簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉偉德
Liu, Wei-Te
論文名稱: 稜鏡調適療法對忽略症患者之視覺搜尋及功能性表現的療效探討
The effect of prism adaptation on visual search and functional task in subjects with unilateral neglect
指導教授: 蔡佩倫
Tsai, Pei-Luen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 職能治療學系
Department of Occupational Therapy
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 122
中文關鍵詞: 忽略症稜鏡調適眼球動作功能性表現
外文關鍵詞: Neglect, Prism adaptation, Eye movement, Functional performance
相關次數: 點閱:93下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 忽略症(neglect)為中風患者臨床常見之知覺症狀,不但導致個案較為嚴重的各項功能缺失,也影響其日常活動表現和復健治療的療效。近年的研究已顯示稜鏡調適療法(prism adaptation)可改善忽略症患者的忽略現象,並反映在多項紙筆測驗中;然而,並非所有的患者都能獲得此療效,且紙筆測驗表現的進步是否可概化至日常生活功能則仍不清楚。故本研究的目的為由生態學的觀點,使用自然場景視覺搜尋作業及按桌鈴的功能性作業,輔以眼球運動分析的方法,進一步檢測例行性多次稜鏡調適的短期和長期療效。此外,本研究將同時結合動作分析技術以客觀測量稜鏡調適的後效(after effect)與稜鏡調適對患者上肢運動學表現的影響。本研究共招募11位參加者分配至兩組,稜鏡調適組6人而一般治療組5人。稜鏡調適組的患者將進行每天一次為期10天的稜鏡調適治療;而一般治療組的患者則延長復健時間15分鐘。所有受試者皆在治療開始前、第一次治療結束後、10次治療結束後,以及治療結束後第1、4和8週接受紙筆測驗、自然場景視覺搜尋作業與功能性作業-按桌鈴的評量,以檢驗稜鏡調適的短期和長期療效。稜鏡調適組在接受完稜鏡調適治療後並無不適現象,且出現明顯後效。稜鏡調適療效主要表現在指向身體中線測驗中,而星狀刪除測驗及卡氏日常活動量表中兩組個案皆出現改善。在自然場景視覺搜尋作業及功能性作業-按桌鈴中兩組的表現則無出現顯著差異,但在前項作業中兩組眼球動作皆有改善,而在後項作業中兩組皆無改善,但在運動學變項方面,目標物位置不同不會影響動作反應時間,而兩組個案在按左桌鈴時的尖峰速度及尖峰加速度都比按右桌鈴慢。依後效值分組後,後效小組在星狀刪除測驗、圖片搜尋測驗及自然場景視覺搜尋作業的口頭報告得分皆有顯著進步,而在功能性作業中僅後效大組出現運動學變項之改善。本研究使用的所有測驗皆無法支持稜鏡調適療法具有長期的療效,因此本研究結果部分支持例行性稜鏡調適療法的療效,但其長期療效則仍需進一步的驗證。

    A large proportion of stroke patients show unilateral neglect that inducing many functional debilitating and effect on everyday life, and responsible for poor functional recovery and ability to benefit from treatment. Prism adaptation (PA) has been demonstrated to be effective in improving unilateral neglect. Previous studies used paper-pencil tests rather than functional tasks to examine the effects of PA, but weather the effects on paper-pencil tests will be generalized to activities of daily living is still uncertain. The purpose of this current study is to examine whether the effects of routine PA could improve the performances not only on paper-pencil tasks but also on visual searching task and functional task in unilateral neglect. Furthermore we try to explore the long-term effect of PA. Eleven neglect patients were divided into 2 groups, 6 patients were submitted to PA(PA group) and the other to traditional treatment for 10 daily sessions. Neglect was assessed before, after first treatment, after overall treatment and 1 weeks, 1 month and 2 month after the end of treatment by paper-pencil tests, visual searching task and functional task. All patients in PA group ameliorated their subjective body midline to the left after 10 times PA treatment. Both groups improved their performance on Star Cancellation Test and Catherine Bergego Scale. In visual searching task, the percentage of first fixation point on the left was increased after treatment in PA group. In functional task, both group performed slower peak velocity and peak acceleration on left target. After grouping by value of after effect of PA, the small-value group appeared improvement on Star Cancellation Test, Picture Scanning Test and scores of oral report of visual searching task. In functional task, only the large-value group appeared improving on kinematic performances. The results of this study only partially support PA effect on neglect, and the long-term effect of PA still need future examined.

