公路隧道在各種潛在災害的預防與緊急事件的應變救援上，具變因多、聯絡困難與狀況不易掌握等難題，且此類特性隨隧道長度增加而益加顯著。國內隧道工程於營運安全常參考歐、美、日本等國經驗，據以設置相關措施，在經營與管理等層面，已有許多相關的研究。然而卻鮮少探討駕駛者於公路長隧道環境中所受之影響，及其駕駛行為分析。
有鑑於民國95年北宜高速公路雪山隧道正式通車，其為世界第五大隧道，東南亞第一大隧道，是台北到宜蘭之主要交通孔道。在這樣的背景下，本研究擬以雪山隧道之駕駛行為為研究範例。首先蒐集與整理國內外隧道災害案例，並從人為因素之角度來歸納事故的特性與原因。駕駛人的人因包含層面非常廣泛，本研究以駕駛分心為主題來分析長隧道駕駛者之駕駛績效。由於長隧道屬於特殊的駕駛環境，其受到安全設施的相關規定與管理法規的管制，因此本研究排除因外界因子而導致的分心行為，專以內在因子的駕駛專注力作為主要探討的課題。
國內外許多文獻都有建立駕駛分心的指標，其中包括生理儀器之量測與駕駛數據的分析。本研究以風險感認之理論來表示駕駛專注力之指標，以得知駕駛者主觀感受，並利用駕駛模擬器收集駕駛之客觀行車數據，最後再進行兩者相互對照、驗證。除此之外，將加入汽車科技、標誌設計、以及其他可能幫助駕駛人提升在長隧道之駕駛專注力與安全性的策略。最後證明這些策略是明顯有效的。

The highway tunnel, prevention in various kinds of potential calamities, have many factors,and with the difficult problem that the state is not easy to handle. This kind of characteristic is up to the increase of the length of the tunnel and increasingly apparent. Internal tunnel project with regard to safe and operation for the tunnel often consult foreign tunnel experience, such as America and Europe, Japan, etc. According to set up the relevant measure on the hardware aspects, such as management and administration, etc. But the effects of driving in long highway tunnel and driving performance, etc. are still lack of a systematic research.
The Hsuehshan Tunnel, the 5th long tunnel in the world, has a total distance of 12.9km. As the open of the tunnel, traffic demand between Taipei and I-Lan increases dramatically However, driver behavior analysis for long tunnels need to be developed and evaluated accordingly in order to alleviate traffic congestion due to high demand and/or possible incidents. The driver's human factor aspects are very extensive, this research focus on the driving performance of the Hsuehshan Tunnel drivers by driver distraction for the theme. This research exclude external behavior of driver distraction that factor cause, and focus on driver inattention that is mainly subject.
Domestic and international references set up driver distraction indicators, include examine of physiological instrument and analysis of driving data. This research expresses driver attention indicator with risk perception, in order to understand the driver experiences subjectively. The driving data are collected by experiments on driving simulator (DS).Finally, carry on driver experiences and driving data to contrast each other. In addition, join advanced vehicle techniques, design of sign, and others may help to improve driver attention and security tactics that a driver drive in the long tunnel.

【1】 王建仁，台灣地區機車使用者風險感認與駕駛行為關聯之研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士論文，民國92年。
【2】 交通部運輸研究所，應用駕駛模擬器開發智慧型運輸系統實驗平台之軟硬體規劃設計（1/4），民國93年。
【3】 交通部運輸研究所，應用駕駛模擬器開發智慧型運輸系統實驗平台之軟硬體規劃設計（2/4），民國95年。
【4】 李再長，人因工程，華泰書局，民國94年。
【5】 吳權威，3ds max 6 應用實務，網亦資訊科技股份有限公司，民國92年。
【6】 周胤德、忻元發、張世忠，「從近年國內外之重大公路長隧道事故探討隧道營運管理安全設施策略」，臺灣公路工程第三十卷第七期，民國93年。
【7】 周長志，高齡者交通安全風險感認影響因素之探討，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士論文，民國94年。
【8】 陳逸勳，應用駕駛模擬器從事時相轉換下路口追撞事故因素之探討，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文，民國95年。
【9】 陳承邦，應用適應型巡航系統於高速公路追撞事故之預防，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文，民國95年。
【10】 陳順宇，多變量分析，華泰書局，民國93年。
【11】 國道新建工程局，北宜高速公路雪山隧道災害應變急救援標準作業程序建制，民國92年。
【12】 雪山隧道專區，國工局（http://gip.taneeb.gov.tw/mp.asp）
【13】 張文城、曹嘉永，「北宜高速公路雪山隧道行車安全概述」，工程第七十九卷第三期，民國95年。
【14】 黃韻璇，國小學童及其家長之道路步行風險認知與行為關聯之研究，國立交通大學運輸科技與管理學系碩士論文，民國93年。
【15】 瑋特擬真科技，EON Studio 3D虛擬實境整合互動網頁設計，全華科技股份有限公司，民國91年。
【16】 黎正中、陳源樹編譯，實驗設計與分析，高立圖書，民國95年。
【17】 謝昀霖，應用駕駛模擬平台探討駕駛者分心行為-以車前防撞系統為研究實例，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文，民國94年。
【18】 賴明昌，行車時使用行動電話對駕駛行為的影響，國立台灣科技大學工業管理系碩士論文，民國90年。
【19】 劉仲祥、劉伯祥，「停車作業工作負荷量測及聽音樂對駕駛之影響」，運輸計劃季刊，第三十二卷，第四期，801-821頁，民國92年。
【20】 Abdel-Aty, M., “Investigating the Relationship Between Cellular Phone Use and Traffic Safety,” ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 10, pp. 38-42, 2003.
