簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭皓綸
Kuo, Hao-Lun
論文名稱: 中美競逐下的馬來西亞政經策略發展:從避險到柔性平衡
Malaysia’s Political-Economic Strategy Development amid U.S.-China Competition:From Hedging to Soft Balancing
指導教授: 宋鎮照
Soong, Jenn-Jaw
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 政治學系
Department of Political Science
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 196
中文關鍵詞: 柔性平衡馬來西亞中美關稅戰供應鏈重組經濟安全
外文關鍵詞: Soft Balancing, Malaysia, China–U.S. Tariff War, Supply Chain Restructuring, Economic Security
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討中美關稅戰持續深化的背景下,馬來西亞是否由傳統「避險(hedging)」策略逐步轉向「柔性平衡(soft balancing)」,並分析此一戰略調整對東協中小型國家外交與經濟治理的意涵。隨著中美競爭由貿易衝突擴展至科技、供應鏈及地緣政治層面,馬來西亞作為東協重要成員,在經濟高度依賴中國、市場安全仍倚重美國的雙重結構下,必須持續調整其政經發展策略,以維持國家利益與戰略自主。

    本研究以新自由制度主義與結構現實主義為主要理論基礎,結合避險理論與柔性平衡理論,採歷史分析法與個案研究法,從外交政策、經貿合作、供應鏈重組及區域制度參與等面向,分析馬來西亞於中美競爭下的政策演變,並透過RCEP、CPTPP、IPEF及東協等制度平台,探討其對外策略之調整方向。

    研究結果顯示,馬來西亞的重心自避險策略轉移,在維持經濟合作與安全平衡的基礎上,逐步展現柔性平衡的特徵。其具體表現包括積極運用區域多邊制度降低對單一大國的依賴、推動出口市場與供應鏈多元化、深化與不同國家的經濟合作,以及在外交政策上持續強調「不選邊站」與戰略自主。此一策略已由過去偏重風險分散的被動避險,逐漸轉向透過制度合作、多邊參與及經濟布局提升國家自主性的積極平衡模式。

    本研究認為,中美競爭並未迫使馬來西亞在兩大強權間作出二元選擇,而是促使其透過制度運用與策略調適,在維持避險基礎上逐步形成柔性平衡的新型政經策略。本研究除補充避險與柔性平衡理論於東南亞中小型國家的適用性外,亦深化新自由制度主義對中小國運用國際制度維護戰略自主之解釋,並為理解東協國家於中美競爭下的政策調適與區域治理提供新的分析視角。

    This study examines whether Malaysia's foreign economic strategy has gradually shifted from the traditional approach of hedging toward soft balancing amid the intensifying China–U.S. tariff war. As strategic competition between China and the United States has expanded beyond trade disputes to encompass technology, supply chains, and geopolitics, Malaysia has faced increasing pressure to adjust its political and economic strategies while maintaining stable relations with both major powers. Given its deep economic ties with China and long-standing security cooperation with the United States, Malaysia has sought to preserve its national interests through a more flexible and adaptive foreign policy.

    This study adopts historical analysis and case study methods to examine Malaysia's policy evolution in response to China–U.S. strategic competition. The analysis focuses on foreign policy, economic and trade cooperation, supply chain restructuring, and participation in regional economic frameworks, including the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), in order to explore the adjustment of Malaysia's external strategy.

    The findings indicate that Malaysia has transferred its traditional hedging strategy. Instead, while maintaining a balance between economic cooperation and security interests, it has increasingly demonstrated the characteristics of soft balancing. This transformation is reflected in its efforts to diversify export markets and supply chains, deepen economic cooperation with multiple partners, reduce dependence on any single major power through multilateral economic frameworks, and consistently uphold a foreign policy of non-alignment. Compared with its previous emphasis on passive risk diversification, Malaysia has gradually adopted a more proactive strategy that strengthens national resilience through institutional cooperation, multilateral engagement, and economic diversification.

    This study argues that intensifying China–U.S. competition has not compelled Malaysia to choose between the two major powers. Rather, it has encouraged Malaysia to develop a more flexible political and economic strategy that combines the traditional logic of hedging with the characteristics of soft balancing. The findings enrich the understanding of strategic adjustment by middle and small powers under great-power competition and provide a new perspective on how Malaysia responds to changes in the regional and international political economy.

    摘要 I Abstract II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與重要性 4 第三節 研究問題與目的 6 第四節 研究範圍 8 第二章 理論與文獻回顧 9 第一節 理論基礎與概念界定 9 第二節 中美競逐下的區域結構壓力 20 第三節 國內因素與策略調整的邏輯 32 第四節 馬來西亞對外經貿與安全策略 36 第五節 小結 44 第三章 研究設計 46 第一節 研究流程 46 第二節 研究分析 47 第三節 研究方法 51 第四節 資料來源 57 第四章 馬來西亞的政治發展策略 59 第一節 內政的政策轉變 59 第二節 外交的政策轉變 69 第三節 小結 78 第五章 馬來西亞的經濟發展策略 80 第一節 財政的政策轉變 80 第二節 國貿的政策轉變 105 第三節 小結 118 第六章 避險策略到柔性平衡的過渡 119 第一節 避險策略的應用與限制 119 第二節 柔性平衡的使用與優勢 130 第三節 小結 147 第七章 研究結論 148 第一節 研究發現 148 第二節 研究建議 151 參考文獻 154

    吳大器,2025,《上海國際金融中心建設探索與實踐(2020-2024)》,上海:立信會計。
    李明,2018,《國際關係》,新北:前程文化。
    李玫憲,2018,《圖解兩岸關係》,台北:五南圖書。
    林泉忠,2019,《當「崛起中國」遇上「太陽傘」:透視廿一世紀兩岸三地新關係》,香港:香港明報。
    宋鎮照,2008,《變遷中的東南亞政治:制度、菁英與政策的磨合》,台北:五南圖書。
    ———,2014,《新世紀之台灣-中國-東協的新三角政經發展:區域經濟整合戰略思維台灣連結新西進與新南向發展的蟹型策略應用》,台北:五南圖書。
    ———,2025,《東南亞新星崛起:中美競逐下的越南、柬埔寨、緬甸、寮國》,台北:五南圖書。
    卓忠宏,2024,《歐洲聯盟決策體系》,台北:國立臺灣大學。
    阮功松,2024,《東南亞國家轉型路口下的抉擇與蛻變》,台北:中華經濟研究院。
    王文岳(2024)。〈美中競合下的南海爭端與區域聲索國的戰略回應〉。《全球政治評論》,(7),73–97。
    王勇 (2025)。〈加快构建平等有序的全球经济新秩序〉。《国家治理》,2025年第13期。
    李志強(2018)。〈中國大陸經濟發展策略、趨勢與挑戰〉。《展望與探索月刊》,16(5),76–93。
    李玫憲(2008)。〈東協推動信心建立措施的困境與作法:從國際關係三大理論分析〉。《全球政治評論》,(2),127–166。
    李瓊莉(2015)。〈亞太區域經濟構築中的〈東協中心性〉〉。《遠景基金會季刊》,16 (4),71–113。
    李莉文、金玉璨(2024)。〈美國加大對華戰略競爭背景下的東盟國家對沖戰略〉。《和平與發展》,(6),150–179。
    李明峻 (2018). 〈歐盟的國家承認實踐〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,14 (3),53-76。
    李明勳(2023)。〈RCEP全面生效下臺灣南向政策之挑戰與機遇〉。《工商會務》,139,4-6。
    林若雩 (2016)。〈東協共同體內外安全治理之困境-新區域主義的觀點〉. 《淡江國際與區域研究》,5(1),1-43。
    林至潔(2021)。〈依賴與自主:柬埔寨的制度選擇與外交困境〉。《國際事務季刊》,15(4),77-102。
    林佾靜(2022)。〈緬甸軍事政變與失敗國家安全危機:東協的回應與辯證〉。《全球政治評論》,(80),87-88。
    林麗香(2022)。〈中國戰狼外交的崛起:以新古典現實主義觀點分析〉。國防大學政治作戰學院,81-108
    宋鎮照(2004)。〈從全球化與區域化分析東協的臺海兩岸發展策略選擇〉。《遠景基金會季刊》,5(4),151-187。
    ———(2021)。〈新南向政策與區域經濟整合發展:台灣的對策與機會〉。《全球政治評論》,(4),33-53。
    宋興洲(2005)。〈區域主義與東亞經濟合作〉。《政治科學論叢》,(4),1–48。
    卓忠宏(2024)。〈歐盟對中國政策的轉變:從避險走向柔性平衡(2013–2023)〉。《歐美研究》,54(3),475-523。
    阮功松(2020)。〈從「避險」到「軟制衡」:美國的策略如何改變越南的中國政策,2014–2019〉。《問題與研究》,59(1),143-193。
    孫伊然(2011)。〈全球經濟治理的觀念變遷:重建內嵌的自由主義?〉。《外交評論:外交學院學報》,(3),16-32。
    張偉玉(2020)。〈東南亞國家對沖戰略的變化趨勢〉。《國際政治科學》,5(2),184-192。
    彭念(2021)。〈東南亞國家對華對沖戰略—緬甸是個例外?〉。《東南亞研究》,(1),135–160。
    邱奕宏(2013)。〈軍事衝突、政治風險與外來直接投資〉。《問題與研究》,52(1),35–66。
    ———(2017)。〈外來直接投資與國家安全的權衡:探討影響美國外資政策的政治因素〉。《政治學報》,(3),1–32。
    ———(2020)。〈國家對外援助與企業對外投資之關聯:以日本的對外援助為例〉。《政治科學論叢》,(85),91–138。
    ———(2021)。〈從國際建制主義解析川普挑戰全球貿易建制的原因〉。《遠景基金會季刊》,22(1),127–184。
    郭俊麟(2008)。〈東南亞區域整合經驗─〈東協模式〉的實踐與檢討〉。《台灣國際研究季刊》,4(1),99–126。
    鄭端耀(1997)。〈國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析〉。《問題與研究》,36(12),1–22。
    ———(2005)。〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉。《問題與研究》,44(1),115-140。
    賴怡忠(2012)。〈美中台經貿三角結構:對台灣作為以及美中台三邊政治互動的影響〉。《台灣國際研究季刊》,3,130-131。
    葛紅亮(2019)。〈權力制衡到規範外溢:東協「大國平衡」戰略再評議〉。《全球政治評論》,(68),51–66。
    饒兆斌(2019)。〈馬來西亞政局發展、外交走向和馬來西亞–台灣關係初評估〉。《台灣亞洲基金會時勢分析》,2019年1月3日。
    廖舜右、蔡松伯(2013)。〈新古典現實主義與外交政策分析的再連結〉。《問題與研究》,52(3)。43-61
    郭淨源,2023,〈避險的終結?中美競爭下的東協國家避險策略發展〉,國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文。
    廖小娟(2006)。〈小國提升國際地位的策略:兼論對臺灣之啟示〉。國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文,1-191。
    黃靜雅(2023)。〈區域全面經濟夥伴協定(RCEP)與東協中心性:一個歷史制度論的分析〉。國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文,1-169。
    烏凌翔,2022,〈美中科技戰與權力轉移──熱戰可以被避免嗎?〉,國立臺灣大學政治學系博士論文。
    李隆生(2006)。〈以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合:從區域主義到全球化?〉。發表於開南大學公共事務管理學系主辦:「全球化與行政治理學術論文研討會」
    中華民國全國商業總會,2024,《RCEP全面生效下臺灣南向政策之挑戰與機遇》,台北市:中華民國全國商業總會。
    馬來西亞外交部,2019,〈馬來西亞與美國關係簡報〉,載於《2019年外交政策藍皮書》附錄,吉隆坡:馬來西亞外交部。
    國際經貿服務網,2024,〈美國貿易政策轉變之前景與挑戰〉,國際經貿服務網:https://www.tradeinfo.org.tw/policy-change-2024,檢索日期:2025年07月10日。
    RCEP專刊編輯部,2024,〈RCEP專刊第二期:50周年新起點,中馬共享開放發展新機遇〉,《上海市企業走出去綜合服務中心》:https://www.scof.org.cn/rcep2024-2,檢索日期:2025年07月26日。
    Acharya, A. 2009. Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London. Routledge.
    Aziz, B. A., Yunus, M. Y. M., Fizal, A. N. S., Abdullah, M. A. M., & Ismail, N. A. (2025, August). Prospect of rare earth supply chain in Malaysia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3225, No. 1, p. 020008). New York:AIP Publishing LLC.
    Ba, Alice D. 2009. (Re)negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Redwood City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Chua, Beng Huat. 2024. Public Subsidy, Private Accumulation: The Political Economy of Singapore's Public Housing. Singapore: NUS Press.
    Gill, S. 2008. Power and resistance in the new world order. Berlin: Springer.
    Hays, J. C. 2009. Globalization and the new politics of embedded liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    He, Kai. 2008. Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic Interdependence and China’s Rise. London: Routledge.
    Ismail, N. A., Abdullah, M. A. M., Aziz, M. A. A., & Aziz, B. A. (2024, March). 50 years of rare earth research in Malaysia: Past, future trend, and what is missing? A bibliometric analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3014, No. 1, p. 040011). New York.AIP Publishing LLC.
    Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2020). Debunking the myth of ‘debt-trap diplomacy’. London. Chatham House.
    Jomo, K. S. (2005). Malaysia’s new economic policy and ‘national unity. In Racism and public policy (pp. 182-214). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Keohane, R. O. 2005. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Lupel, A., Pitakdumrongkit, K., & Ng, J. 2024. Small States and the Multilateral System: Transforming Global Governance for a Better Future. New York. International Peace Institute.
