簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 嚴詩堤
YAN, SHIH-TI
論文名稱: 不同規劃視野下民航機維修滾動排程之研究:以多技能人力與棚廠限制為例
A Study on Rolling Schedule of Aircraft Maintenance under Different Planning Horizons: Taking Multi-skilled Workforce and Hangar Constraints as Examples
指導教授: 王俊涵
Wang, Chun-Han
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 99
中文關鍵詞: 民航機維修 、多技能人力 、混合整數線性規劃 、滾動式排程
外文關鍵詞: Aircraft Maintenance Scheduling, Multi-skilled Workforce, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP), Rolling Horizon Scheduling
相關次數: 點閱:105  下載:4 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著後疫情時代全球航空產業復甦,航空客運需求強勁反彈,帶動了飛機維修、修理與翻修(MRO)市場的快速擴張,同時航空產業面臨資深技術人才大幅流失與新型機隊交機延遲的雙重挑戰,航空公司被迫延長現役機隊壽命,致使維修任務日益繁重。本研究旨在探討不同規劃視野下,民航機維修滾動排程之最佳化問題,以國內某專業航空維修公司為實證對象,建構多技能與棚廠設備資源限制「混合整數線性規劃(MILP)」模型,有別於傳統模型,本研究核心在於將維修人力細分為「一般維修」與「特定專業技能」,針對不同機型的混合停放模式,考量維修棚廠的空間容量與機型尺寸的相容限制,以確保排程方案符合實際營運之物理限制與產能瓶頸。
    本研究全面剖析「短期滾動視窗」與「中長期全期最佳化」策略的營運績效差異,量化揭示全期視野在工單調度與成本防範上的顯著優勢,在管理應用價值上,研究不僅證實該排程最佳化能平衡技術人員工作負荷並提升資源效益,更透過敏感度分析識別出關鍵瓶頸技能組,補足了個案公司缺乏系統化排班的缺口。藉由本研究所建構的排程系統,企業能動態監控各類專業人力的運用率並預測未來人力短缺風險,據以研擬前瞻性的新進員工預聘與專長培訓計畫,以有效填補資深人員退休後產生的技術斷層,為企業提供一套具備實務應用價值的動態決策支援工具。

    With the post-pandemic aviation recovery, the MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) market has expanded rapidly. Facing severe technical labor shortages and fleet aging, MRO providers must optimize scheduling to maintain operational resilience. This study investigates aircraft maintenance rolling horizon scheduling under different planning horizons, using a domestic MRO firm as an empirical case study. We construct a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model integrating multi-skilled workforce constraints and hangar capacity limitations. Unlike traditional approaches, our model differentiates between general and specialized technical skills, and accounts for aircraft compatibility and mixed-parking configurations to ensure practical feasibility.
    This study comprehensively analyzes the performance differences between short-term rolling windows and mid-to-long-term global optimization, demonstrating the significant advantages of a global perspective in task scheduling and cost mitigation. Beyond balancing staff workloads and enhancing resource efficiency, the sensitivity analysis identifies critical bottleneck skill groups, bridging the gap in systematic scheduling for the case company. By utilizing the developed scheduling system, management can dynamically monitor specialized labor utilization and predict workforce shortage risks. This enables the formulation of proactive recruitment and training programs, effectively mitigating technical skill gaps caused by senior staff retirements and providing MRO operators with a practical dynamic decision-support tool.

    摘要 I Extended Abstract II 目錄 V 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的 3 1.3研究假設與問題描述 4 1.4研究流程與架構 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1民航機維修相關文獻 6 2.2民航機定期維修檢查種類 7 2.3民航機維修資源與限制 9 2.4技能彈性與工作權限 11 2.5民航機維修排程模式 12 2.6動態滾動式排程模式 13 2.7規劃時域的設定與執行效能的影響 15 第三章 研究方法 17 3.1維修人員規劃限制 17 3.1.1專業技能人員組S的集合,分別代表七大專業領域 17 3.2模型問題定義 21 3.2.1模型基本假設 21 3.2.2模型符號定義 22 3.3維修排程限制條件 24 3.3.1維修工序與人力指派限制 24 3.3.2工序先後順序限制 24 3.3.3時間與延誤定義 26 3.3.4人力資源工時限制 26 3.3.5棚廠佔用與狀態邏輯 27 3.3.6維修棚廠容量限制 28 第四章 研究結果與分析 34 4.1規劃週期與基準設定 34 4.1.1 A公司現行人工排程實況 34 4.1.2各項指標定義 36 4.2七天版_滾動式求解實驗 40 4.3十四天版_滾動式求解實驗 42 4.4三個月一次性求解實驗 46 4.5不同視野策略比較 47 4.5.1滾動式策略比較結論 47 4.5.2滾動式策略各技能組利用率 48 4.5.3不同策略比較結論與管理意涵 49 4.6敏感度分析 51 4.6.1敏感度分析設計 51 4.6.2員工編制敏感度分析(D維度) 52 4.6.3工單張數敏感度(W維度) 55 4.6.4 NRC工時敏感度(N維度) 55 4.6.5工單張數×技能組S5交叉敏感度(W × S 維度) 56 4.6.6 NRC × S5交叉敏感度(N × S 維度) 57 4.6.7敏感度分析之十四天版 59 4.6.8人力配置敏感度之七天版與十四天版對照 61 4.6.9十四天版擴充分析之綜合小結 63 第五章 研究結論與建議 66 5.1企業決策建議 66 5.2核心管理意涵 67 5.3未來研究方向 68 參考文獻 69

