簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林彥廷
Lin, Yen-Ting
論文名稱: 增強式粒子群聚最佳化演算法於網路合作學習分群最佳化系統之應用
An Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Forming Collaborative Learning Groups Applied to a Web-based Learning System
指導教授: 黃悅民
Huang, Yueh-Min
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工程科學系
Department of Engineering Science
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 合作學習電腦輔助合作學習先備知識粒子群聚最佳化演算法
外文關鍵詞: Collaborative learning, Computer-supported collaborative learning, Prior knowledge, Particle swarm optimization
相關次數: 點閱:173下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 合作學習為目前廣為被應用於教學中的策略之一,其目的為提升所有參與者之學習成效,為了達成此目標,首先便是考量如何協助教師進行合作學習之分組以營造好的學習情境。然而,當教師面對大量的學生時,特別是在電腦輔助合作學習的環境中,要求教師同時考量多個分組準則來將學生分配在適合的合作學習群組之中,這會對教師造成很大的負擔及工作量,基於此,本研究將此合作學習分組問題數學化,並且以學生之先備知識為分組之準則來建構此問題。
    先備知識為學習者學習中不可或缺之基礎,其能夠影響學習者如何去解釋、組織、同化與吸收新的教學與學習,一般而言,測驗為常被教師使用於評估學習者之先備知識,然而,傳統的測驗方式往往只會於測驗結果提供一分數來讓教師與學習者瞭解其測驗結果,如此的方式可能會造成教師與學習者無法清楚的瞭解問題之所在,基於此,本研究提出一先備知識測量模組來協助教師診斷學習者之先備知識能力,透過診斷的結果,本研究應用粒子群聚最佳化演算法提出一合作學習分組模組,此模組能協助教師以學習者之先備能知識的能力來為學習者進行合作學習分組。
    為了評估本研究所提出之合作學習分組模組的實用性與強健性,本研究首先建置了一系列系統化的評估實驗來分析此模組之效能與強健性,此分析結果顯示此模組能夠有效的以學習者之先備知識來進行合作學習之分組,此外,本研究應用所提出之系統於實際教學情境中來探討其對於教學成效之影響,實驗結果顯示出本研究所提出之系統能夠改善學習者之學習動機與提升學習成效,最後,本研究針對先備知識之診斷結果來進行分析,其結果顯示所提出之診斷機制能夠準確的診斷出學習者之先備知識的能力。

    One goal of collaborative learning is to maximize the learning performance of all participating students. In order to achieve this aim, the first step is to consider how to assist instructors in forming well-structured collaborative learning groups with a good work atmosphere to promote successful outcomes for all members. Nevertheless, when the instructors face a large number of students, especially in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, simultaneously considering several grouping criteria to form the students in an appropriate collaborative learning context is almost impossible. To address this issue, this study develops a group formation problem to model the formation of collaborative learning groups based on students’ prior knowledge.
    Prior knowledge is an essential foundation for learning, as it affects the interpretation, organization, assimilation, and absorption of new instructions. Generally, tests are used to help instructors evaluate students’ prior knowledge. Nevertheless, conventional testing approaches usually assign only a score to students, and this may mean that both students and instructors are unable to accurately identify misunderstandings in the formers’ prior knowledge. Therefore, this study proposes a prior knowledge measurement model to assist instructors in diagnosing student’s prior knowledge. Moreover, this study is based on a novel approach called particle swarm optimization (PSO) to propose a group formation model for forming well-structured collaborative learning groups based on students’ prior knowledge.
    To demonstrate that the group formation model is an applicable and robust approach, a series of systematical evaluations were conducted to analyze the performance of the group formation model. The results show that the model can efficiently and effectively form collaborative learning groups based on students’ prior knowledge. In addition, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed approach with regard to improving teaching and learning performance. The results show that the system is able to improve students’ learning motivation and enhance teaching and learning performance. In addition, the diagnosis evaluation results show that the proposed system can accurately diagnose the students’ prior knowledge.

    摘要 I Abstract II 致謝 IV Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Related Works 5 2.1 Particle Swarm Optimization 5 2.2 Formation of Collaborative Learning Groups 7 Chapter 3 Methodology 9 3.1 Measurement of student prior knowledge 9 3.2 Collaborative learning group formation 14 Chapter 4 System Implementation 18 4.1 System architecture 18 4.2 Procedure 21 4.3 An illustrative example 23 Chapter 5 Systematic Evaluation 31 5.1 Evaluation settings 31 5.2 Performance analysis 37 5.2.1 Evaluation 1 37 5.2.2 Evaluation 2 38 5.3 Robustness analysis 39 5.3.1 Evaluation 1 40 5.3.1 Evaluation 2 41 Chapter 6 Experiment 43 6.1 Experimental design 44 6.2 Research instruments 45 6.3 Results 47 6.3.1 Learning motivation survey 47 6.3.2 Learning attitude survey 49 6.3.3 Interview investigation 51 6.3.4 Pre-test/Post-test evaluation 53 6.3.5 Diagnoses evaluation 55 Chapter 7 Conclusions 58 References 60

    [1] Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (2nd Ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [2] Beane, W. E. & Lemke, E. A. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 215-218.
