簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林育瑩
Lin, Yu-Yin
論文名稱: 設計遊戲化的幼兒環境教育教具—以鳥類主題為例
Designing Play-Based Environmental Education Learning Materials for Young Children: A Case Study on Birds
指導教授: 周君瑞
Chou, Chun-Juei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 162
中文關鍵詞: 幼兒環境教育鳥類生態教具設計
外文關鍵詞: Early Childhood Environmental Education, Bird Ecology, Teaching Aids Design
相關次數: 點閱:63下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 自1972年聯合國通過《斯德哥爾摩宣言》以來,各國紛紛將環境永續納入國家政策。然而,最新科學證據顯示,人類對環境永續的努力遠不及破壞速度。為解決幼兒園教師在進行環境教育課程中所面臨的阻礙,本研究以鳥類為主題,開發了一款幼兒環境教育教具。主要研究目的包括:(1)了解幼兒園實施環境教育的現況;(2)探討本套教具是否適合作為幼兒環境教育的媒介;(3)評估幼兒的遊戲學習成效;以及(4)了解幼兒和教師對教具的評價與建議。
    本研究的研究對象包含30位幼兒和35位教師,主要採用設計研究法(Design Research),過程分為準備、執行和評鑑三個階段。研究結果顯示,多數教師認同幼兒環境教育的重要性,並認為以鳥類作為主題是合適的。整體而言,本套教具適合作為幼兒環境教育的媒介,唯部分細節仍有待改良。在遊戲學習成效方面,幼兒的環境知識有所提升,環境態度則無顯著改變,因多數幼兒原先已具備對環境友善的態度,遊戲後其環境態度仍維持友善。根據結果,本套教具的設計和遊戲方式得到肯定,也獲得許多改良建議。最後,本研究提出對未來研究的建議,包括:擴大研究範圍與規模,以及邀請教師實際應用教具進行課程,並蒐集縱貫研究資料等。

    Since the United Nations adopted the Stockholm Declaration in 1972, sustainable development has been integrated into national policies worldwide. However, scientific evidence shows that efforts towards sustainable development lag the rate of environmental degradation. This study developed environmental education learning materials on birds for 4- to 6-year-old children to address challenges faced by preschool and kindergarten teachers. The main objectives were to: (1) understand the current state of environmental education in preschools and kindergartens; (2) assess the suitability of these materials; (3) evaluate children's learning outcomes after play; and (4) gather feedback from children and teachers.
    The study involved 30 children and 35 teachers, using a design research methodology divided into preparation, implementation, and evaluation phases. Results showed teachers valued early childhood environmental education and found birds a suitable theme. The learning materials were appropriate but needed some improvements. Children’s environmental knowledge improved, while their attitudes remained friendly, as they already had positive attitudes towards the environment. The design and gameplay of the materials were well-received, with suggestions for enhancement. Recommendations for future research include expanding the scope of the study, involving teachers more deeply, and collecting longitudinal data.

