簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 凌子涵
Ling, Tzu-Han
論文名稱: 探討影響臺灣中老年人口購買長照險之因素
An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Purchase of Long-term Care Insurance among the Middle and Elderly People in Taiwan
指導教授: 田維華
Tian, Wei-Hua
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 116
中文關鍵詞: 長期照護保險長照政策中老年人口
外文關鍵詞: long-term care insurance, long-term care policy, middle-aged and elderly population
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:32
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來臺灣的醫療技術快速進步以及晚婚現象越來越普及,導致國人平均壽命的增加以及生育率連年下降,人口成長更是於2020年正式邁入負成長的階段,意味著臺灣人口老化之問題將日益嚴重,如何完善規劃老年人口相關之長期照護服務,並處理長期照護服務支出快速攀升帶來之財政負擔,將成為政府與人民需要共同面對之課題。
    本篇研究目的為探討影響臺灣中老年人口購買長照險之因素,研究使用資料為衛福部106年老人狀況調查,研究內容透過「請問您目前有參加哪些商業保險?」之長照服務相關保險問項作為應變數,並以Logit Model作為分析模型,來探討臺灣中老年人口之人口特徵、健康狀況、經濟條件、家庭結構、老年意識、學習力等因素是否與長照險購買之間存在關聯。
    研究結果顯示,年齡越高、男性、教育程度較低、居住在北部、認為生活費不足夠、生活費較低、不需為家人提供經濟支援、兒子數目較多、對目前整體生活持有其他意見、不願意入住長照機構、目前沒有工作、未每天使用網路、沒有購買壽險等受訪者,較不會購買長照險。在以性別、生活費、居住地不同之群體樣本中,與長照險購買有關聯之因素也會有所差異,在限制性別之樣本中,目前沒有工作及沒有社團參與之男性與不願意入住長照機構及未每天使用網路之女性,較不會購買長照險,在限制生活費之樣本中,兒女較多以及僅與配偶同住之高生活費群體,較不會購買長照險,在限制居住地之樣本中,有保存儲蓄或財產之北部群體,較不會購買長照險。根據本文研究結果,期許能對日後政府推廣長照險相關之政策提供參考與建議,在長期照護服務支出快速攀升的高齡社會,提升民眾購買商業長照險之意願。

    Technological advancements in healthcare and late-marriage trend have led to an increase in Taiwan’s average life expectancy and a decline in fertility rate. How to improve the long-term care services and deal with the financial burden caused by long-term care (LTC) expenditures have become important issues. Based on the 2017 Report of the Senior Citizen Condition Survey, this paper investigated the factors affecting LTC insurance purchase for the middle-aged and the elderly people in Taiwan. A Logit Model is used to investigate factors that affect LTC insurance purchase such as demographic characteristics, health status, financial conditions, family structure, elderly awareness, and learning ability.

    Results indicates respondents with the following properties are less likely to purchase LTC insurance: higher age, male, lower education, living in the north, insufficient living income, with less living resources, no family support burden, with more sons, dissatisfaction with life, refusal of entering into LTC institutions, infrequent Internet user, without life insurance, without work and life insurance. Among groups by genders, living expenses, and living area, results indicate that men without work and social club participations, women without using Internet frequently and with less likelihood to enter into LTC institutions; individuals with more children and live with their spouse only for high living expenses group; individuals with savings or properties reside in the north are less likely to purchase LTC insurance. Hopefully, results will facilitate better LTC insurance policies formulated by the government and the private sector.

    摘要 i SUMMARY ii 致謝 vi 目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的 7 第三節 研究流程 9 第二章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 國內外政府長照相關計畫現況 11 第二節 影響購買私人長照險之因素 16 第三章 資料來源與研究方法 19 第一節 資料來源與研究對象 19 第二節 變數定義與介紹 20 第三節 研究方法與模型介紹 28 第四章 研究結果與分析 42 第一節 敘述統計結果 42 第二節 迴歸模型結果 60 第五章 結論與建議 101 第一節 研究結論 101 第二節 政策建議 102 第三節 研究限制 104 參考文獻 105 附錄一:共線性檢定 111 附錄二:生活滿意程度內生性檢定 113 附錄三:有無購買壽險內生性檢定 115

