簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 金光優
JINTAVIRIYASAKUL, DAWIT
論文名稱: PVA 纖維水泥複合材料3D列印構件之撓曲性能:實驗研究與 ATENA 數值模擬
Flexural Performance of 3D-Printed PVA Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composite Members: Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation Using ATENA
指導教授: 洪崇展
Hung, Chung Chan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 252
外文關鍵詞: 3D Concrete Printing (3DPC), Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Fiber, Flexural Performance, Four-Point Bending, Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis, ATENA
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation into the flexural performance of PVA Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composite Members through traditional mold casting and 3D Concrete Printing (3DPC). Four-point bending tests (ASTM C1609) were conducted on six cast and six 3DPC beam specimens, supported by material characterization tests including flowability, compressive strength, direct tensile strength, and interlayer tensile strength.
    Cast specimens achieved approximately 21% higher average flexural strength than 3DPC (7.96MPa vs 6.29 MPa). However, 3DPC specimens exhibited stronger post-crack performance, with 43.3% higher residual strength at 0.75 mm (L/600), 84% greater toughness, and 40% larger deflection at peak, attributed to preferential PVA fiber alignment along the printing direction. Cast beams failed through a single straight vertical crack, while 3DPC beams developed a characteristic zigzag crack path governed by interlayer interface deflection, producing a more progressive and energy-absorbing failure mode.
    Nonlinear finite element simulations in ATENA showed different levels of agreement with the experimental responses across the three evaluated material models. The Cementitious2FRC model reproduced the peak response and residual strength of the cast beams reasonably well, with errors of 1% in peak load, 5% in deflection at peak, and 3% in residual strength, but underestimated the maximum deformation by approximately 39%. When the same parameters were directly transferred to the 3DPC beams without recalibration, the model underestimated the residual strength at L/600 by approximately 58.19% and the maximum deformation by approximately 63%, indicating that the cast calibrated FRC formulation did not adequately reproduce the post-peak response of the layered printed system. The Cementitious2User model achieved reasonable agreement with the cast-beam response following inverse calibration in accordance with the ATENA documentation guidelines. The Cementitious2Variable model, although still at an initial stage of development for 3DPC, provided a closer representation of the overall post-cracking response of the experimental printed beams.

    ABSTRACT i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES x LIST OF FIGURES 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Research Background 10 1.2 Research Objective, Purpose and Output 11 1.3 Research Outline 12 1.4 Research Scope and Limitation 13 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 2.1 Fundamentals of 3D Concrete Printing (3DPC) 14 2.1.1 Comparison Between 3DPC and Traditional Casting 14 2.1.2 Manufacturing Process and Printing Code of 3D Printed Concrete (3DPC) 15 2.1.3 Chemical Admixtures 16 2.1.4 Fiber and 3DPC 17 2.1.5 Fresh Properties of 3DPC 21 2.1.6 Interlayer Bonding & Anisotropy 23 2.2 Flexural Performance 26 2.2.1 Flexural Performance Evaluation Methods 26 2.2.2 Flexural Performance of Cementitious Composite Member 27 2.2.3 Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composite Member 29 2.2.4 Flexural Performance of 3D printed Cementitious Composite Member 31 2.2.5 Four-Point Bend Test Modified for 3DPC 35 2.3 Numerical Simulation 36 2.3.1 ATENA 36 2.3.2 Numerical Simulation and Four-Point Bending Analysis 38 2.3.3 Numerical Simulation and 3D printed