    施輝煌(2014)。民航機航線維護工作人為因素及管理策略探討。﹝碩士論文。國立清華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n6vqjx.
    孫育昇(2024)。地緣政治風險對航太工業供應鏈的影響與因應策略:以A公司為例。﹝碩士論文。國立清華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/g8z75a.
    袁瑞霞(2006)。航機維修廠中長期修護停機排程最佳化模式之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zb6ab6.
    陳玉菁(2001)。航空公司修護人員供給規劃之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uw73cq.
    曾盈翔(2017)。機隊維護計畫與人員排班之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立屏東科技大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/32f844.
    陳德明(2009)。航空維修訓練架構之發展-新進人員訓練。﹝碩士論文。國立清華大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kev297.
    顏上堯、陳俊穎、袁瑞霞(2007)。航機維修廠中期修護停機排程最佳化模式之研究。運輸學刊,19(2),121-139。https://doi.org/10.6383/JCIT.200706.0121.
    顏上堯、孫晉聖、袁堂耀(2023)。航機停機線維修排程最佳化之研究。技術學刊,38(4),275-283。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10123407-N202312210014-00004.
    Adimonyemma, J. P., & Sun, Y. (2025). Optimization model for large-scale long-term aircraft maintenance scheduling and station assignment. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 202, 104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104302
    Albakkoush, S., Pagone, E., & Salonitis, K. (2020). Scheduling challenges within maintenance repair and overhaul operations in the civil aviation sector. 9th International Conference on Through-life Engineering Service, Cranfield, UK. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3718006.
    Andrade, P., Silva, C., Ribeiro, B., & Santos, B. F. (2021). Aircraft maintenance check scheduling using reinforcement learning. Aerospace, 8(4), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8040113
    Anupkumar, A. (2023). Investigating the costs and economic impact of flight delays in the aviation industry and the potential strategies for reduction (Master's project, California State University, San Bernardino). CSUSB ScholarWorks.
    Başdere, M., & Bilge, Ü. (2014). Operational aircraft maintenance routing problem with remaining time consideration. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.066.
    Bureau of Air Safety Investigation. (1996). Human factors in fatal aircraft accidents (BASI Report SIR 1996/04). Australian Government Publishing Service.
    Chand, S., Hsu, V. N., & Sethi, S. (2002). Forecast, solution, and rolling horizons in operations management problems: A classified bibliography. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 4(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.4.1.25.287
    Costanza, D. P., & Sargent, B. (2024). Aviation MRO spend grows amid rising costs and supply chain woes. Oliver Wyman.
    De Bruecker, P., Beliën, J., Van den Bergh, J., & Demeulemeester, E. (2018). A three-stage mixed integer programming approach for optimizing the skill mix and training schedules for aircraft maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.047.
    Dinis, D., Barbosa-Póvoa, A., & Teixeira, Â. P. (2019).A supporting framework for maintenance capacity planning and scheduling: Development and application in the aircraft MRO industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.029 .
    Glomb, L., Liers, F., & Rösel, F. (2022). A rolling-horizon approach for multi-period optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 300(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.043.
    Guo, Z., Wen, X., & Huang, X. (2026). Aircraft maintenance scheduling optimization: state-of-the-art and emerging trends. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 209, 104767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2026.104767.
    International Air Transport Association. (2025, May 29). Passenger growth accelerates to 8% in April.
    Jadoon, W. (2024, February 6). How geopolitical tensions affect the aviation supply chain. Strategy Resolve Innovation.
    Pandey, M., Zuo, M. J., & Moghaddass, R. (2016). Selective maintenance scheduling over a finite planning horizon. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 230(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X15598914.
    Prentice, B., DiNota, A., & Hayes, L. (2025). Global fleet and MRO market forecast 2025–2035. Oliver Wyman.
    Qin, Y., Wang, Z. X., Chan, F. T. S., Chung, S. H., & Qu, T. (2019). A mathematical model and algorithms for the aircraft hangar maintenance scheduling problem. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 67, 491-509.
    Samà, M., D'Ariano, A., & Pacciarelli, D. (2013). Rolling horizon approach for aircraft scheduling in the terminal control area of busy airports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 60, 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.05.006.
    Shahmoradi-Moghadam, H., Safaei, N., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2021). Robust Maintenance
    Scheduling of Aircraft Fleet: A Hybrid Simulation-Optimization Approach. IEEE Access, 9, 17854-17865. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053714.
    Stadnicka, D., Arkhipov, D., Battaïa, O., & Ratnayake, R. M. C. (2017). Skills management in the optimization of aircraft maintenance processes. IFAC PapersOnLine, 50(1), 6912–6917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1216.
    Stolletz, R., & Zamorano, E. (2014). A rolling planning horizon heuristic for scheduling agents with different qualifications. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 68, 39-52.
    Van Kessel, P. J., Freeman, F. C., & Santos, B. F. (2023). Airline maintenance task rescheduling in a disruptive environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 308(2), 605-621.
    Villafranca, M., Delgado, F., & Klapp, M. (2025).Aircraft maintenance scheduling under uncertain task processing time. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 196, 104012.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104012.
    Wang, L., Lu, Z., & Ren, Y. (2019). A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 233(6), 1014–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X19853671.
    Weide, T. v. d., Deng, Q., & Santos, B. F. (2022). Robust long-term aircraft heavy maintenance check scheduling optimization under uncertainty. Computers & Operations Research, 141, 105667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105667.
    Zhang, Q., Chung, S.-H., Ma, H.-L., & Sun, X. (2024). Robust aircraft maintenance routing with Heterogeneous aircraft maintenance tasks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 160, 104518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104518.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE