簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊善智
Yang, Shan-Zhi
論文名稱: 數值高程模型(DEM)之品質評估
Quality Assessment for Digital Elevation Models
指導教授: 曾義星
Tseng, Yi-Hsing
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 測量及空間資訊學系
Department of Geomatics
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 75
中文關鍵詞: 品質評估數值高程模型
外文關鍵詞: DEM, DTM
相關次數: 點閱:89下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 數值高程模型(Digital Elevation Model, DEM)是以數值方式來儲存、表現地表的起伏,應用的層面相當廣泛,為土地利用的重要資訊。近年來測量技術的進步,除了傳統的航測的人工量測外,數值影像匹配、空載光達和干涉合成孔徑雷達的發展,可以利用不同的技術快速的得到DEM。然而不同方式製作的DEM,可能造成的誤差都不同。因此除了製作過程中的品質檢核外,評估已完成的DEM資料品質,亦為一重要的課題。
    測量數據的品質包含了精度(precision)、精確度(accuracy)、可靠度(reliability)三方面的驗證。一般DEM 品質評估指標的方式為採用抽樣檢測高程的精度,計算均方根誤差(Root Mean Square Error, RMSE)值。但是此方式並不能充分的描述資料品質,因為此種評估方式無法提供空間中誤差的分佈和極值的資訊。而本研究對於DEM的品質評估則是採用兩個方法:1.內部評估2.相對的外部評估。內部評估主要是根據DEM的原始資料點,利用最小二乘內插原理,以一個平面來擬合估算每個網格點內插後的高程精度。而相對的外部評估則是將不同時期不同來源的DEM 相互比較,檢視彼此間的高程差值,以判斷是否有系統誤差存在,探討誤差的合理性和邏輯性。
    本研究實驗區為南化水庫,分別測試了航測和光達的資料,實驗結果證明內部精度的評估可以在無外在獨立資料情況下,有效的估計DEM的精度。外部精度的評估則是比較了四種DEM,由結果發現,DEM受到地形及覆蓋物的影響,即使是高精度的光達1公尺和航測5公尺解析度的DEM,在山區的相對誤差有時仍會達到20公尺不合理的差距。從比較中也可看出不同方式製作的DEM 所產生的誤差,例如光達點雲的過濾使山脊部份過度平滑、航測DEM 錯估植被覆蓋的高度等誤差問題。此結果可提供給DEM使用者一個參考。

    DEM has long been important land-use information to many applications because it records height information of terrain surface. With the great progress of measuring technology, DEM could be acquired quickly and efficiently via digital photogrammetry, airborne LiDAR and InSAR. However, the procedure from raw data sources to finale DEM products may involve different types of errors, which would influence the final DEM quality more. For this reason, demand for quality control and assessment arises, then to provide effective and objective quality assessment for DEMs becomes an important topic.

    The quality of measuring data is generally assessed in terms of precision, accuracy, and reliability. It is generally adopted to assess the DEM quality by the index of RMSE. The RMSE value gives whole accuracy index of the DEM quality, but lack to describe interior local variances and relative comparison with other DEM data. So this study proposed two methods to describe DEM quality—interior and exterior relative quality assessment. Instead of whole index of RMSE, the former provides accuracy index of each height point calculated from the raw data to reveal the DEM quality of local. Then the later explores the relative errors between DEMs acquired from different sources and times. The two methods provides the assessment of the internal quality and exterior relative accuracy index for DEMs respectively, which is hoped to give more complete and objective quality information.

    DEMs generated from airborne LiDAR, photogrammetry, and InSAR are employed to test feasible of proposed methods. The main test area is at Nan-Hua Reservoir, Tainan. The interior assessment shows the DEM quality relates to the terrain type, distribution and density of sampling points. It helps to realize the DEM quality of local details. Then comparing present domestic DEMs, the relative assessment finds DEMs of different data sources often make relative big errors. For example, the visible errors between DEMs of LiDAR and photogrammetry usually occur in rough terrain or mountain ridges, where the maximum error ups to 20 m. Through a serious of experiment tests, it is proven that the two methods provide useful information to DEM quality assessment, which makes a user to realize the quality of acquired DEMs in detail.

    中文摘要................................................ IV 英文摘要................................................. V 致謝.................................................... VI 目錄................................................... VII 表目錄.................................................. IX 圖目錄................................................... X 第一章 緒論.............................................. 1 §1-1 數值高程模型簡介................................. 1 §1-2 研究背景......................................... 3 §1-3 研究動機與目的................................... 4 §1-4 研究構想與方法................................... 6 §1-5 論文架構......................................... 8 第二章 DEM的誤差來源..................................... 9 §2-1 DEM的製作方法................................... 9 §2-1-1 地形圖(Topography Map)數化................. 9 §2-1-2 航空攝影測量.............................. 10 §2-1-3 空載雷射掃描資料.......................... 12 §2-1-4 干涉合成孔徑雷達.......................... 15 §2-1-5 野外實測.................................. 19 §2-1-6 不同測量方法的比較........................ 21 §2-2 DEM 取樣方式.................................... 22 §2-3 DEM表達誤差及內插誤差.......................... 23 第三章 DEM品質評估方法.................................. 26 §3-1 內部品質估計.................................... 26 §3-2 相對誤差評估.................................... 32 §3-2-1 DEM的比對方法............................. 33 §3-2-2 坐標系統問題.............................. 33 §3-2-3 尺度問題.................................. 35 §3-2-4 平面誤差的檢視............................ 36 §3-2-5 誤差分析.................................. 37 第四章 內部品質估計實驗................................. 38 §4-1 實驗數據描述.................................... 38 §4-2 空載光達DEM資料估計............................ 41 §4-3 航測DEM資料估計................................ 48 第五章 相對誤差評估實驗................................. 52 §5-1 實驗數據描述.................................... 52 §5-2 內政部DEM和光達DEM比對........................ 54 §5-3 內政部DEM和農航所DEM比對...................... 58 §5-4 內政部DEM和SRTM DEM比對....................... 64 第六章 結論與建議....................................... 69

    王成機及陳思仁,「內政部高精度及高解析度數值地形模型建置現況及未來發
    展」,第二十四屆測量學術及應用研討會,國立政治大學,2005。
    王韋力及賴進貴,「數值高程模型品質對等高線生產之影響-以農委會40公尺DTM為例」,2003。
    王蜀嘉,「數值地形的精度」,第五屆測量學術及應用研討會,97-107,1986。
    王蜀嘉及曾義星,「以空載雷射掃瞄方法生產高精度及高解析度數值地形模型及數值地表模型誤差分析」,2003。
    王蜀嘉及曾義星,「以航測方法生產高精度及高解析度數值地型模型及數值表面模型誤差分析」,2003。
    史天元及彭淼祥,「空載雷射掃描數據精度評估程序之研究」,第二十二屆測量學術及應用研討會,247-256,2003。
    石宏揚及史天元,「八掌溪流域農委會40 公尺DEM 之誤差探討」,土木水利:24(23):46-55,1997。
    余翠紋,「高解析度數值地形模型精度評估與應用」,國立成功大學地球科學系碩士論文,2004。
    李志林及朱慶,「數字高程模型」,2003。
    周富晨,「適應性點雲過濾演算法於空載光達資料產生數值高程模型之研究」,國立成功大學測量及空間資訊學系碩士論文,2004。
    柯正誼、何建邦及池天河,「數字地面模型」,1993。
    郭朗哲、史天元及劉進金,「三維雷射掃描用於河岸崩塌地形之測繪」,測量工程,46:23-46,2004。
    陳卉瑄,「差分合成孔徑干涉雷達應用於偵測集集地震地形變之研究」,國立成功大學地球科學系碩士論文,2001。72
    湯國安、劉學軍及閭國年,「數字高程模型及地學分析的原理與方法」,2005。
    童俊雄,「空載光達系統誤差分析與航帶平差方法之探討」,國立成功大學測量及空間資訊學系碩士論文,2005。
    楊名、曾清涼、史天元及張順隆,「TWD67 與TWD97 大地基準轉換方法之研究」,測量工程,41 (3):27-49,1999。
    楊進雄、高書屏、李鳳斌及洪本善,「十二種內插方法之探討----以SURFER 8.0為例」,中華地理資訊學會年會暨學術研討會,2003。
    詹瑜璋,「雷射測距掃描」,科學發展,2005。
    賴子銘及史天元,「SRTM/TopSAR 高程數據比對與多尺度分析」,國立交通大學土木工程學系碩士論文,2004。
    賴進貴,「數值地形比較之研究」,國立台灣大學地理學系地理學報, 17:87-100,1994。
    賴進貴,「DTM 品質檢核與提昇之研究」,2003。
    Abdelfattah, R. and Nicolas, J.M., (2002). 'Topographic SAR Interferometry Formulation for High-Precision DEM Generation'. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 40 (11).
    Acharya, B. and Chaturvedi, A., (1997). 'Digital Terrain Model:Elevation Extraction and Accuracy Assessment'. JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 123 (2).
    Axelsson, P., (1999). 'Processing of Laser Scanner Data-Algorithms and Applications'. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 54:138-147.
    Casella, V., Zampori, B., Dell'Acqua, F., Gamba, P. and Mainardi, A., (2001). 'DTM Extraction in Urban Areas:A Detailed Comparison of Methodologies, Algorithms and Results'. IEEE.
    Cuartero, A., Felicísimo, A.M. and Ariza, F.J., 'Accuracy of DEM Generation from TERRA-ASTER Stereo data'.
    Gamba, P. and Houshmand, B., (2001). 'Joint Analysis of SAR, LIDAR and Aerial Imagery for Simultaneous Extraction of Land Cover, DTM and 3D Shape of Buildings'. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(20):4439-4450.
    Gooch, M.J. and Chandler, J.H., (1999). 'Failure Prediction in Automatically Generated DigitalElevation Models'. Computers &
    Geosciences, 27:913-920.
    Höhle, J.K. and Potucková, M., (2005). 'Automated Quality Control for Orthoimages and DEMs'. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71:81-87.
    Jancso, T. and Zavoti, J., (2005). 'Quality Control of Digital Terrain Models Using Different Autocorrelation Technics'. Automated Quality Control of Digital Terrain Models. Aalborg University.
    Karel, W., Pfeifer, N. and Briese, C., (2006). 'DTM Quality Assessment'. Proceedings of ISPRS WG II/7. Vienna,Austria.
    Kim, J.S. and Shan, J., (2005). 'A Statistical Approach to DTM Quality Evaluation'. Automated Quality Control of Digital Terrain Models. Aalborg University.
    Kraus, K., (2006). 'Local Accuracy Measures for DTM'. The Photogrammetric Record, 21:342-354.
    Kraus, K., Briese, C., Attwenger, M. and Pfeifer, N., (2004). 'Quality Measure for Digital Terrain Models'. IAPRS, XXXV.
    Kraus, K. and Pfeifer, N., (1998). 'Determination of Terrain Models in Wooded Areas with Airborne Laser Scanner Data'. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 53:193-203.
    Li, z., (1988). 'On the Measure of Digital Terrain Model Accuracy'. Photogrammetric Record, 12(72):873-877.
    Li, z., (1992). 'Variation of the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Models with Sampling Interval'. Photogrammetric Record, 14(79):113-128.
    Li, z., (1994). 'A Comparative of the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Models(DTMs) Based on Various Data Models'. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 49(1):2-11.
    Li, z., Zhu, Q. and Gold, C., (2005). Dugital Terrain Modeling-Principles and Methodology.
    Maune, D., (2001). Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications:The DEM Users Manual: ASPRS.
    Meneses, A.S., Chasco, F.R., García, B., Cabrejas, J. and González-Audícana, M., (2005). 'Quality Control in Digital Terrain Models'. ASCE.
    Oksanen, J., (2006). 'Digital Elevation Model Error in Terrain Analysis'. Faculty of Science University of Helsinki.
    Oksanen, J. and Sarjakoski, T., (2005). 'Error Propagation of DEM-Based Surface Derivatives'. Computers & Geosciences, 31:1015-1027.
    Paszotta, Z. and Szumilo, M., (2005). 'Application of a statistical test of hypothesis to check DTM accuracy over the Internet'. Automated Quality Control of Digital Terrain Models. Aalborg University.
    Pierce, L., Kellndorf, J., Walker, W. and Barros, O., (2006). 'Evaluation of the Horizontal Resolution of SRTM Elevation Data'. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72:1235-1244.
    Podobnikar, T., (2004). 'Production of Integrated Digital Terrain Model from Multiple Datasets of Different Quality'. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (1):69-89.
    Richard Bamler, W., (1999). 'The SRTM Mission: A World-Wide 30 m Resolution DEM from SAR Interferometry in 11 Days.'
    Schenk, T., (2001). 'Modeling and Analyzing Systematic Errors in Airborne Laser Scanners'.
    Schwartz, A., (1974). Calculus and Analytic Geometry.
    Sithole, G. and Vosselman, G., (2004). 'Experimental Comparison of Filter Algorithms for Bare-Earth Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds'. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing,
    59:85-101.
    V.Florinsky, I., (1998). 'Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models'. Internationa l Journal of Geographica l Information Science, 12 (1):47-61.
    V.Florinsky, I., (2001). 'Errors of Signal Processing in Digital Terrain Modelling'. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16:475-501.
    Walker, J.P. and Willgoose, G.R., (2006). 'A Comparative Study of Australian Cartometric and Photogrammetric Digital Elevation Model Accuracy'. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(7):771-779.
    Wehr, A. and Lohr, U., (1999). 'Airborne Laser Scanning - an Introduction and Overview'. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing,54:68-82.
    Wolf, P. and Dewitt, B., (2000). Elements of Photogrammetry with Applications in GIS.

    下載圖示 校內:2008-09-03公開
    校外:2008-09-03公開
    QR CODE