簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方瑜瑄
Hung, Yee-Shuen
論文名稱: 愛情關係中之公開親密動機與公開親密行為: 愛情滿意的調節
The Relationship Between Motivation and Behavior Towards Public Displays of Affection in Love: The Moderation of Romantic Satisfaction
指導教授: 周麗芳
Chou, Li-Fang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 心理學系
Department of Psychology
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 94
中文關鍵詞: 公開親密行為 、公開親密動機(促進感情、減少威脅) 、愛情滿意( 互動滿意、情愛滿意)
外文關鍵詞: Public Displays of Affection (PDAs), relationship satisfaction, motivation (Promotion and Prevention), Online Public Displays of Affection (PDAs)
相關次數: 點閱:224  下載:0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 公開親密行為 (Public Displays of Affection), 定義為在公開場合的情感展現 (Miller, 2013);行為的展現包括從相對溫和的行為,如牽手;到更強烈的行為,如親吻。隨著科技的發展, 公開親密行為也從原來的現實生活中的展現,擴展到在社交媒體上的親密互動 - 網路親密行為。因此,本研究將探討網路社交平台與真實生活中的公開親密互動。再者,動機是驅動行為的關鍵,而在親密關係中,公開親密動機是影響公開親密行為的重要原因,故本研究將進一步以調節焦點理論 (Higgins, 1997) 的促進型焦點 (Promotion Focus) 與預防型焦點 (Prevention Focus) ,探討情侶在公開親密促進感情動機與減少威脅動機,釐清公開親密行為的作用。過去的親密行為研究中,都以親密行為對情侶愛情滿意的影響為研究關鍵;但愛情關係的滿意程度是一個雙向歷程,會被親密他人的行為所影響,包括對方所展現的公開親密行為。所以本研究欲探討情侶的愛情滿意與公開親密行為的關係,在公開親密動機與行為間是否具有調節作用。因此,本研究目的如下:探討 (1) 公開親密動機與公開親密行為間的關聯性。(2) 釐清情侶的愛情滿意和公開親密行為的關係。(3) 情侶的愛情滿意在公開親密動機與公開親密行為間關係的調節作用。(4) 了解公開親密行為與愛情滿意的發展。
    本研究以台灣大學生及其情侶為研究對象;研究一以100位大學生(50對異性戀情侶)為研究參與者,結果發現公開親密促進感情動機與公開親密行為之一般場合、熟人場合及網路親密行為間皆具有正向關聯;但在公開親密減少威脅動機中則無顯著的關聯。研究二以·82位大學生(41對異性戀情侶)為研究參與者,結果發現愛情關係之互動滿意在熟人場合親密行為間有正向關聯;說明情侶的互動滿意越高,在熟人場合親密行為越高。但在一般場合及網路公開親密行為則無顯關聯。研究進一步探討發現 (1) 互動滿意在減少威脅動機與網路親密行為間具有負向調節效果。(2) 情愛滿意在促進感情動機與網路親密行為間具有正向調節效果;(3) 情愛滿意在減少威脅動機與網路親密行為間則有負向調節效果。最後,根據本研究之結果進行討論,並針對研究貢獻、限制與未來方向加以闡述。

    Public displays of affection (PDAs) are acts of physical intimacy that can be seen by others. PDAs have also expanded from real-life to social media. This study will investigate PDAs online and in real life (general and acquaintance occasion).
    Motivation is the key driver for behavior, As we hypothesized that, (1) motivation is the important cause for the behavior of PDAs. In-depth, we clarified motivation in promoting motivation and prevention motivation. Relationship satisfaction is a two-way process that is influenced by the behavior of others, including PDAs displayed by the other half. Therefore, (2) this study investigate the relationship between couple's love satisfaction and PDAs, and the moderating effect between PDA’s motivation and behavior. Study also focus on the long-term effect of PDAs on love satisfaction.
    In Study 1, by analyzing data from 100 heterosexual couples (50 pairs), we found a positive association between PDAs promoting motivation and behavior in PDAs in general, acquaintance occasion, and online; but no significant association was found in PDAs prevention motivation. In Study 2 of 82 heterosexual couples (41 pairs), results show that there was a positive relationship between couples’ interaction satisfaction and PDAs behavior in acquaintance. However, no significant association was found between PDAs behavior in general and online. Lastly, study found that (1) Interaction satisfaction had a negative moderating effect between prevention motivation and online PDAs. (2) Love satisfaction has a positive moderating effect between promoting motivation and online PDAs; (3) Love satisfaction has a negative moderating effect between prevention motivation and online PDAs. Finally, the results of this study are discussed.

