實的行動實踐和謹慎的過程記錄，提供一份具有參考價值的研究經驗，累積並共享成果。

In the realm of urban design and planning, the prevailing methodologies frequently fall short in establishing meaningful communication channels with children and adolescents. This deficiency results in a reliance on subjective values and perceptions from professionals, often at the expense of overlooking the genuine needs of the youth. This research endeavors to address this critical gap by advocating for the reconstruction of a participatory process tailored to urban space transformation. Central to this endeavor is the exploration of the diverse and practical requirements inherent in public spaces. By delving into the multifaceted nature of urban environments, this study seeks to uncover the nuanced perspectives and aspirations of children and adolescents. Designers are poised to assume strategic roles in this paradigm shift, tasked with facilitating communication, collaboration, and consensus among specific societal entities. Through this reimagined participatory approach, the aim is to empower children and adolescents to take the lead in shaping their urban environments. By amplifying their voices and perspectives, the resulting space design becomes more inclusive, responsive, and reflective of the genuine needs of the youth. Ultimately, this research seeks to foster a more equitable and participatory urban planning process, one that truly embraces the diversity and richness of urban life.

Baek, J. S., & Lee, K. P. (2008). A participatory design approach to information architecture design for children. Co-Design, 4(3), 173-191.
Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. (2012). Design: design matters in Participatory Design. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design (pp. 37-63). Routledge.
Carbonell-Carrera, C., Jaeger, A. J., Saorín, J. L., Melián, D., & De la Torre-Cantero, J. (2021). Minecraft as a block building approach for developing spatial skills. Entertainment Computing, 38, 100427.
Farshid, M., Paschen, J., Eriksson, T., & Kietzmann, J. (2018). Go boldly!: Explore augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) for business. Business horizons, 61(5), 657-663.
Gil, T. (2018). Playing It Safe? A Global White Paper on Risk, Liability and Children’s Play in Public Space. https://bernardvanleer.org/publications-reports/playing-it-safe-a-global-white-paper-on-risk-liability-and-childrens-play-in-public-space/
Hsu, J. S., Shen, Y. T., & Cheng, F. C. (2022, June). The development of the intuitive teaching-based design method for robot-assisted fabrication applied to bricklaying design and construction. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 51-57). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), 7, 167-185.
Kim, S. L., Suk, H. J., Kang, J. H., Jung, J. M., Laine, T. H., & Westlin, J. (2014, March). Using Unity 3D to facilitate mobile augmented reality game development. In 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) (pp. 21-26). IEEE.
Koca, B. A., Çubukçu, B., & Yüzgeç, U. (2019, October). Augmented reality application for preschool children with unity 3D platform. In 2019 3rd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Kurilovas, E. (2016). Evaluation of quality and personalisation of VR/AR/MR learning systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11), 998-1007.
Lane, H. C., & Yi, S. (2017). Playing with virtual blocks: Minecraft as a learning environment for practice and research. In Cognitive development in digital contexts (pp. 145-166). Academic Press.
Lin, C. H., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Developing spatial visualization and mental rotation with a digital puzzle game at primary school level. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 23-30.
Luck, R. (2018). Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times. Design Studies, 59, 139-157.
Luck, R. (2018). What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?. Design studies, 59, 1-8.
Martin-Dorta, N., Sanchez-Berriel, I., Bravo, M., Hernandez, J., Saorin, J. L., & Contero, M. (2014). Virtual Blocks: a serious game for spatial ability improvement on mobile devices. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 73, 1575-1595.
Muller, M. J., & Kuhn, S. (1993). Participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36(6), 24-28.
Opmeer, M., Dias, E., De Vogel, B., Tangerman, L., & Scholten, H. J. (2018). Minecraft in support of teaching sustainable spatial planning in secondary education. In 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 316-321).
Šafhalter, A., Glodež, S., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virtič, M. (2020). Development of spatial thinking abilities in engineering 3D modeling course aimed at lower secondary students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-18.
Šafhalter, A., Vukman, K. B., & Glodež, S. (2016). The effect of 3D-modeling training on students’ spatial reasoning relative to gender and grade. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 395-406.
