人才是創新過程中不可或缺的關鍵因素，然而過去主流的創新模型鮮少探討至人才如何在創新的過程中發揮作用。因此，本研究探討的創新投入除了過往主流的研發層面及技術層面外，還新增了人力資源管理層面，並透過問卷調查法及馬賽克圖，探討我國工具機產業之創新投入演化情形。其次，為了更凸顯人才的重要角色，本研究亦透過敘述性統計探討我國工具機產業人才演化，並透過深度訪談法歸納出其引才、留才及育才之現況與困境。最後，工具機產業於我國中部區域形成綿密的外包網絡，得以享有非符碼化知識快速流動之優勢，因此，本研究進一步透過深度訪談法歸納出我國工具機產業形成創新氛圍的五種路徑，並探討工具機產業自1950年發展以來運用路徑之演化。

Talent has been a crucial factor in the innovation process. However, the innovation modes in the past rarely discussed how talent can play a role in the process of innovation. Therefore, besides the R&D and technology investment, this study also take the human resource management as a key innovation investment factor to highlight the important role of talents. In this framework, the paper first explored the evolution of innovation investment of the machine tool industry in Central Taiwan through questionnaire and mosaic plot. Second, we explored the evolution of talents through narrative statistics, and summarized the current human resource strategy of the industry. Third, because the machine tool industry formed a dense outsourcing network in central Taiwan, which let the industry enjoy the advantages of the rapid flow of tacit knowledge, we explored the interaction among the Taiwan's machine tool firms by in-depth interviews and finally sorted out five different kinds of knowledge flow paths.

英文文獻
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Innovation and technological change. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 55-79): Springer.
Al-Dmour, R. H., Love, S., & Al-Debei, M. M. (2016). Factors influencing the organisational adoption of human resource information systems: a conceptual model. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 11(2), 161-207.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87): Harvard Business School Publishing Boston, MA.
Amsden, A. H. (1977). The division of labour is limited by the type of market: The case of the Taiwanese machine tool industry. World Development, 5(3), 217-233.
Apanasovich, N. (2016). Modes of innovation: a grounded meta-analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 720-737.
Apanasovich, N., Alcalde-Heras, H., & Parrilli, M. D. (2017). A new approach to business innovation modes: the ‘Research, Technology and Human Resource Management (RTH) model’in the ICT sector in Belarus. European Planning Studies, 25(11), 1976-2000.
Asheim, B. T., Isaksen, A., Martin, R., & Trippl, M. (2017). The role of clusters and public policy in new regional economic path development. The Life Cycle of Clusters–A Policy Perspective, 13-34.
Aslesen, H. W., Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2012). Modes of innovation and differentiated responses to globalisation—a case study of innovation modes in the Agder region, Norway. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(4), 389-405.
Berry, C. R., & Glaeser, E. L. (2005). The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in regional science, 84(3), 407-444.
Bozkurt, Ö. Ç., & Kalkan, A. (2014). Business Strategies of SME's, Innovation Types and Factors Influencing Their Innovation: Burdur Model/KOBI'lerin Isletme Stratejileri, Inovasyon Türleri ve Inovasyonlarini Etkileyen Faktörler: Burdur Modeli. Ege Akademik Bakis, 14(2), 189.
Braczyk, H.-J., Cooke, P. N., & Heidenreich, M. (1998). Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world: Psychology Press.
Breemersch, K., Damijan, J. P., & Konings, J. (2017). Labour Market Polarization in Advanced Countries.
Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442-457.
Chen, L.-C. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), 527-535.
Chen, L.-C. (2011). The governance and evolution of local production networks in a cluster: the case of Taiwan’s machine tool industry. GeoJournal, 76(6), 605-622.
Cosh, A., Fu, X., & Hughes, A. (2012). Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 301-317.
Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in society, 27(2), 133-153.
Doloreux, D., & Porto Gomez, I. (2017). A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371-387.
Donate, M. J., Peña, I., & Sanchez de Pablo, J. D. (2016). HRM practices for human and social capital development: effects on innovation capabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(9), 928-953.
Frkova, J. SPECIFIKA MALÉHO PODNIKÁNÍ V ČESKÉ REPUBLICE THE SPECIFICS OF SMALL BUSINESS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
Hauge, E. S., Kyllingstad, N., Maehle, N., & Schulze-Krogh, A. C. (2017). Developing cross-industry innovation capability: regional drivers and indicators within firms. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 388-405.
Holm, J. R., & Østergaard, C. R. (2015). Regional employment growth, shocks and regional industrial resilience: a quantitative analysis of the Danish ICT sector. Regional Studies, 49(1), 95-112.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. The learning economy and the economics of hope, 155.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.-Å., & Lundvall, B. (2016). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope; Anthem Press: London, UK, 155, 155-182.
Kenney, M., & Von Burg, U. (2001). Paths and regions: the creation and growth of Silicon Valley. Path dependence and creation, 127-148.
Marcolin, L., & Squicciarini, M. (2017). Investing in innovation and skills. doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9e296b43-en
Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic geography, 86(1), 1-27.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of economic geography, 6(4), 395-437.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2012). The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape.
Njøs, R., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). Policy for Evolution of Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Social Capital and Regional Particularities. Science and Public Policy, 45(2), 257-268.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating. New York.
Nunes, S., Lopes, R., & Fuller-Love, N. (2017). Networking, Innovation, and Firms’ Performance: Portugal as Illustration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-22.
Parrilli, M. D., & Heras, H. A. (2016). STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances. Research Policy, 45(4), 747-756.
Pelinescu, E. (2015). The impact of human capital on economic growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 184-190.
Porter, R. H. (2007). Handbook of Industrial Organization: Volume 3: North Holland.
Santner, D. (2018). Proximity and modes of innovation–evidence from two agricultural engineering industries in north-west Germany. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 877-894.
Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledge-based economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92-109.
Setterfield, M. (1997). ‘History versus equilibrium’and the theory of economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(3), 365-378.
Simon, C. J. (2004). Industrial reallocation across US cities, 1977–1997. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1), 119-143.
Strambach, S. (2010). Path dependence and path plasticity: the co-evolution of institutions and innovation–the German customized business software industry. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Sunley, P., Martin, R., Gardiner, B., & Pike, A. (2019). In search of the skilled city: Skills and the occupational evolution of British cities. Urban Studies, 0042098019834249.
Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5), 687-705.
Walicka, M. (2014). Innovation types at smes and external influencing factors. e-Finanse: Financial Internet Quarterly, 10(3), 73-81.
Yeh, C.-C., & Chang, P.-L. (2003). The Taiwan system of innovation in the tool machine industry: a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4), 367-380.