    目錄 第一章、緒論....................................1 第一節、研究動機及目的.......................1 第二節、研究重要性..........................2 第二章、文獻回顧................................3 第一節、忽略症簡介..........................3 壹、症狀與機制.........................3 貳、評估與治療.........................6 第二節、稜鏡調適療法.......................10 壹、執行方法..........................10 貳、理論與相關神經結構.................12 参、療效研究..........................15 第三節、總結與研究假設......................22 第三章、方法...................................23 第一節、研究設計...........................23 第二節、研究參與者..........................24 第三節、研究工具............................25 第四節、研究設備............................31 第五節、研究程序............................33 第六節、資料分析............................36 第四章、結果....................................38 第一節、稜鏡調適組之稜鏡調適相關分析.......38 第二節、傳統測驗分析.....................40 第三節、自然場景視覺搜尋作業分析..........42 第四節、按桌鈴作業分析...................47 第五節、依後效值大小分組的相關分析........52 第六節、共變數分析......................55 第五章、討論...................................58 第一節、研究主要結果....................58 第二節、稜鏡調適正向療效分析.............60 第三節、未出現稜鏡調適正向療效討論........63 第四節、後效值大小與測驗表現的關係........68 第五節、眼球與手部動作結合分析............71 第六節、共變數分析討論...................71 第七節、研究限制與未來方向....................74 第六章、結論....................................76 參考文獻........................................77 表目錄 表1、單次稜鏡調適後各文獻之長期療效比較.............88 表2、多次稜鏡調適介入各文獻之長期療效比較...........89 表3、兩組的基本資料及初評成績比較..................90 表3、兩組的基本資料及初評成績比較(續)..............91 表4、稜鏡調適組個案第一次稜鏡調適後效值.............92 表5、稜鏡調適組第一次稜鏡調適偏差值無母數統計........92 表6、兩組在紙筆測驗的表現..........................93 表7、兩組在指向身體中線的表現.......................94 表8、兩組在自然場景視覺搜尋測驗口頭報告分數百分比......94 表9、兩組在自然場景視覺搜尋測驗的眼球動作表現..........95 表10、兩組在自然場景視覺搜尋作業的掃視方向百分比.......96 表11、兩組在按桌鈴作業中的反應時間....................96 表12、兩組在按桌鈴作業中眼球動作表現..................97 表13、兩組在按左側桌鈴時的運動學參數表現...............98 表14、兩組在按右側桌鈴時的運動學參數表現...............99 表15、兩組在按桌鈴作業中從開始到搜尋到目標物的時間.....100 表16、兩組在按桌鈴作業中眼球動作與手部動作起始時間差...100 表17、依後效值分組後三組的基本資料...................101 表18、依後效值大小分組後三組紙筆測驗表現..............102 表19、依後效值大小分組後三組在自然場景視覺搜尋作業眼球動作表現..103 表20、依後效值大小分組後三組在按桌鈴作業眼球動作表現....104 表21、依後效值大小分組後三組在按桌鈴作業手部運動學表現..105 圖目錄 圖1、行為不注意測驗4項子測驗.........................106 圖2、太田測驗.......................................107 圖3、自然場景視覺搜尋作業圖片..........................108 圖4、功能性作業-按桌鈴之目標桌鈴及干擾物的擺設...........109 圖5、眼球追蹤系統及軟硬體設備..........................110 圖6、偏角10度稜鏡及目標物板............................111 圖7、稜鏡調適過程圖...................................112 圖8、研究流程圖......................................113 圖9、稜鏡調適過程軌跡圖...............................114 圖10、自然場景視覺尋測驗第一凝視點位於左側位置百分比......114 圖11、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中視覺搜尋軌跡圖...............115 圖12、按桌鈴作業中眼球動作與手部動作結合.................115 圖13、按桌鈴作業中個案使用策略為緊盯桌鈴.................117 圖14、按桌鈴作業中個案使用策略為兩次盯著目標物間會到處察看.117 圖15、按桌鈴作業中個案使用策略為看完目標物後會看一下起始點的位置118 圖16、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中2組個案凝視點數目比較.........118 圖17、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中2組個案掃視總距離比較.........119 圖18、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中遠右區域2組個案凝視點數目比較..119 圖19、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中近右區域2組個案凝視點數目比較..120 圖20、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中遠左區域2組個案掃視總距離比較..120 圖21、自然場景視覺搜尋作業中遠右區域2組個案掃視總距離比較..121 圖22、按右桌鈴時中間區域2組個案凝視點數目比較.............121 圖23、按右桌鈴時中間區域2組個案凝視總時間比較.............122 圖24、按右桌鈴時中間區域2組個案掃視總距離比較.............122

    Angeli, V., Benassi, M. G., & Ladavas, E. (2004). Recovery
    of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 42(9), 1223-1234.
