| 研究生: |
古博而 Cubol, Joel |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
利用產品生命週期分析連結國家間發展策略:以未來汽車產業的資源管理為例 Concerting Development Strategies of Nations Linked by a Product Life Cycle: An Example in Promotion of Future Vehicle Industries with Focus on Resource Management |
| 指導教授: |
福島康裕
Yasuhiro Fukushima |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 環境工程學系 Department of Environmental Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 84 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電動車 、電池材料 、資源管理 、企業發展策略 、溫室氣體排放 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | electric vehicles, materials for batteries, resource management, promotion strategy of an industry, Greenhouse gas emission |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:175 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
電動車和油電混合車在台灣是策略性的推廣產業之一,並且期待在未來的數十年間能夠提供國內、外市場零件及最終產品的市場,並促進台灣經濟。此種策略必須與資源開採國家的目標一致,以確保參與國家間的經濟及環境的永續發展。
在本研究中,台灣在2060年鋰(Li)和鎳(Ni)的需求量,已根據國內引進電動汽車到國內的推廣計劃推估求得。這種新型的汽車產業會利用這些重要的金屬資源做為電池的主要成分,並計劃在金屬退出市場成為可回收資源時,創造一個台灣的金屬回收產業。
藉由廢棄電池回收的參與以及鋰和鎳的回收效率,可求得為補足金屬需求量之回收以及採礦的分配情況。本研究中,將結合上述資訊與溫室氣體排放相關之訊息,提供台灣以及開採國家(保加利亞、菲律賓)建立技術與資源管理一致性的發展策略。
隨著電動車量的增加,即使電動車發展計畫可改進電池上金屬強度的降低,金屬需求仍顯示緩慢成長至飽和的趨勢。有鑑於此以及廢金屬回收庫存量的上升趨勢,台灣在利用回收廢棄金屬於供應面的自給自足能力也提升了。然而該項策略,會使台灣產生更多的溫室氣體排放以及限制開採國家的供應量。這似乎有益於開採國家溫室氣體排放減量,但是於經濟方面卻無法達到永續經營。因此,為避免開採國家金屬產業受到台灣金屬回收產業建立的衝擊,建議這些國家可在下游加工和精煉產業鏈中,增加資源的經濟價值。
只利用三個國家為例的發展策略探討,也許還不夠貼近於現實情況。在實際情況之下,這些國家會與更多國家有所互動,也不僅是單一技術與產品的連結。因此,建議未來的研究可以考量多國或是多項產品間面向,建立一個動態並貼近真實情況的模式。
Electric and hybrid vehicle industry is one of those strategically promoted in Taiwan expected to provide domestic and international markets with parts and final products contributing to Taiwanese economy in the next decades. Such strategy must be in concert with strategies on the resource mining countries, assuring economic and environmental sustainability among the nations involved.
In this study, Taiwan’s lithium (Li) and nickel (Ni) demands until 2060 are estimated in accordance to the promotion plans of the introduction of electric vehicles in the country. This new vehicle industry would utilize these critical metal resources as key components of the batteries. When these metals exit from the market as reusable resource, it is aimed to create a metal recycling industry in Taiwan.
Given the recycling participation of the disposed batteries and the efficiency to recover nickel and lithium, the ultimate potential in recycled metal supply and the mined metals to supplement the shortage to the metal demand can be estimated. These information together with the associated GHG emission are the key inputs to the concerted roadmaps of technological and resource management strategies of Taiwan and the mining countries – Bolivia and the Philippines – that is proposed in this study.
With the increasing number of EVs, although this development plan is coupled with the improvement in battery technology in terms of decreasing the metal intensity, the projection still shows an increasing to slowly saturating metal demands. Because of this, disposed metal stocks accumulation in Taiwan has also increasing trend, making them capable of becoming self-sufficient in supplying its own demand by recycling these disposed metal stocks. This, however, induces more GHG emission from Taiwan and limits the supply share of mining countries. This may sound beneficial in terms of minimizing GHG emission in mining countries; however, it poses challenges in economic aspects of sustainability. If the mining countries cannot achieve economic sustainability, the product life cycle cannot be sustainable. Hence, it is suggested that while the demand from the mining countries is still not suppressed by Taiwan’s recycling industry, they can establish other industry such as downstream processing and refining to increase the economic value of their resource.
The demonstrated example of concerting development strategies of the three stakeholders may not be, however, realistic enough. In reality, these countries interact to more countries and not only linked by one technology or product. Thus, it is recommended for future studies to add more stakeholders and more products to link them to make the model more dynamic and more realistic.
1. Tai, Y.-M., Recommended Indutries for Foreign Investments in Taiwan: Electric Vehicle Industry, Department of Investment Services, 2010.
2. 智慧電動車發展策略與行動方案. 經濟部, 中華民國 99 年 4 月.
3. Thermoanalytics. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.thermoanalytics.com/support/publications/batterytypesdoc.html
4. Battery University: Are Hybrid Cars Here to Stay? [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/are_hybrid_cars_here_to_stay
5. Sloop, S.E., Recycling Rare Earth Metals from Nickel Metal Hydride Batteries, 2012, US Environmental Protection Agency.
