Abbas, F., Pervaiz, A., & Arshad, F. (2018). The competing status of Urdu and English after declaration of Urdu as official language in Pakistan. Journal of Research, 34(1), 142-158.
Abdullah, R. (2019). Communicative and Contextual English Instruction Material for Seventh Grade. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(7), 170-176.
Adams, F., & Steadman, A. (2004). Intentional action in ordinary language: Core concept or pragmatic understanding?. Analysis, 64(2), 173-181.
Ahmad Marzouq, A. (2019). Using an information processing theory (IPT)-based strategy to develop EFL students’ ability to construct and place English adverbials. Journal of Faculty of Education, 120(4), 111-146.
Akhter, S., & Nordin, N. R. M. (2022). Exploring the Role of Collocation in Creative Writing among Pakistani Learners at Secondary Level: A Corpus-based Study. World Journal of English Language, 12(2), 382-382.
Aladjem, R., & Jou, B. (2016). The linguistic landscape as a learning space for contextual language learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2), 66-70.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357-377.
Ampa, A. T., Basri, M., & Andriani, A. A. (2013). The development of contextual learning materials for the English speaking skills. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(9), 1-10.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, Pp. 89-195.
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 91-98.
Aziz, I. N., & Dewi, Y. A. S. (2019). The Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning on English Grammar Competence. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 2(2), 67-95.
Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bahadir, N. H. (2020). The official language status of English within the EU institutions after Brexit. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 11(1), 293-308.
Baharudin, M. D., & Razali, A. B. (2022). Discourse Analysis of ESL Undergraduate Students‟ Patterns of Interaction in an Online Peer Feedback Environment to Develop Writing Performance. World Journal of English Language, 12(5), 283-297.
Baleghizadeh, S. & Zarghami, Z. (2014). Student generated tests and their impact on EFL students' learning of grammar. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(3), 627-642.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58.
Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and when second‐language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: The roles of task type, second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 320-340.
Bardine, B. A., & Fulton, A. (2008). Analyzing the benefits of revision memos during the writing and revision process. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 149-154.
Berry, R. M. (1994). Theory, creative writing, and the impertinence of history. Colors of a Different Horse: Rethinking Creative Writing Theory and Pedagogy, 57-76.
Borjars, K., & Burridge, K. (2019). Introducing English Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
Brewer, W.F., & Lichtenstein, E.H. (1981). A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473-486.
Brookes, I. & Marshall D. (2004). Good writing guide. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap Publishers Ltd.
Brown, J. L. (2015). Using information processing theory to teach social stratification to pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 19-24.
Calabrese, J. E., Capraro, M. M., & Thompson, C. G. (2022). The Relationship between Problem Posing and Problem Solving: A Systematic Review. International Education Studies, 15(4), 1-8.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage publications.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Towards more context and discourse in grammar instruction. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 11(2), 1-6.
Chandio, J. H., Khan, H. M. A., & Samiullah, M. (2013). Condition of creative writing in the north and south Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 7(2), 321-330.
Chang, Y. L. (2007). The effects of online question-generation on elementary students’ learning in English (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan, Taiwan: National Chung Kung University.
Chanquoy, L. (2009). Revision processes. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 80-97). London: Sage.
Chen, M. J. (2009). The study of English interest, achievement and learning strategies in senior high (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan, Taiwan: National Chung Kung University.
Chen, Z. H., Chen, H. H. J., & Dai, W. J. (2018). Using narrative-based contextual games to enhance language learning: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 186-198.
Cheng, W. W. & Yu, F. Y. (2021). Leveraging context for computer-supported student-generated question and EFL learning in grammar instruction: Its effects on task performance. In M. M. Rodrigo, S. I., A. Mitrovic (eds), 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Workshop Proceedings, Volume 2 (pp. 328-337), November 22-26.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
Chiou, B. (2019). The application of problem-based learning approach in English grammar instruction: A pilot study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 446-453.
Choy, S. C., Yim, J. S. C., & Tan, P. L. (2019). Mediating effects of quality learning on metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive experience and outcomes. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 1-18.
Chu, C. C. (2011). The illustrations and e-learning to the effectiveness of learning lever principle for the sixth grade students in elementary school (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hsinchu, Taiwan: National Chiao Tung University.
Chua, Y. P. (2014). The effects of humor cartoons in a series of bestselling academic books. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 27(3), 499-520.
Cortini, M. (2014). Mix-method research in applied psychology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1900-1905.
Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational psychology review, 26(2), 197-223.
Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Crawford,M.L. (2001). Teaching contextually: Research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in Mathematics and Science. Texas: CORD
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.
De Beaugrande, R. (1982). The story of grammars and the grammar of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(1), 383-422.
Doctor, E. A., & Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 195-209.
Educational Testing Services. (2021). Test and score data summary for TOEFL® internet-based and paper-based tests: 2020 test data. Retrieved July 1, 2021, from https://www.toeic.com.tw/Upload/att/2021-03/202103090912192639203763.pdf
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognitive experiences: The missing link in the self-regulated learning process: A rejoinder to Ainley and Patrick. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 287-291.
Ellis, R. A. (2004). University student approaches to learning science through writing. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1835-1853.
Ermansyah, E. (2019). A Study on English Grammar and Pragmatics Competence of Indonesian Speakers. Journal of Advanced English Studies, 2(2), 102-105.
Essien, A. M. (2021). Using Project Work to Strengthen Thai Students’ Learning Attitude Toward English Language. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(12), 1500-1508.
Eun, B., & Lim, H. S. (2009). A sociocultural view of language learning: The importance of meaning-based instruction. TESL Canada Journal, 27(1), 12-26.
Fahim, M., & Haghani, M. (2012). Sociocultural Perspectives on Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(4).
Fang, L., Nunes, M. B., & de Bruijn, C. (2012, June). Drill-and-practice was not necessarily a pejorative approach: An example of its successful application as a self-learning component of a phonetics blended learning environment. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 1655-1664). Quebec: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Feng, A. (2011). English language education across greater China. Brwastol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Feng, Z. (2013). Functional grammar and its implications for English teaching and learning. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 86-94.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE.
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Polakowski, N., Gunderson, B., Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2021). Utilizing peer review and revision in STEM to support the development of conceptual knowledge through writing. Written Communication, 38(3), 351-379.
Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of educational research, 57(4), 481-506.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
Foster, C. (2011). Student-generated questions in mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(1), 26-31.
Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers & Education, 137, 59-77.
Gere, A. R., Limlamai, N., Wilson, E., MacDougall Saylor, K., & Pugh, R. (2019). Writing and conceptual learning in science: An analysis of assignments. Written Communication, 36(1), 99-135.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of research in science teaching, 25(8), 689-703.
Göçen, G. (2019). The effect of creative writing activities on elementary school students’ creative writing achievement, writing attitude and motivation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1032-1044.
Goldstein, L. M. (2005). Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Graham, S. (2006). Writing. P. Alexander, & P. Winne (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graham, K. M. (2022). Examining the English-Medium Instruction Teaching Anxiety of Preservice Secondary Education Teachers in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning, 46(3), 255-272.
Güvenir, H. A. (1992). Drill and practice for Turkish grammar. In M. L. Swartz and M. Yazdani (Eds), Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning (pp. 275-291). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Hahn, C. (2008). Doing qualitative research using your computer: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Hakim, A. (2023). Genre-related episodes as a lens on students’ emerging genre knowledge: Implications for genre-based writing pedagogy, collaborative tasks, and learning materials. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 101001.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Text and Context: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.) Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written communication, 29(3), 369-388.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 465-483.
Hong, C. C. (2002). Effects of question-posing and cooperative learning on students’ learning outcomes within a web-based learning environment (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan, Taiwan: National Chung Kung University.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Tai, K. H. (2022). Effects of gamifying questions on English grammar learning mediated by epistemic curiosity and language anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1458-1482.
Hsu, S. P. (2002). A study of elementary students’ ability in the representation of multiplication-division problems and metacognition (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taichung, Taiwan: National Taichung University of Education.
