傳統電力獨佔事業的架構已漸漸朝向自由化與解除管制的趨勢，在台灣為了改進生產效率與行政運作，近年來許多國營事業自由化的過程持續進行中。電力事業一向被視為具有生產與市場的潛能及系統運作之複雜性與規模經濟，在全球化趨勢下，發電市場自由化相關議題不同的觀點於現在與未來將被提出討論。運用紛爭解決機制ADR提供作為各種通路提供者與尋求者雙方達成協議的方法，本研究運用德爾菲研究方法作為資料分析技術，質性分析將作為主要研究結果，以量化分析為輔，彌補質性研究之不足。

　The traditional structure of integrated monopoly in electricity utility is being abandoned and the general trend is towards privatization and deregulation. In recent year there are many state-owned enterprises that have been privatized continuously in Taiwan in order to improve their productivity and administrative operation. The electricity has been thought to have production, marketing consistency, system operation complexity and scale economy. As the globalization continues rapidly, it comes the time for discussing the liberalization problems of electricity generation market related issues different aspects of now and in the future. Using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) feasibility study as a means of facilitating the reaching of a formal agreement between the access provider and the access seeker. This study uses the Delphi Method as data analysis techniques. The qualitative data will be taken as the main result, and the quantitative data will be an auxiliary to the main result.

REFERENCES
American Psychological Association. Washington, DC. (2003). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Fifth Edition.

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2003). Resolution of telecommunications access disputes — a guide.13-17, 20-26, 32-56.

Berne, M., & Pogore, G. (2004). Privatization Experiences in the France, CESifo Working Paper No. 1195.

Bortolotti, B., Siniscalco, D., & Fantini, M. (2000). Privatization and Institutions: A cross country analysis, CESifo Working Paper No. 375.3, 8-9.

Bortolotti, B., & Faccio, M. (2004). Reluctant Privatization. Finance Working Paper No.40/2004, 3-6, 24-25.

Chi, S.C. (Steve). (1994). The Effects of Perceived Identity and Justice Experiences with an ADR Institution on Managers’ Decision Preferences. National Taiwan University, 10, 21-24.

Commonwealth of Australia. (1999). Best practice utility regulation: Utility Regulators Forum Discussion paper, 1-12.

Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council. On conditions for access to the network for cross-border exchanges in electricity, Brussels, 7.6.2002, COM(2002) 304 final.

Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Green paper. On alternative dispute resolution in civil and commercial law. Brussels, 19.04.2002, COM(2002) 196 final.

HM Treasury. Central Unit on Procurement. (1995). No. 50 Disputes Resolution, 1-9.

Hanousek, J., Kočenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2004). Ownership Control and Corporate Performance After Large-Scale Privatization, William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number, 652, 35-36.

Iavigne, M. (1999). The Economics of Transition. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 162-170.

Kikeri, S., Nellis, J., & Shirley, M. (1992). Privatization: The Lessons of Experience. The World Bank, Washington, D.C, 1.

Office of Energy Regulation (DTe). (2000). The Netherlands, Accelerated Liberalization of the Energy Markets, 4-7, 10-12.

Porter, M. E. (1998). The competitive Advantage of nations: National Agendas, 619, 696-697.

Ramanadham, V. V. (1988). Privatization in the UK. Routledge, London and New York, 68-80, 226-232.

Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2000). Building consensus using the policy Delphi method, 308-315.

Sanchez, P., & Escoba, C. G. (2000). The Delphi method as a validation tool of the intangible measurement and disclosure guidelines. first draft, discussion paper.1-6.

Saunders, P., & Harris, C. (1993). Privatization and popular capitalism. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia, 23-39.

Stern, J. (1999). Electricity Reform in Belarus. London Business School, Regulation Initiative Working Paper. Series Number 31.

The Energy Group Institute of International Education Washington, DC. (2000). Best Practices Guide: Implementing Power Sector Reform, The Regulatory Assistance Project, 2-27, 39-42.

Thomas, G., & Christopher, G. (1993). Organization Development and Change, West Publishing Company, 39-40, 201-17.

Tomlinson, J. (1994). Government and the Enterprise Since 1900, Clarendon Press, Oxford.196, 207-212.

Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue. (2000). Alternative Dispute Resolution In the Context of Electronic Commerce. Doc No. Ecom-12-00.1-3.

United Nations. (1999). Privatization of Public Sector Activities. with a special focus on telecommunications, energy, health, and community services, 25-28,46-48,57-60,100.

Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1997). Privatization: An Economic Analysis. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 9-27, 45-61, 80-81, 150-153.

中文部份
仲裁法, 2002年7月10日公布施行。
電業法修正草案，1999年12月。
公營事業移轉民營條例施行細則，1999年6月。
公營事業移轉民營條例修正草案，1991年12月。
高銘志，2002年，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所，碩士論文，24-30，71-74，83-111。
吳再益、林唐裕，2002年，當前民營電廠興建遭遇之問題與因應對策。
公營事業評論，1999年11月，第一卷第四期，73-91。
中國時報，財經，1999.08.09，輸電業仍傾向不開放。
公營事業評論，1998年10月，第一卷第一期，35-66。
黃財源，公營事業民營化之理論與實踐，3-6。
許志義，1998，國際電業自由化發展趨勢及其對台灣之涵義。
廖義男，1998，公平交易法六年行政法院裁判之評析。
林唐裕、吳再益，1998，從歐美電業自由化發展趨勢探討我國電業自由化之方向。
許志義，1998，德國與英國電業發展現況之探討。
梁志堅，1998，分散型電源對台灣電力系統之影響。