| 研究生: |
邱金榮 Chiu, Chin–Jung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以生命週期觀點探討產業聚集動態外部效果之研究-以台灣地區製造業為例 Exploring the Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities from the Viewpoints of Life Cycles of Industry: A Case Study of Manufacturing Industries in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
孔憲法
Kung, Shiann-Far |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 90 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 產業生命週期 、聚集動態外部效果 、追蹤資料分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Industry Life Cycles, Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities, Panel Data Analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:252 下載:25 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在瞭解城市產業於各階段產業生命週期之聚集動態外部性的變化。以民國70年至90年之年度工商普查資料為基礎資料,實證對象為台灣地區25個中分類製造業,空間單元定義為21個都市區域。於每資料年度分別確認各類產業所處之生命週期階段,並將資料整理成為以「城市-產業」為橫斷面分類的追蹤資料型態(Panel data),採取修改自Neffke et al. (2011) 之實證方法,利用Cobb- Douglas 生產函數建立迴歸實證模型,以隨機效果及固定效果模型測試各階段產業生命週期的外部動態效果影響。主要測試之標的為文獻所重視的三種動態聚集外部性( MAR外部性、Jacobs外部性及Porter競爭外部性)之影響。
結果發現,總合製造業存在著顯著的Jacobs外部性,MAR外部性則無顯著的影響而Porter外部性則對產業發展有負面的影響。聚集外部性隨著產業生命週期演進而有所差異,初始階段之產業存在著顯著的MAR與Jacobs外部性,中間與成熟階段之產業則存在著顯著且積極的Jacobs外部性、Porter外部性則為負面的。
This research aims to understand the changing roles of agglomeration externalities along the industry life cycle in different stages. The objects of study are the data between 1981 and 2001 of 25 Taiwan’s manufacturing industries based on the Industry, Commerce and Service Census. It is identified for each year when the different types of industries are in a young, intermediate, or mature stage. The main subject of this research is test for the impact from three dynamic of agglomeration externalities, such as MAR, Jacobs and Porter’s externalities. The results reveal few points as follow. First, for all industries, there is a significant impact of Jacob’s externalities. Second, for young industries, there is a significant impact of Jacob’s and MAR externalities. Most important of all, for mature industries, there is a significant impact of Jacob’s externalities, but Porter’s externalities are negative impact and none of MAR externalities.
1. 丁力清 (1993),「臺灣地區製造業聚集經濟型態之研究」, 國立政治大學地政研究所,碩論。
2. 王譯賢 (2003),「台灣地區產業外部環境對服務業生產力影響之研究」,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所,碩論。
3. 何祖睿 (2002),「台灣地區製造業空間聚集之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所,碩論。
4. 李庸三 (1973),「計量經濟方法」,台北市: 李庸三印行。
5. 周志龍 (2003),「全球化、台灣國土再結構與制度」, 台北:詹氏書局。
6. 林盛輝 (2000),「產業與都市成長關係之研究」,國立政治大學地政研究所,碩論。
7. 林晶晶 (2003),「台灣知識密集服務業空間結構之研究」,私立中國文化大學地學研究所,碩論。
8. 林楨家、馮正民、李洋寧 (2004),知識可及性對創新的影響:以臺灣北部區域電子產業為例,「運輸計劃季刊」,第33卷,第3期,第 577-601頁。
9. 金家禾、周志龍 (2007),臺灣產業群聚區域差異及中國效應衝擊,「地理學報」,第49期,第 55-79頁。
10. 金家禾、楊政龍 (2002),知識設施對台灣製造業生產力之影響,「都市與計劃」,第 29卷,第4期,第 513-532頁。
11. 姜樹翰 (2008),知識外溢與都市製造業成長,「台灣土地研究」,第11卷,第1期,第37-63頁。
12. 姜樹翰、黃仁德 (2007),台灣製造業都市聚集經濟之研究,「台灣土地研究」,第 10卷,第2期,第127-149頁。
13. 施鴻志 (1997),「都市規劃」,新竹:建都文化。
14. 洪一權 (1993),「產業生命週期與合作策略關聯之研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,碩論。
15. 夏鑄九 (1995),「空間,歷史與社會-論文選1987-1992」,台北:台灣社會研究季刊社。
16. 馬宣羽 (2007),「產業生命週期對廠商存活與規模關係之影響」,私立中原大學國際貿易研究所,碩論。
17. 張郁旎 (2001),「都會區產業空間分佈變遷及區位選擇因素之研究—以台北都會區為例」,國立政治大學地政研究所,碩論。
18. 陳協勝、吳濟華、王翔煒 (2008),科技產業聚集創新之動態外部效果實證研究,「管理學報」,第 25卷,第2期,第 133-149頁。
19. 陳祈潔 (2006),「台灣都市製造業區位選擇決定因素」,國立台北大學都市計劃研究所,碩論。
20. 曾姿菁 (2001),「臺灣製造業空間成長與結構變遷之研究」,國立台北大學都市計劃研究所,碩論。
21. 曾參寶 (1995),「產業雜異度與都市規模之關係:臺灣地區之實證分析」,國立政治大學地政研究所,博論。
22. 游淑慧 (2004),「產業聚集外部性對製造業廠商績效影響」,私立世新大學經濟學系研究所,碩論。
23. 黃台心 (2009),「計量經濟學」(二版),台北市:新陸書局。
24. 楊重信、林育諄 (2003),台灣都市生產者服務業動態外部之實證,「都市與計劃」,第30卷,第2期,第 91-107頁。
25. 劉婷、平瑛 (2009),產業生命週期理論研究進展,「湖南農業科學」,第8期,第 93-96頁。
26. 邊泰明 (2000),台灣地區製造業都市化經濟及地方化經濟分析,「國立政治大學學報」,第 66期,第233-248頁。
27. Abernathy, W. J. and Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation, Technology Review, 80(7): 40-47.
28. Agarwal, R. and Gort, M. (1996). The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3): 489-498.
29. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): 155-173.
30. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events , Economic Journal, 99(394): 116-131.
31. Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M. P. (1996). Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle, Review of Industrial Organization, 11(2): 253-273.
32. Beaudry, C. and Breschi, S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4): 325 - 342.
33. Beaudry, C. and Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate, Research Policy, 38(2): 318-337.
34. Boschma, R.A., Neffke, F. and Van Oort, F. (2005). Externalities and the industry life cycle,CEFR 5th Spring School in Economic Geography,Cagliari.
35. Boschma, R. A. and Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2): 213-238.
36. Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier test and its applications to model-specification in econometrics, Review of Economic Studies, 47(1): 239-253.
37. Bun, M. J. G. and El Makhloufi, A. (2007). Dynamic externalities, local industrial structure and economic development: Panel data evidence for morocco, Regional Studies, 41(6): 823-837.
38. Chen, H. P. (2002). Urban externalities and city growth in Taiwan, Annals of Regional Science, 36(4): 531-550.
39. Combes, P.-P. (2000). Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984-1993, Journal of Urban Economics, 47(3): 329-355.
40. David, B. A. and Arthur, G. W. (1986). The industry life cycle and the condentration profits relationships, American Economist, 30(2): 46-51.
41. de Lucio, J. J., Herce, J. A. and Goicolea, A. (2002). The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32(2): 241-258.
42. de Vor, F. and de Groot, H. L. F. (2010). Agglomeration externalities and localized employment growth: the performance of industrial sites in Amsterdam, Annals of Regional Science, 44(3): 409-431.
43. Dicken, P. (1998). Global Shift: Transforming The World Economy, London: Paul Chapman .
44. Duranton, G. and Puga, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products, American Economic Review, 91(5): 1454-1477.
45. Ejermo, O. (2005). Technological diversity and Jacobs' externality hypothesis revisited, Growth and Change, 36(2): 167-195.
46. Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach, Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 889-927.
47. Forni, M. and Paba, S. (2002). Spillovers and the growth of local industries, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2): 151-171.
48. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1126-1152.
49. Gort, M. and Klepper, S. (1982). Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations, Economic Journal, 92(367): 630-653.
50. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46(6): 1251-1271.
51. Henderson, J. V. (1986). Efficiency of resource usage and city size, Journal of Urban Economics, 19(1): 47-70.
52. Henderson, J.V. (1997). Externalities and industrial development, Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3): 449-470.
53. Henderson, J. V. (2003). Marshall's scale economies, Journal of Urban Economics, 53(1): 1-28.
54. Henderson,J. V., Kuncoro, A. and Turner, M. (1995). Industrial-development in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103(5): 1067-1090.
55. Hoover, E. M. (1937). Location Theory and Shoe and Leather Industries, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
56. Howells,J.R.L. (1983). Filter-down theory – Location and technology in the UK Pharmaceutical-industry, Environment and Planning A, 15(2): 147-164.
57. Huallachain,B.O. and Satterthwaite, M. A. (1992). Sectoral growth-patterns at the metropolitan level – An evaluation of economic-development incentives, Journal of Urban Economics, 31(1): 25-58.
58. Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space -Economy, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
59. Jacobs, J. (1969). The Economy of Cities, New York: Random House.
60. Karlsson, C. (1999). Spatial industrial dynamics in Sweden: Urban growth industries, Growth and Change, 30(2): 184-212.
61. Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1): 145-181.
62. Klepper, S. (2002). Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly, Rand Journal of Economics, 33(1): 37-61.
63. Lee, B. S., Jang, S. and Hong, S. H. (2010). Marshall's scale economies and Jacobs' externality in Korea: the role of age, size and the legal form of organisation of establishments, Urban Studies, 47(14): 3131-3156.
64. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
65. Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2002). The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, Environment and Planning A, 34(3): 429-449.
66. Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial-innovation, Research Policy, 20(1): 1-12.
67. Markusen, A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72(3): 293-313.
68. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, New York: Free Press.
69. Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution, Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4): 395-437.
70. Nakamura,R. (1985). Agglomeration economies in urban manufacturing-industries – A case of Japanese cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 17(1): 108-124.
71. Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R.A., Lundquist, K.-J. and Olander, L.-O. (2011). The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries, Regional Studies, 45(1):49-65.
72. Norton, R. D. (1979). City Life-Cycle and American Urban Policy, New York: J.Wiley.
73. Norton, R. D. and Rees, J. (1979). Product cycle and the spatial decentralization of American manufacturing, Regional Studies, 13(2): 141-151.
74. O'Rand, A. M. and Krecker, M. L. (1990). Concepts of the life cycle: Their history, meanings, and uses in the social sciences, Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1): 241-262.
75. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: NY Free Press.
76. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Macmillan.
77. Potter, A. and Watts, H. D. (2010). Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle, Journal of Economic Geography.
78. Rink, D. R. and Swan, J. E. (1979). Product life-cycle research – Literature-review, Journal of Business Research, 7(3): 219-242.
79. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
80. Schumpter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper.
81. Segal, D. (1976). Are there returns to scale in city size, Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(3): 339-350.
82. Sveikauskas, L. (1975). Productivity of cities, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(3): 393-413.
83. Taylor, M. (1986). The product-cycle model – A critique, Environment and Planning A, 18(6): 751-761.
84. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190-207.
85. Weber, A. (1909). Theory of the Location of Industry, Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.
86. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.