6. Anderson, D.L., An evaluation of current and future costs for lithium-ion batteries for use in electrified vehicle powertrains, 2009, Duke University.
7. USGS Minerals Information: Nickel. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/nickel/mcs-2013-nicke.pdf.
8. Gruber, P.W., et al., Global lithium availability. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2011. 15(5): p. 760-775.
9. Domingo, F.G.S.E.G., Philippine Mineral Exploration Perspective, 2011.
10. Mining Industry Briefing on Executive Order No. 79. A Forum on Mining as a Land Use Issue, 2012: UP-SURP Multipurpose Hall, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
11. Hollender, R. and J. Shultz, Bolivia and its Lithium. Can the" Gold of the 21st Century" Help Lift a Nation out of Poverty, 2010.
12. Electric Vehicle Primer: An Introduction to Hybrid, Plug-in Electric, and Battery Electric Vehicles. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.tc.gc.ca/media/documents/programs/EN-EV-Primer.pdf
13. Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). . [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric.html
14. Aditya, J.P. and M. Ferdowsi. Comparison of NiMH and Li-ion batteries in automotive applications. in Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2008. VPPC'08. IEEE. 2008. IEEE.
15. Vehicle Technologies Program. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/52723.pdf
16. World Demand for Battery Materials Forecast to hit $22.8 Billion by 2012, in EV World News2009.
17. Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_batteries.html
18. Rantik, M., LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FIVE BATTERIES FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES UNDER DIFFERENT CHARGING REGIMES. 1999.
19. Kopera, J.J., Inside the nickel metal Hydride battery. Cobasys, MI, 2004.
20. Valle, R.G. and J.A.P. Lopes, Electric vehicle integration into modern power networks. Vol. 2. 2012: Springer.
21. Lowe, M., et al., Lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: The US value chain. Duke University Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, 2010.
22. Battery University: Types of Lithium-ion. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/types_of_lithium_ion
23. Råde, I. and B.A. Andersson, Requirement for metals of electric vehicle batteries. Journal of power sources, 2001. 93(1): p. 55-71.
24. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle R&D Plan, 2007, US Department of Energy.
25. Majeau-Bettez, G., T.R. Hawkins, and A.H. Strømman, Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Environmental science & technology, 2011. 45(10): p. 4548-4554.
26. Executive Order No. 79 of the President of the Philippines, in Official Gazzette of the Office of the President2012: Malacanang Palace, Manila.
27. Norgate, T. and S. Jahanshahi. Energy and greenhouse gas implications of deteriorating quality ore reserves. in 5th Australian Conference on Life Cycle Assessment. Melbourne, Australia: Austrlian Life Cylcle Assessment Society. 2006.
28. Legers, L., The trouble with lithium 2. Under the Microscope. Meridian International Research, Martainville, France. Available at http://www. evworld. com/library/WTahil_Lithium_Microscope. pdf>(accessed on May 29, 2008), 2008.
29. Stamp, A., D.J. Lang, and P.A. Wäger, Environmental impacts of a transition toward e-mobility: the present and future role of lithium carbonate production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012. 23(1): p. 104-112.
30. Dargay, J., D. Gately, and M. Sommer, Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960-2030. The Energy Journal, 2007: p. 143-170.
31. Mohr, S.H., G. Mudd, and D. Giurco, Lithium resources and production: Critical assessment and global projections. Minerals, 2012. 2(1): p. 65-84.
32. National Statistics, Republic of China (ROC). [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://eng.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=9725&ctNode=1598.
33. Population Projections for ROC (Taiwan): 2012-2060, Council for Economic Planning and Development.
34. Ministry of Transportation and Communications ROC. . [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=59&parentpath=0,6&mcustomize=statistics501.jsp.
35. Weibull Statistics. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.weibull.nl/weibullstatistics.htm
36. A Technical Assessment of High-Energy Batteries for Light-Duty Electric Vehicles, 2006, Standford University.
37. Reliability Analytics Toolkit. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://reliabilityanalyticstoolkit.appspot.com/mechanical_reliability_data.
38. Operations, Nickel Asia Corporation. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nickelasia.com/operations.html
39. Mudd, G.M. Historical trends in base metal mining: backcasting to understand the sustainability of mining. in Proc." 48th Annual Conference of Metallurgists”, Canadian Metallurgical Society, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. 2009.
40. Ballantyne, S.M., Greenhouse gas emissions in mining operations: challenges and opportunities in British Columbia, Canada. 2010.
41. Downstream Processing, Nickel Asia Corporation. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nickelasia.com/downstreamProcessing.html
42. Products, Nickel Asia Corporation. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nickelasia.com/products.html
43. Norgate, T., S. Jahanshahi, and W. Rankin, Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007. 15(8): p. 838-848.
44. Ishihara, K., et al., Environmental burdens of large lithium-ion batteries developed in a Japanese national project. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan, 2002.
45. Sullivan, J. and L. Gaines, A review of battery life-cycle analysis: state of knowledge and critical needs, 2010, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL).
46. Battery Recycling, US Environmental Protection Agency.
47. Lead Recycling, International Lead Association.
48. Shu, J.P.H., et al., Overview of the Taiwan EV National Promotion Program Driven by Clean Zone Policy. World Electric Vehicle, 2009. Volume 3.