簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳思敏
Chan, Sze-Man
論文名稱: 臺南市國中生知覺威脅、自我效能對網路霸凌受害因應策略之影響
The Effect of Threat Appraisal and Self-efficacy on Coping Strategies for Cyberbullying Victimization of Junior High School Students in Tainan City
指導教授: 董旭英
Tung, Yuk-Ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 132
中文關鍵詞: 網路霸凌網路霸凌因應策略知覺威脅自我效能情緒調節自我效能社會自我效能資訊科技自我效能
外文關鍵詞: Cyberbullying, Cyberbullying Coping Strategies, Perceived Threat, Self-Efficacy
相關次數: 點閱:151下載:80
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著網路的普及,網路霸凌成為青少年心理健康的重大威脅。適當的因應策略能有效減少網路霸凌對青少年的負面影響。本研究旨在探討臺南市國中生的知覺威脅與自我效能對網路霸凌受害因應策略的影響,並考量性別與年級的角色。
    本研究目的分為以下四點:(一)調查臺南國中生知覺威脅、自我效能與網路霸凌受害因應策略之現況;(二)探討知覺威脅對臺南市國中生網路霸凌受害因應策略的影響;(三)探討情緒調節自我效能、社會自我效能、及資訊科技自我效能對臺南市國中生網路霸凌受害因應策略的影響;(四)納入性別及年級變項,了解知覺威脅、情緒調節自我效能、社會自我效能、及資訊科技自我效能對臺南市國中生網路霸凌受害因應策略的影響。
    研究採分層叢集隨機抽樣,對 598 名國中生進行調查,分析方法包括描述性統計、因素分析、相關分析及巢式迴歸模型。依據最後分析模型結果,本研究主要有以下發現:(一)知覺威脅、情緒調節自我效能、社會自我效能(家人親戚)、社會自我效能(老師/學校職員)、社會自我效能(慈善團體/政府機構)以及科技自我效能對國中生採取遠程建議因應有直接影響(二) 情緒調節自我效能、社會自我效能(家人親戚)、社會自我效能(老師/學校職員)、社會自我效能(同學朋友)及科技自我效能對果敢表達與親密支持因應策略有直接影響(三) 知覺威脅和情緒調節自我效能則對無助因應的使用有顯著影響(四)知覺威脅、社會自我效能(家人親戚)、社會自我效能(老師/學校職員)和科技自我效能對積極忽略與科技因應及整體因應策略也有顯著影響(五) 科技自我效能對報復因應策略有直接影響(六)在所有自變項中,科技自我效能對遠程建議、積極忽略與科技因應、報復及整體因應的預測力最強。社會自我效能(家人親戚)對果敢表達與親密支持因應的預測力最強,情緒調節自我效能對無助因應的預測力最強(七)隨著年級增加,學生更不傾向使用遠程建議因應策略;而在果敢表達與親密支持及無助因應策略的使用上,存在性別差異:女性較少使用果敢表達與親密支持,更傾向採取無助因應策略。
    最後,本研究結果有助於理解國中生在面對網路霸凌時的因應策略選擇,並為教育環境中推動干預措施提供實務建議和參考。

    Using a stratified cluster random sampling method, 598 valid questionnaires were collected from seventh to ninth-grade students in Tainan. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and nested regression models. This study aims to (1) investigate the current status of perceived threat, self-efficacy, and coping strategies among middle school students in Tainan; (2) explore how perceived threat influences coping strategies for cyberbullying victims; (3) examine the impact of emotional regulation self-efficacy, social self-efficacy, and information technology self-efficacy on coping strategies; and (4) include gender and grade level to understand their effects on these relationships.
    The findings are as follows: (1) Perceived threat, emotional regulation self-efficacy, social self-efficacy (family/relatives), social self-efficacy (teachers/school staff), social self- efficacy (charitable organizations/government), and technology self-efficacy were all significant predictors of students' use of remote advice coping strategies; (2) Emotional regulation self-efficacy, social self-efficacy (family/relatives), social self-efficacy (teachers/school staff), social self-efficacy (peers), and technology self-efficacy significantly predicted the use of assertive expression and intimate support coping strategies; (3) Perceived threat and emotional regulation self-efficacy had a significant impact on helpless coping strategies; (4) Perceived threat, social self-efficacy (family/relatives), social self-efficacy (teachers/school staff), and technology self-efficacy significantly predicted the use of active ignoring, technology-based coping, and overall coping strategies; (5) Technology self-efficacy was a significant predictor of revenge coping strategies; (6) Among all the independent variables, technology self-efficacy had the strongest predictive power for remote advice, active ignoring, technology-based coping, revenge, and overall coping strategies ;social self-efficacy(family/relatives) exhibited the strongest predictive power for assertive expression and intimate support coping strategies; and emotional regulation self-efficacy was the most significant predictor of helpless coping strategies; (7) As grade level increased, students were less likely to use remote advice coping strategies, while gender differences were observed in the use of assertive expression and intimate support versus helpless coping strategies, with females demonstrating a greater tendency toward helpless coping and less use of assertive expression and intimate support.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 iii 自序 vi 目錄 viii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 名詞釋義 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 網路霸凌 5 第二節 壓力認知評估 8 第三節 網路霸凌受害因應策略 14 第四節 知覺威脅、自我效能與網路霸凌受害因應之影響 20 第三章 研究方法 23 第一節 研究分析架構 23 第二節 研究問題與假設 23 第三節 研究對象 28 第四節 變項測量與研究工具 29 第五節 資料處理與統計分析方法 39 第四章 研究結果與討論 41 第一節 各變項之描述統計 41 第二節 網路霸凌因應策略和自變項、控制變項之相關情形 46 第三節 知覺威脅、情緒調節自我效能、社會自我效能和資訊科技自我效能與因應策略之因素探討 51 第四節 綜合討論 82 第五章 結論與建議 93 第一節 研究結論與貢獻 93 參考文獻 102 附錄 113

    王承諺、劉奕蘭(2020)。網路霸凌和三種類行網路攻擊在傷害嚴重度和發生頻率的差異。教育傳播與科技研究(122),25-38。
    王俐淳、陳利銘(2018)。校園霸凌受凌者的因應策略與其知覺有效性之研究。教育研究學報,52(2),21-38。
    王國川、鍾鳳嬌(2014)。多向度社會支持量表之心理計量特質探討―以遭受莫拉克 風災青少年為例。中華心理學刊,56(3),291-311。
    李卓穎、楊士隆(2011)。高中職學生同儕間霸凌行為及其因應策略之研究。教育與心理研究,34(2),235–261。
    兒童福利聯盟(2016)。2016年台灣兒少網路霸凌經驗調查報告。取自http://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1538
    兒童福利聯盟(2021)。2021台灣兒少網路社交焦慮與網路霸凌經驗調查報告。取自https://www.children.org.tw/publication_research/research_report/2267
    林育陞(2016)。新興的霸凌模式:網路霸凌。諮商與輔導(369),25-29。
    施琮仁(2017)。台灣青少年網路霸凌現況、原因與影響。中華傳播學刊,32,203- 240。
    陳怡樺(2013)。高職生霸凌行為與其因應策略相關因素之研究—以新北市陽光高職為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
    陳景花(2019)。網路霸凌面面觀。輔導季刊,55(3),25-41。
    楊順蓉、呂承寬(2020)。青少年網路霸凌與因應策略。諮商與輔導(410),2-5+56
    廖國良、黃正魁、張仁俊、劉籹君(2012)。臺灣網路霸凌之實證研究。資訊與管理 科學,1(5),31-55。
    蘇彙珺(1998)。社會支持、自我效能與國中學生壓力因應歷程中認知評估及因應策略的相關研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
    Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., Eisenberg, N., & Steca, P. (2009). Reciprocal relations among self‐efficacy beliefs and prosociality across time. Journal of personality, 77(4), 1229- 1259.
    Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2014). Assessment of regulatory emotional self-efficacy beliefs: A review of the status of the art and some suggestions to move the field forward. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(1), 24-32.
    Arató, N., Zsidó, A. N., Rivnyák, A., Péley, B., & Lábadi, B. (2022). Risk and protective factors in cyberbullying: the role of family, social support and emotion regulation. International journal of bullying prevention, 4(2), 160-173.
    Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N., & Memmedov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 11(3), 253-261.
    Bandura, A. (2013). Self-Efficacy: The Foundation of Agency1. In Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 16-30). Psychology Press.
    Bingöl, T. Y. (2018). Determining the Predictors of Self-Efficacy and Cyber Bullying. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(2), 138-143.
    Black, S., Weinles, D., & Washington, E. (2010). K-8 students’ perceptions of bullying: Reactions and coping strategies. Journal of School Counseling, 8(11), 1–30.
    Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 523-531. Caprara,
    G. V., Di Giunta, L., Pastorelli, C., & Eisenberg, N. (2013). Mastery of negative affect: a hierarchical model of emotional self-efficacy beliefs. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 105.
    Catterson, J., & Hunter, S. C. (2010). Cognitive mediators of the effect of peer victimization on loneliness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 403-416.