concrete (3DPC) 40 2.3.4 Numerical Simulation of Flexural Performance in 3DPC 42 2.4 Research Gap and Contribution 44 CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM 46 3.1 Introduction 46 3.2 Experimental Program Flowchart 46 3.2.1 Mixed Design Parameters 47 3.2.2 Mixing Procedure 49 3.2.3 Curing Treatment 51 3.3 Test Parameters 52 3.3.1 Flowability Test 52 3.3.2 Compressive Test 53 3.3.3 Tensile Test (Dog Bone) 54 3.3.4 Interlayer Tensile Strength 55 3.3.5 Four-Point Bending Test (ASTM C1609 modified) 57 3.4 Printing Parameters 61 3.4.1 Printing Detail 61 3.4.2 G-Code 65 CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 66 4.1 Basic Properties Experimental Results 66 4.1.1 Flowability for Different Time Results 66 4.1.2 Compressive Results 68 4.1.3 Tensile Results (Dog Bone) 69 4.2 Printing Results 70 4.2.1 Beam Dimension 70 4.2.2 Bonding strength by Direct Tensile 72 4.3 Four-Point Bending Results 73 4.3.1 Cast Beams 74 4.3.2 3DPC Beams 78 4.3.3 Cast Beams and 3DPC Beams comparisons 82 4.3.4 Crack Analysis 88 4.4 Experimental Discussion 94 4.4.1 Peak Strength 94 4.4.2 Post Peak and Cracking 94 4.4.3 Overall Reliability 95 4.4.4 Experiment Contribution 95 4.4.5 Experimental Limitation 96 CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL MODELING, CALIBRATION, and ASSESSMENT USING ATENA 97 5.1 Establishment of Model 98 5.1.1 Establishment of Full Beam Model 98 5.1.2 Establishment of Half Beam Model 104 5.1.3 Definition of Different Material Model 113 5.2 Performance of Cementitious2FRC material model 126 5.2.1 Comparison: Cast Model vs Cast Experiment (Average) 128 5.2.2 Comparison: 3DPC Model vs 3DPC Experiment (Average) 130 5.3 Performance of Cementitious2User defined material model 133 5.3.1 Comparison: Cast Model vs Cast Experiment (Average) 134 5.3.2 Comparison: 3DPC Model vs 3DPC Experiment (Average) 137 5.4 Performance of Cementitious2Variable material model (3DPC elements) 140 5.4.1 Comparison: Printing Simulation vs Experiment 140 5.4.2 Comparison: 3DPC Model vs 3DPC Experiment 142 5.5 Sensitivity and Calibration Studies 145 5.5.1 Sensitivity Study of Mesh Size Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 146 5.5.2 Sensitivity Study of Self-Weight Consideration Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 151 5.5.3 Sensitivity Study of Displacement Increment Sizes Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 153 5.5.4 Sensitivity Study of Surface Contact Between Beam and Apparatus Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 155 5.5.5 Sensitivity Study of Geometrical Non-Linearity Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 158 5.5.6 Calibration Study of Tensile Behavior Using Cementitious2User Material Prototype 160 5.5.7 Calibration study of GF Using Cementitious2FRC Material Prototype 163 5.5.8 Development and Calibration of Cementitious2Variable Model for 3DPC Model 165 5.5.9 Sensitivity Study of Printing Simulation Boundary Conditions 179 5.6 Discussion for ATENA 183 5.6.1 ATENA vs Experimental 183 5.6.2 ATENA, Sensitivity and Calibration Studies 188 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS 192 6.1 Experimental Findings 192 6.1.1 Cast Beam Behavior 192 6.1.2 3DPC Beam Behavior 192 6.1.3 Comparison Between 3DPC and Cast Manufacturing Method 193 6.2 Numerical Modeling Findings 195 6.2.1 Cementitious2FRC 195 6.2.2 Cementitious2User 195 6.2.3 Cementitious2Variable 196 6.2.4 Sensitivity and Calibration Studies 197 6.3 Recommendations for Future Research 198 6.3.1 Trade-off Between Flexural Strength and Post-Peak Performance 198 6.3.2 Extend to The Microstructure Scale 199 6.3.3 Improve the Developed Model (Post-Peak softening) Behavior. 199 6.3.4 Test Other Material Model Prototypes Available in ATENA. 199 6.3.5 Cementitious2FRC Model Prototypes 200 6.4 Practical Recommendation of future ATENA modeling 200 6.4.1 General Modeling Setup in ATENA-GiD 200 6.4.2 Solver and Convergence Settings 201 6.4.3 Systematic Troubleshooting Workflow 201 6.4.4 Guidance for Cementitious2FRC 202 6.4.5 Guidance for Cementitious2User 202 6.4.6 Guidance for Cementitious2Variable and Printing Simulation 202 References 204 APPENDIX A 212 APPENDIX B 215 APPENDIX C 219 APPENDIX D 228 APPENDIX E 239