Sanders, E. B. N. (2002). From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In Design and the social sciences (pp. 18-25). CRC Press.
Shen, Y. T., & Hsu, J. S. (2023, July). The Development of Mix-Reality Interface and Synchronous Robot Fabrication for the Collaborative Construction. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 372-381). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Shen, Y. T., Lu, P. W., & Lin, F. C. (2020). The integration of web-based and mobile-based participatory sensing interfaces apply to the identification and assessment of contextual features in the city. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting with Information: Thematic Area, HIMI 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 22 (pp. 519-528). Springer International Publishing.
Shen, Y. T., Shiu, Y. S., & Lu, P. (2016). City Probe: the crowdsourcing platform driven by citizen-based sensing for spatial identification and assessment. In Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering: 13th International Conference, CDVE 2016, Sydney, NSW, Australia, October 24–27, 2016, Proceedings 13 (pp. 69-76). Springer International Publishing.
Shen, Y. T., Shiu, Y. S., Liu, W. K., & Lu, P. W. (2017). The participatory sensing platform driven by UGC for the evaluation of living quality in the city. In Human Interface and the Management of Information: Supporting Learning, Decision-Making and Collaboration: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part II 19 (pp. 516-527). Springer International Publishing.
Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication, 52(2), 163-174.
Yiwei, H. U. A. N. G. (2020). RESPONSIBILITIES AND ROLES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHILD FRIENDLY CITY. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 8(2). 
苗元紅。（2022）。兒少表意權的實踐：臺灣中央兒少代表觀點初探。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/757332。
李玉華。（2022）。【專題│眼底城事】使用者經驗對空間設計專業的養成不重要？「遊戲孩子王」在兒少參與式設計，玩什麼把戲。典藏ARTouch。https://artouch.com/artco-kids/content-2212081.html。
劉香吟。（2004）。參與式社區規劃設計之探討與實證－以台南市東明里為例。﹝碩士論文。國立高雄大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dar83b。
林玟伶。（2021）。博眾之間：博物館社群參與實踐的意義、挑戰與評量。博物館與文化，22，49-76。
林建彰。（2019）。空間深度察覺應用於擴增實境之研究。﹝碩士論文。逢甲大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qft8a9。
林宇儂。（2022）。為孩子設計？設計過程中的兒童參與。眼底城市。https://eyesonplace.net/2022/04/10/20203/?cv=1&session-id=620c1ce6ad2f411a944563d3a6604408&doing_wp_cron=1694623443.0429029464721679687500。
邱靖雯。（2021）。我們的秘密基地-幼兒建築空間玩具。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/972k72。
周書儀。（2019）。發展參與式感應公共藝術用於群眾生成內容揭露。﹝碩士論文。逢甲大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bue4j5。
卓彥宇。（2022）。實虛疊合的敘事－空間深度切片。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8589hq。
程昱維。（2020）。空間深度感知應用於直覺化電腦輔助建築設計方法。﹝碩士論文。逢甲大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uhsw87。
施佩吟。（2022）。社區教給我的新功課:在「非正式」的過程中學習。眼底城市。https://eyesonplace.net/2022/04/13/20219/。
曾漢珍。（1997）。校園更新規劃設計過程中「使用者參與原則」之探討。https://teric.naer.edu.tw/wSite/DoDownload?xmlId=1794587&fileName=1532484608490&format=pdf&OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=BVY2-F6FD-6Z6L-MO1R-7ORZ-VG8H-WN05-GJNW。
蔡旻家。（2022）。半場攝影展：探索閒置空間機能性填充的可適應性。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wwc2x8。
曹筱玥、林小慧。（2012）。想像力量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊，57(4)，1-37。
宋宜欣。（2021）。以遊戲化觀點探討設計思考工作坊之參與動力營造。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8y7tp5。
吳怡諄。（2022）。擴增實境輔助全尺度沉浸式直覺設計。﹝碩士論文。國立成功大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/svgb55。
溫孟瑀。（2017）。參與式設計工作坊分析研究：以溝通策略和溝通工具為視角。﹝碩士論文。國立交通大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ygax4c。