    Chan, H. C. O., & Wong, D. S. (2015). The overlap between school bullying perpetration and victimization: Assessing the psychological, familial, and school factors of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of child and Family Studies, 24, 3224-3234.
    Chen, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Cyberbullying victimisation among adolescents in China: Coping strategies and the role of self‐compassion. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), e677-e686.
    Cowie, H. (2013). Understanding the role of bystanders and peer support in school bullying. International journal of emotional education, 6(1), 26-32.
    Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404–412.
    Dennehy, R., Meaney, S., Walsh, K. A., Sinnott, C., Cronin, M., & Arensman, E. (2020). Young people's conceptualizations of the nature of cyberbullying: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Aggression and violent behavior, 51, 101379.
    DePaolis, K., & Williford, A. (2015). The nature and prevalence of cyber victimization among elementary school children. In Child & Youth Care Forum (Vol. 44, pp. 377- 393). Springer US.
    Dewe, P., & Cooper, C. L. (2007). Coping research and measurement in the context of work related stress. International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2007, 141-192.
    Ebata, A. T., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Personal, situational, and contextual correlates of coping in adolescence. Journal of research on Adolescence, 4(1), 99-125.
    Erikson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton & Company
    Fenyvesiova, L., & Holla, K. (2021). Strategies the adolescents of different age and gender use to cope with cyberbullying. Proceedings of ICERI2021 Conference (Vol. 8, p. 9th).
    Fisher, M. H., & Taylor, J. L. (2016). Let’s talk about it: Peer victimization experiences as reported by adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(4), 402-411.
    Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
    Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 745-774. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
    Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and violent behavior, 45, 134-153.
    Hamm, M. P., Newton, A. S., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Sundar, P., ... & Hartling, L. (2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: A scoping review of social media studies. JAMA pediatrics, 169(8), 770-777.
    Heiman, T., Olenik-Shemesh, D., & Frank, G. (2019). Patterns of coping with cyberbullying: emotional, behavioral, and strategic coping reactions among middle school students. Violence and victims, 34(1), 28-45.
    Hough, E. S., Magnan, M. A., Templin, T., & Gadelrab, H. F. (2005). Social network structure and social support in HIV-positive inner city mothers. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 16(4), 14-24.
    Huang, Y. Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1581-1590.
    Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M., & Warden, D. (2004). Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer‐aggression and bullying: The influence of school‐stage, gender, victimisation, appraisal, and emotion. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 375-390.
    John, A., Glendenning, A. C., Marchant, A., Montgomery, P., Stewart, A., Wood, S., ... & Hawton, K. (2018). Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: Systematic review. Journal of medical internet research, 20(4), e9044.
    Jordan, P. J., & Sheehan, M. (2000). Stress and managerial bullying: Affective antecedents and consequences. Transcending Boundaries: Integrating People, Processes and Systems, 201-207.
    Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School health, 78(9), 496-505.
    Kim, H. (2023). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Their threat appraisal and coping strategies [Master’s thesis, Tampere University]. Tampere University Institutional Repository. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/152159
    Kliewer, W., & Sullivan, T. N. (2008). Community violence exposure, threat appraisal, and adjustment in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(4), 860-873.
    Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Skinner, K. (2002). Children's coping strategies: Moderators of the effects of peer victimization? Developmental Psychology, 38, 267-278. https://doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.267
    Kokkinos, C. M., Panagopoulou, P., Tsolakidou, I., & Tzeliou, E. (2015). Coping with bullying and victimisation among preadolescents: The moderating effects of self efficacy. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20(2), 205-222.
    Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2012). The relationship between bullying, victimization, trait emotional intelligence, self-efficacy and empathy among preadolescents. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 41–58. doi:10.1007/s11218-011-9168-9
    Kowalski R. M., Limber S. P., Agatston P. W. (2012) Cyberbullying: Bullying in the digital age, (2nd ed). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Kowalski, R. M. (2008). Cyber bullying: Recognizing and treating victim and aggressor. Psychiatric Times, 25 (pp. 1–2). Retrieved September 8, 2011, from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/ display/article/10168/1336550.
    Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
    Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ó lafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings and policy implications from the EU kids online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. London: EU Kids Online Network (Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/ EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009- 11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/D4FullFindings. pdf).
    Macaulay, P. J., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2022). An introduction to cyberbullying. In A. A. Moustafa (Ed.), Cybersecurity and cognitive science (pp. 197– 213). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90570-1.00002-4
    Machackova, H., Cerna, A., Sevcikova, A., Dedkova, L., & Daneback, K. (2013). Effectiveness of coping strategies for victims of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(3), 1-12.
    Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 267–274. doi:10. 1089/vcyber.2010.0002
    Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and behavioral Assessment, 23, 145-149.
    Na, H., Dancy, B. L., & Park, C. (2015). College student engaging in cyberbullying victimization: Cognitive appraisals, coping strategies, and psychological adjustments. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 29(3), 155-161.
    Newman, D. A., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Been there, bottled that: Are state and behavioral work engagement new and useful construct “wines”?. Industrial and organizational Psychology, 1(1), 31-35.
    Nicholls, A. R., Polman, R. C., & Levy, A. R. (2012). A path analysis of stress appraisals, emotions, coping, and performance satisfaction among athletes. Psychology of sport and exercise, 13(3), 263-270.
    Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 129-142.
    Olweus, D. (2003). A profile of bullying at school. Educational Leadership, 60, 12–19.
    O’Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 426–441.
    Parris, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Cutts, H. (2012). High school students’ perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth & society, 44(2), 284-306.
    Paul, S., Smith, P. K., & Blumberg, H. H. (2012). Reflecting on their own bullying experiences: Perceptions of children from 8 to 16 years. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 273–286.
    Pauletto, M., Grassi, M., Passolunghi, M. C., & Penolazzi, B. (2021). Psychological well being in childhood: The role of trait emotional intelligence, regulatory emotional self efficacy, coping and general intelligence. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(4), 1284-1297.
    Raskauskas, J., & Huynh, A. (2015). The process of coping with cyberbullying: A systematic review. Aggression and violent behavior, 23, 118-125.
    Raskauskas, J., & Huynh, A. (2015). The process of coping with cyberbullying: A systematic review. Aggression and violent behavior, 23, 118-125.
    Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.41.7.813 Rueger,
    S. Y., Malecki, C. K., and Demaray, M. K. (2008). Gender differences in the relationship between perceived social support and student adjustment during early adolescence. School Psychol. Q. 23, 496–514. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.496
    Schenk, A. M., & Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. Journal of school violence, 11(1), 21-37.
    Skrzypiec, G., Roussi-Vergou, C., & Andreou, E. (2011). Common problems, common solutions? Applying a foreign ‘coping with bullying’intervention in Greek schools. Mental health and wellbeing: Educational perspectives, 263-274.
    Skrzypiec, G., Slee, P. T., Murray-Harvey, R., & Pereira, B. (2011). School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope? School Psychology International, 32(3), 288–311.
    Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9450.2007.00611.x
    Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ó lafsson, K., ... & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids online 2020. Survey results from, 19, 74 Smith, P.
    K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
    Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42, 739-750.
    Sticca, F., Machmutow, K., Stauber, A., Perren, S., Palladino, B. E., Nocentini, A., et al. (2015). The coping with cyberbullying questionnaire: development of a new measure. Societies. 5, 515–536. doi: 10.3390/soc5020515
    Strom, P. S., & Strom, R. D. (2005). When teens turn cyberbullies. Education Digest , 7/(4), 35
    Sumter, S. R., Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2012). Developmental trajectories of peer victimization: Off-line and online experiences during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(6), 607-613.
    Swearer, S., & Hymel, S. (2015). Bullying and discrimination in schools: Exploring variations across student subgroups. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 504-509. Valois, P., Talbot, D., Caron, M., Carrier, M. P., Morin, A. J., Renaud, J. S., ... &
    Gosselin, P. (2017). Development and validation of a behavioural index for adaptation to high summer temperatures among urban dwellers. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(7), 820.
    Van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics, 168(5), 435-442.
    Völlink, T., Bolman, C. A., Dehue, F., & Jacobs, N. C. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: Differences between victims, bully‐victims and children not involved in bullying. Journal of community & applied social psychology, 23(1), 7-24.
    Wang, C.-W., Musumari, P. M., Techasrivichien, T., Suguimoto, S. P., Tateyama, Y., Chan, C.-C., Ono-Kihara, M., Kihara, M., & Nakayama, T. (2019). Overlap of traditional bullying and cyberbullying and correlates of bullying amongst Taiwanese adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, Article 1756. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8116-z
    Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign,IL: Research Press.
    Wright, M. F., Wachs, S., Yanagida, T., Ševčíková, A., Dědková, L., Bayraktar, F., ... & Shu, C. (2022). Coping with public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization among adolescents in six countries: roles of severity and country. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(21), 14405.
    Wu, W. C., Luu, S., & Luh, D. L. (2016). Defending behaviors, bullying roles, and their associations with mental health in junior high school students: a population-based study. BMC Public Health, 16, 1-10.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE