在當今激烈競爭的商業環境中，供應鏈管理對企業的成功至關重要，而採購策略則是影響企業成本、風險管理、效率提升和競爭力的核心要素。本研究專注於半導體設備供應商的採購策略，特別關注單源採購和雙源採購策略的競爭優勢比較。考慮到供應鏈中斷風險，研究將運用採購緩解的模式進行深入分析，並以柏川得模型探討雙源採購和單源採購的效果，揭示在競爭激烈環境下，半導體設備供應商如何選擇最適合的採購策略以保持競爭力。透過不同的競爭情境設定，我們將研究製造商在不同策略條件下的決策影響，以及這些決策對其利潤的影響。為了模擬這一供應鏈的動態，我們設定多種情境組合進行深入分析，包括單源採購策略、雙源採購並實施緊急調貨策略，以及雙源採購並實施訂單分配策略。這三種策略的組合形成了我們的情境模組。現有研究普遍認為供應鏈中斷是供應鏈管理的重要問題，尤其在競爭激烈的情況下，找到有效策略減輕中斷影響至關重要。本研究針對半導體設備供應商的立場進行深入分析，運用採購緩解的模擬分析方法深入研究半導體設備供應商的策略。在雙占市場情境下，研究將進一步探討個案公司與競爭對手之間的競爭關係，以及彼此的決策對雙方的影響。提供半導體設備公司有價值的採購策略建議，協助其在競爭激烈的供應鏈中取得更佳的競爭地位。

In today's fiercely competitive business environment, supply chain management plays a crucial role in the success of enterprises, with procurement strategy being a key element affecting costs, risk management, efficiency improvement, and competitiveness. This study focuses on the procurement strategies of semiconductor equipment suppliers, with a particular focus on comparing the competitive advantages of single-sourcing and dual-sourcing strategies. Considering the risk of supply chain disruption, the study will utilize a procurement mitigation model for in-depth analysis and employ the Bertrand model to explore the effectiveness of dual-sourcing and single-sourcing procurement, revealing how semiconductor equipment suppliers choose the most suitable procurement strategy to maintain competitiveness in a competitive environment.
Through different competitive scenarios, we will examine the decision impact of manufacturers under different strategic conditions and the effect of these decisions on their profits. To simulate the dynamics of this supply chain, we set multiple scenario combinations for in-depth analysis, including single-sourcing strategy, dual-sourcing with emergency shipment strategy, and dual-sourcing with order allocation strategy. These three strategy combinations form our scenario model. Existing research generally considers supply chain disruption to be an important issue in supply chain management, especially in highly competitive situations, finding effective strategies to mitigate disruptions is crucial.
In the competitive environment of semiconductor equipment suppliers, price competition becomes an indispensable part of the market. Analyzing price competition strategies through the Bertrand model helps companies develop more effective strategies, improve market competitiveness, and ensure long-term sustainable development. This study conducts in-depth analysis from the perspective of semiconductor equipment suppliers, utilizing simulation analysis methods for procurement mitigation to deeply study the strategies of semiconductor equipment suppliers. In a duopoly market scenario, the study will further explore the competitive relationship between the case company and its competitors, as well as the impact of each other's decisions on both parties. Providing valuable procurement strategy recommendations for semiconductor equipment companies to help them achieve a better competitive position in the fiercely competitive supply chain.

Anderson Edward and Yong Bao. “Price Competition with Integrated and Decentralized Supply Chains.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 200, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 227–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.049.

Burke Gerard, Carrillo Janice, and Vakharia Asoo. “Single versus Multiple Supplier Sourcing Strategies.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 182, no. 1, Oct. 2007, pp. 95–112, ww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037722170600587X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.007.

Chopra Sunil, Reinhardt Gilles, and Mohan Usha. “The Importance of Decoupling Recurrent and Disruption Risks in a Supply Chain.” Naval Research Logistics, vol. 54, no. 5, 2007, pp. 544–555, https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20228.

Chopra Sunil and Sodhi ManMohan “Managing Risk to Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown.” MIT Sloan Management Review, 15 Oct. 2004, sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-risk-to-avoid-supplychain-breakdown/.

Christopher Tang. “Perspectives in Supply Chain Risk Management.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 103, no. 2, Oct. 2006, pp. 451–488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006.

Deo Sarang and Charles Corbett. “Cournot Competition under Yield Uncertainty: The Case of the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Market.” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 11, no. 4, Oct. 2009, pp. 563–576, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1080.0242. Accessed 20 Mar. 2022.

Haisheng Yu, Amy Zeng, and Lindu Zhao. “Single or Dual Sourcing: Decision-Making in the Presence of Supply Chain Disruption Risks.” Omega, vol. 37, no. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 788–800, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.05.006.

Hallikas Jukka, Karvonen Iris, Pulkkinen Urho, Virolainen Veli-Matti, and Tuominen Markku. “Risk Management Processes in Supplier Networks.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 90, no. 1, July 2004, pp. 47–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.007.

Jianqing Chen and Zhiling Guo. “Strategic Sourcing in the Presence of Uncertain Supply and Retail Competition.” Production and Operations Management, vol. 23, no. 10, 19 Oct. 2013, pp. 1748–1760, https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12078.

Kleindorfer, Paul and Germaine Saad. “Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains.” Production and Operations Management, vol. 14, no. 1, 5 Jan. 2009, pp. 53–68, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x.

Kumar Milan, Basu Preetam, and Avittathur Balram. “Pricing and Sourcing Strategies for Competing Retailers in Supply Chains under Disruption Risk.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 265, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 533–543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.019.

Minner Stefan. “Multiple-Supplier Inventory Models in Supply Chain Management: A Review.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 81-82, Jan. 2003, pp. 265–279, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527302002888, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00288-8.

Pochard Sophie. “Managing Risks of Supply-Chain Disruptions : Dual Sourcing as a Real Option.” Dspace.mit.edu, 2003, dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/30036.

Tiaojun Xiao and Xiangtong Qi. “Price Competition, Cost and Demand Disruptions and Coordination of a Supply Chain with One Manufacturer and Two Competing Retailers.” Omega, vol. 36, no. 5, Oct. 2008, pp. 741–753, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.008.

Tomlin Brian. “On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks.” Management Science, vol. 52, no. 5, May 2006, pp. 639–657, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515.

Vives Xavier. “On the Efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria with Product Differentation.” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, June 1985, pp. 166–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90086-9. Accessed 22 Aug. 2021.

Vlachos Dimitrios and Tagaras George. “An Inventory System with Two Supply Modes and Capacity Constraints.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 72, no. 1, June 2001, pp. 41–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00083-9.

Wen-Jung Liang, Ching-Chih Tseng, Kuang-Cheng, and Andy Wang. “Location Choice with Delegation: Bertrand vs. Cournot Competition.” Economic Modelling, vol. 28, no. 4, July 2011, pp. 1774–1781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.03.006. Accessed 6 Jan. 2020.

Yaner Fang and Biying Shou. “Managing Supply Uncertainty under Supply Chain Cournot Competition.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 243, no. 1, May 2015, pp. 156–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.038.

Yi, Qi Guo and Xiang Jin Zeng. “Complex Dynamics and Chaos Control of Duopoly Bertrand Model in Chinese Air-Conditioning Market.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 76, 1 July 2015, pp. 231–237, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077915001198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.04.008. Accessed 7 Apr. 2022.

Yimin Wang, Wendell Gilland, and Brian Tomlin. “Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement?” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 12, no. 3, July 2010, pp. 489–510, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1090.0279.