The purpose of this study is to evaluate Thai state’s capacity in responding to the 2020 Doi Suthep forest fire through the analytical dimensions of information management, resource mobilization, and inter-organizational collaboration. Using the state capacity framework, the study evaluates how institutional structures enabled or constrained the timely and effective deployment of disaster response mechanisms. Drawing on qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with local officials, firefighters, community leaders, and NGO representatives, as well as document analysis of government reports and media coverage, the research investigates both centralized responses and local government. Findings indicate that while the Thai government possessed technical tools—such as satellite monitoring and mobile apps—information dissemination was delayed, fragmented, and often inaccessible to rural communities. In terms of resource mobilization, the deployment of both human and non-human assets was hindered by bureaucratic bottlenecks and visibility-driven allocation, prioritizing symbolic sites over high-risk zones. Local volunteer units, although critical, were insufficiently equipped and excluded from strategic planning. Inter-organizational collaboration was further constrained by hierarchical governance, with central agencies exercising command authority but failing to coordinate effectively with local governments and civil society actors. The research concludes that Thailand’s centralized disaster governance model limits responsiveness and equity. Addressing these gaps requires decentralizing decision-making authority, institutionalizing community participation, and creating integrated systems for real-time communication and coordinated action.

Air4Thai. (2020). PM2.5 Air Quality Monitoring Data: Chiang Mai Province (March 2020). Pollution Control Department, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Retrieved from http://air4thai.pcd.go.th/webV3/#/Home

Allison, et al. (2024). Exploring the use of satellite Earth observation active wildland fire hotspot data via open access web platforms. International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Austin, J. E. (2000). Collaborative partnerships: Enhancing the effectiveness of inter-organizational collaboration. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10(3), 295-310.

Auf der Heide, E. (1989). Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. C.V. Mosby Company.

Bangkok Tribune. Piyaporn, W. (2023 June 7). The hard lessons of PM2.5 haze. https://bkktribune.com/the-hard-lessons-of-pm2-5-haze/

Bangkok Tribune. Piyaporn, W. ( (2024, Feburary 3). Special report: Under the haze I demystifying the flames. https://bkktribune.com/special-report-under-the-haze-i-demystifying-the-flames/

Boonmee, C., & Thoenburin, P. (2024). Temporary safety zone site selection during haze pollution: An integrated approach with FAHP and FTOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 245, 123002.

