工業革命之後，時代的輪軸不斷向前運行，讓人類從人力的階段進入了利用機械的時代，然而就算現今進入了資訊發達的時代，靠著機械運轉的產品、器械依舊舉目可見依舊與我們密不可分，而汽車正是一個明顯的例子。然而自從汽車的出現至今也有數百年的歷史，隨著時代的演進，汽車的種類也逐漸繁多，各種適合不同階層人士的需求車輛也一一問世。進入21世紀全球汽車銷售戰況愈演愈烈，伴隨著市場的變化，房車市場已逐漸為休旅車(Recreation Vehicle，簡稱RV車)所佔領，然而在車體造型的改變之下，車燈所應具備的指示性以及警示性也將被重新探討，而找出屬於休旅車種的車燈設計規範。

　　本研究以Honda CR-V為研究對象，探討其車燈造型以及排列方式之不同對於駕駛者警示性(煞車燈)以及視認性(方向燈)之影響。而車燈造型部分是以直線形、長條形以及圓形為主要造型變化，而在車燈排列部分則以方向燈排列於煞車燈之內、外、上、中及下側作為分別，因此透過種種排列而建構出八款車燈樣式作為實驗之分析樣本。實驗過程是以電腦模擬之方式進行，由3D Max軟體建構出實驗之八款基本樣本，再將樣本匯入EON Studio進行場景編製以及動作設定，之後將平台導入固定基底型駕駛模擬並進行實驗。

　　實驗結果皆以Honda CR-V之原出廠設置(長條形方向燈排列於煞車燈上)作為比較對象，由實驗結果發現，於煞車警示時圓形車燈與直線形車燈之反應時間皆較長條形來的迅速，方向燈指示部分造型則無明顯差異；並且在車燈排列部份煞車燈與方向燈之排列方式皆以排列於接近車體邊緣部位(外、上及下側)較能引起駕駛者之注意。此外在性別方面，男性與女性之反應時間並無明顯之差異存在，而分析之後將探討其差異之主因為何，冀其能導入並建立休旅車車尾燈設計之規範。

　　After the industry-revolution, the change of our daily life becomes more and more faster. It makes us through the human power stage and into machine stage. Even now we live in a digital information period, but we still can’t live without machine product, and cars maybe the evident example. From the first car has borne until now, the history of car has several hundred years at less. More and more different design require has be pointed out to satisfy every different level people. Adapt to the change of car-marketing, Recreation Vehicle car become the most popular type for the consumer. However, when the car structure different with before, the new safety rule must be refined to match this new structure.

　　In this study we choose Honda CR-V become the study object, and try to find out the effect of driver cognitive ability in different shape and different arrangement. In the study we choose three different shapes (a straight line shape, a rectangular form shape, a circular form shape) and five different arrangement (dispose in upper, middle, lower, near car body outside , near car body inside ) to establish different stop lamp and turn signal lamp into eight different sample models in 3D Max. After model making, use EON Studio to arrange the driving environment and set the motion of CR-V. In the end combine the driving simulation system (DS) into this experiment.

　　Every experiment result will compare with the CR-V original setting (rectangular form shape and turn signal lamp arrange into upper to the stop lamp). Through the experiment, the result shows: in stop lamp shape, the circular form shape and the straight line shape both have higher alertness than the rectangular form shape. But in turn signal lamp, different lamp shape has the same result. In the car lamp arrangement, put the stop lamp and turn signal lamp to the upper, lower and near car body outside cause driver’s attention easily. In the different sex won’t have different result. In the end discuss what cause these different and line out some car lamp design principle for designer.

【01】Falkmer, T.,Nilsson, L.,and Tornros,J., 1998,Detection and identification of information presented peripherally inside the car, VTIrapport 461A.

【02】Farmer, C., 1996,Effectiveness estimates for center high mounted stop lamps: a six year study" Accident Analysis and Prevention,Vol.28,pp. 201-208

【03】Kent E. Higgins, Joanne Wood and Alan Tait, 1998,Vision and driving: selective effect of optical blur on different driving tasks, Human　Factors, Vol.41, pp. 224~232

【04】Kuge Nobuyuki, Matsushita, Yasuhiro, Shimoyama, Osamu, 2002, Development of a high-functionality tail lamp system in the second phase of the ASV program, JASE Review, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, pp. 371-377

【05】Luckiesh, M.，and Moss, F.K., 1927-1932, The new science of seeing In Interpreting the science of seeing into lighting practice.,vol.1.Cleveland：General electric Co。

【06】Mortimer P., 1990, Perceptual factors in rear-end crashes, Human Factor and Ergonomics Society, Vol.34, pp. 591-594

【07】Mortimer R., 1993,High mounted brake lamp: a cause without a theory. Human Factor and Ergonomics Society, Vol.37 ,pp. 955-959

【08】Mourant, R.,and Rockwell,T., 1972,Mapping eye-movement patterns to the visual scene in driver. Human Factors,Vol.14,pp. 325-335.

【09】Paul L. Olson and Michael Sivak., 1986, Perception-Response time to unexpected roadway hazards, Human Factors, Vol28, pp91-96

【10】Sivak M, David V. Post, Paul L. Olson, Robert J. Donohue., 1981,Driver responses to high-mounted break light in actual traffic, Human Factor, Vol.23,pp. 231-235

【11】Tokunaga, R.A.et al., 2000,Celluar telephone conversation while driving-effects on driver reaction time and subjective mental workload, TRR1724,pp.1-6

【12】Tomoko Saito, and Haruhiko Iizuka.,1992,Model of night vision characteristics, Jase Review, Vol.13, pp. 83~87

【13】Viktor Lowenfeld and W.Lambert Brittain., 1987,Creative and mental growth, Macmillan publishing company

【14】Wolf，M.，and Gardiner，J.S., 1965,Studies on the scatter of light in the dioptric media of the eye as a basis of visual glare , Archives of Ophthalmology，74，338-345。

【15】中華民國「道路交通安全規則」附件七

【16】丘永福,1987,造形原理,藝風堂出版社,台北

【17】行政院主計處國情統計通報第211號

【18】台灣區車輛工業同業公會，2003年7月

【19】李友仁,2005,應用汽車駕駛模擬系統於道路交通事故成因檢討之研究，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所，碩士論文

【20】林大煜,1992a,汽車第三煞車燈之效用評估，交通部運輸研究所研究報告

【21】林大煜,1992b,汽車第三煞車燈之效用評估，交通部運輸研究所研究報告

【22】林大煜,1998,道路交通事故之趨勢與特性分析，道路交通安全育資訊年刊八十七年版

【23】吳宇婷,2004,汽車尾燈型態與駕駛者視認性安全效能之研究，國立成功大學工業設計學系，碩士論文

【24】石曉蔚/編著，室內照明設計原理，淑馨出版社。

【25】黃俊英,2002,多變量分析第七版，中國經濟企業研究所。

【26】許勝雄、彭游、吳水丕,民國87年,人因工程,滄海書局,台北

【27】眩光的亮度及偏角對視覺清晰度的影響，國立清華大學工業工程研究所，計劃人/游志雲副教授，研究員/陳泰良。

【28】國際標準組織，ISO7227-1987 機動車及其拖車之訊號裝置

【29】超越購車雜誌，2002年1月號

【30】曾志明,2000,前饋資訊輔助之緊急煞車燈---理論架構之模擬驗證，私立逢甲大學工業工程所，碩士論文

【31】李碩重/編著，照明設計學，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，P7-12。

【32】歐洲標準化協會，ECE R48 對車燈之ㄧ般規定項目報告

【33】賴新喜、管倖生,1991a,汽機車視覺效應及人因工程安全性之研究<I>機車煞車操作反應與尾燈設計之研究，國家科學委員會專案研究報告

【34】賴新喜,1991c,汽機車駕駛視覺效應及人因工程安全性之研究<I>汽機車駕駛者基本視覺之視域、感光反應與訊號辨識性之研究

【35】學生視力保健工作手冊，台灣省政府教育廳編印，中華民國79年1 月。