    Angeli, V., Meneghello, F., Mattioli, F., & Ladavas, E. (2004). Mechanisms underlying visuo-spatial amelioration of neglect after prism adaptation. Cortex, 40(1), 155-156.
    Appelros, P., Nydevik, I., Karlsson, G. M., Thorwalls, A. & Seiger, A. (2003). Assessing unilateral neglect: shortcomings of standard test methods. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(9), 473-479.
    Arene, N. U. & Hillis, A. E. (2007). Rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect and neuroimaging. Europa Medicophysica, 43, 255-269.
    Azouvi1, P., Samuel1, C., Louis-Dreyfus1, A., Bernati, T., Bartolomeo, P., Beis, J-M., Chokron, S., Leclercq, M., Marchal, F., Martin, Y., de Montety, G., Olivier, S., Perennou, D., Pradat-Diehl, P., Prairial, C., Rode, G., Siéroff, E., Wiart, L. & Rousseaux, M. (2002). Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73, 160-166.
    Behrmann, M., Watt, S., Black, S. E., & Barton, J. J. S. (1997). Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia, 35(11), 1445-1458.
    Coulthard, E., Parton, A. & Husain, M. (2006). Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(13), 2717-2733.
    Courtois-Jacquin, S., Rossetti, Y., Rode, G., Fischer, C., Michel, C., Allard, C., & Boission, D. (2001). Effect of prism adaptation on auditory extinction: an attentional effect? International Symposium on Neural Control of Space Coding and Action Production, 22-24.
    Datié, A. M., Paysanta, J., Destainvillea, S., Sageza, A., Beisa, J. M. & André, J. M. (2006). Eye movements and visuoverbal descriptions exhibit heterogeneous and dissociated patterns before and after prismatic adaptation in unilateral spatial neglect. European Journal of Neurology, 13, 772-779.
    Dijkerman, H. C., McIntosh, R. D., Milner, A. D., Rossetti, Y., Tilikete, C., & Roberts, R. C. (2003). Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 220-230.
    Dijkerman, H. C., Webeling, M., ter Wal, J. M., Groet, E., & van Zandvoort, M. J. E. (2004). A long-lasting improvement of somatosensory function after prism adaptation, a case study. Neuropsychologia, 42(12), 1697-1702.
    Doricchi, F., Guariglia, P., Figliozzi, F., Silvetti, M., Bruno, G., & Gasparini, M. (2005). Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements. Brain, 128(6), 1386.
    Fisk, J. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1988). The effects of unilateral brain-damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Experimental Brain Research, 77(2), 425-435.
    Farnè, A., Rossetti, Y., Toniolo, S., & Ladavas, E. (2002). Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 718-729.
    Ferber, S., Danckert, J., Joanisse, M., Goltz, H. C., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology, 60(11), 1826-1829.
    Frassinetti, F., Angeli, V., Meneghello, F., Avanzi, S., & Ladavas, E. (2002). Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain, 125(3), 608-623.
    Gillen, G. (2007). Cognitive and Perceptual Rehabilitation: Optimizing Function (pp.32-44). US: Mosby Elevier
    Goodale, M. A, Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S. & Carey, D. P. (1990). Kinematic analysis of limb movements in neuropsychological research: Subtle deficits and recovery of function. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44(2), 180-195.
    Golisz, K. W. & Toglia J. P. (2003). Evaluation of Performance Skills and Client Factors: section II: Perception and Cognition. In E. B. Crepeau , E. S. Cohn , & B. A. B. Schell. (Eds.), Wallard and Spackman’s occupation therapy (10th ed., pp.365-426). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
    Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H. & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35(6), 855-859.
    Himmelbach, M. & Karnath, H. (2003). Goal-directed hand movements are not affected by the biased space representation in spatial neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7), 972-980.
    Harvey, M., Milner, A. D. & Roberts, R. C. (1994). Spatial bias in visually-guided reaching and bisection following right cerebral stroke. Cortex, 30(2), 343-50.
    Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., & Wade, D. T. (1989). Visuaospatial neglect: Underlying factors and sensitivity. Lancet, 2, 908-911.
    Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heillman & E. Valenstein (Eds.). Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 279-336). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Humphreys, G. W., Watelet, A., & Riddoch, M. J. (2006). Long-term effects of prism adaptation in chronic visual neglect: A single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 463-478.
    Jackson, S. R., Newport, R., Husian, M., Harvey, M. & Hindle , J. V. (2000). Reaching movements may reveal the distorted topography of spatial representation after neglect. Neuropsychologia, 38, 500-507.
    Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Pisella, L., Boisson, D. & Rosseti, Y. (2008). Wheel-chair driving improvement following viauo-manual prism adaptation. Cortex, 44, 90-96.
    Karnath, H., Dick, H. & Konczak, J. (1997). Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: Control of hand in space. Neuropsychologia, 35(4), 435-444.
    Katz, N., Hartman-Maeir, A., Ring, H., & Soroker, N. (1999). Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(4), 379-384.
    Konczak, J. & Karnath, H. O. (1998). Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: Control of hand velocity. Brain and Cognition, 37(3), 387-403
    Keane, S., Turner, C., Sherrington, C., & Beard, J. R. (2006). Use of fresnel prism glasses to treat stroke patients with hemispatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 87(12), 1668-1672.
    Linden, M. A., Crothers, I. R., & Rauch, R. J. (2006). Exploring eye movement analysis as a measure of selective visual attention in brain injured individuals. Brain Injury, 20, 143-150.
    Luaute, J., Halligan, P., Rode, G., Rossetti, Y., & Boisson, D. (2006). Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(7), 961-982.
    Land, M. F. & Hayhoe, M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41, 3559-3565.
    Land, M., Mennie, N. & Rusted, J. (1999). The role of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311-1328.
    Morton, S. M., & Bastian, A. J. (2004). Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. Journal of neurophysiology, 92, 2497-2509.
    Mattingley, J. B., Phillipsa, J. G. & Bradshawa, J. L. (1994). Impairments of movement execution in unilateral neglect: A kinematic analysis of directional bradyskinesia. Neuropsychologia, 32(9), 1111-1134.
    Morris, A. P., Kritikos, A., Berberovic, N., Pisella, L., Champers, D. C., & Mattingley, J. B. (2004). Prism adaptation and spatial attention: A study of visual search in normals and patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex, 40, 703–721.
    Menon, A. & Korner-Bitensky, N. (2002). Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post stroke: working your way through the maze of assessment choices. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(3), 41-66.
    Maravita, A., McNeil, J., Malhotra, P., Greenwood, R., Husain, M., & Driver, J. (2003). Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology, 60(11), 1829-1831.
    Nijboer, T., Vree, A., Dijkerman, C. & Stigchel, S. V. (2010). Prism adaptation influences perception but not attention: Evidence from antisaccades. Neuroreport, 21, 386-389.
    Ota, H., Fujii, T., Suzuki, K., Fukatsu, R., & Yamadori, A. (2001). Dissociation of body-centered and stimulus-centered representations in unilateral neglect. Neurology, 57, 2064-2069.
    Plummer, P., Norris, M. E. & Dunai, J. (2003). Assessment of unilateral neglect. Physical Therapy, 83(8), 732-740.
    Pisella, L., Rode, G., Farne, A., Boisson, D., & Rossetti, Y. (2002). Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients. Neuropsychologia, 40(3), 327-334.