    摘要 I 致謝 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 X 圖目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 親密關係與行為 4 壹、 親密關係 4 貳、 親密行為與感受 5 第二節 公開親密行為與動機 8 壹、 公開親密行為 8 貳、 公開親密動機 11 第三節 愛情關係滿意與公開親密行為 16 壹、 愛情關係滿意 16 貳、 愛情關係滿意與公開親密行為 17 第四節 研究架構 21 壹、 研究一架構 21 貳、 研究二架構 22 第三章 研究一:情侶親密行為動機與公開親密行為 23 第一節 研究對象與程序 23 第二節 研究工具 25 壹、 預測變項- 公開親密行為之量表的編制 25 貳、 公開親密動機 30 參、 控制變項 30 第三節 資料分析 33 壹、 描述性統計 33 貳、 相關分析 33 參、 迴歸分析 33 第四節 研究結果 34 壹、 各研究變項間之相關分析 34 貳、 控制變項與其他變項之關聯 34 參、 預測變項與其他變項之關聯 34 第五節 公開親密之動機與行為間關係 36 第四章 研究二:關係滿意在情侶公開親密之動機與行為中, 是關鍵還是結果? 38 第一節 研究樣本與研究程序 38 第二節 研究工具 40 第三節 資料分析 45 壹、 描述性統計 45 貳、 相關分析 45 參、 迴歸分析 45 第四節 研究結果 47 壹、 各研究變項間之相關分析 47 貳、 控制變項與其他變項之關聯 47 參、 預測變項與其他變項之關聯 47 肆、 調節變項與其他變項之關聯 48 第五節 分析結果 50 第六節 公開親密行為與追蹤之愛情滿意 59 壹、 各研究變項間之相關分析 59 貳、 控制變項與其他變項之關聯 59 參、 控制變項後變項之關聯 59 第五章 討論與建議 63 第一節 結果討論 63 第二節 研究貢獻 66 壹、 理論貢獻 66 第三節 研究限制 68 壹、 研究樣本 68 貳、 情侶的愛情滿意填答狀況 68 參、 半年後追蹤狀況 68 肆、 研究變項:考慮其他變項的影響 69 中文參考文獻 70 英文參考文獻 73 附錄一 (研究一) 81 附錄二 (研究二) 86 附錄三 (研究二 - 追蹤) 91

    王郁茗、王慶福 (2007)。大學生知覺其人際依附風格對愛情關係適應之影響。教育心理學報,38 (4),397-415。
    王純娟 (2001)。婚姻與親密關係。台北市:教育部社會教育司。
    王慶福 (1995)。大學生愛情關係徑路模式之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系博士論文,彰化縣。
    何冠瑩 (2004)。大學生愛情關係之李氏生氣表達、李氏生氣滿意度對愛情滿意度的影響。東吳大學心理學系碩士班碩士論文,台北市。
    何冠瑩 (2004)。大學生愛情關係之李氏生氣表達、李氏生氣滿意度對愛情滿意度的影響。東吳大學心理學系碩士班碩士論文,台北市。
    周佳蓉 (2017)。公開「是」愛?瑪那熊拆解「放閃」心理。張老師月刊,470。
    林文瑛、王震武 (1995)。中國父母的教養觀:嚴教觀或打罵觀?。本土心理學研究, (3),2-92。
    林以正、王澄華、吳佳煇 (2005)。網路人際互動特質與依戀型態對網路成癮的影響。中華心理學刊,47 (3),289-309。
    林生傳 (1997),《教育社會學》,高雄市:復文書局。
    林宜旻 (1994)。愛情類型、嫉妒與關係滿意度之相關研究。國立政治大學心理學系碩士論文,台北市。
    林素妃 (2003)。知覺父母婚姻關係、性別角色與親密關係滿意度之分析研究-以大學生情侶為例。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系研究所碩士論文。
    林淑惠、黃韞臻、林佳筠 (2010)。大學生共依附、愛情關係與分手調適之相關研究。臺中教育大學學報:人文藝術類,24 (2),119-140。
    洪翊鴻 (2018)。親密關係的互動:拒絕敏感度與接近動機、逃避動機關聯之探討。
    孫頌賢、李宜玫 (2011)。約會伴侶的愛情動機導向與愛情依戀系統之關聯性研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊, (10),95-110。
    徐敏瑜 (2017)。長者喜歡攻城掠地還是謹守寶物?探討調節性適配對認知訓練的影響。東吳大學心理學系碩士論文,台北市。
    張旭中、邱發忠、陳學志 、 徐芝君 (2011). 調整焦點動機、成功預期對創造力與批判性思考的影響。
    張妤玥、陸洛 (2007)。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關連。中華心理衛生學刊,20 (2),155-178。
    張芳熒 (2004)。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關聯。輔仁大學心理學系碩士論文。
    張春興 (1996)。教育心理學—— 三化取向的理論與實踐。
    張時雯 (2003)。大學生自我效能、衝突反應方式與戀愛關係品質之研究。國立政治大學教育學系教育心理與輔導組碩士論文。
    陳秀菁 (2002)。大學生的共依附特質、人際親密能力與親密感之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    陳秀菁、吳麗娟、林世華 (2004)。大學生的共依附特質、人際親密能力與親密感之相關研究。教育心理學報,36 (2),145-164。
    陳美如 (2009)。家庭溝通與親密關係-談婚姻與家庭介入。諮商與輔導, (284),30-34。
    陳美端 (2007)。女性乳癌患者婚姻中親密關係轉變之研究-以曾接受乳房切除手術者 為例。
    陳語箴 (2014)。親密關係研究: 知覺父母婚姻關係、與父母依附關係對大學生愛情觀之影響。
    曾文志 (1996)。成年早期婚姻親密量表之編製及影響婚姻親密之因素探討。國立高雄師範大學輔導學系碩士論文,高雄市。
    曾育齡 (2004)。大學生身體意象與戀愛關係相關之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所在職專班碩士論文。
    費孝通 (1948)。鄉土中國與鄉土重建。上海:觀察社
    黃先量 (1993)。從了解到形成親密關係:以人格構念的觀點看。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
    黃宗堅、周玉慧 (2009)。大學生親子三角關係類型與親密關係適應之研究。中華心理學刊,51 (2),197-213。
    黃韞臻、林淑惠、林佳筠 (2011)。大學生性別角色、共依附與愛情態度之相關研究。學校衛生, (59),105-131。
    楊于萱 (2009)。服務補救矛盾與雙重偏差之邊界條件探討。國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
    楊國樞 (1993a)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點,載於楊國樞、余安邦主編:中國人的心理與行為─理念與方法篇。台北:桂冠87-142。
    葉炳煙 (2013)。學習動機定義與相關理論之研究。
    蔡育恒 (2017)。社交網路背景下的秀恩愛與嫉妒關係研究。新聞傳播學。
    鄭羽芯 (2006)。大學生人際依附風格、情緒表達方式與愛情關係滿意度之相關研究。國立臺中教育大學諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文。
    賴曉璐、劉學蘭、黎莉. (2018). 親密關係中的自我擴張. 心理科學進展 , 26 (12), 2170-2179.
    簡嘉菱、程炳林 (2013)。環境目標結構、自我決定動機與學業情緒之關係。教育心理學報,44 (3),713-733。
    顏欣怡、卓紋君 (2013)。大學生情侶之愛情風格、溝通姿態、關係滿意度及關係承諾度之探討-對偶分析研究。中華心理衛生學刊,26 (3),443-485。
    羅子琦、賴念華 (2010)。大學生走出愛情分手困頓經驗之心理歷程研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊, (9),1-32。
    Andersen, P. A., Guerrero, L. K., & Jones, S. M. (2006). Nonverbal Behavior in Intimate Interactions and Intimate Relationships. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 259–277). Sage Publications, Inc.
    Anderson, Traci & Emmers-Sommer, Tara. (2006). Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Online Romantic Relationships. Communication Studies. 57:2, 153-172.
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (4), 596–612.
    Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1996). Love and the expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3 (1), 45–58.
    Berry, D. S., & Willingham, J. K. (1997). Affective traits, responses to conflict, and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 31 (4), 564-476.
