成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳柔涵 Chen, Jou-Han
論文名稱：	行人、自行車、機車混合車流之速度-密度關係 The Speed-Density Relationship in Heterogeneous Traffic Containing Pedestrians, Bicycles and Powered Two-Wheelers
指導教授：	李子璋 Lee, Tzu-Chang
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning
論文出版年：	2015
畢業學年度：	103
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	64
中文關鍵詞：	地區性道路、混合車流、速度-密度關係
外文關鍵詞：	Local street, Mixed traffic flow, Speed-density relationship
相關次數：	點閱：193 下載：21
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

運具種類的多樣性影響旅運模式，進而形塑出不同的混合車流型態。過去對於混合車流的研究多針對一般道路上汽車及機車使用者混合型態，但在住宅以及住商混合等人口密度較高的地區性道路，混合車流的型態不僅包含汽、機車，也包含行人以及自行車的混流。然而，汽、機車、自行車與行人間的運動學特性差異往往在車流中成為彼此移動的干擾，帶來交通安全層面的隱憂。

本研究旨在探討商業區的地區性道路中，行人、自行車以及機車在不同的混合車流密度下的速度變化。資料蒐集地點於台南市成功大學周邊商業區中的地區性道路，從二維以及微觀的角度量測行人、自行車以及機車的運動軌跡。資料結果顯示，此種型態的地區性道路，行人的使用比例較高，街道使用者的速率約在時速25公里以下，街道使用者的移動速率較不受限於視覺範圍內的其他街道使用者。

Local streets traffic speed control in residential areas or commercial areas require attention in the planning and design stages. With the increase of various kinds of automobile transportation modes, mixed traffic context which contains motorized and non-motorized vehicles has not been uncommon to be seen nowadays. As the street users such as pedestrians, bicycles and powered two-wheelers have total different kinematic characteristics, they might cause huge disturbance to each other in the traffic. The aim of this study is to investigate the speed profile under different density group in heterogeneous traffic in local streets. To conduct this study, the trajectories of the street users in local streets were observed in a two-dimensional and microscopic manner. Data were collected at a food street near a university in Tainan. Different dimensions of virtual lane by various types of street users were found to establish the speed-density models. Models were able to depict the speed profile properly. The models to describe the relationship between the speed and the density were established to reflect the speed profiles of the street users in mixed traffic. The results show that the local street surrounding with food shops provided a luxurious atmosphere where people moved at their own speeds and directions. Low speeds occur frequently under low density. Also, bicycles are the most competitive traffic mode in this environment with their flexibility easily weaving in and out in the traffic flow. The results provide basic knowledge for local street design in traffic control.

INTRODUCTION	1
1.	BACKGROUND	1
2.	OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY	2
3.	STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY	3
REVIEW OF MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW	5
1.	DIFFERENT TYPES OF MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW	5
2.	MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW CHARACTERISTIC IN LOCAL STREETS	6
3.	SUMMARY	8
REVIEW OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE SPEED OF STREET USERS	9
1.	Personal factors	9
1.1.	Age	9
1.2.	Gender	10
1.3.	Devices	10
1.4.	Group	10
2.	Environmental factors	11
2.1.	Land-use	11
2.2.	Facilities	11
2.3.	Other participating street users	11
3.	Summary	12
REVIEW OF THE SPEED AND THE DENSITY MEASUREMENT	14
1.	SPEED AND DENSITY MEASUREMENT	14
REVIEW OF THE MEASUREMENT OF THE ALERT AREA	16
1.	Introducing the alert area	16
2.	The shape of the alert area	17
3.	The dimension of the alert area	19
3.1.	The lateral distance	19
3.2.	The longitudinal distance	20
4.	Summary	21
THE MODELS OF THE SPEED AND THE DENSITY	22
1.	The speed model	22
2.	The density model	22
3.	The dimension of the alert area	23
4.	Summary	25
DATA COLLECTION	26
1.	Types of data required	26
1.1.	Observable data	26
1.2.	Environmental data	26
2.	Data collection method	27
2.1.	Data collection procedure	27
2.2.	Data collection technique	27
3.	The database	30
3.1.	Street user trajectory	30
3.2.	Kinetic characteristic	33
4.	Time and site of the data survey	33
4.1.	Time	33
4.2.	Site	34
DATA ANALYSIS	36
1.	PROPERTIES OF THE SPEED	36
2.	THE SPEED CLASSIFICATION	37
3.	THE ALERT AREA OF THREE TYPES OF STREET USERS	38
4.	THE SPEED-DENSITY MODEL OF THREE TYPES OF STREET USERS	41
5.	STANDARD DEVIATION	43
6.	SKEWNESS	43
7.	KURTOSIS	44
8.	SPEED DIFFERENCES BETWEEN EACH STREET USER AND OCCUPIERS IN THE ALERT AREA	45
CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION	47
SIGNIFICANCE TO KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE WORK	50
1.	SIGNIFICANCE TO KNOWLEDGE	50
2.	FUTURE WORK	50
REFERENCES	I
                                    

AL-AZZAWI, M. & RAESIDE, R. 2007. Modeling pedestrian walking speeds on sidewalks. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133, 211-219.
ANTONINI, G., BIERLAIRE, M. & WEBER, M. 2006. Discrete choice models of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40, 667-687.
ANVARI, B., DAAMEN, W., KNOOP, V. L., HOOGENDOORN, S. P. & BELL, M. G. 2014. Shared Space Modeling Based on Social Forces and Distance Potential Field. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer.
APPLEYARD, D. 1980. Livable streets: Protected neighborhoods? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 451, 106-117.
CHO, H.-J. & WU, Y.-T. Modeling and simulation of motorcycle traffic flow. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 Hague, Netherlands. 6262-6267.
DELLAERT, B. G. C., ARENTZE, T. A., BIERLAIRE, M., BORGERS, A. W. J. & TIMMERMANS, H. J. P. 1998. Investigating consumers' tendency to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 177-188.
DIJ (2014) The world leader in camera drones/quadcopters for aerial photography. Retrieved 17 th September, 2014, from http://www.dji.com/
DE WAARD, D., EDLINGER, K. & BROOKHUIS, K. 2011. Effects of listening to music, and of using a handheld and handsfree telephone on cycling behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, 626-637.
EL-GENEIDY, A., KRIZEK, K. J. & IACONO, M. Predicting bicycle travel speeds along different facilities using GPS data A proof of concept model. Transportation Research Board, 2007 Washington, DC.
FINNIS, K. K. & WALTON, D. 2008. Field observations to determine the influence of population size, location and individual factors on pedestrian walking speeds. Ergonomics, 51, 827-842.
GARTNER, N. H., MESSER, C. J. & RATHI, A. 1992. Traffic flow theory: a state of the art, the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Centre.
GATTIS, J. & WATTS, A. 1999. Urban street speed related to width and functional class. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125, 193-200.
GREENSHIELDS, B. D., BIBBINS, J. R., CHANNING, W. S. & MILLER, H. H. 1935. A study of traffic capacity. Highway Research Board Proceedings, 14.
GUNDALIYA, P. J., MATHEW, T. V. & DHINGRA, S. L. 2008. Heterogeneous traffic flow modelling for an arterial using grid based approach. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 42, 467-491.
HALL, E. T. 1969. The hidden dimension, Anchor Books New York.
HAMILTON-BAILLIE, B. 2008. Towards shared space. Urban Design International, 13, 130-138.
HAN, Y.-S. & KO, S.-K. 2012. Analysis of a cellular automaton model for car traffic with a junction. Theoretical Computer Science, 450, 54-67.
HE, M., TAN, Y., HE, M. & LIN, S. 2008. Comparison study on operating speeds of electric bicycles and bicycles: Experience from field investigation in Kunming, China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2048, 52-59.
HELBING, D. 1992. A fluid-dynamic model for the movement of pedestrians. Complex Systems, 6, 391-415.
HELBING, D. & MOLNAR, P. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review E, 51, 4282-4286.
HOOGENDOORN, S. & BOVY, P. H. L. 2000. Gas-kinetic modeling and simulation of pedestrian flows. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1710, 28-36.
HOOGENDOORN, S. P. & DAAMEN, W. 2005. Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks. Transportation Science, 39, 147-159.
HSU, T.-P. & CHEN, Y.-W. 1999. A comparative study on car and motorcycle traffic flow characteristics on local streets. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Transportation, 11, 1-18.
ISHAQUE, M. M. & NOLAND, R. B. 2008. Behavioural issues in pedestrian speed choice and street crossing behaviour: A review. Transport Reviews, 28, 61-85.
KANG, L., XIONG, Y. & MANNERING, F. L. 2013. Statistical analysis of pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 53, 10-21.
KAPARIAS, I., BELL, M. G., MIRI, A., CHAN, C. & MOUNT, B. 2012. Analysing the perceptions of pedestrians and drivers to shared space. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 15, 297-310.
KLOSTER, T., DAISA, J. & LEDBETTER, R. Linking land use and transportation through street design. Urban Street Symposium, 1999 Dallas, Texas. Transportation Research Board.
LAM, W. & CHEUNG, C.-Y. 2000. Pedestrian speed/flow relationships for walking facilities in Hong Kong. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126, 343-349.
LAXMAN, K. K., RASTOGI, R. & CHANDRA, S. 2010. Pedestrian flow characteristics in mixed traffic conditions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136, 23-33.
LEE, T.-C. 2007. An agent-based model to simulate motorcycle behaviour in mixed traffic flow. Ph.D., Imperial College London (University of London).
LEE, T.-C., POLAK, J. W. & BELL, M. G. 2009. New approach to modeling mixed traffic containing motorcycles in urban areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2140, 195-205.
LEHIGH VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION. 2011. Street connectivity. Improving the function and performance of your local streets. Lehigh Valley Planning Commission.
LIN, Y.-J. 2002. Using Neural Network method to build the motorcycle traffic flow model. Ph.D., National Cheng Kung University.
LIU, H., WANG, H. & FENG, Y. Bicycle flow modeling based on cellular automata. Chinese Control Conference, 2008 Kunming, Yunnan, China. 527-531.
LOEB, P. D. & CLARKE, W. A. 2009. The cell phone effect on pedestrian fatalities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45, 284-290.
LUO, Y., JIA, B., LIU, J., LAM, W. H., LI, X. & GAO, Z. 2013. Modeling the interactions between car and bicycle in heterogeneous traffic. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49, 29-47.
MINH, C. C., SANO, K. & MATSUMOTO, S. 2005. Characteristics of passing and paired riding maneuvers of motorcycle. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 186-197.
MIRANDA-MORENO, L. F., MANAUGH, K., STRAUSS, J. & ZAHABI, S. A. H. 2011. Estimating potential effect of speed limits, built environment, and other factors on severity of pedestrian and cyclist injuries in crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2247, 81-90.
MONTUFAR, J. & ARANGO, J. 2008. Walking speed of older pedestrians who use canes or walkers for mobility. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2073, 79-85.
MONTUFAR, J., ARANGO, J., PORTER, M. & NAKAGAWA, S. 2007. Pedestrians’ normal walking speed and speed when crossing a street. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002, 90-97.
RASTOGI, R., CHANDRA, S., VAMSHEEDHAR, J. & DAS, V. R. 2011a. Parametric study of pedestrian speeds at midblock crossings. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137, 381-389.
RASTOGI, R., THANIARASU, I. & CHANDRA, S. 2011b. Design implications of walking speed for pedestrian facilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137, 687-696.
TARAWNEH, M. S. 2001. Evaluation of pedestrian speed in Jordan with investigation of some contributing factors. Journal of Safety Research, 32, 229-236.
TAYLOR, D. B. & MAHMASSANI, H. S. 1998. Behavioral models and characteristics of bicycle-autimobile mixed-traffic: Planning and engineering implications, University of Texas, Austin.
TEKNOMO, K. 2006. Application of microscopic pedestrian simulation model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 15-27.
TIPAKORNKIAT, C., LIMANOND, T. & KIM, H. 2012. Determining an influencing area affecting walking speed on footpath: A case study of a footpath in CBD Bangkok, Thailand. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391, 5453-5464.
VASIC, J. & RUSKIN, H. J. 2012. Cellular automata simulation of traffic including cars and bicycles. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391, 2720-2729.
WALKER, I. 2007. Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 417-425.
WHYNES, D. K., REED, G. & NEWBOLD, P. 1996. General practitioners' choice of referral destination: A probit analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 17, 587-594.
WILLIS, A., GJERSOE, N., HAVARD, C., KERRIDGE, J. & KUKLA, R. 2004. Human movement behaviour in urban spaces: Implications for the design and modelling of effective pedestrian environments. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 31, 805-828.
WOLFRAM, S. 2002. A new kind of science, Wolfram Media.
WOOD, J. M., LACHEREZ, P. F., MARSZALEK, R. P. & KING, M. J. 2009. Drivers' and cyclists' experiences of sharing the road: incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 772-776.
YEH, C.-L. 2011. A study of street pattern in commercial area. Master, National Cheng Kung University.
ZHAO, L., BIAN, Y., RONG, J., LIU, X. & SHU, S. Modeling pedestrian level of service on sidewalks with multi factors based on different pedestrian flow rates. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, 2015 Washington, D.C., United States.

校內：立即公開
校外：2020-09-01公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文