    Abdrassilov, D., Aniskin, A., Shakhmov, Z., & Lukpanov, R. (2026). Hydrophobic Modification of Concrete Using a Hydrophobizing Admixture. Construction Materials, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater6010003
    Aminpour, N., & Memari, A. (2025). Analysis of anisotropic behavior in 3D concrete printing for mechanical property evaluation. Journal of Building Engineering, 99, 111652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111652
    Aramburu, A., Calderon-Uriszar-Aldaca, I., & Puente, I. (2022). 3D printing effect on the compressive strength of concrete structures. Construction and Building Materials, 354, 129108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129108
    Arunothayan, A. R., Nematollahi, B., Ranade, R., Bong, S. H., Sanjayan, J. G., & Khayat, K. H. (2021). Fiber orientation effects on ultra-high performance concrete formed by 3D printing. Cement and Concrete Research, 143, 106384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106384
    Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016). Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867
    Bradshaw, J., Balasubramanian, S., Si, W., Khan, M., & McNally, C. (2025). Towards Greener 3D Printing: A Performance Evaluation of Silica Fume-Modified Low-Carbon Concrete. Buildings, 15(21), 3919. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213919
    Buswell, R. A., Leal De Silva, W. R., Jones, S. Z., & Dirrenberger, J. (2018). 3D printing using concrete extrusion: A roadmap for research. Cement and Concrete Research, 112, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006
    Cervenka J., Jendele L. & Vaitova M. (2019). Simulation of digitally printed concrete structures using 3D extrusion.
    Cervenka, V., Cervenka, J., Jendele, L., & Smilauer, V. (2014). ATENA simulation of crack propagation in CONCRACK benchmark. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 18(7), 828–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.881757
    Chen, Q., Barbat, G. B., & Cervera, M. (2025). Finite element buildability analysis of 3D printed concrete including failure by elastic buckling and plastic flow. Engineering Structures, 340, 120675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120675
    Colyn, M., Van Zijl, G., & Babafemi, A. J. (2024). Fresh and strength properties of 3D printable concrete mixtures utilising a high volume of sustainable alternative binders. Construction and Building Materials, 419, 135474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135474
    Cuevas, K., Chougan, M., Martin, F., Ghaffar, S. H., Stephan, D., & Sikora, P. (2021). 3D printable lightweight cementitious composites with incorporated waste glass aggregates and expanded microspheres – Rheological, thermal and mechanical properties. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102718
    Dey, D., Van, V. N., Xuan, H. N., Srinivas, D., Panda, B., & Tran, P. (2023). Flexural performance of 3D printed concrete structure with lattice infills. Developments in the Built Environment, 16, 100297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100297
    Earij, A., Alfano, G., Cashell, K., & Zhou, X. (2017). Nonlinear three–dimensional finite–element modelling of reinforced–concrete beams: Computational challenges and experimental validation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 82, 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.025
    Feng, L., Chen, N., & Wen, X. (2026). Influence of process parameters on interlayer interface mechanical properties of 3D printing fiber reinforced concrete. Materials & Design, 263, 115539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115539