Hsu, Y. T. (2009). The relationships among junior high school students’ foreign language anxiety, EFL learning motivation and strategy (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan, Taiwan: National Chung Kung University.
Hughes DL, McGillivray LR, Schmidek M. Guide to narrative language: Procedures for assessment. Thinking Publications; 1997.
Hung, Y. J. (2019). Bridging assessment and achievement: Repeated practice of self-assessment in college English classes in Taiwan. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1191-1208.
Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Ji, C. (2018). A study on the effectiveness of English grammar teaching and learning in Chinese junior middle schools. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(11), 1553-1558.
Juan, S. (2021). Promoting engagement of nursing students in online learning: Use of the student-generated question in a nursing leadership course. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104710-104714.
Kaiser, H. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2020). The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 519-539.
Karimi, P., Lotfi, A. R., & Biria, R. (2019). Enhancing Pilot's Aviation English Learning, Attitude and Motivation through the Application of Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 751-766.
Karlsson, E (1990). Constraint grammar as a framework for parsing running text. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 168-173), Delhi: The Association for Computational Linguistics.
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Khaki, N. (2014). Improving reading comprehension in a foreign language: Strategic reader. Journal of Education, 14(2), 186-200.
Khan, A., & Akhtar, M. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of cooperative learning method on teaching of English grammar. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 1-16.
Khashaba, A. S. (2020). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Online Peer-Based Formative Assessments (PeerWise) to Enhance Student Learning in Physiology: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA Guidelines. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 613-628.
Kim, D. (2020). Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519-541.
Kristiana, V. Tarihoran, R. K. & Ningsih, A. M. (2022). Implementation of modeling components of contextual learning on students’ agricultural English vocabulary mastery at Umn Al Washliyah. Journal of English Language and Literature. 2(2), 107-111.
Kuan, M. C. (2016). The effects of different scaffolding designs and cognitive style for an online student question-generation strategy on elementary school students’ science learning (Unpublwashed master’s theswas). Tainan, Taiwan: National Chung Kung University.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
Latchanna, G., & Dagnew, A. (2009). Attitude of teachers towards the use of active learning methods. E-journal of All India Association for Educational Research, 21(1), 53-60.
Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual EFL learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 16-31.
Lan, Y. J., Wei, H. H., & Chiu, Y. L. (2014). Virtual English village: A Task-based English learning platform in Second Life. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2014) (pp. 625–629). Nara, Japan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special wassue. The modern language journal, 78(4), 418-420.
Lewwas, T., Petrina, S., & Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem posing—Adding a creative increment to technological problem solving. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 36(1), 5-35.
Lin, C. C., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G. Z. (2021). English outside the academic sphere: A mobile‐based context‐aware comparison study on collaborative and individual learning. Journal of Computer Asswasted Learning, 37(3), 657-671.
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Cao, Y. H. (2020). Facilitating EFL students’ English grammar learning performance and behaviors: A contextual gaming approach. Computers & Education, 152, 103876.
Lin, C. C. & Yu, F. Y. (2021). The design and effects of online contextual student-generated questions for English grammar learning. In M. M. Rodrigo, S. I., A. Mitrovic (eds), 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Workshop Proceedings, Volume 2 (pp. 92-101), November 22-26.
Lin, C. C. & Yu, F. Y. (2021, December). On the relationship among learning strategy use, learning motivation and learning performance in contextual student-generated question tasks for English grammar instruction. In I. S. Wang (Chair), Taiwan Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Symposium conducted at National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taiepi, Taiwan.
Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Analyzing online revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Studies in writing, Vol. 18, Computer keystroke logging and writing (pp. 157-188). Elsevier.
Livingstone, J. A. (1997). Metacognition an overview. Available online at: http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/sheell/ cep564/Metacog.htm (accessed September 2021).
Malkawi, N., Awajan, N. W., Alghazo, K. M., & Harafsheh, H. A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using Student-Created Questions for Assessing Their Performance in English Grammar/Case Study of “King Abdullah II Schools for Excellence” In Jordan. World, 13(5), 156-170.