中文文獻
王振寰、高士欽(2000)。全球化與在地化: 新竹與台中的學習型區域比較。臺灣社會學刊，24，179-237。
王素彎(2018)。人力加值培訓產業發展方案執行之我見。經濟前瞻，175，123-128。
江雪嬌、林浩鉅(2003)。我國產業技術發展之研究—如何從技術追隨者走向技術創新者的發展歷程。經濟情勢暨評論，9:1，270-288。
吳秉恩(2004)。企業人力資源管理定位與功能轉型。人力資源管理學報，4(3)，1-27。
林泰成(2003)。協力網路觀點下模組產品創新類型之探討—台灣工具機業的實證研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/75msca。
胡太山、尤淑萍、周享民、賈秉靜、羅欣玫(2015)。傳統產業地區創新生產網絡之研究-以彰化縣為例。建築與規劃學報，16(2&3)，111-134。
胡太山、林建元、張素莉(2002)。科技廠商群聚與創新生產網絡形塑之探討-以新竹與台南地區為例。環境與世界，6，1-29。
胡太山、張素莉(2001)。技術基礎設施、產業聚群與與地方創新網絡建構之初探︰以新竹科學園區暨周邊地區為例。建築與規劃學報，2(1)，27-42。
胡太山(2005)。經濟部產業專業人才發展推動計畫—強化產業群聚人才發展機制之研究。經濟部研究報告。
張文德(2001)。協力廠商參與產品創新之類型探討─台灣工具機業的實證研究(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dkrtaf。
張淑芬(2007)。運用學界能量支援產業創新—以工具機產業為例。臺灣經濟研究月刊，30(2)，56-63。
陳良治(2012)。國家與公共研究機構在產業技術升級過程中的角色及演化：台灣工具機業。人文及社會科學集刊，24(1)，19-50。
陳良治、田孟凌(2017)。外部衝擊、區域經濟回復力之構成及作用機制。都市與計劃，44(1)，1-25。
陳恆文(2015)。產業群聚的制度建構—以台灣工具機產業M-Team發展為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mz394r。
曾淑華(1998)。工具機年鑑。工業技術研究院機械工業研究所，新竹縣竹東鎮，經濟部產業技術資訊服務推廣計畫。
黃羽慈(2016)。區域創新系統發展-以韓國大德研究開發特區為例。臺灣經濟研究月刊，39(5)，114-121。
詹依靜(2014)。台灣工具機產業發展中的國家角色：1945-2010(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mxrt6r。
詹炳熾(2004)。研發人員職能與績效關聯之研究—以工具機產業為例(碩士論文)。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zddj77。
劉仁傑(2011)。工具機產業機械加工流程的精實生產研究。國科會研究報告，計畫編號：NSC100-2622-H029-001-CC3。
劉永珊(2004)。 協力互動關係與企業間電子化介面類型關連性之探討—台灣工具機產業的實證研究.
蔡蕙安(2007)。南台灣產業結構調整與永續經濟發展。都市與計劃，34(4)，317-341。