簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 趙頌暐
Chao, Sun-wei
論文名稱: 流動應計項目品質與益本比、市場系統風險、會計風險之關連性
The Relation among EP Ratio, Market Systematic Risk, Accounting Risk and the Quality of Current Accruals
指導教授: 林玲芬
Lin, Ling-Fen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 權益資金成本會計風險流動應計項目品質
外文關鍵詞: the Quality of Current Accruals, Accounting Risk, the Cost of Funding
相關次數: 點閱:123下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 應計項目品質向為國內外學者在盈餘管理方面所探討之焦點,本研究企圖討論應計項目品質與資金成本之關係,並以益本比、系統風險係數、會計風險等等代理變數檢證之。研究是否公司應計項目品質之優劣影響該公司之資金成本,而其影響是否可由本文之分析中得到證明。
    若一公司所面臨之風險較高,是否市場將給予該公司證券較低之價格,或要求較高之報酬,造成了較高的資金成本;在要求報酬愈高而股價愈低之時,該公司本益比
    即愈小,而本益比愈小之公司有愈大之益本比,因此可知益本比愈大則風險愈大,資金成本愈大,其中風險所指者乃是無法分散之非系統風險。本文以1996 至2005 年之台灣上市、上櫃公司為樣本,將盈餘品質中影響最鉅者,應計項目品質作為自變數,與產業調整後之益本比、系統風險係數、會計風險指標,三項權益資金成本代理變數進行分析與檢證,實證結果說明如下:
    一、依據 Dechow and Dichev Model 及由 Modified Dechow and Dichev Model 求出之應計項目品質指標均可證實與產業調整後益本比呈顯著正相關。故應計項目品質愈低,則資金成本愈高,而應計項目品質愈高,資金成本愈低;可得到應計項目品質與權益資金成本呈反向關係之結論。
    二、依據 Dechow and Dichev(2002) 所使用之方法,可見應計項目品質指標與系統風險係數呈正向變動,惟僅有少數顯著,而迴歸分析結果亦不顯著,由於以往文獻無法確實證明系統風險係數與資金成本之關係是否密切,故當企業之盈餘中應計項目品質愈低時,我們不一定能推論出該公司之系統風險係數即愈大之結論,亦無法確實證明,應計項目與系統風險呈反向關係之假說。
    三、依據 Dechow and Dichev Model 及由 Modified Dechow and Dichev Model 求出之應計項目品質指標均可知應計項目品質愈低,會計風險愈高,則資金成本愈高;而應計項目品質愈高,會計風險愈低,則資金成本愈低;可得應計項目品質與會計風險呈反向關係之結論。

    The quality of accruals is always a famous topic when talking about Earnings Management. This paper follow Dechow and Dichev(2002)and McNichols(2002)to test the quality of accruals with Dechow and Dichev Model and Modified Dechow and Dichev Model as independent variables. Take EP ratio, the system risk variable(Beta), accounting risk as dependent variable. Using empirical model to test their relation. If the quality of accruals affect the cost of funding, is what this paper want to discuss.

    If a company face higher risk, does the whole market value its stock as worse and would not like to get its stocks at fair value? Or the market will ask for higher rewards as getting the stock? As the market ask for higher reward and lower stock price, the company have lower PE ratio. The company with lower PE ratio gets higher EP ratio. So we know a company with higher EP ratio will face higher risk. Here, the risk means the undistributable system risk.

    Using the data of the public companies of Taiwan during 1996 to 2005 as study sample(334 firms). Specifically, the paper examine the following three related issues. And list the conclusions as follow.

    1. Using Dechow and Dichev Model and Modified Dechow and Dichev Model to get the quality index of accruals. Examine the relation between the quality index and adjusted EP ratio. They are significantly positive related. So we know that a company with lower quality of accruals will be charged higher cost as funding. The conclusion is the quality of accruals and the cost of funding are negative related.

    2. Using Dechow and Dichev Model and Modified Dechow and Dichev Model to get the quality index of accruals. Examine the relation between the quality index and Beta risk. We only observed the trend of Beta and the index moving in the same direction. But we can not prove if they are significantly related. So the result does not support the expected conclusion.

    3. Using Dechow and Dichev Model and Modified Dechow and Dichev Model to get the quality index of accruals. Examine the relation between the quality index and accounting risk index. They are significantly positive related. So we know that a company with lower quality of accruals will face higher accounting risk and will be charged higher cost as funding. The conclusion is the quality of accruals and the accounting risk are negative related.

    第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景……………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機及目的…………………………………………….2 第三節 論文架構與研究流程………………………………………..4 第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………6 第一節 應計項目與盈餘品質之定義………………………………....6 第二節 資金成本之相關文獻………………………………………14 第三節 盈餘管理及相關之應計項目模型…………………………...21 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………..26 第一節 研究假說的建立…………………………………………...27 第二節 研究模型設計與變數定義………………………………….30 第三節 資料來源與樣本篩選………………………………………40 第四章 實證結果與分析………………………………………...42 第一節 敘述統計量………………………………………………...42 第二節 應計項目品質與益本比(EP ratio)………………………...47 第三節 應計項目品質與市場系統風險係數(β,Beta)…………...53 第四節 應計項目品質與會計風險(Risk of Accounting)…………...58 第五章 研究結論及建議與限制………………………………..62 第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………..62 第二節 限制與建議………………………………………………..64 參考文獻…………………………………………………..……..65