Mansoor, A. (2010). Teaching creative writing to university level second language learners in Pakwastan. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 7(3), 201- 218.
Maplethorpe, L., Kim, H., Hunte, M. R., Vincett, M., & Jang, E. E. (2022). Student-generated questions in literacy education and assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(1), 74-97.
Mart, C. T. (2013). The grammar-translation method and the use of translation to facilitate learning in ESL classes. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 1(4), 103-105.
Matarazzo, K. L., Durik, A. M., & Delaney, M. L. (2010). The effect of humorous instructional materials on interest in a math task. Motivation and emotion, 34(3), 293-305.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mays, B. R., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2020). The effects of using audience response systems incorporating student-generated questions on EFL students' reading comprehension. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(6), 553-566.
McConachy, T. (2019). L2 pragmatics as ‘intercultural pragmatics’: Probing sociopragmatic aspects of pragmatic awareness. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 167-176.
McDonald, P. A., & Smith, J. M. (2020). Improving mathematical learning in Scotland's Curriculum for Excellence through problem posing: an integrative review. The Curriculum Journal, 31(3), 398-435.
Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 363–376.
Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293-308.
Minot, S. (2003). Three Genres (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Mousavi, S. M., & Darani, L. H. (2018). Effect of collocations on Iranian EFL learners’ writing: Attitude in focus. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(4), 131-145.
Morales, J., Lau, H., & Fleming, S. M. (2018). Domain-general and domain-specific patterns of activity supporting metacognition in human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(14), 3534-3546.
Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: promwase and pitfalls. In L. M. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Brunning (Eds.), Technology-based education (pp. 1-20). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publwashing.
Munir, M., & Nur, R. H. (2018). The Development of English Learning Model Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in Junior High Schools. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 31-39.
Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., Cosgun, V., & Altan, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 141, 103618.
Naziah, R., Caska, C., Nas, S., & Indrawati, H. (2020). The Effects of Contextual Learning and Teacher’s Work Spirit on Learning Motivation and Its Impact on Affective Learning Outcomes. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 30-43.
Offerdahl, E. G., & Montplawasir, L. (2014). Student‐generated reading questions: Diagnosing student thinking with diverse formative assessments. Biochemwastry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 29-38.
Önal, N., Çevik, K. K., & Şenol, V. (2022). The effect of SOS Table learning environment on mobile learning tools acceptance, motivation and mobile learning attitude in English language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 834-847.
Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design. Educational technology research and development, 40(2), 83-99.
Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: Theory and practices. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(2), 134-148.
Pan, Y.C., & Newfields, T, (2013). Student washback from tertiary standardized English proficiency exit requirements in Taiwan. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 108-122.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statwastics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Prator, C., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). An outline of language teaching approaches. In M, Celce-Murcia and L Mcintosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Proust, J. (2009). Overlooking metacognitive experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 158-159.
Qindah, S. (2018). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ usage of grammar in context. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 10, 11-22.
Obermeier, A., & Elgort, I. (2021). Deliberate and contextual learning of L2 idioms: The effect of learning conditions on online processing. System, 97, 102428.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies and beyond: A look at strategies in the context of styles. In S.S. Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (pp. 35-55). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
Rahman, M. M. (2011). Genre-based writing instruction: Implications in ESP classroom. English for Specific Purposes World, 33(11), 1-9.
Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90-106.
Ray, S. (2012). Using Language in the Community for Enhancing. Language and Language Teaching, 1(1), 12-17.
Permana, A., Ahmad, Y. B., & Ambarwati, E. K. (2022). Undergraduate Students’ Engagement in Writing Classroom Through Written Formative Feedback Using Google Classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(5), 7211-7218.
Şahbaz, N. K., & Duran, G. (2011). The efficiency of cluster method in improving the creative writing skill of 6th grade students of primary school. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(11), 702-709.
Sánchez-Hernández, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2019). Pragmatic gains in the study abroad context: Learners' experiences and recognition of pragmatic routines. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 54-71.
Saragih, D. I., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis the effectiveness of mathematics learning using contextual learning model. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 34(1), 135-143.
Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, M. H. (2012). Contextual teaching and learning approach to teaching writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 10-22.
Schwarz, V. S., & Hamman-Ortiz, L. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics, teacher education, and writing outcomes for US elementary English learners: A review of the literature. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100727.
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2010). Leveling students' creative thinking in solving and posing mathematical problem. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 1(1), 17-40.
Surya, E., & Putri, F. A. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85-94.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity research journal, 18(1), 87-96.
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & De Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 201-233.
Stoyanova, E. (2005). Problem solving strategies used by years 8 and 9 students. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 61(3), 6-11.
Swander, M., Leahy, A. and Cantrell, M. (2007) ‘Theories of creativity and creative writing pedagogy’, in S. Earnshaw, (ed.) The Handbook of Creative Writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Swanson, H. L. (1987). Information processing theory and learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of learning Disabilities, 20(1), 3-7.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
Tho, P. D., Lai, C. H., & Navratil, O. (2020). Effect of behavior patterns of accessing learning materials on learning performance in student-generated question activities. Journal of Internet Technology, 21(1), 135-146.
Tsai, C. H., Cheng, C. H., Yeh, D. Y., & Lin, S. Y. (2017). Can learning motivation predict learning achievement? A case study of a mobile game-based English learning approach. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2159-2173.
Tsai, H. C. The effects of guided short-answer online student question-generation on elementary student science learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan, Taiwan: National Cheng Kung University.
Tsui, A. B., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?. Journal of second language writing, 9(2), 147-170.
van Broekhoven, K., Cropley, D., & Seegers, P. (2020). Differences in creativity across Art and STEM students: We were more alike than unalike. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(1), 100707.
Wang, L. C., & Cheng, P. Y. (2017). Using instant messaging (Line) for English learning: A case study of EFL university students in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology and Engineering Education, 14(2), 17-24.
Wang, M., Walkington, C., & Rouse, A. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effects of problem-posing in mathematics education on performance and dispositions. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(4), 265-287.
Wang, S., McCall, M., Jiao, H., & Harris, G. (2012, April). Construct validity and measurement invariance of computerized adaptive testing: Application to Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) using confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where Exactly for Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking: The Use of Problem Posing or Contextual Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877-887.
Wu, J. R. W., & Wu, R. Y. F. (2010). Relating the GEPT reading comprehension tests to the CEFR. In W. Martyniuk (Ed.), Aligning tests with the CEFR: Reflections on using the council of Europe’s draft manual (pp. 204–224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129-1138.
Yu, F. Y. (2021a). Student-generated questions with technology-mediated socio-constructivist learning approaches. Panel on ‘Leveraging student-generated ideas (SGI) to facilitate socio-constructivist learning and conceptual change: The roles of technology in SGI learning trajectories. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2021), November 22-26, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yu, F. Y. (2021b). Development and preliminary evaluation of the learning potential of an online system in support of a student-generated testlets learning activity. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2021), November 22-26, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yu, F. Y. & Lin, C. C. (2020). The effect of different online procedural prompts on student-generated questions tasks performance for English grammar instruction. In H-J So, M. M. Rodrigo, J. M., A. Mitrovic (eds), 28th International Conference on Computers in Education Workshop Proceedings, Volume 2 (pp. 84-92), November 23-27.
Yu, F. Y. & Su, C.L. (2016). Content Analysis of Online Undergraduate Student-Generated Questions and the Development of Its Creativity Indicators. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 29(1), 97-138.
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2013). Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 332-341.
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL quarterly, 16(2), 195-209.
Zarghami, Z., & Baleghizadeh, S. (2014). Student-generated Tests and Their Impact on EFL Students' Learning of Grammar. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(3), 627-642.
Zhang, L. J. (2002). Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: Reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 69-94.
Zhou, C. (2018). Teaching model of college English grammar in intensive reading course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6), 2617-2632.