    下野 恵子 (2009)。介護サービス産業と人材確保。季刊家計経済研究。第八十二期,13-23頁。
    Brown J. R., & Finkelstein A. (2008). The Interaction of Public and Private Insurance: Medicaid and the Long-Term Care Insurance Market. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1083-1102. doi: 10.3386/w10989
    Campbell, J. C., Ikegami, N., & Gibson, M. J. (2010). Lessons From Public Long-Term Care Insurance In Germany And Japan. Health Affairs, 29(1), 87-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0548
    Coe, N. B., Skira, M. M., & Van Houtven, C. H. (2015). Long-term care insurance: Does experience matter? Journal of Health Economics, 40, 122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.01.001
    Costa-Font, J., & Font, M. (2009). Does ‘early purchase’ improve the willingness to pay for long-term care insurance? Applied Economics Letters, 16(13), 1301-1305. doi: 10.1080/13504850701720171
    Courbage, C., & Roudaut, N. (2008). Empirical Evidence on Long-term Care Insurance Purchase in France. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 33(4), 645-658. doi: 10.1057/gpp.2008.30
    Crystal, S., & Shea, D. (1990). Cumulative Advantage, Cumulative Disadvantage, and Inequality Among Elderly People1. The Gerontologist, 30(4), 437-443. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.4.437
    Evelien Eggink, Evert Pommer, & Isolde Woittiez (2008). De ontwikkeling van AWBZ-uitgaven : een analyse van AWBZ-uitgaven 1985-2005 en een raming van de uitgaven voor verpleging en verzorging 2005-2030. Den Haag, Nederlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
    Feder, J., Komisar, H. L., & Niefeld, M. (2000). Long-Term Care In The United States: An Overview: A complex system of public and private funding often leaves elderly persons at risk of financial catastrophe and inadequate care. Health Affairs, 19(3), 40-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.40
    Hammer E., & Österle A. (2003). Welfare State Policy and Informal Long-Term Care Giving in Austria: Old Gender Divisions and New Stratification Processes Among Women. Journal of Social Policy, 32(1), 37-53. doi: 10.1017/S0047279402006888
    Hoffman, A. K. (2016). Reimagining the Risk of Long-Term Care. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics, 16(2), 147-232.
    Houtven, C. H. V., Coe, N. B., & Konetzka, R. T. (2015). Family Structure and Long-Term Care Insurance Purchase. Health Economics, 24(S1), 58-73. doi: 10.1002/hec.3145
    Ioncică, M., Petrescu, E.-C., Ioncică, D., & Constantinescu, M. (2012). The Role of Education on Consumer Behavior on the Insurance Market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4154-4158. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.217
    Laferrère A. (2012) Housing Wealth as Self-insurance for Long-Term Care. In: Costa-Font J., Courbage C. (eds) Financing Long-Term Care in Europe (pp. 73-90). Palgrave Macmillan, London. doi: 10.1057/9780230349193_5
    Lin, H., & Prince, J. T. (2016). Determinants of Private Long-Term Care Insurance Purchase in Response to the Partnership Program. Health Services Research, 51(2), 687-703. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12353
    Masud, J., & Haron, S. A. (2008). Income differences among elderly in Malaysia: A regional comparison. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(4), 335-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00674.x
    McCall, N., Mangle, S., Bauer, E., & Knickman, J. (1998). Factors important in the purchase of partnership long-term care insurance. Health Services Research, 33(2 Pt 1), 187-203.
    Nadash, P., Doty, P., & von Schwanenflügel, M. (2018). The German Long-Term Care Insurance Program: Evolution and Recent Developments. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 588-597. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx018
    Rothgang, H. (2010). Social Insurance for Long-term Care: An Evaluation of the German Model. Social Policy & Administration, 44(4), 436-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00722.x
    Schneider, U. (1999). Germany’s Social Long-term Care Insurance: Design, Implementation and Evaluation. International Social Security Review, 52(2), 31-74. doi: 10.1111/1468-246X.00037
    Schut, F.T. & W.P.M.M. van de Ven (2010). Uitvoering AWBZ door zorgverzekeraars onverstandig. Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 95(4591), 486-489.
    Schwarzkopf, L., Menn, P., Leidl, R., Wunder, S., Mehlig, H., Marx, P., Graessel, E., & Holle, R. (2012). Excess costs of dementia disorders and the role of age and gender—An analysis of German health and long-term care insurance claims data. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1), 165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-165
    Tamiya, N., Noguchi, H., Nishi, A., Reich, M. R., Ikegami, N., Hashimoto, H., Shibuya, K., Kawachi, I., & Campbell, J. C. (2011). Population ageing and wellbeing: Lessons from Japan’s long-term care insurance policy. The Lancet, 378(9797), 1183-1192. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61176-8
    Tian, W.-H., Chen, C.-S., & Liu, T.-C. (2010). The demand for preventive care services and its relationship with inpatient services. Health Policy, 94(2), 164-174. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.09.012
    Ungerson C. (2000). Thinking about the Production and Consumption of Long-term Care in Britain: Does Gender Still Matter? Journal of Social Policy, 29(4), 623-643. doi: 10.1017/S0047279400006061
    Unruh, M. A., Stevenson, D. G., Frank, R. G., Cohen, M. A., & Grabowski, D. C. (2016). Demand-Side Factors Associated with the Purchase of Long-Term Care Insurance. Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 19(1), 23-43. doi: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0020
    Yamada, M., Arai, H., Nishiguchi, S., Kajiwara, Y., Yoshimura, K., Sonoda, T., Yukutake, T., Kayama, H., Tanigawa, T., & Aoyama, T. (2013). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for long-term care insurance (LTCI) need certification among older Japanese adults: A two-year prospective cohort study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 57(3), 328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2013.03.009
    蔡啟源 (2008)。建構「老人長期照顧制度」之我見日本「公共介護制度」經驗之參酌。社區發展季刊,第一百二十一期,428-457頁。
    蔡宗益、李荔芳、林庭光與蕭伊祐 (2019)。簡述臺灣長期照護現況與挑戰。台灣老年醫學暨老年學會雜誌。第十四卷第一期,44-50頁。doi: 10.29461/TGGa.201902_14(1).0004
    陳玉梅 (2013)。長期照護保險偏好之研究 (碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。取自華藝線上圖書館。
    財團法人國家政策研究基金會 (2019)。德國、荷蘭長期照護保險內容與相關法令之研究。台北市:行政院經濟建設委員會。
    姜向群與郑研辉 (2013)。中国老年人的主要生活来源及其经济保障问题分析。人口学刊。第三十五卷第一百九十八期,42-48頁。doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-129X.2012.02.005
    林碧珠 (2017)。長照十年計劃2.0與護理人員角色。新臺北護理期刊,第十九卷第一期,1-8頁。doi: 10.6540/NTJN.2017.1.001
    林淑馨. (2018)。日本介護保險制度之初探:經驗與啟示。文官制度季刊,第十卷第三期,1-28頁。
    衛生福利部 (2017)。中華民國106年老人狀況調查報告。台北市:作者。
    王品 (2015)。德國長期照顧保險效應分析:1995-2013。人文及社會科學集刊,第二十七卷第一期,135-203頁。
    吳秉毅 (2020)。長照2.0:如何補貼與融通 (碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。取自華藝線上圖書館。
    徐瑜璟、邱采昀與周美伶 (2012)。日本介護保險與台灣長照保險的比較。台灣老年學論壇,第十五期,1-21頁。
    顏埕洲 (2019)。居家服務使用決策是否存在區域差異?以長照2.0支付給付新制試辦計畫為例 (碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。取自華藝線上圖書館。
    葉秀珍 (1999)。長期照護財務機制與各國經驗之探討---社會面評析。長期照護財務問題─各國經驗及台灣前景研討會 (8.1-8.26頁)。苗栗縣:國家衛生研究院。
    張麗娟與張琪惠 (2018)。影響購買長期照護保險的關鍵因素-以台灣為例。中華管理評論國際學報,第二十一卷第二期,1-12頁。
    周世珍 (2006)。荷蘭健康照護法制新趨勢。長期照護雜誌,第十卷第二期,136-153頁。doi: 10.6317/LTC.200607_10(2).0005
    財團法人保險事業發展中心 (2015)。長期看護(照顧)保險經驗資料統計分析。網址:https://www.tii.org.tw/export/sites/tii/files/download/actuarial_3_2_10.pdf
    金融監督管理委員會 (2020)。109年上半年長期照顧保險投保對象之性別、年齡、要保人所在行政區域與年收入分布之交叉分析。網址: https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=448&parentpath=0,7,446&mcustomize=sextarget_view.jsp&dataserno=202008110001&dtable=SexTarget
    衛生福利部 (2017)。106老人狀況調查。網址:https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/cp-1767-38429-113.html
    國家發展委員會,人口推估查詢系統。網址:https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/chart.aspx?c=1&uid=61&pid=60
    國家發展委員會,人口推估國際比較。網址:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=6EA756F006B2A924
    行政院主計總處,家庭收支調查。網址:https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40875&ctNode=511&mp=4

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE