交通事故的發生，人為因素佔有較大的比例。交通安全的關鍵要素是文化，文化影響人們在駕駛座上的價值觀和判斷，進而塑造出不同的動態行為特徵和模式。因此，駕駛行為常被視為探討交通安全主要議題的一部分。隨著世界交通工具的成熟，國際間的交流越來越頻繁，不同文化之間的衝擊和磨合也逐漸加劇。本論文著重於探討在台國際學生、外國籍或多國籍商務人士，他們在台灣使用道路的體驗情形，針對台灣人的駕駛習慣帶給了外國人什麼樣的用路感受，用開放的心態以不同文化的背景和觀點討論台灣的交通安全文化。
本研究主要萃取台灣「民國110年道路交通安全觀測指標」計畫為基礎設計問卷，在台國際學生和多國籍或外籍商務人士為母體，探討之問題主要分為3類：危險用路行為、正向駕駛行為、台灣交通安全文化整體表現。問卷使用李克特五點量表作為衡量方式，採用描述性統計和變異數分析統計方法作為分析探討，比較不同文化背景的國際人士，對台灣交通安全多層面的觀點，作為改善台灣交通安全的參考。
研究結果發現，外籍人士普遍認為台灣駕駛人的危險行為發生率很高，正向駕駛行為觀念薄弱，這反映出台灣駕駛人的正向駕駛行為及危險用路行為的意識和觀念有待加強。此外，外籍人士最為不滿意的行為包括機動車輛不禮讓行人、違規停車、沒有正確使用方向燈，以及駛出巷道沒有停下左右察看交通狀況等行為，並且提出較多回饋和意見。

The occurrence of traffic accidents is largely attributed to human factors. The key element of traffic safety is culture, which influences people's values and judgments behind the wheel, consequently shaping different patterns of dynamic behavior. For that reason, driving behavior is often considered a significant aspect when discussing traffic safety issues. With the advancement of international travel and increasing international exchanges, the impact and adaptation among different cultures have become more pronounced. This paper placed a significant emphasis on the exploration of road usage experiences among international students and multinational or foreign business professionals in Taiwan. It aimed to uncover how the driving habits of Taiwanese people influence the perceptions of foreigners when navigating the roads in Taiwan. With an open and receptive mindset, the researcher engaged in discussions about Taiwan's traffic safety culture, taking into account distinct cultural backgrounds and perspectives.
The design of the questionnaire used in this study is primarily based on extracts from the 2021 Road Traffic Safety Performance Indicators project. The target audience of the questionnaire includes international students and multinational or foreign business professionals in Taiwan. The study aimed to explore three main categories of issues: dangerous road behaviors, safe driving behaviors, and Taiwanese collective performance in traffic safety culture. The questionnaire employed the Likert five-point scale for assessment, utilizing both descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) as analytical methods. By comparing individuals from different cultural backgrounds, the study examined diverse perspectives on various facets of Taiwan's traffic safety, providing insights for en-hancing Taiwan's traffic safety.
The outcomes of the study revealed a prevailing belief among foreign residents that the occurrence of dangerous road behaviors is notably high and that safe driving behavior is a weak concept among Taiwanese drivers. This highlights the need to enhance awareness and understanding regarding both safe driving behav-ior and dangerous road behaviors among Taiwanese drivers. Furthermore, the be-haviors that foreign residents are most dissatisfied with include Taiwanese motor vehicle drivers not yielding to pedestrians, violations of parking regulations, incorrect or non-usage of direction indicator lights, and failure to stop and observe traffic conditions before exiting alleys. These findings are accompanied by a substantial amount of feedback and suggestions from foreign residents.

1. 168交通安全入口網 (2019)，轉彎、變換車道未打方向燈、未依規定使用燈光 加重處罰最高1200至3600元，https://168.motc.gov.tw/theme/news/post/1911011450759。
2. 168交通安全入口網 (2018)，車禍肇事原因前3名 看看駕駛最易犯的錯，https://168.motc.gov.tw/theme/car/post/1906121102065。
3. 中華民國內政部移民署 (2023)，內政部統計月報，https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5385/7344/7350/%E5%90%84%E6%A9%9F%E5%A0%B4-%E6%B8%AF%E5%8F%A3%E5%85%A5%E5%87%BA%E5%9C%8B-%E5%A2%83-%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%B8/。
4. 張新立 (2021)，從安全文化培育規劃學校之交通安全教育，高雄市教育局交通安全資訊網，http://trafficsafety.kh.edu.tw/trafficsafety/msgboard_detail.php?id=526&ca=0&page=1&tag=&rsty=&kw=。
5. 張新立 (2020)，從文化培育觀點談我國之學校交通安全教育，國立彰化師範大學-學務處生活輔導組，https://stuaff01.ncue.edu.tw/files/11-1020-1838-2.php?Lang=zh-tw。
6. 張新立 (2015)，守護終生交通安全的好觀念，臺東縣岩灣國民小學，https://yups.ttct.edu.tw/var/file/70/1070/img/1849/190067585.pdf。
7. 國家教育研究院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網 (2021)，李克特量表，https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678776/。
8. 勞動部勞動力發展署外國人在臺工作服務網-一般外國專業人士在臺工作 (2023)，https://ezworktaiwan.wda.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=1840E9E4C04A4FE2。
9. 道路交通安全規則-全國法規資料庫 (2022)，https://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx。
10. 道路交通管理處罰條例-全國法規資料庫 (2022)，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=K0040012。
11. 衛生福利部疾病管制署 (2023)，旅客來臺 COVID-19入境檢疫及醫療資訊網，https://www.cdc.gov.tw/ArrivalQuarantine/info_1013.html。

1. Cambridge Dictionary (2022)，https://dictionary.cambridge.org/zht/%E8%A9%9E%E5%85%B8/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E/paternalistic.
2. CNN (2022)，Taiwan’s ‘living hell’ traffic is a tourism problem, say critics，https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/taiwan-traffic-war-tourism-intl-hnk/index.html?utm_content=2022-12-06T09%3A15%3A03&utm_term=link&utm_source=twCNNi&utm_medium=social.
3. ResearchGate (2019)，https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Represents-the-Interpretation-Guidelines-for-Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin-KMO_tbl3_338855081.
4. Montana State University of Center for Health and Safety Culture (2022) ，How are Vision Zero, Safe System, and Traffic Safety Culture related?，https://chsculture.org/how-are-vision-zero-safe-system-and-traffic-safety-culture-related/.
5. World Health Organization (2022)，How solutions journalism boosts road safety in Tanzania，https://www.who.int/news/item/20-07-2022-solutions-journalism-boosts-road-safety—Tanzania.

1. 交通部 (2021)，「110年道路交通安全觀測指標」。
2. 交通部 (2018)，第13期院頒 「道路交通秩序與交通安全改進方案」。
3. 交通部運輸研究所 (2009)，汽機車駕駛訓練之學科課程規劃、教材編製與筆試題庫設計。
4. 交通部運輸研究所 (2003)，機車駕駛行為與事故風險分析。
5. 李克明 (1995)，用於分析測量資料的初等統計，測驗統計年刊，第3輯，頁115-128。
6. 李建興 (2010)，高中職校交通安全教育活動成效之研究，中央警察大學交通管理研究所碩士論文。
7. 吳明隆 (2009)，SPSS操作與應用問卷統計分析實務，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
8. 吳明隆與涂金堂 (2014)，SPSS與統計應用分析，五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
9. 周文生 (2014)，駕駛人危險感知測驗之研究，運輸學刊，第26卷，第4期，頁435-465。
10. 柳晴 (2021)，我國道路交通安全觀測指標關聯模型之建立及探討，國立陽明交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
11. 郭德賓 (2018)，讓你輕鬆學研究方法、數量分析、論文寫作，郭德賓。
12. 張瑜婷 (2015)，以澳洲國民小學交通安全教育教案為基礎發展國內教案之研究，中華大學運輸科技與物流管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
13. 張新立與蔡維唐 (2010)，影響小客車駕駛人駕駛技能與行為之因素研究，運輸學刊，第22卷，第2期，頁233-260。
14. 楊宗璟 (2005)，於駕駛訓練與考驗制度中提倡防衛駕駛與駕駛道德對交通安全影響之研究，逢甲大學交通工程與管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
15. 蕭人儒 (2019)，從多維度構念角度探討汽機車駕駛人之交通安全文化，國立交通大學運輸與物流管理學系碩士班碩士論文
16. 羅文垣 (2016)，應用機車駕駛模擬遊戲於機車安全認知之學習成效評估，淡江大學運輸管理學系運輸科學碩士班碩士論文。

1. Atchley, P., Shi, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014), “Cultural foundations of safety culture: A comparison of traffic safety culture in China, Japan and the United States” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 26, pp. 317-325.
