世界衛生組織的殘疾報告中指出，目前全球有超過10 億人是殘疾人士，若其肢體殘疾發生於兒童身上，對於兒童的成長將會有相當大的影響，許多斷肢的孩童相較一般小孩，肢體缺損造成生活上許多困難。然而其兒童因為會隨著其成長，義肢需要不斷更換，導致義肢費用購買成本提高，亦或是家長等待兒童長大才購買義肢，而嚴重影響了兒童的成長心理與生理的變化，為何不在兒童最需要時提供為佳的輔具。
本研究透過S 科技大學，運用「產學合作」、「價值共創」的基礎理論觀點，為產學合作下之價值共創的協作歷程視角，S 科技大學結合相關利害關係人包括醫療輔具股份公司及非營利事業組織等單位進行產學合作案，達成兒童與父母的心願，在最適當的時機提供完善的資源。
促使各個利害關係人願意更主動地參與，並透過彼此間的溝通與協調，讓各利害關係人能更緊密的鏈結，進而創造出能彼此共享的價值與利害關人各自的價值，乃是本研究之產學合作價值共創之策略思維。
因此本研究欲建構模組化義肢結構設計與客製化3D 列印製造兒童義肢輔具，分別以模組化套件功能手與運動功能手的方向設計，改善兒童肢體發展的問題，採用3D列印的方式改善兒童肢體發展的問題，同時讓兒童在生活、學習及運動過程中健康自信的成長。
本研究預期結果希望能夠透過模組化義肢結構，讓肢體殘障兒童無論是偏遠地區亦或是經濟不佳的家庭也能夠讓孩童有義肢度過一個完整的童年。

According to the World Health Organization's disability report, there are currently more than 1 billion people with disabilities in the world. If their physical disabilities occur in children, it will have a considerable impact on the growth of children. Many children with amputated limbs are more than ordinary children. , Limb defects cause many difficulties in life. However, as the children grow up, the prosthetic limbs need to be replaced continuously, which leads to the increase of the cost of purchasing the prosthetic limbs, or the parents wait for the children to grow up before purchasing the prosthetic limbs, which seriously affects the psychological and physiological changes of the children's growth. Provide the best aids when needed.
Through S University of Science and Technology, this research uses the basic theoretical viewpoints of "industry-university cooperation" and "value co-creation" to provide a collaborative process perspective of value co-creation under industry-academia cooperation. S University of Science and Technology combines relevant stakeholders, including medical aids Joint-stock companies and non-profit organizations carry out industry-university cooperation projects to achieve the wishes of children and parents, and provide comprehensive resources at the most appropriate time.
Promoting the willingness of each stakeholder to participate more actively, and through mutual communication and coordination, allows each stakeholder to be more closely linked, thereby creating value that can be shared with each other and the value of each stakeholder. The strategic thinking of the value co-creation of industry-university cooperation in this study.
Therefore, this research intends to construct modular prosthetic structure design and customized 3D printing to manufacture children's prosthetic aids, respectively design in the direction of modular kit functional hand and motor functional hand, so as to improve the problem of children's limb development. The way of printing improves children's physical development, and at the same time allows children to grow up healthily and confidently in the process of life, learning and sports.
The expected results of this study hope that through the modularized prosthetic structure, children with physical disabilities, whether in remote areas or financially disadvantaged families, can also have prosthetic limbs for children to spend a complete childhood.

Audhesh, K. P., D'Souza, D., & Rajasree, K. R. (2014). Value co-creation through knowledge exchange in franchising. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(2), 116-125.
Gouillart, F., & Billings, D. (2013). Community-Powered Problem Solving. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 70-77.
Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: who creates value? And who co‐creates?European Business Review, 20(4), 298-314.
Grönroos, C. (2012). Conceptualising value co-creation: A journey to the 1970s and back to the future. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1520-1534.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150.
O’Hern, M. and Rindfleisch, A., 2009. Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. Review of Marketing Research, vol. 6, pp 84-106.
Pinho, N., Beirão, G., Patrício, L., & Raymond, P. F. (2014). Understanding value cocreation in complex services with many actors. Journal of Service Management,25(4), 470-493.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 5-14.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). The future of competition : co-creating unique value with customers. USA: Harvard Business School Pub.
Ramaswamy, V., & Chopra, N. (2014). Building a culture of co-creation at Mahindra. Strategy & leadership.
Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. (2010). Building the co-creative enterprise. Harvard business review, 88(10), 100-109.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of business research, 84,196-205.
Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290-315.
Roser, T., DeFillippi, R., & Samson, A. (2013). Managing your co‐creation mix: cocreation ventures in distinctive contexts. European Business Review, 25(1), 20-41.
Saha,Goyal and Jebarajakirthy (2021). Value co-creation: a review of literature and future research agenda, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 37/3 (2022) 612–628
Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard business review, 94(4), 54-6
Vargo, S. L. (2008). Customer Integration and Value Creation:Paradigmatic Traps and Perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 11(2), 211-215.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing.Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-Dominant Logic” Continuing the Evolution.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1-10.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal,26(3), 145-152. 
方世杰 (2020b)。 價值共創的迷思與省思 。 金屬情報網智庫專欄 ，(119)
方世杰、李慶芳 (2017)。「價值共創團隊」形成之歷程：生態性、系統性、永續性。檢自 http://teamwork0035.blogspot.com/2017/05/blog-post.html (Feb.15,2021)
田秀蘭 (2006)。 質性研究的基本概念 －研究方法概論。
李彥儀，2014，專訪教育部技職司司長李彥儀 (20140815 醒報人物現場)
杜鵬、李慶芳、周信輝、方世杰 (2017)。「（創）串新」的服務模式：以價值共創觀點探索尚品宅配的服務流程與本質。管理學報 34(401-430
徐芳儀（2017）。以服務主導邏輯探討建設公司之價值共創: 以富立建設股份有限公司為例
陳靖惠、林明杰、方世杰、商育綸 (2018)。健康照護服務生態系統之生成與發展：價值共創觀點。科技管理學刊 23( 1-30。
陳伯璋（2000）。教育研究方法新取向-質的研究方法。台北: 南宏圖書有限公司。
羅伯特﹒清崎作者寫了一系列《富爸爸窮爸爸》的暢銷書。
蕭瑞麟（2007）。不用數字的研究: 鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究，二版: 台北: 臺灣培生教育出版。
蕭瑞麟（2020）。不用數字的研究: 質性研究的思辯脈絡: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
相關網站:
經濟部工業局，https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=index&lang=0
科技部，https://www.most.gov.tw/
教育部，https://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx
台灣神手-開源義肢，https://sites.google.com/view/twgodhand/
衛生福利部社會及家庭署 輔具資源入口網，https://newrepat.sfaa.gov.tw/