    [3] Bergh, F. V. D. & Engelbrecht, A. P. (2006). A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories. Information Sciences, 176(8), 937-971.
    [4] Cheng, S. C., Huang, Y. M., Chen, J. N., & Lin, Y. T. (2005). Automatic leveling system for e-learning examination pool using entropy-based decision tree. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3583, 273–278.
    [5] Cheng, S. C., Lin, Y. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2009). Dynamic question generation system for web-based testing using particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 616–624.
    [6] Chiou, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2009). An auto-scoring mechanism for evaluating problem solving ability in a web-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(2), 261-272.
    [7] Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15–24.
    [8] Cobos-Moyano, A., Martin-Blas, T., & Oñate-Gómez, C. (2009). Evaluating background and prior knowledge: A case study on engineering graphics learning. Computers & Education, 53(3), 695-700.
    [9] Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152 [Special Issue on Technology, Organizations, and Innovation].
    [10] Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Jr., & Sandmann, A. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421-30.
    [11] Dalton, D. W., Hannafin M. J., & Hooper S. (1989). Effects of individual and cooperative computer-assisted instruction on student performance and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 15-24.
    [12] Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. UK: Elsevier Science.
    [13] Dochy, F. J.R.C., Moerkerke, G., & Marten, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and instruction: assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior knowledge and program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(4), 309–339.
    [14] Eberhart, R. C. & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, In Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micromachine and human science, (pp. 39–43). Nagoya, Japan: IEEE Service Center.
    [15] Fernández-Breis, J. T., Castellanos-Nieves, D., & Valencia-García, R. (2009). Measuring individual learning performance in group work from a knowledge integration perspective. Information Sciences, 179(4), 339-354.
    [16] Finger, S., Gelman, D., Fay, A., Szczerban, M., Smailagic, A., & Siewiorek, D. P. (2006). Supporting collaborative learning in engineering design. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(4), 734–741.
    [17] Gall, M. D. (1987) Discussion Method. In Dunkin, M. J. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Oxford, England: Pergamon, 232-237.
    [18] Gerber, M., Grund, S., & Grote, G. (2008). Distributed collaboration activities in a blended learning scenario and the effects on learning performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 232-244.
    [19] Gokhale, A.A. (1995). Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
    [20] Hooper, S. & Hannafin, M.J. (1988). Cooperative CBI: The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous group on the learning of progressively complex concepts. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 413-424.
    [21] Huang, C. J., Chen, H. X., & Chen, C. H. (2009). Developing argumentation processing agents for computer-supported collaborative learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2615-2624.
    [22] Huang, Y. M., Chen, J. N., Huang, T. C., Jeng, Y. L., & Kuo Y. H. (2008). Standardized course generation process using Dynamic Fuzzy Petri Nets. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 72-86.
    [23] Huang, Y. M., Chen, J. N., Kuo, Y. H., & Jeng, Y. L. (2008). An intelligent human-expert forum system based on fuzzy information retrieval technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 446-458.
    [24] Huang, C. J. & Chuang, Y. T. (2008). Supporting the development of collaborative problem-based learning environments with an intelligent diagnosis tool. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3) 622-631.
    [25] Huang, T. C., Huang, Y. M., & Cheng, S. C. (2008). Automatic and interactive e-learning auxiliary material generation utilizing particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 2113-2122.
    [26] Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, 52(1), 53-67.
    [27] Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). Effectiveness of a Mobile Plant Learning System in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education, 54(1), 47-58.
    [28] Huber, G. L. (2003). Processes of decision-making in small learning groups. Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 255-269.
    [29] Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R., & Bollback, J. (2001). Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294(5550), 2310–2314.
    [30] Hwang, G. J. (2003). A test-sheet-generating algorithm for multiple assessment requirements. IEEE Transactions on Education, 46(3), 329-337.
    [31] Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Yin, P. Y., & Lin, J. Y. (2008). An innovative parallel test-sheet composition approach to meet multiple assessment criteria for national tests. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1058-1072.
    [32] Hwang, G. J., Yin, P. Y., Hwang, C. W., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An enhanced genetic approach to composing cooperative learning groups for multiple grouping criteria. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 148-167.
    [33] Jeng, Y. L., Huang, Y. M., Kuo, Y. H., Chen, J. N., & Chu, W. C. (2005). ANTS: agent-based navigational training system. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3583, 320-325.
    [34] Jong, T. D. & Joolingen, W. R. V. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.
    [35] Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51(1), 54-66.
