簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴昀瑩
Lai, Yun-Ying
論文名稱: 電子化學習市場中選擇教材元件組合之研究
指導教授: 謝中奇
Hsieh, Chung-Chi,
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 教材元件選擇決策電子化學習
相關次數: 點閱:87下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   隨著網際網路的普及與資訊科技的發展,人們對於網路資訊的依賴性越來越高,電子化學習~(e-Learning)的崛起意味著未來教育輔佐角色之異動,可以預知電子化學習勢必在學習的過程中扮演不可或缺的角色。電子化學習之中的教材元件特色在於元件的互通與分享,只要元件遵從某一個規則架構,則此元件即可以與其他相同規則架構的元件互相搭配做結合。目前電子化學習市場已經開始有學者針對電子市場品質掌控進行探討,例如:傳輸品質、使用介面、顧客回饋等,主要目的是要讓電子化交易市場可以如願成真。我們可以預料到的問題是,當電子化市場中存在著許多公司和學校提供大量依循相同規則的教材元件給消費者選擇,未來的消費者將會面臨在這麼多的元件資訊下,如何適當的決選出適合自己學習的內容?本研究希望在電子化學習市場的平台架設與網頁架構成熟的情況下,透過一個選擇決策模式來幫助使用者在龐雜的資訊中,針對影響消費者購買的教材元件屬性,找出符合消費者滿意度最大的教材元件組合,提供給消費者購買參考之依據。

    none

    第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機.....................................................1 1.2 研究目的...........................................................3 1.3 研究範圍與限制.....................................................4 1.4 論文架構...........................................................5 第二章 相關文獻回顧 6 2.1 電子化學習(e-learning).............................................6 2.2 描述教材元件之標準.................................................8 2.2.1 教材元件....................................................8 2.2.2 教材元件之標準格式與管理...................................10 2.3 概念圖............................................................18 2.4 遺傳演算法........................................................19 第三章 問題定義與模式 22 3.1 問題描述與基本假設................................................22 3.1.1 問題描述...................................................22 3.1.2 基本假設...................................................23 3.1.3 符號說明...................................................24 3.2 教材元件組合之選擇模式............................................26 3.2.1 教材元件組合...............................................26 3.2.2 消費者屬性之確立...........................................28 3.2.3 變數及限制式...............................................32 3.2.4 目標函數...................................................38 3.2.5 教材元件組合選擇模式.......................................40 第四章 遺傳演算法與程式模擬實作 41 4.1 遺傳演算法之解題流程..............................................41 4.2 遺傳演算法之程式設計..............................................44 4.2.1 染色體編碼方式.............................................44 4.2.2 染色體的交配與突變.........................................45 4.2.3 適合度函數.................................................46 4.2.4 母體的繁衍.................................................47 4.3 模擬實作..........................................................47 4.3.1 小量教材元件下窮舉法與遺傳演算法之模擬實做.................49 4.3.2 遺傳演算法之模擬分析.......................................51 4.4 結語..............................................................52 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 55 5.1 結論..............................................................55 5.2 未來研究方向......................................................56

    ADL. 2001. Advanced distributed learning. http://www.adlnet.org.

    Anido, L., Llamas, M., Fernandez, M. J., Caeiro, M., Santos, J. and Rodriguez, J. S.
    A component model for standardized Web-based education. ACM Journal of
    Educational Resources in Computing, 1(2), 1-21, 2001.

    Bichler, M. and Kalagnanam, J. Con¯gurable oRers and winner determination in
    multi-attribute auctions. European Journal of Operational Research, 160, 380{
    394, 2005.

    Branco, F. The design of multidimensional auctions. The Rand Journal of Economics,
    28(1), 63{81, 1997.

    Cheong, C. S. E-learning{a provider's prospective. The Internet and Higer Education,
    4, 337{352, 2002.

    Drucker, P. 2000. Need to know: Integrating e-learning with high velocity value chains.
    http://www.delphigroup.com/pubs/whitepapers/20001213-e-learning-wp.pdf.

    Drucker, P. F. Post-Capitalist Society. New Youk: Harper Business, 1993.
    Edmondson, K. Concept mapping for the development of medical curricular. Journal
    of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 777-793, 1995.

    Friesen, N. What are educational objects? Interactive Learning Environments, 9(3),
    219{230, 2001.
    Gen, M. and Cheng, R. Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design. John Wiley and
    Sons, Inc., 1996.

    Laey, J. M. and Singer, J. Using mapping for cognitive assessment in project-based
    science. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 363{387, 1997.

    Langenbach, C. and Bodendorf, F. Media-based education and training: realisation
    approaches and market perspectives. Engineering Science and Education Journal,
    2000.

    Man, K. F., Tang, K. S. and Kwong, S. Genetic Algorithms: Concepts and Designs.
    Springer, 1999.

    Nakhleh, M. and Krajcik, J. S. In°uence of levels of information as presented by
    dierent technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts.
    Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1077{1096, 1994.

    Nichols, M. A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 1{10,
    2003.

    Novak, J. D. 1977. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them.
    http://cmap.coginst.uwf.edu/info/printer.html.

    Novak, J. D. Application of advances in learning theory and philosophy of science
    to the improvement of chemistry teaching. The Journal of Chemical Education,
    61(7), 607{612, 1984.

    Novak, J. D. Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research
    in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937{949, 1990.

    Oliver, R. L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction
    decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460{469, 1980.

    Oria, V. 2002. Generating new course material from existing courses.
    http://db.uwaterloo.ca/? tozsu/seminars/notes/courseware.pdf.

    Qu, C. and Nejdl, W. 2002. Towards interoperability and reusability of learning
    resources: a scorm-conformant courseware for computer science education. In
    Proceedings of IEEE International Conference of Advanced Learning Technolo-
    gies(IEEE ICALT 2002). Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia.

    S., G. C. and S., S. S.-F. An enhanced genetic algorithm for automated assembly
    planning. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18, 355{364, 2002.
    Schmid, R. F. and Telaro, G. Concept maps as an instructional strategy for high school
    biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78{85, 1990.

    Spalter, A. M. and Dam, A. Problems with using components in educational software.
    Computers and Graphics, 27, 329{337, 2003.

    Starr, M. L. and Krajcik, J. S. Concept maps as heuristic for science curriculum
    development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research
    of Science Teaching, 27, 987{1000, 1990.

    Stergioulas, L. K., Ahmed, H., Xydeas, C. S. and Simon, B. 2003. Total quali-
    ty management for electronic educational markets. In Proceedings of the 3rd
    IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies(ICALT'03)
    (pp. 160{164). Athens, Greece.

    Swan, J. E., Trawick, I. F. and Carroll, M. G. Satisfaction related to predictive, desired
    expectations: A ¯eld study. 15{22, 1980.

    Thompson, S. H. T. and Yuanyou, Y. Online buying behavior: a transaction cost
    economics perspective. Omega, 33(5), 451{465, 2005.
    Urdan, T. A. and Weggen, C. C. 2000. Corporate e-learning: exploring a new frontier.
    http://www.e-learning.nl/publicaties/marktonderzoek/New Frontier.pdf.

    下載圖示 校內:2009-06-29公開
    校外:2009-06-29公開
    QR CODE