    Mardon, A. R. 2022. Belt and road investments and ethnic politics in Malaysia. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
    Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
    Narine, Shaun. 2002. Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder, CO: Boulder, Colorado. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    Ostwald, K. 2023. Why Malaysia's Unity Government Will (probably) Survive. Singapore. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
    Pape, R. A. 2005. Soft balancing against the United States. International security, ambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press.
    Paul, T. V. 2018. Restraining Great Powers: Soft Balancing from Empires to the Global Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Strange, S. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Sobri, N. A., Yunus, M. Y. B. M., & Harun, N. 2023. A review of ion adsorption clay as a high potential source of rare earth minerals in Malaysia. Amsterdam, Materials Today: Proceedings.
    Schweller, Randall L. 2010. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Valencia, M. J., J. M. Van Dyke, and N. A. Ludwig. 2021. Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea. Vol. 31. Leiden, Leiden. BRILL.
    Walt, Stephen M. (1990). The Origins of Alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Yeoh, T. (2024). Managing State-Federal Relations: Growing Pressure on Malaysia’s Madani Administration. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
    Armstrong, S.(2025/10/26)。〈ASEAN leads response to the threat of global economic disorder〉。《East Asia Forum》。
    Bose, A., & Hamilton, W. (2019, May). Compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 715-724). PMLR.
    Brusylovska, O. (2023). Russia's nuclear blackmail as a threat to the global nuclear order. In M. Budjeryn, M. Fuhrmann, M. Krepon, & H. Notte (Eds.), Russia's war on Ukraine: The implications for the global nuclear order (pp. 39–52). Springer Nature Switzerland.
    Chong, Alan. 2010. “Small State Soft Power Strategies: Virtual Enlargement in the Cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3): 383–405.
    Ciorciari, John D., and Jürgen Haacke. 2019. “Hedging in International Relations: An Introduction.” International Affairs, 95(3): 611–627.
    Chirathivat, S., Rutchatorn, B., & Devendrakumar, A. (2022). China's Belt and Road Initiative and its implications for ASEAN: An introduction. In S. Chirathivat, B. Rutchatorn, & A. Devendrakumar (Eds.), China's Belt and Road Initiative in ASEAN: Growing presence, recent progress and future challenges (pp. 1–22). World Scientific Publishing.
    Flemes, Daniel. 2010. “O Brasil na iniciativa de segurança hemisférica.” Contexto Internacional, 32(2): 329–362.
    Fernandez, M. I., Go, Y. I., Wong, M. D., & Früh, W. G. (2024). Malaysia’s energy transition and readiness towards attaining net zero: review of the potential, constraints, and enablers. Renewable Energy Focus, 51, 100640.
    Gerstl, Alfred. 2020. “Malaysia’s Hedging Strategy towards China under Mahathir Mohamad (2018–2020): Direct Engagement, Limited Balancing, and Limited Bandwagoning.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49(1): 106–131.
    ———. 2024. “Southeast Asia’s grand strategy: Hedging.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 21(2), 76-83
    Goh, Evelyn. 2007. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security, 32(3): 113–157.
    Hasan, B. M. M., & Salleh, A. Z. (2025, August). The Medina Charter's Enduring Relevance: A Foundational Constitutional Model for Malaysia's MADANI Vision. In International Conference on Islamic Economics, (ICIE) (Vol. 2, pp. 185-198).
    He, Kai, Paul, T. V., and Wivel, A. 2020. “Introduction: International Institutions and Peaceful Change.” Ethics & International Affairs, 34(4): 457–459.
    Hlovor, I., & Mawuko-Yevugah, L. (2024). “The Current World-System and Conflicts: Understanding the US-China Trade War.” Journal of World-Systems Research, 30(2), 583-609.
    Hufbauer, G. C., and Schott, J. J. 1985. “Economic Sanctions and US Foreign Policy.” PS: Political Science & Politics, 18(4): 727–735.
    Ilai Z. Saltzman. 2012. “Soft Balancing as Foreign Policy: Assessing American Strategy Toward Japan in the Interwar Period.” Security Studies, 21(1): 93–131.
    Jetschke, Anja, and Jürgen Rüland. 2009. “Decoupling Rhetoric and Practice: The Cultural Limits of ASEAN Cooperation.” The Pacific Review, 22(2): 179–203.
    Jones, Lee, and Martin L. R. Smith. 2007. “Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order.” International Security, 32(1): 148–184.
    Jiang, Y., & Husin, H. (2024). “Assessing the economic impact and welfare effects of RCEP: A case study of Malaysia's progress in the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(8), 1600-1625.
