Creativity is the correlation and reconstruction of the experiences we have in our mind. The conceptual stage is the first stage where creativity is seen, it is the design stage where any idea is welcomed. Visual stimuli have been concluded to have an effect on the quality of a design solution. Therefore, this study aims to find the influence of two different types of visual stimuli namely; random visual stimuli and complete solution stimuli. Random images are any visuals that one sees daily. Complete solution is a complete product that is already a possible solution for an answer.
Two experiments are conducted in this study, the subject selection aims to find subjects within the same range of creativity. This is achieved through the Williams Creativity Assessment test. The second experiment, concept creativity experiment investigates the concept designs produced by subjects under the influence of the above mentioned two visual stimuli.
The criteria being scored are originality, practicality, interactivity and overall completeness. Significant differences were found in practicality and overall completeness, where the group influenced by complete solution performed better. No significant differences were found in the criteria of originality and interactivity.
In conclusion, different visual stimuli stimulate the designer in different aspects. Random visual stimuli stimulated the forms of the product and provided a vertical development of the concept. Complete solution stimuli stimulated functional aspects of the design and provided a horizontal development of the concept.

Casakin, H. and Goldschmidt, G., 2000. Reasoning by visual analogy in design
problem-solving: the role of guidance Journal of Planning and Design: Environment
& Planning B Vol. 27 p 105-119.
Eckert, C. and Stacey, M., 2000. Sources of inspiration: a language of design
Design Studies Vol. 21 No. 5, p 523-538.
Finke, R. A., 1990. Creative imagery: discoveries and inventions in visualization
Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, p 204–244.
Gabora, L., 2002. Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In (T.
Hewett and T. Kavanagh, Eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on
Creativity and Cognition , October 13-16, Loughborough University, UK, p 126-133.
Goldschmidt, G. and Smolkov, G., 2006. Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on
design problem solving performance, Design Studies, Volume 27, Issue 5, p 549-569.
Johnson, J. Sharp, H. and Petre, M., 1999. The use of sources of inspiration in early
knitwear design: a computational model in J S Gero and B Tversky (eds) Visual and
spatial reasoning in design, p 275-280.
Koestler, A., 1964. The Act of Creation London: Hutchinson & Co.Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago
Press, p 103-114.
Lawson, B., 1980. How Designers Think. The Architectural Press, London, p 6.
Malaga, R. A., 1999. The Effect of Stimulus Modes and Associative Distance in
Individual Creativity Support Systems. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual
Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences-Volume 7 - Volume 7 (January
05 - 08, 1999). HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 7006.
McCoy, M. J. and Evans, G. W., .2002. The potential role of the physical environment
in fostering creativity Creativity Research Journal Vol 14 No 3&4, p 409-426.
Nakakoji, K. Yamamoto, Y. and Ohira, M., 1999. A framework that supports
collective creativity in design using visual images. In Proceedings of the 3rd
Conference on Creativity & Cognition (Loughborough, United Kingdom, October 11
- 13, 1999). C&C '99. ACM, New York, NY, p 166-173.
Rhodes, M., 1961. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, p 305-310.
Saffer, D., 2006. Designing for Interaction, New Riders. p 4.
Torrance, E. P., 1966. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: norms-technical
manual. Presonnel Press, Princeton, N.J.Wallas, G. The Art of Thought., 1926. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
Warr, A. and O'Neill, E., 2005. Understanding design as a social creative process. In
Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity &Amp; Cognition (London, United
Kingdom, April 12 - 15, 2005). C&C '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, p 118-127.
Warr, A. and O'Neill, E., 2006. The effect of group composition on divergent thinking
in an interaction design activity. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on
Designing interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA, June 26 - 28, 2006). DIS
'06. ACM Press, New York, NY, p 122-131.
Williams, F. E., 1993. Creativity Assessment Packet (CAP): Examiner’s manual.
http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=mental%20synthesis
http://www.tokyo-fashion.net/content/big5/Index.shtml
http://www.notcot.org