    摘要 i ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation 5 1.3 Research Objectives 7 1.4 Research Scope and Limitations 8 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1 Overview of Environmental Education 10 2.2 Environmental Education in Preschool and Kindergarten 15 2.3 Play-Based Learning 20 2.4 Theoretical Framework for Teaching Aids Design 25 2.5 Methods for Assessing Early Childhood Environmental Education 33 CHAPTER 3 METHODS 38 3.1 Research Methodology 38 3.2 Research Process and Steps 40 3.3 Data Analysis Framework 56 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 63 4.1 Current Status of Early Childhood Environmental Education 63 4.2 Appropriateness of the Learning Materials 65 4.3 Learning Outcomes from Children Using the Learning Materials 99 4.4 Teacher Evaluations and Suggestions for the Learning Materials 106 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 114 5.1 Discussion 114 5.2 Research Limitations 133 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 134 6.1 Conclusions 134 6.2 Research Recommendations 137 REFERENCES 138 Appendix 1: Pre- and Post-Test Worksheet Responses - Drawing Birds 146 Appendix 2: Image Sources 150

    十二年國民義務教育課程綱要(2020)。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52
    王川華(2000)。玩具也可以是教具。蒙特梭利,32,16-17。
    王美晴(1999)。幼兒教具設計與製作。華騰文化。
    幼兒園教保活動課程大綱(2016)。https://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/ch/preschool/course/curriculum_framework/cf_1/
    汪靜明(1996)。自然保育與環境教育。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育中心,39。
    汪靜明(2003)。環境教育的生態理念與內涵。環境教育學刊,2(1),9-46。https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A03022310
    吳美姬、周俊良(2017)。積木建構遊戲的歷史演進及其對幼兒教育之影響。人文社會電子學報,13(1),69-94。 https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/P20160525001-201709-201804180007-201804180007-69-94
    林佳慧(2000)教師必備的行頭-教具設計與應用。幼教資訊,24-27。
    林素華(2013)臺灣環境教育的發展與現況。生態臺灣,41,6-13。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/19914903-201310-201402140006-201402140006-6-13
    周昌弘編(1991)。臺灣環境教育研究。中央研究院植物研究所。
    祝懷新、熊浩天(2021)。澳大利亚幼儿环境教育政策探析。比較教育研究,96-104。https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/bjjyyj202111012
    翁穎哲、譚克平(2008)。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊,307,15-30。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003
    郭春在、卓素慧(2008)。從認知發展觀點探討幼兒教具設計原則之研究。應用藝術與設計學報。https://libap.nhu.edu.tw/citesys/jnPaperDetail.aspx?pID=1260
    游雅婷(2007)。幼兒園環境教育指標之發展、執行現況及阻礙因素。國立東華大學。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c9y968
    楊淑雅、李崗(2022)。蒙特梭利的美育方法:二個實例。課程與教學,25(1),173-191。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202201_25(1).0006
    楊芷穎(2016)。自然體驗活動對兒童自然連結、親環境行為與生活品質之研究。國立新竹教育大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8kc2mw
    楊孟麗、謝水南(譯)(2013)。教育研究法:研究設計實務(第二版)(原作者:Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H.)。心理。
    張勤(譯)(2004)。媽咪,我們今天玩什麼?(原作者:Goldberg, D.)。高富。
    臺灣科技媒體中心(2022,6月5日)。「斯德哥爾摩+50會議」專家意見。https://smctw.tw/13276/
    蔡瑜容(2010)。以情感設計三層次探究大學生使用手機之現象。銘傳大學。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/veatup
    環境教育法(2017)。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=o0120001
    環境資訊協會(2008)。國際環境公約。環境資訊中心。https://e-info.org.tw/node/37828
    簡楚瑛(2001)。「遊戲」之定義-理論與發展的文獻探討。新竹師範學院學報,105-133。https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79160
    魏麗卿(2005)。多元創意教具製作與應用。心理。
    Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001021
    Berze, I. Z., Varga, A., Mónus, F., Néder, K., & Dúll, A. (2022). Measuring environmental worldviews: Investigating the dimensionality of the new environmental paradigm scale for children in a large central European sample. Sustainability, 14(8), 4595. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14084595
    Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878. https://doi.org/10.1021/ED063P873
    Broom, C. (2017). Exploring the relations between childhood experiences in nature and young adults’ environmental attitudes and behaviours. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/AEE.2017.1
    Cherrett, J. M. (1989). Book review. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 15(10), 2507-2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020380
    Chou, C. J., & Conley, C. (2009). Engaging experience: A new perspective of user experience with physical products. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5619, 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_5
    Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
    Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1301_2
    Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Edwards, S. (2013). Toward a model for early childhood environmental education: Foregrounding, developing, and connecting knowledge through play-based learning. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44(3), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.751892
    Davis, J. (2005). Educating for sustainability in the early years: Creating cultural change in a child care setting. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S081406260000094X
    Davis, J. (2009). Revealing the research ‘hole’ of early childhood education for sustainability: A preliminary survey of the literature. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802710607
    Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
    Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures - Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/unobtrusive-measures-nonreactive-research-social-sciences
    Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3
    Elliott, S., & Davis, J. (2009). Exploring the resistance: An Australian perspective on educating for sustainability in early childhood. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168879
    Fabbri, K. (2013). Thermal comfort evaluation in kindergarten: PMV and PPD measurement through datalogger and questionnaire. Building and Environment, 68, 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2013.07.002
    Härtel, T., Randler, C., & Baur, A. (2023). Using species knowledge to promote pro-environmental attitudes? The association among species knowledge, environmental system knowledge and attitude towards the environment in secondary school students. Animals, 13(6), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ANI13060972
    Johnson, B., & Manoli, C. C. (2008). Using Bogner and Wiseman’s model of ecological values to measure the impact of an earth education programme on children’s environmental perceptions. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951673
    Kong, X., & Jia, F. (2023). Intergenerational transmission of environmental knowledge and pro-environmental behavior: A dyadic relationship. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 89, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2023.102058
    Manoli, C. C., Johnson, B., & Dunlap, R. E. (2007). Assessing children’s environmental worldviews: Modifying and validating the new ecological paradigm scale for use with children. Journal of Environmental Education, 38(4), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.4.3-13
    Melis, C., Wold, P. A., Billing, A. M., Bjørgen, K., & Moe, B. (2020). Kindergarten children’s perception about the ecological roles of living organisms. Sustainability, 12(22), 9565. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12229565
    Montessori, M. (1967a). The absorbent mind. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Montessori, M. (1967b). The discovery of the child. Ballantine Books.
    Munson, B. H. (1994). Ecological misconceptions. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1994.9941962
    Palmberg, I. E., Jonsson, G., Jeronen, E., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Blivande lärares uppfattningar och förståelse av baskunskap i ekologi i Danmark, Finland och Sverige. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.5617/NORDINA.2557
    Palmberg, I., Hofman-Bergholm, M., Jeronen, E., & Yli-Panula, E. (2017). Systems thinking for understanding sustainability? Nordic student teachers’ views on the relationship between species identification, biodiversity and sustainable development. Education Sciences, 7(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI7030072
    Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, Trans.). Norton. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1520-6807%28196604%293%3A2%3C189%3A%3AAID-PITS2310030222%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z
    Puk, T. G., & Stibbards, A. (2012). Systemic ecological illiteracy? Shedding light on meaning as an act of thought in higher learning. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.622840
    Pyle, A., & Danniels, E. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
    Pyle, A., & DeLuca, C. (2017). Assessment in play-based kindergarten classrooms: An empirical study of teacher perspectives and practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118005
    Rillo, T. J. (1974). Basic guideline for environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 52–55.
    Rosa, C. D., Collado, S., & Larson, L. R. (2022). The utility and limitations of the New Ecological Paradigm scale for children. Journal of Environmental Education, 53(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2044281
    Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001025
    Stockholm+50: Unlocking a better future. (2022).
    Stokols, D., Misra, S., Runnerstrom, M. G., & Hipp, J. A. (2009). Psychology in an age of ecological crisis: From personal angst to collective action. American Psychologist, 64(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014717
    Taylor, M. E., & Boyer, W. (2020). Play-based learning: Evidence-based research to improve children’s learning experiences in the kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00989-7
    Villanueva, X., Villarroel, J. D., & Antón, A. (2018). Environmental awareness and its relationship with the concept of the living being: A longitudinal study. Sustainability, 10(7), 2358. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072358
    Villarroel, J. D., Antón, Á., Zuazagoitia, D., & Nuño, T. (2017). Young children’s environmental judgement and its relationship with their understanding of the concept of living things. Environmental & Socio-Economic Studies, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/environ-2017-0001

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE