簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳虹瑾
Chen, Hong-Jin
論文名稱: 國中生社會目標歷程分析:環境─社會與成就目標模式之檢驗
The Analysis on Social Goals Process of Junior High School Students:Verification of the Environment-Social and Achievement Goals Model
指導教授: 程炳林
Cherng, Biing-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 160
中文關鍵詞: 成就目標個人目標導向社會目標環境目標結構適應性學習組型
外文關鍵詞: social goals, adaptive patterns of learning, individual goal orientation, environment goal structure, achievement goals
相關次數: 點閱:160下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本研究的主要目的為:(一)編製國中生社會目標量表,並分析其信、效度。(二)分析社會目標、成就目標與適應性學習組型之關係,並比較互補、發展、階層及成就-社會目標模式與觀察資料的適配度。(三)驗證本研究所建構的環境-社會與成就目標歷程模式與觀察資料的適配度。
      為完成上述目的,本研究分為研究ㄧ、研究二和研究三。在研究一中,研究者編製社會目標量表,抽取384名國中生為樣本,以進行探索性因素分析及信度分析;另外,並抽取415名國中生為樣本,進行社會目標量表之驗證性因素分析,以檢驗此量表的建構效度。在研究二中,本研究抽取415名國中生為樣本,受試者接受社會目標量表、個人目標導向量表與適應性學習組型量表的測量,以比較互補、發展、階層及成就-社會目標模式與觀察資料的適配度。在研究三中,本研究抽取513名國中生為樣本,以環境目標結構量表、社會目標量表、個人目標導向量表與適應性學習組型量表為測量工具蒐集觀察資料,以驗證環境-社會與成就目標歷程模式與觀察資料的適配度。
      本研究的發現如下:
    一、本研究編製社會目標量表並進行因素分析,結果顯示此量表的信、效度均佳。其次,社會目標驗證性因素分析模式與觀察資料適配,代表本量表具有良好的建構效度。
    二、從競爭模式的比較上,研究結果顯示發展模式具有理想的模式效度,適合用來解釋國中生的觀察資料。分析結果顯示:社會關係目標能正向預測趨向精熟目標與逃避精熟目標;社會責任目標能正向預測趨向精熟目標、逃避精熟目標與趨向表現目標;社會地位目標能負向預測趨向精熟目標,正向預測趨向表現目標與逃避表現目標。
    三、本研究所建構的環境-社會與成就目標歷程模式可用來解釋國中生的觀察資料。分析結果顯示:環境精熟目標結構能正向預測社會關係目標、社會責任目標、社會地位目標、趨向精熟目標與逃避精熟目標;環境表現目標結構能正向預測社會地位目標、逃避精熟目標、趨向表現目標與逃避表現目標;且在此模式中,社會關係目標對趨向精熟目標與逃避精熟目標的直接效果並不顯著。

      本研究根據研究結果進行討論,以供國中教學、學習輔導及未來研究之參考。

      The purposes of this study were to (a) know if the Social Goals Scale developed in this study had good reliability and validity, (b) examine the relationship between social goals, achievement goals and adaptive patterns of learning, and test model fit of the complementary model, developmental model, hierarchical model and achievement-social goal model, (c) test model fit of the environment-social and achievement goals model constructed in the present study.
    To achieve the purposes mentioned above, there were three studies. In addition, the studies used junior high school students as participants, who were divided into three groups. In studyⅠ, 384 studentes as the first group were uesd to test the reliability of the Social Goals Scale. 415 studentes, the second group, were adopted to test a confirmatory factor analysis model. In study Ⅱ, the second group was also utilized to test the model fit of the models on this study. The instruments used in study Ⅱ included the Social Goals Scale, Individual Goal Orientation Scale and Adaptive Patterns of Learning Scale. In study Ⅲ, 513 studentes which were the third group were observed to test the model fit of the environment-social and achievement goals model. The instruments used in study Ⅲ included the Environment Goal Structure Scale, Social Goals Scale, Individual Goal Orientation Scale and Adaptive Patterns of Learning Scale.
    The results of this study were summarized as following: (a) The Social Goals Scale developed in this study had good reliability and validity, and the theoretical model fitted the data well. (b) The developmental model fitted the empirically observed data well. The social relationship goal positively predicted the approach-mastery goal and avoidance-mastery goal ; the social responsibility goal positively predicted the approach-mastery goal, avoidance-mastery goal and approach-performance goal ; the social status goal negatively predicted the approach-mastery goal, positively predicted the approach-performance goal and avoidance- performance goal. (c) The environment-social and achievement goals model adequately fitted the observed data. The environment mastery goal structure positively predicted the social relationship goal, social responsibility goal, social status goal, approach-mastery goal and avoidance-mastery goal ; the environment performance goal structure positively predicted the social status goal, avoidance-mastery goal, approach-performance goal and avoidance –performance goal ; the social relationship goal didn’t positively predict the approach-mastery goal and avoidance-mastery goal.
    Based on the findings in this research, suggestions for junior high school implications, educational guidances and futher studies were proposed.

    中文摘要 Ⅰ 英文摘要 Ⅱ 目次 Ⅲ 表目次 Ⅴ 圖目次 Ⅶ 第一章 緒論 1   第一節 研究動機和目的 1   第二節 研究問題 6   第三節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 13   第一節 社會目標之內涵與分類 13   第二節 社會目標、成就目標與適應性學習組型之關係 24   第三節 環境目標結構、社會目標/成就目標與適應性學習組型之關係 33 第三章 研究方法 45   第一節 研究ㄧ:社會目標量表之信、效度分析 45   第二節 研究二:四個競爭模式之適配度比較 53   第三節 研究三:環境-社會與成就目標歷程模式之考驗 66 第四章 研究結果 73   第一節 研究ㄧ:社會目標量表之信、效度分析 73   第二節 研究二:四個競爭模式之適配度比較 81   第三節 研究三:環境-社會與成就目標歷程模式之考驗 97 第五章 討論、結論與建議 120   第一節 討論 120   第二節 結論 129   第三節 建議 133 參考書目 139   一、中文部分 139   二、英文部分 141 附錄一 社會目標訪談大綱 149 附錄二 社會目標量表 154 附錄三 個人目標導向量表 155 附錄四 適應性學習組型量表 156 附錄五 環境目標結構量表 159

    一、中文部份
    王枝燦(2001)。同儕影響與青少年偏差行為之研究。東吳大學社會學系研究所碩士論文。
    余安邦、楊國樞(1987)。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機:概念分析與實徵研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,64,51-98。
    吳武典(1997)。國中偏差行為學生學校生活適應之探討。教育心理學報,29,25-49。
    李岑萍(2003)。國中生自律/能力焦點及精熟/表現目標導向的課業避助行為之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    李玫蓉(2004)。國中生趨向表現目標、文化價值觀與適應性學習組型之關係。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    李俊青(2006)。學業情緒歷程模式之分析。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    林宴瑛(2006)。個人目標結構、課室目標結構與自我調整策略之關係及潛在改變量分析。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    施淑慎(2004)。成就目標、自我效能、以及策略使用在考試焦慮上所扮演之角色。國立台北師範學院學報,17(1),355-378。
    施淑慎(2006)。教室目標結構與成就目標取向對國小學童自我阻礙行為及考試焦慮之預測作用。教育與心理研究,29(3),517-546。
    陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用(四版)。台北:五南。
    彭淑玲(2004)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類,46(1),67-92。
    程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類,47(1),39-58。
    程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),1-24。
    程炳林(2006)。主觀能力與逃避策略之關係。師大學報:教育類,51(2),
    程炳林、林清山(2000)。中學生自我調整學習之研究(1/2)。國科會專案研究報告。NSC89-2413-H-035-001。
    黃章雯(2006)。國中生社會性目標、成就目標取向對情感反應與學習行為之相關研究。私立大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文。
    楊岫穎(2003)。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    劉潔玲(2002)。從中國傳統文化思想及價值觀論目標取向理論在華人社會的應用。教育研究資訊,10(3),183-203。
    謝岱陵(2003)。國中生四向度目標導向之中介效果分析。國立成功大學教育研究所論文。


    二、英文部分
    Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111-123.
    Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
    Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Pychology, 80(3), 260-267.
    Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of change in students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 21-37.
    Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 78-102.
    Baumrind, D. (1991). Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P. A. Cowan & M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family Transition (pp. 111-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Berndt, T. J., & Park, K. (1989, March). Adolescents’ perceptions of friends’ and parents’ influence on their school orientation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
    Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 272-281.
    Blumenfeld, P. C., Pintrich, P. R., & Hamilton, V. L. (1986). Children’s concepts of ability, effort, and conduct. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 95-104.
    Boekaert, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students’ context sensitivity. In S. Volet & S. Karabenick (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications.(pp. 17-31). New York: Pergamon.
    Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43-54.
    Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 35-42.
    Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals?: Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91-113.
    Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
    Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
    Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
    Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3-14). New York: Guilford Press.
    Elliot, A., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
    Elliot, A., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 501-519.
    Epstein, J. L. (1983). Friends in school: Patterns of selection and influence in secondary schools. New York: Academic Press.
    Flook, L., Repetti, R. L., & Ullman, J. B. (2005). Classroom social experiences as predictors of academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 319-327.
    Ford, M. E., & Nicholls, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessments to identify motivational patterns and facilitate behavioral regulation and achievement. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 51-84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79-90.
    Hater, S. (1975). Developmental differences in the manifestation of mastery motivation on problem-solving tasks. Child Development, 46, 370-378.
    Heyman, G. D., Dweck, C. S., & Cain, K. M. (1992). Young children’s vulnerability to self-blame and helplessness: Relationship to beliefs about goodness. Child Development, 63, 401-415.
    Hicks, L. (1997). How do academic motivation and peer relationships mix in an adolescent’s world? Middle School Journal, 28(4), 18-22.
    Hicks, L., Murphy, A. M., & Patrick, H. (1995, March). Social goals and achievement goals in early adolescence. Poster presented at the bi-annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 382394)
    Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175.
    Juvonen, J., & Weiner, B. (1993). An attributional analysis of student’s interations: The social consequences of perceived responsibility. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 325-345.
    Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Education Psychology, 72, 191-211.
    Kinderman, T. A. (1993). Natural peer groups as contexts for individual development: The case of children’s motivation school. Developmental Psychology, 29, 970-977.
    Maehr, M. L. (1974). Culture and achievement motivation. American Psychologist, 29, 887-896.
    Maehr, M. L. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp.115-144). New York: Academic Press.
    Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1991). Enhancing student motivation: A school-wide approach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
    Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 221-267). New York: Academic Press.
    Midgley, C., Anderman, E., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach . Journal of Early Adolescent, 15, 90-113.
    Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Education Psychology, 81, 247-258.
    Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Perfomance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86.
    Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Education Psychology, 26, 61-75.
    Nelson, J. M., Hruda, L. Z., & Miggley, C. (2000). The importance of parent achievement goals for their children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
    Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91 , 328-346.
    Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescent’s theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683-692.
    Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal and environmental influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Education Psychology, 15, 116-130
    Patrick, H., Hicks, L., & Ryan, A. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficancy and social goal pursuit to self-efficancy for academic work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109-128.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000c). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
    Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 63, 167-199.
    Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychology and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 408-422.
    Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, academic goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 152-171.
    Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help?: The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Education Psychology, 89, 329-341.
    Ryan, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., & Midgley, C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and Why? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 93-114.
    Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
    Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Anderman, E. M., Midgley, C., Cheen, M., & Kang, Y. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
    Urdan, T. (1997a). Achievement goal theory: Past result, future directions. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 99-141). Greenwich , CT: JAI.
    Urdan, T, C. (1997b). Examining the relations among early adolescent students’ goals and friends’ orientation toward effort and achievement in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 165-191.
    Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213-243.
    Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Education Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
    Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in the students’ use self-handicapping strategies. American Education Research , 35(1), 101-122.
    Volet, S. E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 235-254.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1989). Adolescent classroom goals, students for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 131-142.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Social competence at school: Relation between social responsibility and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 61, 1-24.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Social and academic goals at school: Motivation and achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 4-20.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 173-182.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Motivation in context: Social relationships and achievement in middle school. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 226-247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209.
    Wentzel, K. R.(1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 76-97.
    Wentzel, K. R. (2000). What is it that I’m trying to achieve? Classroom goals from a content perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 105-115.
    Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Motivating students to behave in socially competent ways. Theory into Practice, 42(4), 319-326.
    Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279-296). New York: Guilford Press.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2007-07-25公開
    QR CODE