簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳瑋康
Wu, Wei-Kang
論文名稱: ESG 與公司績效的關聯性:商業策略之中介效果
The Relationship between ESG and Firm Performance: The Mediation Effect of Business Strategy
指導教授: 梁少懷
Liang, Shao-Huai
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 49
中文關鍵詞: ESG公司績效商業策略探勘者分析者防禦者
外文關鍵詞: ESG, firm performance, business strategy, prospectors, analyzers, defenders
相關次數: 點閱:61下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文探討關於公司實行ESG之程度與公司績效(Firm Performance)之關聯性,並進一步研究商業策略(Business Strategy)對於ESG與公司績效之中介效果。

    本文針對可能干擾觀察ESG與公司績效關係之原因進行研究方法的調整,首先加入商業策略作為中介變數,並同時納入長短期公司績效(ROA, Tobin’s Q)作為應變數。並因台灣經濟新報TEJ所公布之 TESG 自2015年開始,因此本研究之樣本期間為2016年至2022年,並以台灣上市櫃公司為研究對象進行迴歸分析。

    本研究透過中介效果檢驗法對ESG與公司績效間關係是否存在中介效果進行驗證,研究結果發現三種商業策略當中僅防禦型策略對ESG與公司績效之關聯存在部分中介效果,其餘探勘者策略與分析者策略則顯示不存在中介效果。

    This paper investigates the relationship between the extent of ESG implementation and firm performance, and further explores the mediating effect of business strategy on ESG and firm performance.

    Methodologically, adjustments were made to address potential confounding factors affecting the observation of the relationship between ESG and firm performance. Firstly, business strategy was introduced as a mediator variable, alongside incorporating both short-term and long-term firm performance (ROA, Tobin’s Q) as dependent variables. Leveraging data from Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) TESG dataset starting from 2015, the sample period for this study spans from 2016 to 2022, with regression analysis conducted on listed companies in Taiwan.

    This study examines whether there is a mediating effect in the relationship between ESG and firm performance through a mediation analysis method. The results show that among the three types of business strategies, only defender strategy exhibits a partial mediating effect on the relationship between ESG and firm performance. In contrast, the prospector and analyzer strategies do not demonstrate a mediating effect.

    第壹章、緒論 8 第貳章、文獻回顧與假說發展 13 第一節、 ESG 與公司績效 13 第二節、 商業策略 17 第參章、研究設計與實證模型 22 第一節、樣本選取與來源 22 第二節、實證模型與變數定義 23 第肆章、實證結果 31 第一節、敘述性統計分析 31 第二節、相關係數分析 32 第三節、線性迴歸結果 34 第伍章、結論 40 參考文獻 43