Boer, M.M., Resco de Dios, V. & Bradstock, R.A. (2020) Unprecedented burn area of Australian mega forest fires. Nature Climate Change, 10, 171–172.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Bowman, D. M. J. S., Williamson, G. J., Price, O. F., Ndalila, M. N., & Bradstock, R. A. (2021). Australian wildfires: The compensatory role of workarounds in crisis response efficiency. Disasters, 45(3), 567-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12432
Butler, R. A. (2022, February). For fire-ravaged Northern Thailand, there's now an app to battle the blaze. Mongabay. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2022/02/for-fire-ravaged-northern-thailand-theres-now-an-app-to-battle-the-blaze/
Chiang Mai Citylife. (2024, March 20). Doi Suthep burning bright: What’s being done? Why is it happening? https://www.chiangmaicitylife.com/clg/our-city/environment/doi-suthep-burning-bright-whats-being-done-why-is-it-happening/
Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of hurricane Katrina on the information environment. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 109-122.
Comfort, L. K., & Kapucu, N. (2006). Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Natural Hazards, 39(2), 309-327.
Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343311405698
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Djalante, R., Garschagen, M., Thomalla, F., & Shaw, R. (2017). Disaster risk reduction in Indonesia: Progress, challenges and issues. Environmental Science & Policy, 70, 26–35.
DDPM (Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation). (2020). Official statement on emergency forest fire response in Chiang Mai. Ministry of Interior, Thailand.
Department of Environment Malaysia. (n.d.). Air Pollutant Index Management System (APIMS). Retrieved from https://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/home.html
Earth.org. (2020, April 17). Forest fires have devastated Northern Thailand. Retrieved from https://earth.org/forest-fires-have-devastated-northern-thailand/
Ekachai, S. (2020, April 2). Forests doomed by power and prejudice. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1891350/forests-doomed-by-power-and-prejudice
Elliott, J. A., Chuvieco, E., & San Miguel, J. (2012). Remote sensing of active fires: Current status and future trends. Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(4), 187-203.
FEMA. (2017). National Incident Management System. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA. (2019). National Response Framework. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Fischer, A. P., Spies, T. A., Steelman, T. A., Moseley, C., Johnson, B. R., Bailey, J. D., & Bourgeron, P. (2016). Wildfire risk as a socioecological pathology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(5), 276-284.
Forsyth, T. (2020). Who shapes the politics of expertise? Co-production and authoritative knowledge in Thailand's political forests. Antipode, 52(4), 1039–1059.
Fujimoto, K., & Shiwaku, K. (2015). Problems of disaster warning systems for vulnerable populations: Lessons from the 2011 Japan tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.009
Ganjanapan, A. (2000). "Local Control of Land and Forest: Cultural Dimensions of Resource Management in Northern Thailand." Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), Chiang Mai University Press.
Garcia, M., & Santos, J. R. (2018). Systemic failures in disaster response: The 2017 Puerto Rico case. Natural Hazards Review, 19(4), 05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000301
Garden, P., Lebel, L., Viseskul, F., Ngampramuan, C., Prompanyo, M., & Thanasukarn, A. (2020). The consequences of institutional interplay and density on local governance in northern Thailand. Sustainability, 12(6), Article 2441.
GISTDA. (2020). Satellite Fire Detection Reports: March 2020. Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency. Retrieved from https://fire.gistda.or.th
Global Forest Watch. (n.d.). Dashboards: Thailand - Chiang Mai. Retrieved from https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/THA/10/?category=fires
Goldammer, J. G., & Penafiel, S. R. (Eds.). (1990). Fire in the tropical forests: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Fire Ecology. Freiburg University Press.
Goldammer, J. G., Schantz, H. L., & Veeman, J. (2004). Wildland fire management handbook for Sub-Sahara Africa. FAO Forestry Paper 144. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Gopalkrishnan, R., & Okada, T. (2007). Disaster risk reduction: Institutionalizing disaster management. Environmental Hazards, 6(1), 34–45.
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175-184.
Hance, J. (2022, March 18). Fires rage across Thailand, destroying vast swathes of forest. Mongabay. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2022/03/fires-rage-across-thailand-destroying-vast-swathes-of-forest/
Harakan, A., Hilman, Y. A., Karso, A. J., Awaluddin, A., Nurhalijah, N., Muin, I. S., B, A. N., Fadillah, A., & Hardi, R. (2025). Inter-agency collaboration in building urban fire resilience in Indonesia: how do metropolitan cities address it? Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, Article 1492869.
Heath, R. L., & Frey, K. (2004). Strategic communication: A theoretical approach. Journal of Communication Management, 8(1), 5-18.
Henstra, D. (2010). Evaluating local government emergency management programs: What framework should public managers adopt? Public Administration Review, 70(2), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02130.x
Jasanoff, S. (2007). Technologies of humility. Nature, 450(7166), 33.
Jet-Setting Duo. (2024, January 27). Chiang Mai: Exploring Thailand's cultural gem. Retrieved June 24, 2025, from https://jetsettingduo.com/chiang-mai-exploring-thailands-cultural-gem/
JITEC. (2023). Joint Interagency Training and Education Center. West Virginia National Guard.
Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies: Boundary Spanners in Multiagency Coordination. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207-225.
Kapucu, N., et al. (2018). Nonprofit Organizations in Disaster Response and Management: A Network Analysis.
Kartez, J. D., & Lindell, M. K. (1987). Planning for uncertainty: The case of local disaster planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(4), 487–498.