    Hager, I., Maroszek, M., Mróz, K., Kęsek, R., Hebda, M., Dvorkin, L., & Marchuk, V. (2022). Interlayer Bond Strength Testing in 3D-Printed Mineral Materials for Construction Applications. Materials, 15(12), 4112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124112
    Kan, W., Yang, Z., & Yin, W. (2022). Simulation of Four-Point Bending Fracture Test of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. Materials, 15(20), 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207146
    Kanda, T., & Li, V. C. (1998). Interface Property and Apparent Strength of High-Strength Hydrophilic Fiber in Cement Matrix. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:1(5)
    Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Law, R., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012). Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(3), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003
    Li, L., Shu, W., Xu, H., Rui, X., Wang, Z., Zeng, Y., Jia, S., Chen, T., & Zhu, Z. (2024). Experimental study on flexural toughness of fiber reinforced concrete beams: Effects of cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol and polyolefin fibers. Journal of Building Engineering, 81, 108144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108144
    Liu, S., Bai, R., Zhang, J., Yan, C., & Wang, X. (2019). Flexural load-deflection performance of polyvinyl alcohol fiber reinforced cementitious composite beams. Construction and Building Materials, 223, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.215
    Liu, X., Xu, J., Dobrzanski, J., Kolawole, J. T., Buswell, R., & Cavalaro, S. (2025). Factors affecting the flexural performance of reinforced 3D printed concrete beams. Engineering Structures, 337, 120497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120497
    Liu, Z., Li, M., Quah, T. K. N., Wong, T. N., & Tan, M. J. (2023). Comprehensive investigations on the relationship between the 3D concrete printing failure criterion and properties of fresh-state cementitious materials. Additive Manufacturing, 76, 103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103787
    Mechtcherine, V., Muthukrishnan, S., Robens-Radermacher, A., Wolfs, R., Versteege, J., Menna, C., Ozturk, O., Ozyurt, N., Roupec, J., Richter, C., Jungwirth, J., Miranda, L., Ammann, R., Caron, J.-F., De Bono, V., Monte, R., Navarrete, I., Eugenin, C., Lombois-Burger, H., … Bos, F. (2025). Mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete: A RILEM 304-ADC interlaboratory study – compressive strength and modulus of elasticity. Materials and Structures, 58(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-025-02688-9
    Nakase, K., Hashimoto, K., Sugiyama, T., & Kono, K. (2024). Influence of print paths on mechanical properties and fracture propagation of 3D printed concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 438, 137019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137019
    Nguyen, C.-L., & Lee, C.-K. (2021). Flexural behaviours of Engineered Cementitious Composites – High strength steel composite beams. Engineering Structures, 249, 113324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113324
    Nguyen-Van, V., Dai, M., & Dang, B.-L. (2026). 3D concrete printing for digital construction: Materials, process integration, and emerging performance paradigms. Materials and Emerging Technologies for Sustainability, 02(01), 2630001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S3060932126300015
    Pressmair, N., Brosch, F., Hammerl, M., & Kromoser, B. (2022). Non-linear material modelling strategy for conventional and high-performance concrete assisted by testing. Cement and Concrete Research, 161, 106933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106933
    Rymes, J., Cervenka, J., Jendele, L., Bures, V., & Citek, D. (2024). Integrating 3D Modelling and Non-linear Numerical Simulations in Concrete Additive Manufacturing.
    Shahzad, Q., Abbas, N., Akbar, M., Sabi, E., Thomas, B. S., & Arshid, M. U. (2024). Influence of print speed and nozzle diameter on the fiber alignment in 3D printed ultra-high-performance concrete. Frontiers in Materials, 11, 1355647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2024.1355647
    Souza, M. T., Ferreira, I. M., Guzi De Moraes, E., Senff, L., & Novaes De Oliveira, A. P. (2020). 3D printed concrete for large-scale buildings: An overview of rheology, printing parameters, chemical admixtures, reinforcements, and economic and environmental prospects. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101833
    Suiker, A. S. J., Wolfs, R. J. M., Lucas, S. M., & Salet, T. A. M. (2020). Elastic buckling and plastic collapse during 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Research, 135, 106016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106016
    Tambusay, A., & Suprobo, P. (2019). PREDICTING THE FLEXURAL RESPONSE OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM USING THE FRACTURE-PLASTIC MODEL. Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.12962/j20861206.v34i2.6470
    Uehara, S., Ohshiro, Y., Shima, K., Sakamoto, K., & Yasui, K. (2026). Thixotropy Management in PVA Fiber-Reinforced Mortars for 3D Printing Applications. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202602.0588.v1
    Vespalec, A., Podroužek, J., Boštík, J., Míča, L., & Koutný, D. (2023). Experimental study on time dependent behaviour of coarse aggregate concrete mixture for 3D construction printing. Construction and Building Materials, 376, 130999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130999
    Wang, X., Jia, L., Jia, Z., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Ma, L., Wang, Z., Deng, Z., Banthia, N., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Optimization of 3D printing concrete with coarse aggregate via proper mix design and printing process. Journal of Building Engineering, 56, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104745
    Wang, Z., Wang, P., & Zhu, F. (2022). Synergy effect of hybrid steel-polyvinyl alcohol fibers in engineered cementitious composites: Fiber distribution and mechanical performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 62, 105348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105348
    Wen, K.-W., Su, Y.-F., Mo, K. H., & Hung, C.-C. (2026). Time-dependent rheology, green strength, and buildability of 3D-printed ultra-high performance concrete incorporating various fiber types and contents. Journal of Building Engineering, 117, 114919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114919
    Wolfs, R. J. M., Bos, F. P., & Salet, T. A. M. (2018). Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing. Cement and Concrete Research, 106, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001
    Wolfs, R. J. M., Bos, F. P., & Salet, T. A. M. (2019). Triaxial compression testing on early age concrete for numerical analysis of 3D concrete printing. Cement and Concrete Composites, 104, 103344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103344
    Yang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Tan, Y., & Wu, G. (2026). A comparative analysis of 3D-printed concrete incorporating fibers and fiber grids: Mechanical properties and microstructure. Construction and Building Materials, 524, 146341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.146341
    Yang, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, Z., Dong, L., Yang, T., Zhao, Q., & Wu, C. (2024). Effect of hydration process on the interlayer bond tensile mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete for 3D printing. Construction and Building Materials, 451, 138902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138902
    Yao, Y., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Pi, Y., Wang, J., & Lu, C. (2024). Mechanical properties and failure mechanism of 3D printing ultra-high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 447, 138108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138108
    Zhang, P., Ling, Y., Wang, J., & Shi, Y. (2019). Bending resistance of PVA fiber reinforced cementitious composites containing nano-SiO2. Nanotechnology Reviews, 8(1), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2019-0060
    Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., & Deng, M. (2022). Four-point bending tests of ECC: Mechanical response and toughness evaluation. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01573
    Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Liu, G., Chen, Y., Yu, S., & Du, H. (2021). Hardened properties and durability of large-scale 3D printed cement-based materials. Materials and Structures, 54(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01632-x
    Červenka, V., Jendele, L., & Červenka, J. (2022). ATENA program documentation part 1: Theory. Červenka Consulting.
    Procházková, Z., Červenka, J., Janda, Z., Pryl, D., & Mikolášková, J. (2019). ATENA program documentation part 4-6: ATENA Science – GiD tutorial – Step by step guide for nonlinear analysis with ATENA and GiD. Červenka Consulting.
    Pryl, D., & Červenka, J. (2020). ATENA program documentation part 11: Troubleshooting manual. Červenka Consulting.
    Sajdlová, T. (2016).ATENA program documentation part 4-7: ATENA Science – GiD FRC tutorial – Step by step guide for nonlinear analysis of fiber reinforced concrete structures with ATENA and GiD. Červenka Consulting.

    QR CODE