簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 巴札爾
Gonchig, Bayarjargal
論文名稱: Measuring Central Bank Information Systems Success: Analysis of Internal and External Systems
Measuring Central Bank Information Systems Success: Analysis of Internal and External Systems
指導教授: 陳正忠
Chen, Jeng-Chung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所
Institute of International Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 86
外文關鍵詞: Information systems success model, Central bank information systems, User performance, System importance, Mixed methods sequential explanatory design
相關次數: 點閱:135下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • As the information systems involvement in every different sector is increasing, this paper specifically focuses on e-government, or more detailed, central bank information systems success. Based on DeLone and McLean’s Information Systems Success Models and Seddon and Kiew’s Path Model, information systems success and influential factors for successful systems are evaluated exampling two different systems representing external and internal systems of the Central Bank of Mongolia. Comparison analysis is developed using different research methods, quantitative approach for the external system and mixed methods approach for the internal system depending on the different amount of users.
    Measured by evaluation of actual users of the systems, research results show mostly positive conclusions along with unsupported results of service quality and system quality. Negative and insignificant results are further explained by interviews with internal system users. The external system is resulted having more positive and significant effects compared to the internal system.

    ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VIII LIST OF FIGURES IX CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions. 4 1.3 Research Procedure. 5 1.4 Research Structure. 6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 Central Bank Information Systems. 8 2.2 Theoretical Background. 9 2.2.1 DeLone and McLean IS Success Model (1992). 9 2.2.2 IS Success Model Extension. 10 2.2.3 Updated IS Success Model. 12 2.3 Definitions of Relevant Research Variables. 14 2.3.1 System Quality. 14 2.3.2 Information Quality. 14 2.3.3 Service Quality. 15 2.3.4 System Importance. 15 2.3.5 Usefulness. 16 2.3.6 User Satisfaction. 17 2.4 Definition of Dependent Variable. 17 2.4.1 User Performance. 18 2.5 Development of Research Hypotheses. 18 2.5.1 The Relationship of System Quality with Usefulness and User Satisfaction. 18 2.5.2 The Relationship of Information Quality with Usefulness and User Satisfaction. 19 2.5.3 The Relationship of Service Quality with Usefulness and User Satisfaction. 20 2.5.4 The Relationship of Importance of the System with Usefulness and User Satisfaction. 21 2.5.5 The Relationship between Usefulness and User Satisfaction. 21 2.5.6 The Relationship between Usefulness and User Performance. 22 2.5.7 The Relationship between User Satisfaction and User Performance. 22 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 23 3.1 Conceptual Framework. 23 3.2 Summary of Hypotheses. 24 3.3 Methodology One (Independent Quantitative Methods). 25 3.4 Methodology Two (Mixed Methods). 25 3.5 Quantitative Analysis. 26 3.5.1 Construct Measurements. 27 3.5.2 Statistical Methods. 30 3.6 Qualitative Analysis. 31 3.7 Sampling Plan. 32 3.8 General Characteristics Question Items. 32 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 33 4.1 External System. 33 4.1.1 Characteristics of Respondents. 33 4.1.2 PLS SEM Factor Analysis. 34 4.1.3 Partial Least Squares Equation Modeling. 37 4.2 Internal System. 38 4.2.1 Characteristics of Respondents. 38 4.2.2 PLS SEM Factor Analysis. 39 4.2.3 Partial Least Squares Equation Modeling. 43 4.3 Interview. 44 4.3.1 Characteristics of Respondents. 45 4.3.2 Interview Procedure. 45 4.3.3 Interview Results. 46 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 53 5.1 Research Conclusion. 53 5.2 Research Discussion and Implications. 54 5.2.1 Discussion. 54 5.2.2 Implications. 57 5.3 Research Limitations. 58 REFERENCES 59 APPENDICES 67 Appendix 1:Questionnaire (English) 67 Appendix 2: Questionnaire (Mongolian) 71 Appendix 3: Interview Transcript (Commercial bank users) 75 Appendix 4: Interview Transcript (Central bank users) 81 Appendix 5: Interview Transcript (IT Engineer) 84

    Aladwani, A. (2002). Organizational actions, computer attitudes, and end-user satisfaction in public organizations: An empirical study. Journal of End User Computing, 14(1), 42-49.
    Armstrong, D. B., Dimbleby, J., Dingsdag, D., & Fogarty, G. (2005). Information systems success in small business: Validation of survey instrument. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 37(1), 27-42.
    Au, N., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43-66.
    Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.
    Balaban, I., Mu, E., & Divjak, B. (2013). Development of an electronic portfolio system success model: An information systems approach. Computers & Education, 60(1), 396-411.
    Barki, H., & Harrwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 52-63.
    Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 37-69.
    Bearden, W. D., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 21-28.
    Birkinshaw, J., Morrison, A., & Hulland, J. (1995). Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16(8), 637-655.
    Bradley, R., Pridmore, J., & Byrd, T. (2006). Information systems success in the context of different corporate culture types: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 267-294.
    Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2002). Evaluating e-commerce web site design: A customer’s perspective. Paper presented at the The 33rd Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, San Diego, CA.
    Chang, Cha-jan, J., & King, W. R. (2005). Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 85-115.
    Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
    Chiu, C., Chiu, C., & Chang, H. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271-287.
    Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 491-504.
    Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.