    Katsumata, H., & Nagata, S. 2019. “ASEAN and the BRI: the utility of equidistant diplomacy with China and the US.” Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 7(2), 333-348.
    He, K., & Feng, H. 2008. “If not soft balancing, then what? Reconsidering soft balancing and US policy toward China.” Security Studies, 17(2), 363-395.
    Kam, Adrian J. Y. 2024. “Navigating the US–China Decoupling: Malaysia's Response to the US–China Trade War.” Asian Economic Papers, 23(2): 144–173.
    Kang, David C. 2003. “Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks.” International Security, 27(4): 57–85.
    Kobayashi, Y., and King, J. 2022. “Myanmar's Strategy in the China–Myanmar Economic Corridor: A Failure in Hedging?” International Affairs, 98(3): 1013–1032.
    Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2008. “The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2): 159–185.
    ———. 2016. “Malaysia Between the United States and China: What Do Weaker States Hedge Against?” Asian Politics & Policy, 8(1): 155–177.
    ———. 2022. “Hedging via Institutions: ASEAN-led Multilateralism in the Age of the Indo-Pacific.” Asian Journal of Peace building, 10(2): 355–386.
    ———. 2023, October 11. Active Neutrality: Malaysia in the Middle of U.S.-China Competition. United States Institute of Peace.
    Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, and Jamil, N. S. 2024. “The Feasibility and Future of Middle-state Hedging.” East Asian Policy, 16(1): 7–28.
    Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, and Lai Yew Meng. 2025. “Deference and Defiance in Malaysia's China Policy: Determinants of a Dualistic Diplomacy.” International Journal of Asian Studies, 22(1): 5–24.
    Lee, H. A., & Zhang, K. 2025. “Economics and Politics of Malaysia’s Petrol Subsidy Reform.” ISEAS Perspective, 2025(68).
    Liu, T., & Woo, W. T. 2018. Understanding the US-China trade war. China Economic Journal, 11(3), 319-340.
    Lim, Lee H., and Ong, Kok Kiong. 2023. “Malaysia in 2022: Election Year, Islamization, and the Politics of Coalition.” Asian Survey 63(2): 291–298.
    Lim, Sok Ling, and Nguyen, A. P. T. 2024. “Shifting Trade Winds: Southeast Asia’s Response to the United States–People’s Republic of China Trade Dispute.” Asian Development Review 41(2): 57–80.
    Mangiarotti, E. (2023). Malaysia 2023: A reform agenda overshadowed by identity politics. Asia Maior, 34.
    Mangiarotti, E., & Razali, M. M. 2024. “Malaysia 2024: Trials and Trajectory of Anwar Ibrahim’s Political Leadership.” Asia Maior, 35: 207–222.
    Martin, L. L. 1992. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism.” International Organization, 46(4): 765–792.
    Mun, T. S. 2009. “Punching Above its Weight: Malaysia's Foreign Policy.” Global Asia, 4(3), 27-31.
    Nesadurai, Helen E. S. 2008. “The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).” In Louise Fawcett (ed.), The International Relations of the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–203.
    Pape, Robert A. 2005. “Soft Balancing against the United States.” International Security, 30(1): 7–45.
    Paul, T. V. 2005. “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy.” International Security, 30(1): 46–71.
    Paul, T. V., He, K., and Wivel, A. 2025. “Soft Balancing in the Regions: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences.” International Affairs,101(1): 3–15.
    Putra, B. A. (2024). Malaysia’s “triadic maritime diplomacy” strategy in the South China Sea. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 13(2), 166-192.
    Rüland, Jürgen. 2011. “Southeast Asian Regionalism and Global Governance: The Politics of Interdependence.” Asian Survey,51(6): 1052–1074.
    Simões, L. 2022. “The Role of ASEAN in the South China Sea Disputes.” In M. De Souza, G. Coutaz, & D. Karalekas (Eds.), Asian Territorial and Maritime Disputes: A Critical Introduction, pp. 26–47. Bristol, England: E-International Relations.
    Shee, P. K. 2004. “The Political Economy of Mahathir's China Policy: Economic Cooperation, Political and Strategic Ambivalence.” Politics & International Relations Series.
    Saltzman, I. Z. 2012. “Soft balancing as foreign policy: Assessing American strategy toward Japan in the interwar period.” Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(2), 131-150.
    Saravanamuttu, Johan. 2022. “Malaysia’s Approach to Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific.” AEI Insights: An International Journal of Asia-Europe Relations 8(1): 32–44.
    Siew Mun Tang. 2009. “Punching Above its Weight: Malaysia’s Foreign Policy.” Global Asia, 4(3), 82–91.
    Stulz, R. M. 1984. “Optimal hedging policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19(2), 127-140.
    Steinberg, P. F. 2009. “Institutional resilience amid political change: the case of biodiversity conservation.” Global Environmental Politics, 9(3), 61-81.
    Schweller, R. L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in.” International security, 19(1), 72-107.
    Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory.” International Organization, 39(4): 579–614.
    Southgate, L. (2025). Explaining ASEAN institutional balancing success and failure. Asian Security, 21(2), 149-167.
    Sundaram, Jomo Kwame. 1989. “Malaysia’s New Economic Policy and National Unity.” Third World Quarterly 11(4): 36–58.
    Tan, S. S. 2020. “Consigned to hedge: south-east Asia and America's ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ strategy.” International Affairs, 96(1), 131-148.
    Umair, M., Hidayat, N. M., Nik Ali, N. H., Hakomori, T., & Abdullah, E. 2024. “A Review of Malaysia's Current State and Future in Electric Vehicles.” Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 12(4), 1-35.
    Venugopal, R. 2015. “Neoliberalism as concept.” Economy and Society, 44(2), 165-187.
    Waltz, K. N. (1996). International politics is not foreign policy. Security Studies, 6(1), 54-57.
    Wivel, A., & Paul, T. V. 2020. “Soft balancing, institutions, and peaceful change.” Ethics & International Affairs, 34(4), 473–485.
    Weiss, Meredith L. 1999. “What Will Become of Reformasi? Ethnicity and Changing Political Norms in Malaysia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 21(3): 424–450.
    Yean, T. S., & Rebecca, N. H. Y. 2024. “A Study of the Emerging Electric Vehicle (EV) Supply Chain in Malaysia.” ISEAS Perspective, 2024(33).
    Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2022. “ASEAN and Great Power Rivalry in Regionalism: From East Asia to the Indo-Pacific.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 42(1): 25–44.
    Zhang, Jun. 2023. “Rebuilding Strategic Autonomy: ASEAN’s Response to US–China Strategic Competition.” China International Strategy Review 5(1): 73–89.
    Malgeri, Giacomo. 2019. “Malaysia and the Belt and Road Initiative: An Agency Perspective of the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) Renegotiation Process.” Master’s thesis, University of Birmingham.
    Chow-Bing, Ngeow. 2019. “Malaysia–China Cooperation on the Belt and Road Initiative under the Pakatan Harapan Government: Changes, Continuities, and Prospects.” Presented at NIDS ASEAN Workshop, Tokyo, Japan.
    Pape, Robert A., “Soft Balancing: How States Pursue Security in a Unipolar World,” paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, USA, September 2~5, 2004.
    AMRO (ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office). 2025. Charting Malaysia’s Fiscal Strategy amid Rising Global Uncertainty. Singapore: AMRO.
    ASEAN. 2019. ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
    ASEAN Secretariat. 2010. AEC Blueprint 2015. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
    ———. 2022. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement – Text and Annexes. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
    ASEAN Stats. 2021. Trade Statistics. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
    Bank Negara Malaysia. 2024. Annual Report 2024. Kuala Lumpur: Bank Negara Malaysia.
    Canada, Global Affairs. 2023. The Growth of Supply Chain Trade within the CPTPP. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
    IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2024. 2024 Article IV Consultation – Press Release, Malaysia. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
    India Ministry of Commerce. 2022. Brief on Outcomes of the Twelfth Ministerial Conference of the WTO. New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce.
    ISIS Malaysia. 2023. Unpacking Budget 2024: Navigating Fiscal Realities and Policy Priorities. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Strategic & International Studies Malaysia.
    Khazanah Research Institute. 2022. Malaysia’s Trade Governance at a Crossroads. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute.
    Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). 2022. Malaysia Looks Forward to Robust Trade after Finalising CPTPP, RCEP Deals in 2022. Kuala Lumpur: MIDA.
    Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Malaysia. 2019. Report on Malaysia’s CPTPP Compliance Initiatives. Kuala Lumpur: MITI.
    ———. 2021. National Investment Aspirations (NIA) – New Investment Policy Framework. Kuala Lumpur: MITI.
    Ministry of Finance Malaysia. 2024. Fiscal outlook and federal government revenue estimates 2025. Ministry of Finance Malaysia.
    OECD. 2024. OECD economic surveys: Malaysia 2024. OECD Publishing.
    Petri, P. A., and Michael G. Plummer. 2020. East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia’s New Trade Blocs. Working Paper 20-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    U.S. Department of Labor. 2020. Situation and Gap Analysis on Malaysian Labour Legislation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Labor.
    U.S. Department of State. 2021. 2021 Investment Climate Statements: Malaysia. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs.
    U.S. Trade Representative. 2022. Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF). Washington, D.C.: Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
    Astro Awani. 2022. “CPTPP to Come into Force for Malaysia on Nov 29, 2022 – Mohamed Azmin.” https://www.astroawani.com/berita-bisnes/cptpp-akan-berkuatkuasa-di-malaysia-pada-29-nov-2022-azmin-392370 (accessed November 29, 2025).
    Ananthalakshmi, A., Chu, M.M. & Latiff, R. (2023). With eye on deficit, Malaysia’s Anwar tightens spending, taxes the rich. Reuters, 24 Feb 2025.
    Amalina Anuar (2023). Malaysia’s new budget and the long road to fiscal consolidation. East Asia Forum, 24 Nov, 2025.
    AP News, 2025. Malaysia warns Southeast Asia on shrinking neutrality. 25 Oct 2025.
    Barney, K., Rajah, R., & Cooray, M. (2025). Trapped in debt: China’s role in Laos’ economic crisis. Lowy Institute.https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/trapped-debt-china-s-role-laos-economic-crisis(accessed October 15, 2025).
    Bibek Raj Kandel & Diana Teoh, 2025. Can Malaysia’s Neutrality Survive the Great Mineral Divide? China-US Focus, 15 Dec 2025.
    Bernama. 2023. “Malaysia Expects Fiscal Deficit to Consolidate to 5 pct of GDP in 2023.” https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2165439 (accessed June 1, 2025).
    ———. 2024. “Budget 2025 Maintains Gradual Fiscal Consolidation Approach – Fitch Ratings.” https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2265123 (accessed October 15, 2025).
    Bloomberg Economics. 2024. “A War over Taiwan Is a $10 Trillion Risk.” Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-10/a-war-over-taiwan-is-a-10-trillion-risk (accessed July 10, 2025).
    Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2026). BTI 2026 Country Report — Malaysia.https://bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report/MYS (accessed May 10, 2026).
    Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet. (2024, October 14). U.S. Navy, Marine Corps and Royal Malaysian Navy commence Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Malaysia 2024. U.S. Pacific Fleet.https://www.cpf.navy.mil/Newsroom/News/Article/3949280/us-navy-marine-corps-and-royal-malaysian-navy-commence-cooperation-afloat-readi/(accessed December 10, 2025)
    CodeBlue. 2025. “Anwar: Extra RM38 Billion Health Allocation Rejected to Avoid Breaching Debt Ceiling.” https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2025/04/15/anwar-extra-rm38-billion-health-allocation-rejected (accessed July 16, 2025).
    CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies). 2023. “APEC 2023: An Old Foundation for New Architectures.” https://www.csis.org/analysis/apec-2023-old-foundation-new-architectures (accessed November 1 2025).
    Eldessouki, Ahmed, and Al Midfa, Noura. 2024. “Malaysia’s Strategic Hedging toward China and the United States.” Trends Research & Advisory. https://trendsresearch.org/insight/malaysias-hedging-toward-china-and-us (accessed September 16, 2025).
    Fox, John. 2022. “Malaysia’s Ratification of CPTPP to Help Increase Trade.” ASEAN Briefing. https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/malaysias-ratification-of-cptpp-to-help-increase-trade (accessed November 2, 2025).
    Gomez, E. T. (2025, January 29). Seizing the middle power moment: ASEAN and Canada at a convergence. Fulcrum. https://fulcrum.sg/aseanfocus/seizing-the-middle-power-moment-asean-and-canada-at-a-convergence/(accessed April 30, 2026).
    Gigi, Onag. 2025. U Mobile picks Huawei and ZTE to deploy Malaysia's second 5G network.LightReading.https://www.lightreading.com/5g/u-mobile-picks-huawei-and-zte-to-deploy-malaysia-s-second-5g-network(accessed November, 2025)
    Gerstl, Alfred. 2024. “Southeast Asia’s Grand Strategy: Hedging.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2024/08/12/southeast-asias-grand-strategy-hedging (accessed August 12, 2025).
    Han, David Guo Xiong. 2024. “Malaysia’s Non-Aligned Policy: A Strong Inclination Towards China and Guarded Cooperation with the US.” RSIS Commentary. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/cmmt2024- (accessed July 7 2025).
    Hernandez, C. G. 2019. “Mahathir’s Recalibration of Malaysia-China Relations: New Roads Ahead?” ISEAS Perspective 2019(62). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2019-62 (accessed June 2025).
    Hutchinson, Francis, and Siow Yue Tham. 2020. “The BRI in Malaysia’s Port Sector: Drivers of Success and Failure.” ISEAS Economics Working Paper 2020-10. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/economics-working-paper/2020-10 (accessed August 2025).