    Creasey, G., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2001). Affective responses, cognitive appraisals, and conflict tactics in late adolescent romantic relationships: Associations with attachment orientations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48 (1), 85-96.
    De Guerrero, M.C.M. and Villamil, O.S. (1994), Social-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78: 484-496.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
    Elliot, A. J. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. Psychology Press.
    Emmers, T. M., & Dindia, K. (1995). The effect of relational stage and intimacy on touch: An extension of Guerrero and Andersen. Personal Relationships, 2 (3), 225–236.
    Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed: A review. New York: Norton.
    Fauber, R., Forehand, R., Long, N. et al. The relationship of young adolescent Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) scores to their social and cognitive functioning. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 9, 161–172 (1987).
    Fivecoat, H. C., Tomlinson, J. M., Aron, A., & Caprariello, P. A. (2015). Partner support for individual self-expansion opportunities: Effects on relationship satisfaction in long-term couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 368–385.
    Flaherty, L. M. (1999). Communication expectations, feeling understood, and relationship development (Doctoral dissertation, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1999 Jul., 60 (1-A), 0020
    Forsell, L. M., & Åström, J. A. (2012). Meanings of Hugging: From Greeting Behavior to Touching Implications. Comprehensive Psychology.
    Franzoi, S. L., Davis, M. H.,&Young, R. D. (1985). The effects of private self-consciousness and perspective taking on satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1584-1594.
    Fuendeling, J. M. (1998). adult attachment and affect regulation:A test of a stylistic.Michigan State University
    Gable S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of personality, 74 (1), 175–222.
    Gaines, S. O. (1996). Impact of interpersonal traits and gender-role compliance on inter-personal resource exchange among dating and engaged/married couples. Journal of Socialand Personal Relationships, 13, 241–261.
    Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 818 – 831.
    Gosling, S. D., Augustine, A. A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N., & Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of personality in Online Social Networks: self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 14 (9), 483–488.
    Graham, James & Harf, Mikaela. (2014). Self-expansion and flow: The roles of challenge, skill, affect, and activation. Pers Relationship, 22: 45-64.
    Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63–84). Macmillan Library Reference Usa; Prentice Hall International.
    Guerrero, L. K., & Andersen, P. A. (1991). The waxing and waning of relational intimacy: Touch as a function of relational stage, gender and touch avoidance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8 (2), 147–165.
    Gulledge A.K., Hill M., Lister Z., Sallion C. (2007) Non-Erotic Physical Affection: It’s Good for You. In: L’Abate L. (eds) Low-Cost Approaches to Promote Physical and Mental Health. Springer, New York, NY.
    Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H., & Stahmann, R. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31 (4), 233–242.
    Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (1990). A relationship-specific version of the love attitudes scale. In Neuliep, J. W. (Ed.), Replication research in the social sciences (pp.239-254). Newbury Park, CA; Sage.
    Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 93-98.
    Hendrick, S.S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N.L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980-988.
    Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
    Hojjat, M. (1997). Philosophy of life as a model of relationship satisfaction. In R. J. Sternberg, & M. Hojjat (eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships. New York:Guilford
    Ickes, W., & Barnes, R. (1978). Boys and girls together and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex role in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 669-683.
    Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16 (4), 151–163.
    Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16 (4), 151–163.
    Kate M. Esterline & Charlene L. Muehlenhard (2017). Wanting to Be Seen: Young People’s Experiences of Performative Making Out, The Journal of Sex Research, 54:8, 1051-1063,
    Kenny, G. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 417-431.
    Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., Bush, A. L., & Cook, A. (2008). Relationship-contingent self-esteem and the ups and downs of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (3), 608–627.
    Krueger, K. L., & Forest, A. L. (2020). Communicating Commitment: A Relationship-Protection Account of Dyadic Displays on Social Media. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 46 (7), 1059–1073.
    Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97 (3), 377–395.
    Levesque, R. J. R. (1993). The romantic experience of adolescents in satisfying love relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22 (3), 219-251
    Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw Hill.
    Linardatos, L., & Lydon, J. E. (2011). Relationship-specific identification and spontaneous relationship maintenance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101 (4), 737–753.
    Mackey, R.A., Diemer, M.A. & O'Brien, B.A. (2000). Psychological Intimacy in the Lasting Relationships of Heterosexual and Same-Gender Couples. Sex Roles 43, 201–227.
    Maki, A., Dwyer, P.C. and Snyder, M. (2015), Understanding AmeriCorps Service: Perspectives from Psychological Theory and Research on Volunteerism. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15: 253-281.
    Mattingly, B.A., Mcintyre, K.P. and Lewandowski, G.W., JR. (2012), Approach motivation and the expansion of self in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 19: 113-127.
    Miller, R.L. (2013). Public Displays of Affection. In The Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Psychology, K.D. Keith (Ed.).
    Morris, D. (1971). Intimate behavior. New York: Random House.
    Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (5), 771–784.
    Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16 (2), 172–186.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
    Sargent, K. S., Krauss, A., Jouriles, E. N., & McDonald, R. (2016). Cyber Victimization, Psychological Intimate Partner Violence, and Problematic Mental Health Outcomes Among First-Year College Students. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 19 (9), 545–550.
    Schneirla, T. C. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1959 Oxford, England: Univer. Nebraska Press.
    Seidman, G., Langlais, M., & Havens, A. (2019). Romantic relationship-oriented Facebook activities and the satisfaction of belonging needs. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8 (1), 52–62.
    Seidman, G. (2014). Expressing the "True Self" on Facebook. Computer in Human Behavior, 31, 367-372.
    Sheets, V. L. (2014). Passion for life: Self-expansion and passionate love across the life span. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31 (7), 958–974.
    Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., & Hinsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1 (S), 2–15.
    Siavelis, R.L., & Lamke, L.K. (1992). Instrumentalness and expressiveness:predictiors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 26 (3/4)149-159.
    Simpson, T. (1990). Sexuality on Campus─90’s Style. Change, 4 (25), 50-56.
    Slotter, Erica & Gardner, Wendi. (2012). The dangers of dating the “bad boy” (or girl): Romantic desire encourages the adoption of even negative qualities of potential partners.. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48. 1173.
    Smith, J. C. S., Vogel, D. L., Madon, S., & Edwards, S. R. (2011). The Power of Touch: Nonverbal Communication Within Married Dyads. The Counseling Psychologist, 39 (5), 764–787.
    Sprecher, S., Metts, S., Burleson, B., Hatfield, E., & Thomson, A. (1995). Domains of expressive interaction in intimate relationships: Associations with satisfaction and commitment. Family Relations, 44 (2), 203-210
    Steinberg, S. J., Davila, J., & Fincham, F. (2006). Adolescent Marital Expectations and Romantic Experiences: Associations With Perceptions About Parental Conflict and Adolescent Attachment Security. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35 (3), 333–348.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). Yale University Press.
    Steuber, K. R. (2005). Adult attachment, conflict style, and relationship satisfaction: A comprehensive model. University of Delaware
    Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. W W Norton & Co.
    Swensen, C., & Trahaug, G. (1985). Commitment and the Long-Term Marriage Relationship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47 (4), 939-945.
    Swensen, C.H., Eskew, R.W. & Kohlhepp, K.A. (1984). Five factors in long-term marriages. J Fam Econ Iss 7, 94–106.
    Tan Shen Kian & Wan Fauziah Wan Yusoff & Sivan Rajah, (2014). Motivation for Generations Cohorts: An Organizational Justice Perspective," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2 (11), pg 536-542.
    Thompson, E. H., & Hampton, J. A. (2011). The effect of relationship status on communicating emotions through touch. Cognition & emotion, 25 (2), 295–306.
    Toma, C.L. (2015). Online Dating. In The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication (eds C.R. Berger, M.E. Roloff, S.R. Wilson, J.P. Dillard, J. Caughlin and D. Solomon).
    Tomlinson, J. M., & Aron, A. (2013). The path to closeness: A mediational model for overcoming the risks of increasing closeness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30 (6), 805–812.
    Weigel, D.J., Weiser, D.A., & Lalasz, C.B. (2017). Testing a Motivational Model of Relationship Maintenance: The Role of Approach and Avoidance Relationship Goals. Western Journal of Communication, 81, 341 - 361.
    Zhao, X., Salehi, N., Naranjit, S., Alwaalan, S., Voida, S., & Cosley, D. (2013). The many faces of facebook: experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
    Zywica, J. and Danowski, J. (2008), The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting Facebook and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14: 1-34.

    下載圖示
    2026-08-06公開
    QR CODE