    [36] Keedwell, E. C. & Narayanan, A. (2005). Intelligent Bioinformatics: The Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Bioinformatics Problems. Wiley.
    [37] Kelemen, A., Abraham, A., & Chen, Y. (2008). Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics. Springer.
    [38] Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R.C. (1995). Particle swarm optimization, In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks (pp. 1942–1948). Perth, Australia: IEEE Service Center.
    [39] Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. C. (1997). A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 4104-4108). Piscataway, NJ : IEEE Service Center.
    [40] Khumalo, B. (2006). The fundamental theory of knowledge. MPRA Paper, 3733.
    [41] Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL: Theory and Practice of an emerging paradigm, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [42] Kravcik, M., Kaibel, A., Specht, M., & Terrenghi, L. (2004). Mobile collector for field trips. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 25-33 [Special Issue on Technology-Enhanced Learning].
    [43] Lai, C. Y. & Wu, C. C. (2006). Using handhelds in a jigsaw cooperative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 284-297.
    [44] Lavnitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primean, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95-111.
    [45] Li, J. & Wong, L. (2002). Identifying good diagnostic gene groups from gene expression profiles using the concept of emerging patterns. Bioinformatics, 18(5), 725–734.
    [46] Liao, S. H. & Ho, Y. P. (2008). A knowledge-based architecture for implementing collaborative problem-solving methods in military e-training. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 967-990.
    [47] Linderothm J. T., & Savelsbergh, M. W. P. (1999). A computational study of search strategies for mixed integer programming. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 11(2), 173-187.
    [48] Liu, H. C. & Andre, T. (2006). How college students’ prior knowledge level affected their use of computer simulations to learn electrochemistry. Paper Presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting sessions for the American Educational Research Association (AERA). San Francisco, CA, USA.
    [49] Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
    [50] Martín, E. & Paredes, P. (2004). Using learning styles for dynamic group formation in adaptive collaborative hypermedia systems. In Proceedings of Workshops in Connection with 4th International Conference on Web Engineering, (pp. 188–197). Munich: Rinton Press, Inc.
    [51] Meyer, D. (2009). OptAssign – A web-based tool for assigning students to groups. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1104-1119.
    [52] Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 99-113.
    [53] Mitchell, T. J. F., Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2005). Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs. system expertise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 53-64.
    [54] Nagata, R. & Ronkowski, S. (1998). Collaborative Learning: Differences between Collaborative and Cooperative Learning. The Office of Instructional Consultation. University of California Santa Barbara.
    [55] Nielsen, T., Hvas, A. E., & Kjaergaard, A. (2009). Student team formation based on learning styles at university start: does it make a difference to the student? Reflection Education, 5(2), 85–103.
    [56] Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., Triampo, W., & Shih, B. Y. (2010). A Multi-Expert Approach for Developing Testing and Diagnostic Systems based on the Concept Effect Model. Computers & Education, 55(2), 527-540.
    [57] Paredes, P., & Rodriguez, P. (2006). The Application of Learning Styles in Both Individual and Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 1141-1142). IEEE Service Center.
    [58] Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
    [59] Roschelle, J. (1995). Learning in Interactive Environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. American Association of Museums, Washington, D.C..
    [60] Setubal, J. & Meidanis, J. (1997). Introduction to Computational Molecular Biology. PWS Publishing, Boston.
    [61] Solimeno, A., Mebane, M. E., Tomai, M., & Francescato, D. (2008). The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 109-128.
    [62] Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79-90.
    [63] Sun, C.T., & Chou, C. (1996). Experiencing CORAL: design and implementation of distant cooperative learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 39 (3), 357-366.
    [64] Tang, T., Chan, K., Winoto, P., & Wu, A. (2001). Forming student clusters based on their browsing behaviors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2001), (pp. 1229–1235). Seoul, Korea.
    [65] Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
    [66] Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [67] Webb, N. M. (1982). Student Interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421–455.
    [68] Wilkinsona, I.A.G. & Fung, I.Y.Y. (2002). Small-group composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 425–447.
    [69] Yang, S. J. H. (2006). Context aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer-to-peer collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 188–201.
    [70] Yates, G. & Chandler, M. (1994). Prior Knowledge. SET: Research Information for Teachers, 2, Item 6.
    [71] Yin, P. Y., Chang, K. C., Hwang, G. J., Hwang, G. H., & Chan, Y. (2006). A particle swarm optimization approach to composing serial test sheets for multiple assessment criteria. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 3–15 [Special Issue on Next Generation e-Learning Systems: Intelligent Applications and Smart Design].
    [72] Zhang, D. S., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, Jr. J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.
    [73] Zurita, G., Nussbaum, M., & Salinas, R. (2005). Dynamic grouping in collaborative learning supported by wireless handhelds. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 149-161 [Special Issue on Authoring of Adaptive Hypermedia].

    下載圖示 校內:2013-10-06公開
    校外:2013-10-06公開
    QR CODE