    Hong Kong Trade Development Council. (n.d.). Belt and Road Portal. https://beltandroad.hktdc.com/ (accessed May 2026).
    Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 2026. The state of Southeast Asia 2026 survey report. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/frontpage-featured/the-state-of-southeast-asia-2026-survey-report/ (accessed April 2026).
    Kevin Zhang & Lee Hwok Aun. 2024. “A Study of the Emerging Electric Vehicle (EV) Supply Chain in Malaysia.” ISEAS Perspective, 2025/3/3.https://sealionplus.iseas.edu.sg/nodes/view/92968(accessed July 2025)
    Marhalim Abas. 2021. More Short Range SAMs In RMK12, Hopefully. Malaysian Defence. https://www.malaysiandefence.com/more-short-range-sams-in-rmk12-hopefully/(accessed July 2025)
    Malaysia Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024, September 4). Leak of classified information related to a diplomatic note. https://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/-/leak-of-classified-information-related-to-a-diplomatic-note(accessed July 24, 2025).
    ———.(2025, May 26). Chairman’s statement of the 46th ASEAN Summit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 26 May 2025. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2025/04/22/tariff-shocks-malaysia-credit (accessed July 22, 2025).
    Medina, Antonio F. 2025. “马来西亚对华战略加码:以深度合作应对美加征关税压力.” ASEAN Business News. https://aseanbusinessnews.cn/malaysia-china-cooperation-2025 (accessed April 24, 2025).
    Menon, Jayant. 2023. “What Can Malaysia Expect from IPEF?” ISEAS Perspective 2023 (64). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2023-64 (accessed July 2025).
    McKinsey & Company Diversifying global supply chains: Opportunities in Southeast AsiaUmai : https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/logistics/our-insights/diversifying-global-supply-chains-opportunities-in-southeast-asia (accessed December 2025).
    Moody’s. 2024. “Malaysia Set to Benefit from US-China Competition.” Bernama/MIDA. https://www.moodys.com/research/Malaysia-benefit-us-china-competition-2024 (accessed December 2025).
    ———. 2025. “Tariff Shocks Pose a Threat to Malaysia’s Credit Rating.” The Star/Bloomberg. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2025/04/22/tariff-shocks-malaysia-credit (accessed April 22, 2025).
    Pang, E. 2017. “‘Same-same but Different’: Laos and Cambodia’s Political Embrace of China.” ISEAS Perspective 2017(66). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2017-66 (accessed October 2025).
    Peter B.M. Wang & Rahul Mishra, 2024. Malaysia is pushing the chips in on neutrality. CNA Commentary, 23 Jun 2025.
    Reuters. 2018. “Malaysia’s Mahathir Cancels China-backed Rail, Pipeline Projects.” https://www.reuters.com/article/malaysia-china-projects-idUSL3N1VB2FZ (accessed August 21, 2025).
    Singapore Ministry of Defence. (2024, October 14). FPDA militaries participate in Exercise Bersama Lima 2024. MINDEF Singapore.https://www.mindef.gov.sg/news-and-events/latest-releases/14oct24_nr/ (accessed December 20, 2025).
    Tan, Andrew. 2023. “One Year Recap of Anwar Ibrahim’s Foreign Policy.” ISIS Malaysia. https://www.isis.org.my/2023/12/20/anwar-foreign-policy-recap (accessed December 20, 2025).
    The Asia Foundation. (2024, March 15). Digital trade agreements in Asia and the Pacific. https://asiafoundation.org/publication/digital-trade-agreements-in-asia-and-the-pacific/(accessed December 20, 2025).
    U.S. Naval Institute. 2025. “INDOPACOM CO Paparo Outlines Risk of Western Pacific Conflict.” https://news.usni.org/2025/04/10/indopacom-co-paparo-outlines-risk-western-pacific-conflict (accessed April 10, 2025)
    U.S. Navy. (2024, October 22). U.S. and Malaysian armed forces deepen cooperation through CARAT Malaysia 2024. United States Navy.https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/3957708/us-and-malaysian-armed-forces-deepen-cooperation-through-carat-malaysia-2024/(accessed December 10, 2025)
    Weiss, Meredith L. 2024. Whither Institutional Reform in Malaysia? ISEAS Perspective 2024(50). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2024-50 (accessed May 2025).
    Wong, Aaron, Hong, Kelvin, and Yong, H. T. 2023. “Malaysia’s Ratification of the RCEP and CPTPP.” Global Compliance News (Baker McKenzie). https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/2023/02/15/malaysia-rcep-cptpp (accessed February 15, 2025).

    QR CODE