| 研究生: |
翁朝棟 Wong, Chao-Tung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
世界鋼鐵產業營運績效與經營策略分析:區域治理觀點 Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of the World Steel Industry-A Regional Governance Perspective |
| 指導教授: |
陳家榮
Chen, Chia-Yon |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 資源工程學系 Department of Resources Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2009 |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 98 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 鋼鐵業 、資產報酬率 、資料包絡法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Steel industry, ROA, DEA |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:391 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科技日新月異,生產效率也不斷提高,造成鋼鐵產業生產過剩的現象,因此,鋼鐵產業所面對的經營環境越來越競爭。根據世界鋼鐵協會的統計,世界粗鋼的產量在2007年前七月達761百萬噸,比前年同期增加8.04%。整體而言,亞洲、歐盟與北美增加最多,分別為233百萬噸、125百萬噸與7575萬噸。
本文以32家全球大型一貫作業鋼廠為對象,應用資料包絡分析法的交叉效率分析與麥氏生產力指數,並將樣本分群為北美、歐洲、亞洲與南半球進行分析,來探討1994年~2006年均進入全球50大一貫作業鋼廠之經營績效、跨期效率及總要素生產力變動,其實證分析結果為32個樣本中,在技術效率變動上有19家呈現上升,13家呈現衰退。其中,衰退的13家中,有7家是因為技術落後,而13家中的3家是因為技術落後且有技術效率衰退現象,尤其是亞洲的大型一貫作業鋼廠。最後,本文分析32家一貫作業鋼廠管理決策矩陣,並提出改善生產效率與生產力的建議。
此外,根據五大鋼鐵產區,以資產報酬率為經營績效變數,探討影響經營績效的決定因子,據以擬定經營管理策略及規劃生產力改善方向,以達到提昇競爭力的目標。經營策略方面,北美地區應注重財務管理與成本控制,南半球地區應積極提升生產技術,並善用料源優勢,歐洲地區應改善生產管理並更新生產機器,亞洲地區應提升操作率,增加國際競爭力。最後,在日本地區則應重視行銷策略與人力資源管理。本研究的主要貢獻為將全球一貫作業鋼廠之生產區域劃分,使用DEA方法檢視每一區域的生產效率,並以資產報酬率(ROA)為被解釋變數,找出經營績效的決定因子,據以決定未來經營策略之導向。
With the development of advanced technology and the increase of production efficiency, the market of steel is in oversupply. Therefore, the environment which steel industries have faced has been more and more competitive for recent decades. According to International Iron and Steel Institute, (IISI), global production of crude steel totaled 761 million tons in the first seven months of 2007, an increase of 8.04 percent over the same period a year earlier. Geographically, Asia, the European Union, , and North America were the world’s largest producers of crude steel in the first seven months of 2007, accounting for 233 million tons, 125 million tons, and 75,750,000 tons, respectively.
A sample of 32 global integrated steel mills were examined by utilizing both cross efficiency test of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist productivity indexes (MPI). These global steel mills were grouped into four regions: North America, Europe, Asia and the Southern Hemisphere. The sequence, listed by their operational efficiency, was North America, Europe, the Southern Hemisphere and Asia. The MPI analysis showed that the trend for each region was almost the same. It showed that the total factor productivity slightly improved between 1994 and 2006, and there were an upward tendency for nineteen steel mills and a downward tendency for the other thirteen steel mills. In addition, it showed that nine of the thirteen steel mills went downward due to the decline in technical efficiency, seven of the thirteen steel mills slid down due to the decline in technology, and three of the thirteen declined owing to both the failing of technical efficiency and technology. In particular, the technical efficiency change and technical change of the Asian steel mills were examined. Finally, this paper constructed an analysis of the operational performance management matrix of the 32 integrated steel mills, which would give recommendations for these steel mills to improve their efficiency and productivity.
In addition, the steel industry was separateded into five areas and addressed the determinants of operating performance by ROA. Thus, get the goal to increase productivity on the steel industry. We suggest several operating strategies such as financial management and cost control in North America, raising productivity in the Southern Hemisphere, manufacture management in Europe, promoting core competency in Asia, and sales management in Japan.
一、 中文部分
大前研一,2007,新企業參謀,商周出版社。
金屬中心,2005,鋼鐵年鑑2004年。
林秀蓮,2005,”我國粗鋼及鋼板捲業之現況與展望”,產業調查與技術,154期。
林妙玲,1994,中國大陸鋼鐵工業之探討及兩岸合作前景分析,國立成功大學資源工程研究所碩士論文。
林炳文,2002,”臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用”,臺灣管理學刊,第一卷第二期,頁341-356。
吳堯峰,1988,戰時人事行政之研究,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
吳學良,1997,”我國鋼鐵工業生產效率之探討-資料包絡分析之實證研究”,台灣經濟,第二百五十一期,頁1-14。
吳忠岳,2003,台鐵車站生產效率分析,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文。
吳萬益、林淑梅、黃暄仁,2007,利用DEA方法確立世界鋼鐵產產業之標竿目標與標竿夥伴,中山管理評論,第十五卷,頁161-196。
高強、黃旭男、末吉俊幸,2003,管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
高子荃、陳振遠、周建新,2004,”台灣地區產險業經營效率之研究-資料包絡法與Malmquist生產力指數之應用”,輔仁管理評論,第十一卷第一期,頁53-76。
凌岩世,2006,我國鋼鐵產業經營績效與最適規模之研究-資料包絡分析法(DEA)之應用,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士論文。
洪海玲,2001,以資料包絡分析法作製造業之營運效率分析,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
洪炎星,兩岸鋼鐵產業概況,2002,金屬中心ITIS計劃。
郭彥秀、黃士滔,2007,結合灰關聯分析與資料包絡分析法評估鋼鐵企業績效,中華民國品質學會第43屆年會暨第13屆全國品質管理研討會。
黃暄仁,2000,利用資料包絡分析法決定標竿目標與標竿夥伴:以全球32大鋼鐵廠為例,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
黃子菱,2002,集團企業多角化程度與經營績效相關性之研究--以平衡計分卡觀點探討,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
梁智昇,2005,兩岸資訊科技產業經營之效率評估,東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
陳澤浩,2005,”2005年全球鋼鐵市場供需與未來發展趨勢”,鑛冶,191期。
陳哲鵬,2006,廠商經營效率評估與財務比率之關聯性研究-以台灣鋼鐵產業為例,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士論文。
陳望曾,2006,台灣民營電廠(IPP)營運績效之研究-資料包絡分析法的應用,國立台北大學公共事務學院自然資源與環境管理研究所碩士論文。
崔曉倩、吳文棋,2007,”裁撤與非效率之間:由效率角度檢視台糖製糖廠的停閉政策”,人文及社會科學集刊,第十九卷第二期,頁231-266。
劉文聰,2004,台灣地區核電廠營運績效之比較-DEA方法之應用,國立台北大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。
賴仁基,1997,我國綜合大學效率差異之衡量─資料包絡分析的應用,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
謝明瑞,2001,台灣鋼鐵業的發展,財團法人國定政策基金會,財金(研)090-072號。
羅永昶,2003,”台灣鋼鐵業的價值創造策略”,鋼鐵資訊,153期。
蘇進祿,2004,以資料包絡分析法評估鋼鐵產業經營績效之研究,國立成功大學管理學院高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
鐘國安,2004,整合企業流程與核心能力提升鋼鐵業競爭優勢之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理系所碩士論文。
龔良智,1999,DEA模型應用於台電配電技術部門績效評估之研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文部分
Aaker, D. A., “Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to A Sustainable Competitive Advantage”. California Management Review. p. 91-106. 1989.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”. Management Science 30, p. 1078–1092. 1984.
Charles W. Hofer and Don S., Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. West Publishing Co. p. 18-19. 1978.
Charnes,A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. “Measuring the efficiencyof decision making units” European Journal of Operational Research 2, p. 429–444. 1978.
Coelli, Tim., An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer. New York. 2005.
Cooper, A. C., Willard, G. E. and Woo, C. Y., “Strategies of High- Performing New and Small Firms: A Reexamination of the Niche Concept”. Journal of Business Venturing. 1, p. 247-260. 1986.
Coyne, K. P., “Sustainable Competitive Advantage-What It Is, What It Isn’t”. Business Horizons. 29, p. 54-61. 1986.
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K., “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantages”. Management Science. 35, p. 1504-1511.1989.
Farrell,M.J., Fieldhouse, M. “Estimating efficiencyproduction function under increasing returns to scale”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A125 , p. 252–267. 1962.
Hill, Charles W. L., and Jones, G. R., Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company. 4th. 1998.
Huberty, C. J., “Problems with stepwise methods-Better alter-natives. Advances in Social Science Methodology”. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc. vol. 1, p. 43-70. 1989.
Hunt, M. S., Competition in the major home appliance industry 1960-1970. Unpulished doctoral dissertation. 1972.
Jinlong Ma, David G. Evans, Robert J. Fuller and Donald F. Stewart, “Technical Efficiency and Productivity Change of China’s Iron and Steel Industry”. International Journal of Production Economics. 76, p.293-312. 2002.
Pedhazur, E. J., Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanationand prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston. 1982.
Porter, M. E., Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. 1980.
Ramanujam, V. and Varadarajan, P., “Research on Corporate Diversification: A Hypothesis”. Strategic Management Journal. 10(6), p. 523-551. 1989.
Yi-Ming Wei, Hua Liao and Ying Fan, “An Empirical Analysis of Energy in China’s Iron and Steel Sector”. Energy 32, p.2262-2270. 2007.
校內:2109-06-29公開