    洪榮耀, & 陳正佑. (2012). 上市上櫃公司治理實務守則與公司績效關連性之探究. 商業現代化學刊, 6(4), 43-61.
    李秀英, 劉俊儒, & 楊筱翎. (2011). 企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性. 東海管理評論第 13 卷第一期, 77-112.
    林俊傑, 劉梧柏, & 黃華瑋. (2017). 公司治理評鑑與財務績效及公司價值之關聯性探討: 以台灣上市櫃企業公司治理評鑑為例 (Doctoral dissertation, National Cheng Kung University Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)).
    温忠麟, & 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731.
    Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968.
    Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
    Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary accounting research, 30(2), 780-817.
    Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2017). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 241-254.
    Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of business Ethics, 69, 111-132.
    Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance?. Sustainability, 14(13), 7595.
    Carnini Pulino, S., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG disclosure influence firm performance?. Sustainability, 14(13), 7595.
    Chang, C. L., & Robin, S. (2008). Public policy, innovation and total factor productivity: An application to Taiwan's manufacturing industry. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79(3), 352-367.
    Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
    Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 114, 155-169.
    Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
    Esteban-Sanchez, P., de la Cuesta-Gonzalez, M., & Paredes-Gazquez, J. D. (2017). Corporate social performance and its relation with corporate financial performance: International evidence in the banking industry. Journal of cleaner production, 162, 1102-1110.
    Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Academy of management journal, 60(3), 954-985.
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64.
    Fauser, D. V., & Utz, S. (2021). Risk mitigation of corporate social performance in US class action lawsuits. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(2), 43-65.
    Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management science, 61(11), 2549-2568.
    Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Berlin, Heidelberg: springer berlin heidelberg.
    Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 135-147.
    Hajar, I. (2015). The effect of business strategy on innovation and firm performance in the small industrial sector. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(2), 1-9.
    Habib, A. M. (2023). Do business strategies and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance mitigate the likelihood of financial distress? A multiple mediation model. Heliyon, 9(7).
    Habib, A., & Hasan, M. M. (2020). Business strategies and annual report readability. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 2513-2547.
    Hair, J. F., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Education+ Training, 49(4), 336-337.
    Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance: some theory and implications. The economic journal, 105(430), 678-689.
    Ho, J. L., Hsu, F. H., & Lee, C. L. (2022). Business strategy, corporate social responsibility activities, and financial performance. Journal of International Accounting Research, 21(1), 49-75.
    Jain, T., Aguilera, R. V., & Jamali, D. (2017). Corporate stakeholder orientation in an emerging country context: A longitudinal cross industry analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 701-719.
    Jasch, C. (2006). Environmental management accounting (EMA) as the next step in the evolution of management accounting. Journal of Cleaner production, 14(14), 1190-1193.
    Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European financial management, 13(5), 908-922.
    Lim, E. K., Chalmers, K., & Hanlon, D. (2018). The influence of business strategy on annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(1), 65-81.
    Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in society, 31(1), 56-63.
    Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Ho, J. A., & Sambasivan, M. (2019). The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility–Corporate financial performance Nexus: Application of Panel Vector Autoregression approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 401-418.
    Janz, N., Lööf, H., & Peters, B. (2003). Firm level innovation and productivity-is there a common story across countries?.
    Marquez, C.S and Ferreira, J. (2009), “SME Innovative capacity, competitive advantage and perfomance in a traditional industrial region of Portugal”, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, Vol. 4, Issue 4 pp. 53-68.
    McDaniel, S. W., & Kolari, J. W. (1987). Marketing strategy implications of the Miles and Snow strategic typology. Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 19-30.
    McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
    McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 854-872.
    Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.
    Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574.
    Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: The role of marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26-46.
    Mishra, S., & Modi, S. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder wealth: The role of marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26-46.
    Nagar, V., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Discretionary disclosure and stock-based incentives. Journal of accounting and economics, 34(1-3), 283-309.
    Parnell, J. A., & Wright, P. (1993). Generic strategy and performance: an empirical test of the Miles and Snow typology. British Journal of Management, 4(1), 29-36.
    Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: agency or stakeholder theory?. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 16(1).
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.
    Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: Redefining capitalism and the role of the corporation in society. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
    Ramakrishnan, R. Black, A. Nath, P and Muylderman, L. (2010), “Impact to environmental regulations on innovation and
    performance in the UK industrial sector”, Journal of Management Decision, Vol. 48 No. 10, pp. 1493-1513.
    Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859.
    Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859.
    Rajagopalan, N. (1997). Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: Evidence from electric utility firms. Strategic management journal, 18(10), 761-785.
    Rajagopalan, N., & Finkelstein, S. (1992). Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 127-141.
    Rosenbusch, N. Brinckmann, J. Bausch, A. (2010), Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs”, Journal of Business Venturing, JBV-05550; No of Pages 17
    Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of business economics, 86, 867-904.
    Shahzad, F., Saeed, A., Asim, G. A., Qureshi, F., Rehman, I. U., & Qureshi, S. (2021). Political connections and firm performance: Further evidence using a generalised quantile regression approach. IIMB Management Review, 33(3), 205-213.
    Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic management journal, 31(5), 463-490.
    Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic management journal, 31(5), 463-490.
    Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journal, 18(4), 303-319.
    Wang, Z., Hsieh, T. S., & Sarkis, J. (2018). CSR performance and the readability of CSR reports: too good to be true?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 66-79.
    Welch, K., & Yoon, A. (2022). Do high-ability managers choose ESG projects that create shareholder value? Evidence from employee opinions. Review of Accounting Studies, 1-28.
    Wong, W. C., Batten, J. A., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value?. Finance Research Letters, 39, 101593.
    Yuan, Y., Lu, L. Y., Tian, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Business strategy and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 359-377.
    Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607.
    Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE