隨著全球科技的迅速發展及ESG浪潮的興起，許多企業希望藉由發展數位科技驅動永續，而數位永續也逐漸成為各行各業維持競爭力的關鍵因素。其中，消耗大量的自然資源和高度能源使用的製造業首當其衝，但對於製造商來說，要如何因應數位永續並沒有一個明確的對策，因此必須不斷的檢視企業內部所擁有的資源及能力，並即興的利用這些資源及能力做出行動以應對環境的變化。此外，在傳統製造商發展數位永續的過程之中，許多發展的方向都跟他們傳統的思維模式有所不同，在制度上可能有所衝突，使得企業在轉型過程面臨許多困難，甚至必須改變過去的制度並建立新制度以因應數位永續的轉型。
本研究將以個案研究的方式探討數位永續轉型在企業中的重要性，並以中小型線材製造商 - 新呈工業作為研究之分析對象。本研究觀察傳統製造商在數位永續過程中制度的變化，以即興制定的觀點探討組織如何利用其資源與能力，以突破遇到的困境。綜上所述，本研究希冀能以個案分析的方式建立一套製造商數位永續雙軌轉型的即興制定機制，成為未來其他中小型製造商的參考案例。
考量雙軌轉型尚在發展之初，本研究以即興制定觀點探討企業因應新興挑戰的動態軌跡。此外，本研究將新呈工業的數位永續轉型過程概念化，並以即興制定打造數位永續之策略，為傳統製造產業提供參考的依據。

With the rapid development of global technology and the rise of the ESG wave, many enterprises hope to drive sustainability through the development of digital technology. Digital sustainability has been recognized as a key factor in maintaining competitiveness across various industries. Among these, the manufacturing industry, which consumes a large amount of natural resources and uses high levels of energy, is at the forefront. However, for manufacturers, there is no clear strategy to respond to digital sustainability, necessitating a continuous review of internal resources and capabilities and improvising actions to adapt to environmental changes. Additionally, during the development of digital sustainability in traditional manufacturers, many development directions differ from their conventional thinking patterns, potentially causing institutional conflicts. This makes the transformation process challenging and may require changes to existing institutions and the establishment of new institutions to cope with the digital sustainability transformation.
This study will use a case study approach to explore the importance of digital and sustainable transformation in enterprises, with Everbiz Industrial Co ltd. (Everbiz), a small and medium-sized wire manufacturer, as the research subject. This study will observe the institutional changes in traditional manufacturers during the digital sustainability process and, from an improvisational perspective, explore how organizations can utilize their resources and capabilities to overcome encountered difficulties. In summary, this study aims to establish an improvisational enactment mechanism for digital and sustainable transformation in manufacturers through case analysis, offering guidance for other small and medium-sized manufacturers.
Considering that the transformation is still in its early phases of development, this study adopts an improvisational enactment perspective to explore the dynamic trajectory of enterprises in response to emerging challenges. Additionally, this study conceptualizes the process of digital and sustainable transformation at Everbiz and uses improvisational enactment to develop strategies for digital sustainability, providing a reference for the traditional manufacturing industry.

英文部分
Andriushchenko, K., Buriachenko, A., Rozhko, O., Lavruk, O., Skok, P., Hlushchenko, Y., Muzychka, Y., Slavina, N., Buchynska, O., & Kondarevych, V. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 7(3), 2255.
Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of environmental management, 86(1), 88-103.
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120420.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research policy, 32(2), 255-276.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
Barrett, F. J. (2017). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. In The aesthetic turn in management (pp. 407-424). Routledge.
Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization studies, 20(5), 777-799.
Beier, G., Niehoff, S., & Xue, B. (2018). More sustainability in industry through industrial internet of things? Applied sciences, 8(2), 219.
Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. N. K. (2008). Learning how to restructure: absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic management journal, 29(6), 593-616.
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 169-196.
Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization science, 16(1), 3-18.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
Chan, C. M., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T.-C. (2011). Managing e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541.
Crossan, M., Cunha, M. P. E., Vera, D., & Cunha, J. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of management review, 30(1), 129-145.
Crossan, M. M. (1998). Improvisation in action. Organization science, 9(5), 593-599.
Crossan, M. M., White, R. E., Lane, H. W., & Klus, L. (1996). The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity. Organizational dynamics, 24(4), 20-36.
Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how, and why. International journal of management reviews, 1(3), 299-341.
Danneels, E. (2003). Tight–loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic management journal, 24(6), 559-576.
Delmas, M. A., Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2019). Understanding the role of the corporation in sustainability transitions. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 87-97.
DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional patterns and organizations, 3-21.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dyer Jr, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of management review, 16(3), 613-619.
Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Communication Research, 17(2), 139-164.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers’ perceptions of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. Journal of Business ethics, 98, 425-453.
Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American behavioral scientist, 40(4), 397-405.
Fountain, J. E. (2004). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Rowman & Littlefield.
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication (Vol. 18). NYU press.
Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. In (Vol. 28, pp. 957-969): Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England.
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 252, 119869.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization science, 7(4), 375-387.
Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainability of manufacturing and services: Investigations for research and applications. International journal of production economics, 140(1), 35-47.
Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International journal of management reviews, 17(4), 437-459.
Hadjimanolis, A. (2000). A resource-based view of innovativeness in small firms. Technology analysis & Strategic management, 12(2), 263-281.
Hanvanich, S., Sivakumar, K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2006). The relationship of learning and memory with organizational performance: the moderating role of turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 600-612.
Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 1, 198-217.
Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of management review, 31(4), 864-888.
Hatch, M. J. (1997). Jazzing up the theory of organizational improvisation. Advances in strategic management, 14(2), 181-191.
Hedrick, T. E., Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (1993). Applied research design: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of management journal, 49(6), 1137-1157.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of management journal, 42(4), 351-371.
Huang, C.-H., & Chou, T.-C. (2023). ICT as a collectively enacted artifact? A collective enactment perspective. Information & Management, 60(8), 103887.
Huang, C.-H., Chou, T.-C., & Liu, J. S. (2021). The development of pandemic outbreak communication: a literature review from the response enactment perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 525-535.
Kamoche, K., Cunha, M. P. E., & Cunha, J. V. d. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. Journal of management studies, 40(8), 2023-2051.
Kelly, S. E., Bourgeault, I., & Dingwall, R. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research, 19, 307-326.
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of cleaner production, 115, 36-51.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of management journal, 47(5), 657-679.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (2018). The limits to growth. In Green planet blues (pp. 25-29). Routledge.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Miner, A. S., Bassof, P., & Moorman, C. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative science quarterly, 46(2), 304-337.
Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative science quarterly, 160-197.
Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of management review, 33(3), 750-770.
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of management review, 23(4), 698-723.
Nave, A., & Ferreira, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 885-901.
Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.
Perky, L. T. (1991). Strategic improvising: How to formulate and implement competitive strategies in concert. Organizational dynamics, 19(4), 51-64.
Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in organizational behavior, 22, 237-281.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Rutherfoord, R., Blackburn, R. A., & Spence, L. J. (2000). Environmental management and the small firm: An international comparison. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6(6), 310-326.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 237-263.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of management review, 27(2), 222-247.
Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762.
Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Chou, T.-C., & Huang, J.-Y. (2010). Enabling agility through routinized improvisation in IT deployment: The case of Chang Chun Petrochemicals.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization science, 16(3), 203-224.
Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations [1]. Journal of management studies, 25(4), 305-317.
Weick, K. E. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Administrative science quarterly, 301-313.
Weick, K. E. (1998). Introductory essay—Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization science, 9(5), 543-555.
Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization, Volume 2: The impermanent organization. John Wiley & Sons.
Weick, K. E. (2015). The social psychology of organizing. Management, 18(2), 189.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16(4), 409-421.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Wheeler, B. C. (2002). NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Information systems research, 13(2), 125-146.
Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3).
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
York, J. G., Vedula, S., & Lenox, M. J. (2018). It’s not easy building green: The impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Academy of management journal, 61(4), 1492-1523.
 
中文部分
吳思華. (2002). 策略九說: 策略思考的本質. 復旦大學出版社.
涂敏芬. (2012). 對抗制度的創新: 策略行動者的能動性實踐. 臺大管理論叢, 22(2), 87-118.
陳向明. (2002). 社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
黃振皓 (2021). 制定興業IT能動性：金融科技產業之多重個案（博士論文）.
國立臺灣科技大學臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
https：//hdl.handle.net/11296/pdhwtt。
 
網站部分
新呈工業股份有限公司官方網站https：//www.everbiz.com.tw/
資誠(PwC Taiwan)數位轉型案例中心，2023年1月6號，新呈建立數位戰情室 突破老牌企業瓶頸，(2024年4月瀏覽)https：//www.pwc.tw/zh/focus/digital-transformation/cases/manufacturing-2022-06.html
經濟日報 商情，新呈工業啟動綠色供應鏈 首波5家廠商響應，2023年3月13號，(2024年5月瀏覽)https：//money.udn.com/money/story/6722/7028085