Karurung, W. S., Lee, K., & Lee, W. (2025). Assessment of forest fire vulnerability prediction in Indonesia: Seasonal variability analysis using machine learning techniques. Environmental Modelling & Software, 175, Article 105442.
Kilby, P. (2008). The Strength of Networks: The Local NGO Response to the Tsunami in India. Disasters, 32(1), 120-130.
Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2011). Humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: The start of a new journal. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(1), 5–14.
Kowsuvon, N., & Sangawongse, S. (2016). Landuse changes tendency and environmental quality indicators development for air and water pollutions monitoring in Chiang Mai comprehensive plans boundary, Thailand. PSAKU International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 5(1), 60–70.
Laosuwan, T., Plybour, C., & Rotjanakusol, T. (2023). Inspection of burning areas caused by forest fire in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park with Landsat 8 satellite data and Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR). Agriculture and Forestry, 17(2), 84–90. https://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/rpf/2566/rpf592-66.pdf
Lebel, L., Sinh, B. T., Chinh, N., Boontaveeyuwat, S. and Kimkong, H. (2013.) Risk communication and adaptation planning in deltas and coastal settlements of the Mekong Region. Pages 253-269 in S. Moser and M. Boykoff, editors. Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. Routledge, New York.
Lebel, L., Wattana, S. and Talerngsri, P. (2015.) Assessments of ecosystem services and human well-being in Thailand build and create demand for coproductive capacity. Ecology and Society, 20 (1).
Lichterman, J. D. (2000). A "Community as Resource" Strategy for Disaster Response. Public Health Reports, 115(2-3), 262-265.
Matana, S., & Phich, P. (2021).พัฒนาการนโยบายไฟป่าและหมอกควัน: กรณีศึกษานโยบายไฟป่าและหมอกควัน จ.เชียงใหม่ [Development of forest fire and haze policy: A case study of forest fire and haze policy in Chiang Mai Province]. วารสารการบริหารปกครอง, 10(1), 408–446.
Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. St. Paul, MN: Fieldstone Alliance.349.
Maxwell, J. F. & S. Elliott, 2001. Vegetation and Vascular Flora of Doi Sutep–Pui National Park, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Thai Studies in Biodiversity 5. Biodiversity Research & Training Programme, Bangkok. 205.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
McCloughen, A., & O’Brien, L. (2006). Building effective communication channels in inter-organizational collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(3), 229-241.
McGee, T. K. (2019). Preparedness and Experiences of Evacuees from the 2016 Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire. Fire, 2(1), 13
Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Miller, D. F. M. (2005). Community-based Forest Fire Management in Southeast Asia: A Synthesis of Lessons Learned. RECOFTC—The Center for People and Forests.
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE), Thailand. (2010). Thailand national report on the implementation of the programme of work on protected areas. http://www.icem.com.au/documents/biodiversity/pad/thailand_nr.pdf
MNP LLP. (2017). 2016 Fort McMurray wildfire after-action review report. Government of Alberta. https://www.alberta.ca/assets/documents/Wildfire-KPMG-Report.pdf
Mosoti, L., & Mekouar, A. (2020). Human resource management in emergency response: A review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48, Article 101569.
Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 895-915.
Natalie Karen. (2020, April 17). Forest Fires Have Devastated Northern Thailand. Earth.Org. Retrieved from https://earth.org/forest-fires-have-devastated-northern-thailand/?utm_source=chatgpt.comNEMA. (2022). What is EMAC? National Emergency Management Association.
Nguyen, N. L. T., Pimonsree, S., Prueksakorn, K., Thao, P. T. B., & Vongruang, P. (2022). Public health and economic impact assessment of PM₂.₅ from open biomass burning over countries in mainland Southeast Asia during the smog episode. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 13(6), 101418.
Nowell, B., Steelman, T., Velez, A. L. K., & Yang, Z. (2018). The structure of effective governance of disaster response networks: Insights from the field. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(7), 699-715
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC), Office of the Prime Minister, Thailand. (2018). The 20-Year National Strategy (2018-2037).
Osthanandaikul, M. (2020). โครงการความหลากหลายทางชีวภาพของพืชในระบบนิเวศของป่าไม้เมืองร้อน (อุทยานแห่งชาติดอยสุเทพ-ปุย): รายงานวิจัยฉบับสมบูรณ์ [Plant biodiversity project in tropical forest ecosystems (Doi Suthep-Pui National Park): Complete research report]. Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI).
Pattaya Mail. (2024). Chiang Mai forest fires are now under control. https://www.pattayamail.com/thailandnews/chiang-mai-forest-fires-are-now-under-control-458699
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Paudel, P. K., Parajuli, S., Sinha, R., Kumar, A., Baral, P., Thapa, R., Pandey, B. P., Khanal, D., Sharma, R., & Huntington, H. P. (2025). Integrating traditional and local knowledge into disaster risk reduction policies: Insights from Nepal, India and Bangladesh. Environmental Science & Policy, 158, 10–21.
Posee, N., Sirisunyaluck, R., Limnirankul, B., & Khamyong, S. (2011). แนวทางการแก้ปัญหาไฟป่าแบบผสมผสานในพื้นที่ อุทยานแห่งชาติดอยสุเทพ-ปุยของเกษตรกรใน ตำบลดอนแก้ว อำเภอแม่ริม จังหวัดเชียงใหม่ [Integrated approach for solving forest fire problems in Doi Suthep-Pui National Park area, of farmers in Donkeaw sub-district, Mae Rim District, Chiang Mai Province]. วารสารเกษตร, 27(2), 121–127.
Prachatai English. (2024, September 24). Chiang Mai's air quality is better than last year. What's behind their progress? Retrieved from https://prachataienglish.com/node/11115
Ramasamy, S. S., Suyaroj, N., & Chakpitak, N. (2022). Forest Protection by Fire Detection, Alarming, Messaging Through IoT, Blockchain, and Digital Technologies in Thailand Chiang Mai Forest Range.