    Quintana, L. A. (2002). Optimizing Vision, Visual Perception, and Praxis Abilities. In Trombly, C. A. & Radomski M. V. (5th Eds.), Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction(pp.597-608). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
    Radomski, M. V. (2002). Planning, Guiding, and Documenting Therapy. In Trombly, C. A. & Radomski M. V. (5th Eds.), Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction(pp.443-461). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
    Redding, G. M. & Wallace, B. (2005). Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: Review and analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(1), 1-20.
    Rode, G., Klos, T., Courtois-Jacquin, S., Rossetti, Y.& Pisella, L. (2006). Neglect and prism adaptation: A new therapeutic tool for spatial cognition disorders. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 24, 347-356.
    Rode, G., Rossetti, Y., & Boisson, D. (2001). Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia, 39(11), 1250-1254.
    Rossetti, Y., Rode, G., Pisella, L., Farne, A., Li, L., Boisson, D. & Marie-Therese, P. (1998). Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature, 395(6698), 166-169.
    Rousseaux, M., Bernati, T., Saj, A., & Kozlowski, O. (2006). Ineffectiveness of prism adaptation on spatial neglect signs. Stroke, 37(2), 542-543.
    Sarri, M., Greenwood, R., Kalra, L., Papps, B., Husain, M. & Driver, J. (2008). Prism adaptation aftereffects in stroke patients with spatial neglect: Pathological effects on subjective straight ahead but not visual open-loop pointing. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1069-1080.
    Sarri, M., Kalra, L., Greenwood, R., & Driver, J. (2006). Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Neurocase, 12(3), 127-135.
    Seidel, A. C. (2003).Theories Derived from Rehabilititation Perspective: section II: Rehabilitation Frame of Reference. In E. B. Crepeau , E. S. Cohn , & B. A. B. Schell. (Eds.), Wallard and Spackman’s occupation therapy(10th ed., pp.240-242). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
    Serino, A., Angeli, V., Frassinetti, F., & Ladavas, E. (2006). Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1068-1078.
    Serino, A., Bonifazi, S., Pierfederici, L., & Ladavas, E. (2007). Neglect treatment by prism adaptation: What recovers and for how long. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 17(6), 657-687.
    Serino, A., Barbiani, M., Rinaldesi, M. L. & Làdavas, E. (2009). Effectiveness of prism adaptation in neglect rehabilitation: A controlled trail study. Stroke, 40, 1392-1398.
    Saevarsson, S., Kristjánsson, Á., Hildebrandt, H. & Halsband, U. (2009). Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect. Neueropsychologia, 47, 717-725.
    Sheliga, B. M., Riggio, L. & Rizzolatti, G. (1994). Orienting of attention and eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 98(3), 507-522.
    Shinsha, H. A., & Ishigami, I. A. (1999). Rehabilitation approach to patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 6, 1-14.
    Stone, S. P., Halligan, P. W., & Greenwood, R. J. (1993). The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age and Ageing, 22, 46-52.
    Stone, S. P., Patel, P., Greenwood, R. J. & Halligan, P. W. (1992). Measuring visual neglect in acute stroke and predicting its recovery: the visual neglect index. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 55, 431-436.
    Turton, A. J., O’Leary, K., Gabb, J., Woodward, R. & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). A single blinded randomised controlled pilot trial of prism adaptation for improving self-care in stroke patients with neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(2), 180-196.
    Tilikete, C., Rode, G., Rossetti, Y., Pichon, J., Li, L., & Boisson, D. (2001). Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation improves postural imbalance in left-hemiparetic patients. Current Biology, 11(7), 524-528.
    Toglia, J. P. (2003). Interventions to improve personal skills and abilities. In E. B. Crepeau , E. S. Cohn , & B. A. B. Schell. (Eds.), Wallard and Spackman’s occupation therapy(10th ed., pp.579-650). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
    Valler, G. & Perani, D. (1986). The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia, 24,609-622.
    Watanabe, S. & Amimoto, K. (2010). Generalization of prism adaptation for wheelchair driving task in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 443-447.
    Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioural Inattention Test. Titchfield Hants, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987.
    Zoccolotti, P., Antonucci, G., Judica, A., Montenero, P., Pizzamiglio, L.&Razzano, C. (1989). Incidence and Evolution of hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 47, 209-216.

    下載圖示 校內:2013-02-17公開
    校外:2013-02-17公開
    QR CODE