【21】 Blaschae, C., Breyer, F., Freyer, J., and Limbacher, R., “Driver distraction based lane-keeping assistance,” Transportation Research Part F 12 (2009) pp. 288-299, 2009.
【22】 Brown, D., Groeger, J.A., “Risk Perception and Decision Taking During the Transition between Novice and Experienced Driver Status,” Ergonomics, 31, pp.585-597, 1988.
【23】 Blaylock, B. K, “Risk perception: Evidence of an interactive process,” Journal of Business Research, 13, 207-221, 1985.
【24】 Donmez, B., Boyle, L., Lee, J. D., and McGehee, D. M., “Drivers' attitudes towards imperfect distraction mitigation strategies,” Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, 9(6), pp. 387-398, 2006.
【25】 Glendon, A.I., Hoyes, T.W., Haigney, D.E., Taylor, R.G., “A Review of Risk Homoeostasis Theory in Simulated Environments,” Safety Science, Vol. 22, No. 1-3, pp. 15-25, 1996.
【26】 Hajime, ITO. et al., “Visual Distraction While Driving-Trends in Research and Standardiztion,” Journal of International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2001.
【27】 Matthews, R., Legg, S., and Charlton, S., “The Effect of Cell Phone Type on Drivers Subjective Workload During Concurrent During Concurrent Driving and 237 Conversing,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 2003.
【28】 Montgomery, D. C., “Design and Analysis of Experiments,” John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2005.
【29】 Pettitt, M., Burnett, G., Stevens, A., “Defining driver distraction,” World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, San Francisco, November 2005.
【30】 Robert B. Noland, “Perceived Risk and Modal Choice: Risk Compensation in Transportation Systems,” Accid. Anal. Prev., Vol.27, No.4, pp.503-521, 1995.
【31】 Sitkin, S., and Pablo, A. “Reconceptualizing the determinants of riskbehavior,” Academy of Management Review, 17, 9-38, 1992.
【32】 Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R., “Determinants of risky decision-makingbehavior: A test of the mediating role of perceptions and propensity,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592, 1995.
【33】 Summala, H., “Risk Control Not Risk Adjusment: The Zero-Risk Theory of Driver Behaviour and it’s Implication,” Ergonomics, Vol.31, No.4, pp.491-506, 1988a.
【34】 Sodhi, M., Reimer, B., Tant, M., Peli, E., Bowers, A., Wood, R., Higgins, K., and Turco, P., “Driver Performance Evaluation: Considerations underlying Selection and Design of Routes.” Vision and Vehicles Conference X conference in Granada Spain, 2004.
【35】 Stutts, J. C. and Hunter, W. W., “Driver Inattion, Driver Distraction and Traffic Crashes,” ITE Journal, Vol, 73, No. 7, 2003.
【36】 Taylor, R.G., Hoyes, T.W., Dorn, L., and Desmond, P.A., “Risk Homeostasis Theory, Utility and Accident loss in a Simulated Driving Task,” Safety Science, Vol. 22, No. 1-3, pp. 49-62, 1996.
【37】 Tay, R., Knowles, D., “Driver Inattation – Drivers’ Perception of Risks and Compensating Behaviours,” IATSS RESEARCH, Vol.28 No.1, 2004.
【38】 Young, M.S., Mahfoud, J.M., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Jenkins, D.P., Walker, G.H., “Conflicts of interest: The implications of roadside advertising for driver attention,” Transportation Research Part F (2009).
【39】 Wilde, G.J.S., “The Theory of Risk Homeostasis：Implications For Safety and Health,” Risk Analysis 2, pp.209-225, 1982.