Sangkhaduang, T., Visuthismajarn, P., & Kongchouy, N. (2021). The relationship between responsible tourism practice, destination sustainability and quality of life: Perspective of Marine National Park communities. Planning, 16(5), 895–901.

Sangawongse, S., Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (2012). The multi-level perspective and the scope for sustainable land use planning in Chiang Mai city. Environment and Natural Resources Journal, 10(2), 21–30.

Sanyal, S., Na Ranong, V., & Poapongsakorn, N. (2013). Strengthening Thailand's social protection system: Towards an integrated and sustainable framework (TDRI Research Report No. N54). Thailand Development Research Institute. https://tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/N54.pdf

San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Durrant, T., Boca, R., Maianti, P., Liberta`, G., Artes Vivancos, T., Jacome Felix Oom, D., Branco, A., De Rigo, D., Ferrari, D., Pfeiffer, H., Grecchi, R. and Nuijten, D., Advance report on wildfires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2021, EUR 31028 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022,

Schroeder, W., & Giglio, L. (2018). VIIRS/NPP Thermal Anomalies/Fire Daily L3 Global 1 km SIN Grid (VNP14A1) response time. Remote Sensing of Environment, 143, 85–96.

Selangor Journal. (2017). State-led haze response plans enhance efficiency. Retrieved from https://selangorjournal.my

Shah, I., Mahmood, T., Khan, S. A., Elahi, N., Shahnawaz, M., Dogar, A. A., Subhan, F., & Begum, K. (2022). Inter-agency collaboration and disaster management: A case study of the 2005 earthquake disaster in Pakistan. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1), 1-14.

Sharma, S., & Pokhrel, A. (2020). Challenges in Forest Fire Management in the Himalaya: Experiences from Nepal. Tropical Forest Issues, 61, 137-143.

Simo, G., & Bies, A. L. (2007). The Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: An Expanded Model of Cross-Sector Collaboration. Public Administration Review, 67, 125-142.
Simpson, D. M. (1992). Disaster Preparedness Measures: A Test Case Development and Evaluation Model. Disasters, 16(3), 276-280.

Siva Shankar, Ramasamy, Naret Suyaroj, & Nopasit Chakpitak (2022). Forest Protection by Fire Detection, Alarming, Messaging Through IoT, Blockchain, and Digital Technologies in Thailand Chiang Mai Forest Range. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 462, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2211-4_14

Steelman, T. A., & McCaffrey, S. (2013). Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards, 65(1), 683-705.

Sundari, C., Purnomo, E. P., Mutiarin, D., Adrian, M. M., Suling, C. F., & Pratama, I. (2022). Sustainable Forest Governance: A New Policy Strategy in Handling Forest Fires in Jambi Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1111/1/012005

Suthep Municipality. (2025). About Suthep Municipality: General information [เกี่ยวกับเทศบาลเมืองสุเทพ: ข้อมูลทั่วไป]. Suthep Municipality, Chiang Mai Province. Retrieved from http://www.suthep.go.th/about.php?id=1&pid=2

Talukdar, N. R., Ahmad, F., Goparaju, L., Choudhury, P., Qayum, A., & Rizvi, J. (2023). Forest fire in Thailand: Spatio-temporal distribution and future risk assessment. Natural Hazards Research, 4(1), 87–96.
Tang, S.Y.(1992). Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation. CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
Tantinipankul (2017). University Engagement for Community-based Tourism Development: Case of Hmong Community at Mon Ngor Village, Chiang Mai. Asian Journal of Tourism Research. Vol. 2, No. 2, September 2017, pp. 159-178.
Tavida, S. (2021, July). Thailand Disaster & Emergency Management. The International Emergency Management Society (TIEMS). https://tiems.info/images/pdf/Webinar_2021_Thailand_Disaster_Risk_Management_TK.pdf
Techawongtham, W. (2020, January 25). Haze crisis a symptom of state of failures. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1843114/haze-crisis-a-symptom-of-state-of-failures
Thai PBS World. (n.d.). Doi Suthep forest fires now under control, Chiang Mai governor. Retrieved from https://www.thaipbsworld.com/doi-suthep-forest-fires-now-under-control-chiang-mai-governor/

Thériault, L., Belleville, G., Ouellet, M.-C., & Morin, C. M. (2021). The Experience and Perceived Consequences of the 2016 Fort McMurray Fires and Evacuation. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, Article 641151

The Thaiger. (2020). Chiang Mai fire spikes air pollution up to 20 times 'safe' levels. https://thethaiger.com/hot-news/environment/chiang-mai-fire-spikes-air-pollution-up-to-20-times-safe-levels

The Thaiger. (2024). Chiang Mai forest fire tamed by dedicated officers despite challenges. https://thethaiger.com/news/chiang-mai/chiang-mai-forest-fire-tamed-by-dedicated-officers-despite-challenges

Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley.
Trupp, A. (2014). Ethnic tourism in Northern Thailand: Viewpoints of the Akha and the Karen. In K. Husa, A. Trupp, & H. Wohlschlägl (Eds.), Southeast Asian mobility transitions: Issues and trends in tourism and migration (pp. 346–376). Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna.
Turoff, M., Chumer, M., Van de Walle, B., & Yao, X. (2004). The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS). Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(4), 1-35.
UNICEF Thailand. (2019). Thailand social protection diagnostic review. https://www.unicef.org/thailand/media/10826/file/Thailand%20Social%20Protection%20Diagnostic%20Review_EN.pdf

UNDP Nepal. (2023). Data to the rescue: Innovative approaches in disaster risk reduction and agriculture. https://www.undp.org/nepal/news/data-rescue-innovative-approaches-disaster-risk-reduction-and-agriculture

UNISDR. (2008). Indigenous knowledge for disaster risk reduction. https://www.unisdr.org/files/3646_IndigenousKnowledgeDRR.pdf

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (2023). National Prescribed Fire Resource Mobilization Strategy. FS-1216.

U.S. Forest Service. (2020). National Interagency Mobilization Guide. National Interagency Fire Center.

Vaddhanaphuti, C. (2023). Politics of Hotspot and Uncertainties in Space and Time of the “FireD” System: A Case Study on Forest Fire and Haze Pollution in Chiang Mai 2022. Journal of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, 35(1), 188–235.

Wanthonchai, K., & Tarusadamrongdet, V. (2020). Effects of Fire on Structure and Composition of Vegetation Community in Pine Forests, Nam Nao National Park, Thailand. BIOTROPIA, 27(2), 143-152.

Williams, D. R., & Jakes, P. J. (2013). Communities at risk report. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/43247

Wittayapak, C., & Dearden, P. (1999). "Decision-making Arrangements in Community-Based Watershed Management in Northern Thailand." Society and Natural Resources, 12(7), pp. 673-691.

Wongpreedee, A., & Mahakanjana, C. (2017). Decentralization and local governance in Thailand. In Public Administration in Southeast Asia (pp. 53-77).

World Bank. (2021). Thailand Forest Fire Economic Impact Brief 2020. Bangkok Office.

Yang, Y. (2010). The 9/21 Earthquake in Taiwan: A Local Government Disaster Rescue System. Disasters, 34(1), 112-136.
Zaini, A. A. (2017). Development of real time air quality monitoring system (Master’s thesis, Universiti Teknologi Petronas). UTPeida.