    一、中文部份
    1. 王明隆、簡金成、黃信諭,新上市公司盈餘品質對股票價格影響,亞太管理評論 5,第403-422頁,2002。
    2. 林惠玲,代理成本、盈餘屬性與資金成本之關係,私立輔仁大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文,2006。
    3. 林獻章,穩健原則下,應計項目與盈餘管理間之關係研究,國立成功大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文,2005。
    4. 馮志卿,營運活動現金流量、應計項目、業外損益之盈餘持續性及市場效率研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,1999。
    5. 趙正源,應計項目組成與股票報酬之關聯性,私立輔仁大學會計學研究所碩士論文,2003。
    6. 鄭淩淇,裁決性應計項目的資訊內涵,私立中原大學會計學研究所碩士論文,1999。
    7. 羅怡君,盈餘屬性與資金成本關係之研究,國立成功大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文,2006。
    8. 游采熒,盈餘品質與資金成本之關聯性,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文,2005。
    二、日文部份
    1. 音川和久,IR活動對資金成本降低效果,「會計」森山書房,第158卷第4號,第543-555頁,2002。
    2. 野間幹晴,會計品質對資本市場之評價之影響,「會計」森山書房,第168卷第7號,第15-28頁,2005。
    三、英文部分
    1. Aboody, D., J. Hughes, and J. Liu. “Earnings quality, insider trading and the cost of capital,” Journal of Accounting Research 43(5): 651- 673, 2005.
    2. Alford, A.. “The effect of the set of comparable firms on the accuracy of the price-earnings valuation method,” Journal of Accounting Research 30, 1:94-108, 1992.
    3. Barth, M.E., D.P. Cram, and K.K. Nelson. “Accruals and the prediction of future cash flows,” The Accounting Review 76(1): 27-58, 2001.
    4. Beneish, M. D. and M. Vargus. “Insider trading, earnings quality, and accrual mispricing,” The Accounting Review : 755-791, 2002.
    5. Bharath, S.T., J. Sunder, and S.V. Sunder. “Accounting quality and debt contracting,” University of Michigan and Northwestern University Working Paper, 2004.
    6. Bhattacharya, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. “The world price of earnings opacity,” The Accounting Review 78(3): 641-678, 2003.
    7. Botosan, C.. “Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital,” The Accounting Review 72(3): 323-349, 1997.
    8. Botosan, C. and M. Plumlee. “A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital,” The Accounting Research 40(1): 21-40, 2002. 9. Botosan, C., M. Plumlee, and Y. Xie. “The role of information precision in determining the cost of equity capital,” Review of Accounting Studies 9(2-3): 233-259, 2004.
    10. Chan, K., L. Chan, N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok. “Accruals quality and stock returns : the evidence from accruals,” National Taiwan University and University of Illinois Working Paper, 2001.
    11. DeAngelo, L. E.. “Managerial Competition, Information Costs, and Corporate Governance: The User of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy Contests,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, January, 3-36, 1988.
    12. Dechow, P. M.,and R.G. Sloan.. “Detecting earnings management,” The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225, 1995.
    13. Dechow, P. M.,and D. J., Skinner. “Earnings Management: Reconciling the Views of Accounting Academics, Practitioners, and Regulators,” Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235-250, 2000.
    14. Dechow, P. M and I.D. Dichev. “The quality of accruals and earnings:the role of accruals estimation errors.” The Accounting Review 77:35-59, 2002.
    15. Defond and C.W. Park. “Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (July):115-139, 1997.
    16. Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer, and M. O’Hara. “Is information risk a determinant of asset returns?” Journal of Finance 57: 2185-2221, 2002.
    17. Easley, D. and M. O’Hara. “Information and the cost of capital,” Journal of Finance 59(4): 1553-1583, 2004.
    18. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. “Costs of equity and earnings attributes,” The Accounting Review 79(4): 967-1010, 2004.
    19. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. “The market pricing of accruals quality,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 39(2): 295-372, 2005.
    20. Guay, W., S.P. Kothari, and R. Watts. “A market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual model,” Journal of Accounting Research 34(supplement):83-105, 1996.
    21. Healy, P.. “The Impact of Bonus Schemes on the Selection of Accounting Principles,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85-107,1985.
    22. Healy, P., and Wahler, J.. “A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting,” Accounting Horizons, 13,365-383, 1999.
    23. Jones, J. J. “Earnings management during import relief investigation,”Journal of accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228, 1991.
    24. Lambert, R., C. Leuz, and R.E. Verrecchia. “Accounting information, disclosure
    and the cost of capital,” University of Pennsylvania Working Paper, 2005.
    25. Leuz, C., and R.Verrecchia. “Firm’s capital allocation choices, information quality, and the cost of capital,” University of Pennsylvania Working Paper, 2004.
    26. McNichols, M.. “Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings : the role of eccrual estimation errors,” The Accounting Review 77(supplement): 61-69, 2002.
    27. O’Hara, M.. “Presidential address: Liquidity and price discovery,” Journal of Finance 58: 1335-1354, 2003.
    28. Penman, S.H.. “Financial statement analysis and security valuation,” McGraw-Hill International Edition, Singapore, 2001.
    29. Sloan, R.. “Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flow about Future Earnings,” Accounting Review 71, 289-315,1996.
    30. Subramanyam, K.R.. “The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22(1-3): 249-218, 1996.
    31. Teoh, S.H., I. Welch, and T.J. Wong. “Earnings management and the long run underperformance of seasoned public offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics 50(1): 63-99, 1998.
    32. Verrecchia, R.E.. “Essays on Disclosure,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 97~180, 2001.
    33. Xie, H.. “The mispricing of abnormal accruals,” The Accounting Review 76(3):357-373, 2001.

    下載圖示 校內:2012-07-01公開
    校外:2017-07-01公開
    QR CODE