    Compeau, D., Higgins, C., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
    Coombs, C., Doherty, N., & Loan-Clarke, J. (2001). The importance of user ownership and positive user attitudes in the successful adoption of community information systems. Journal of End User Computing, 13(4), 5-16.
    Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-346.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2002). Information systems success revisited. Paper presented at the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
    Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating e-commerce metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 316-333.
    Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
    Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010). Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 47-56.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
    Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2009). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (pp. 691-711). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
    Green, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
    Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
    Hair, J. R., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 7). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Halawi, L., Mccarthy, R., & Aronson, J. (2007). An empirical investigation of knowledge-management systems’ success. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 121-135.
    Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(1), 277-319.
    Hsieh, J., & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employees’ extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 216-227.
    Hunton, James, E., & Jesse, D. B. (1997). Effects of user participation in systems development: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 359-388.
    Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of DeLone-McLean model of information systems success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8-27.
    Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. (2006). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20.
    Jiang, K., Sobol, G., & Klein, G. (2000). Performance ratings and importance of performance measures for IS staff: The different perceptions of IS users and IS staff. Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(4), 424-434.
    Kamis, A., Koufaris, M., & Stern, T. (2008). Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 159-177.
    Kettinger, W., & Lee, C. (1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences, 25(5), 737-766.
    Kettinger, W., & Lee, C. (1997). Pragmatic perspectives on the measurement of information systems service quality. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 223-240.
    Kim, C., & Lee, S. (2009). Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191–201.
    Kulkarni, U., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2006). A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309-347.
    Larcker, D. F., & Lessig, V. P. (1980). Perceived usefulness of information: A psychometric examination. Decision Sciences, 11(1), 121-134.
    Leclercq, A. (2007). The perceptual evaluation of information systems using the construct of user satisfaction: Case study of a large French group. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38(2), 27-60.
    Leonard-Barton, D., & Sinha, D. (1993). Developer user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1125-1139.
    Lewis, R. C., & Booms, B. H. (1983). The marketing aspects of service quality. In Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing (pp. 99-107). Chicago, USA: American Marketing Association.
    Lin, H. F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 10(6), 817-820.
    Lin, J. C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197-208.
    Marble, R. (2003). A system implementation study: Management commitment to project management. Information & Management, 41(1), 111-123.
    Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information & Management, 1(4), 219–234.
    McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean’s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24-45.
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Mintu-Wimsatt, A., & Graham, J. L. (2004). Testing a negotiation model on Canadian anglophone and Mexican exporters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 345-356.
    Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2001). E-commerce systems success: An attempt to extend and respecify the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4), 131–141.
    Morgan, D. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 62-76.
    Moss, S., Prosser, H., Costello, H., Simpson, N., Patel, P., Rowe, S., et al. (1998). Reliability and validity of the PAS–ADD Checklist for detecting psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42(2), 173-183.
    Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (1997). A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment. Information Resources Management Journal, 10(1), 6-25.
    Naylor, J. C., Prichard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York, USA: Academic Press.
    Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychological theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 460–469.
    Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430.
    Oliver, R. L. (1994). Conceptual issues in the structural analysis of consumption emotion, satisfaction and quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 16-22.
    Palmer, J. (2002). Web site usability, design and performance metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 151-167.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implication. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
    Patterson, P. (1993). Expectations and product performance as determinants of satisfaction with a high-involvement purchase. Psychology & Marketing, 10(5), 449-465.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 236-263.
    Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management, 46(3), 159-166.
    Pitt, L., Watson, R., & Kavan, C. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173–188.
    Poropat, A., Abugabah, A., & Sanzogni, L. (2009). The impact of information systems on user performance: A critical review and theoretical model. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering, London, UK.
    Rai, A., Lang, S., & Welker, R. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 5-69.
    Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Number and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.
    Saunders, C., Gammerman, A., & Vovk, V. (1998). Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. Paper presented at the The 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, WI.
    Schaupp, L. C., Bélanger, F., & Fan, W. (2009). Examining the success of websites beyond e-commerce: An extension of the IS success model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 42-52.
    Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253.
    Seddon, P. B., & Kiew, M.-Y. (1994). A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, GA.
    Sedera, D., & Gable, G. (2004). A factor and structural equation analysis of the enterprise systems success measurement model. Paper presented at the The Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, Washington, DC, USA.
    Shannon, C. L., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    Sharifi, H., & Zarei, B. (2004). An adaptive approach for implementing e-government in I.R. Iran. Journal of Government Information, 30(5-6), 600-619.
    Shaw, N., DeLone, W. H., & F, N. (2002). Sources of dissatisfaction in end-user support: An empirical study. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 33(2), 41-56.
    Shih, H. (2004). Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Information & Management, 41(6), 719-729.
    Suh, K., Kim, S., & Lee, J. (1994). End-user’s disconfirmed expectations and the success of information systems. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 30-39.
    Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantita- tive approaches (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Thompson, S. H. T., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-131.
    Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 30-34.
    Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761-774.
    Werts, C., Linn, R., & Jöreskog, K. (1974). Intra-class reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25-33.
    Wold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, W. J. (1984). The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 5(3), 735-743.
    Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean model. Information & Management, 43(6), 728-739.
    Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & O’Neal, Q. (1995). Exploring the factors associated with expert system success. MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 83-106.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-08-31公開
    校外:2024-08-31公開
    QR CODE