簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉昌霖
Liu, Chen-Lin
論文名稱: 公司治理評鑑與委任四大會計師事務所之關聯性研究:以台灣上市櫃公司為例
The Association between Corporate Governance Evaluation and Appointment Big Four: Evidence from Corporate Governance Evaluation in Taiwan
指導教授: 黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班
Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 34
中文關鍵詞: 公司治理評鑑委任四大會計師事務所
外文關鍵詞: corporate governance, appointment of Big Four auditors
相關次數: 點閱:137下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要探討公司治理評鑑結果與委任四大會計師事務所時,是否影響其公司治理評鑑之等級。公司治理評鑑系統從2015年第一屆開始迄今已辦理第五屆。本研究係以2017年(第三屆)及2018年(第四屆)公司治理評鑑結果為研究對象,實證結果顯示,公司治理評鑑等級與委任四大會計師事務所之機率呈現顯著水準的正相關。其代表著,會委任四大會計師事務所的企業,相對重視著公司治理狀況,並且透過委任四大會計師事務所之審計品質,對公司財務資訊的透明度更具信心。

    This study focuses on the results of corporate governance evaluations and the appointment of the Big Four, whether it affects the level of corporate governance evaluation. The corporate governance evaluation system has been in the fifth session since the first year of 2015. This study is based on the results of 2017 (3rd) and 2018 (4th) corporate governance evaluation. The empirical results show that the corporate governance evaluation level is significantly positively correlated with the probability of appointing the Big Four. It represents the company that will appoint the Big Four, and pays more attention to corporate governance, and by appointing the auditing quality of the Big Four, they are more confident in the transparency of the company's financial information.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 1 第三節 研究流程 2 第四節 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 公司治理的發展與定義 4 第二節 公司治理理論背景 6 第三節 我國公司治理評鑑制度 6 第四節 選擇會計師事務所相關之研究 8 第三章 研究方法 9 第一節 研究假說 9 第二節 樣本取樣與資料來源 9 第三節 模型的建立與變數說明 11 第四章 實證結果分析 14 第一節 樣本資料敘述性統計分析 14 第二節 迴歸分析 20 第三節 額外分析 22 第五章 結論與建議 31 第一節 研究結論 31 第二節 研究限制與建議 31 參考文獻 32 參考網站 34

    柯承恩,「我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議-上」,會計研究月刊,第173 期,第75~81 頁,民國89 年。
    林俊傑、劉梧柏與黃華瑋,2018,〈 公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討:以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例〉,《商略學報》,第10巻(1期):23-46頁
    證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,2004,台灣公司治理,台北;財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會。
    王鈴(1998),傳統審計品質代理變數之研究,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    Abbott, L. J. and S. Parker. (2000), “Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics,” Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol.19, No.2 (Fall):pp. 47-66.
    Beatty, R. P.1989. Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings. The Accounting Review 64(October): 693-709.
    Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earning management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(Spring): 1-24.
    Bachar, J. (1989). Optimal Underwriting Contracts and Underpricing of New Issues. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,4: 432-459
    Caramanis, C. and C. Lennox (2008), “Audit effort and earnings management,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp.116-138.
    DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 183-199
    Dopuch, N. and D. A. Simunic. 1992. Competition in Auditing:An Assessment. Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research (University of Illinois)
    Ertugrul, M. and Hegde, S. (2009). Corporate governance ratings and firm performance. Financial Management, 38(1), 139-160.
    Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18(Fall): 17-34.
    Fama, E F., and M. C. Jensen, (1983a), “Agency Problems and Residual Claims”, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
    Francis, J. R, E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the Credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18 (Fall):17-34
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October):305-360.
    Kim, J., R. Chung, and M Firth. 2003. Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 20(Summer): 323-359.
    Lennox, C. S. 1999. Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26: 779-805.
    Lawrence, A., M. Minutti-Meza, and P. Zhang, 2011. Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attribute to client characteristics? The Accounting Review 86(1): 259-286.
    Menon, K., and D. D. Williams. 1991. Auditor credibility and initial public offerings. The Accounting Review 66(April): 313-332.
    Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Production differentiation in auditing: A study of auditor choice in the market for new issue. Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation.
    Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues. Canadian Certified General Accountants' Research Foundation, Vancouver, B. C.
    Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review 68(April): 346-366.
    Wallman, S. M. H.1996. The future of accounting, part iii: reliability and auditor independence. Accounting Horizons 10(December): 76-97.
    Watts, L. W., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Toward a positive accounting theory of determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.

    無法下載圖示
    校外:不公開
    電子論文及紙本論文均尚未授權公開
    QR CODE