2. Buss, A. H. and Perry, M. (1992), “The Aggression Questionnaire,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 452-459.
3. Benzaman, B., Ward, N. J. & Schell, W. J. (2022), “The influence of inferred traffic safety culture on traffic safety performance in US States (1994–2014),” Journal of safety research, Vol. 80, pp. 311-319.
4. Boufous, S., Ivers, R., Senserrick, T., Norton, R., Stevenson, M., Chen, H. Y., & Lam, L. T. (2010), “Risky driving behavior and road traffic crashes among young Asian Australian drivers: findings from the DRIVE study,” Traffic in-jury prevention, Vol. 11(3), pp. 222-227.
5. Constantinou, E., Panayiotou, G., Konstantinou, N., Loutsiou-Ladd, A. & Ka-pardis, A. (2011), “Risky and aggressive driving in young adults: Personality matters,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43(4), pp. 1323-1331.
6. Chang, H. L. & Wu, S. C. (2005), “Exploring the mode choice in daily travel behavior of the elderly in Taiwan,” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6, pp. 1818-1832.
7. Chang, H.-L. & Yeh, T.-H. (2007), “Motorcyclist accident involvement by age, gender, and risky behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan,” Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 10(2), pp. 109-122.
8. Chang, H. W. & Chang, H. L. (2008), “Students’ perceptions of difficulties in cycling to school in urban and suburban Taiwan,” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2060(1), pp. 123-130.
9. Calvo-Poyo, F., Navarro-Moreno, J. & de Oña, J. (2020), “Road investment and traffic safety: An international study,” Sustainability, Vol. 12(16), pp. 6332.
10. Dula, C. S., & Geller, E. S. (2007). “Creating a total safety traffic culture,” Improving traffic safety culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 177-199.
11. Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., & Lynch, R. S. (1994), “Development of a driving anger scale,” Psychological reports, Vol. 74(1), pp. 83-91.
12. DePasquale, J. P., Geller, E. S., Clarke, S. W., and Littleton, L. C. (2001), “Measuring Road Rage Development of the Propensity for Anger Driving Scale,” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1-16.
13. Elvebakk, B. (2015), “Paternalism and acceptability in road safety work,” Safety science, Vol. 79, pp. 298-304.
14. Edwards, J., Freeman, J., Soole, D., & Watson, B. (2014), “A framework for conceptualising traffic safety culture,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 26, pp. 293-302.
15. Girasek, D. C. (2013), “Gauging popular support for traffic safety in the Unit-ed States,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, pp. 1112-1117.
16. Girasek, D. C. (2007), “Moving America towards evidence-based approaches to traffic safety,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States, (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 131-148.
17. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2019), IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 16th ed., Routledge.
18. Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. M. (1989), “Dimensions of driver stress,” Ergonomics, Vol. 32(6), pp. 585-602.
19. González, M. P. S., Sotos, F. E. & Ponce, Á. T. (2018), “Impact of provincial characteristics on the number of traffic accident victims on interurban roads in Spain,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 118, pp. 178-189.
20. Hedlund, J. (2007), “Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States-The Journey Forward: Summary and Synthesis”, Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
21. Johnston, I. (2004), “Reducing injury from speed related road crashes,” Injury Prevention, Vol. 10(5), pp. 257-259.
22. Kissinger, J. (2007), “Improving traffic safety culture in the United States,” The Journey Forward AAA Foundation Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
23. Lonero, L. P. (2007), “Finding the next cultural paradigm for road safety,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 1-20.
24. Morimoto, A., Wang, A., & Kitano, N. (2022). “A conceptual framework for road traffic safety considering differences in traffic culture through interna-tional comparison,” IATSS research, Vol. 46(1), pp. 3-13.
25. McNeely, C. L., & Gifford, J. L. (2007), “Effecting a traffic safety culture: Lessons from cultural change initiatives,” Improving traffic safety culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 21-39.
26. Mohan, D. (2003), “Road traffic injuries: a neglected pandemic,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 81, pp. 684-685.
27. Moeckli, J., & Lee, J. D. (2007), “The making of driving cultures,” Improv-ing Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washing-ton, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 59-76.
28. McIlroy, R. C., Nam, V. H., Bunyasi, B. W., Jikyong, U., Kokwaro, G. O., Wu, J., et al.,& Stanton, N. A. (2020), “Exploring the relationships between pedestrian behaviours and traffic safety attitudes in six countries,” Transpor-tation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 68, pp. 257-271.
29. Nakamura, H. & Morimoto, A. (2022), “Road safety and traffic culture from an international perspective,” IATSS Research, Vol. 46, pp. 1-2
30. Nævestad, T. O., & Bjørnskau, T. (2012), “How can the safety culture per-spective be applied to road traffic,” Transport reviews, Vol. 32(2), pp. 139-154.
31. Nævestad, T. O., Laiou, A., Phillips, R. O., Bjørnskau, T., & Yannis, G. (2019). “Safety culture among private and professional drivers in Norway and Greece: Examining the influence of national road safety culture,” Safety, Vol. 5(2), pp. 20-52.
32. Nævestad, T. O., Laiou, A., Rosenbloom, T., Elvik, R. & Yannis, G. (2022), “The role of values in road safety culture: examining the valuation of free-dom to take risk, risk taking and accident involvement in three countries,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 84, pp. 375-392.
33. Nordfjærn, T., Şimşekoğlu, Ö., & Rundmo, T. (2014), “Culture related to road traffic safety: a comparison of eight countries using two conceptualiza-tions of culture,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 62, pp. 319-328.
34. Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005), “A new addition to DBQ: Positive driver behaviours scale,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 8(4-5), pp. 355-368.
35. Pelé, M., Bellut, C., Debergue, E., Gauvin, C., Jeanneret, A., Leclere, T., ... & Sueur, C. (2017), “Cultural influence of social information use in pedestrian road-crossing behaviours,” Royal Society open science, Vol. 4(2), pp. 160739.
36. Reason, J. T., Manstead, A. S. R., Stradling, S. G., Baxter, J. S., and Camp-bell, K. (1990), “Errors and Violations on the Road: a Real Distinction,” Er-gonomics,Vol. 33, No. 10&11, pp. 1315-1332.
37. Sleet, D. A., Dinh-Zarr, T. B., & Dellinger, A. M. (2007), “Traffic safety in the context of public health and medicine,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 41-58.
38. Toriumi, A., Abu-Lebdeh, G., Alhajyaseen, W., Christie, N., Gehlert, T., Mehran, B., et al.,& Nakamura, H. (2022), “A multi-country survey for col-lecting and analyzing facts related to road traffic safety: Legislation, en-forcement, and education for safer drivers,” IATSS research, Vol. 46(1), pp. 14-25.
39. Tazul Islam, M., Thue, L., & Grekul, J. (2017), “Understanding traffic safety culture: Implications for increasing traffic safety,” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2635(1), pp. 79-89.
40. Williams, A. F., & Haworth, N. (2007), “Overcoming barriers to creating a well-functioning safety culture,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 77-91.
41. Wiegmann, D. A., von Thaden, T. L., & Gibbons, A. M. (2007), “A review of safety culture theory and its potential application to traffic safety,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Technical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 113-129.
42. Wegman, F. (2007), “Road traffic in the Netherlands: Relatively safe but not safe enough,” Improving Traffic Safety Culture in the United States (Tech-nical Report), Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety., pp. 281-304.
43. Warner, H. W., Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2009), “Cross-cultural differences in drivers’ speed choice,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41(4), pp. 816-819.
44. Ward, N. J., Linkenbach, J., Keller, S. N., & Otto, J. (2010), “White Paper on Traffic Safety Culture,” White Paper No. 2.
45. Ward, N. J., Otto, J., & Finley, K. (2019), “Ten Principles of Traffic Safety Culture,” Traffic Safety Culture: Definition, Foundation, and Application, pp. 21-39.
46. Ward, N. J., Otto, J. & Linkenbach, J. (2014), “A primer for traffic safety cul-ture,” ITE Journal, Vol. 84(5), pp. 41-47.
47. Xie, C. Q., & Parker, D. (2002), “A social psychological approach to driving violations in two Chinese cities,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 5(4), pp. 293-308.
48. Zaidel, D. M. (1992), “A modeling perspective on the culture of driving,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 24(6), pp. 585-597.