目前我國即將面臨高齡社會問題，身心障礙者人數也不斷上升，原因可能是年紀、受傷或是疾病，其中以台灣二千三百萬人口推估，台灣腦性麻痺人數約有四到六萬人，保守估計至少有四萬多個腦性麻痺的家庭。根據衛福部的調查顯示，身心障礙者從事休閒活動多以靜態為主，極少數的人參與動態的休閒活動。目前市面上休閒運動產品極少考慮身心障礙使用者的需求，當身心障礙者的手、眼反應速度較正常人慢的情形，或者手部握持功能較差的情形，又或者使用輪椅的情形，這些狀況往往導致身心障礙者無法使用現有的休閒運動器材。
本研究以腦性麻痺者休閒活動的生活型態，研究腦性麻痺者對於休閒運動產品的需求。針對目前腦性麻痺患者最為缺乏的休閒運動產品，建立其腦性麻痺患者生活運動產品類型最佳組合及設計方針建議。
研究成果如下：(1)瞭解腦性麻痺患者之生活型態。(2)分析出腦麻患者的休閒運動產品的產品組合類型。(3)經過品質機能展開，產出適用於腦性麻痺患者於休閒運動產品的設計方針，提供企業相關部門於產品設計上可依循的方向。

Taiwan is becoming an aged society, and the number of people with disabilities also keeps rising due to aging, injuries, or diseases. Based on Taiwan’s population totaling 23 million people, there are about 40,000-60,000 people suffered from cerebral palsy (CP) from at least 40,000 families according to a conservative estimation. The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) statistics show that most CP patients engage in inactive leisure activities, and rarely will they participate in active leisure activities. While the needs of people with disabilities are not the main concerns of leisure sports product (LSP) manufacturers, ready-to-use leisure sports equipment is often useless to people with disabilities who have slower hand and eye responses or poorer hand grip function than normal people or who need to use wheelchairs
After reviewing the pattern of the leisure activities of CP patients, this study investigates the LSP needs of CP patients and proposes the optimal types of LSP combinations for CP patients and optimal LSP designs based on the desperate needs of CP patients.
The outcomes of this study include: (1) understanding the lifestyle of CP patients; (2) analyzing the type of LSP combinations for CP patients; and (3) producing the design LSP guidelines for CP patients through quality function deployment (QFD) for the product design reference of relevant business departments.

余佩芬（2015），擲與執：腦性麻痺運動員參與地板滾球之個案研究，臺北市立大學運動教育研究所碩士學位論文。
吳萬益（2011），企業研究方法，華泰，台北。
張勤昌（2003），聯合分析應用於金控後銀行顧客知覺與偏好之研究，國立成功大學統計學系碩士論文。
陳鴻雁、楊志顯（1999），國民參與休閒運動人口調查，行政院體育委員會委辦調查。
謝育倫（2015），應用品質機能展開於高齡者使用智慧型手機通訊軟體需求與介面之設計，國立成功大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
羅明華（2002），「遊戲治療在國民小學的實施與考量」，輔導季刊，Vol.38，頁1-6。
蘇瑋佳（2000），以立面綠化設計改善都市商業街道視覺品質之模式研究，國立中興大學園藝學系碩士論文。
身心障礙者服務資訊網http://disable.yam.org.tw/life/468
Cox, K & Walker, D. (1993). User Interface Design, Prentice Hall.
Green, P.E., V. Srinivasan(1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and
Outlook”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp.103-123.
Hair, Jr. J.F., Anderson, R., Black, W.C.(1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings,
4th ed., N.Y.: Macmill-an.
Hawkins, Del. I.、Roger J. Best and Kenneth A. Coney(1992), Consumer Behavior:
Implication For Marketing Stategy, 5th ed, Mass:Irwin., pp.326
Jowett, S., & Lavallee, D. (2007). Social psychology in sport. Champaign, IL: Human
Kinetics.
Kaiser, H. F. ( 1974). An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. Metz,
P. J. (1998, Winter). Demystifying supply chain management. Supply Chain
Management Review, 46-55.
Malone, M. D., & Langone, J. (1998). Variability in the play of preschoolers with
cognitive delays across different toy sets. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 45, 127-142.
Marsh, H. W., & Köller, O.(2003).Unification of theoretical models of academic self
concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school
systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
29(3), 264-282.
Niel, B., & Landreth, G. L. (2001). Have toys-will travel: A traveling play therapist in the
school setting. In G. L. Landreth (Ed.), Innovations in play therapy: issues, process,
and special populations (pp.349-360). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
Sproles, G. B. (1985). “From perfectionism to faddism: Measuring consumer’ decision-
making styles, proceeding,” American Council on Consumer interests, 79-85.