| 研究生: |
張月盈 Chang, Yeh-Ying |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
莎士比亞《理查二世》與《亨利四世,上》中契約經濟的修辭與對王權的影響 The Language of Economic Contractualism and Its Influence on Kingship in Shakespeare’s Richard the Second and Henry Fourth, Part I |
| 指導教授: |
石苓
Carolyn F. Scott |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 外國語文學系 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 82 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 《理查二世》 、《亨利四世,上》 、王權 、契約經濟修辭 、慷慨 、有效管理 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Richard II, 1 Henry IV, kingship, language of economic contractualism, largesse, effective stewardship |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:98 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
一般認為莎士比亞的第二輯四部曲是詩人探討權力的作品。在這部十四世紀末、十五世紀初的英國歷史中,使用契約經濟的語言修辭被描繪成眾多權力來源中,極重要的一種權力形式。本論文檢視該系列歷史劇中的經濟契約修辭。在《理查二世》和《亨利四世,上》兩劇中,兩位國王的價值取決於面對政治權力和經濟利益衝突時展現的能力。理查二世依賴慷慨手段及儀式化的語言,亨利四世則堅持使用契約經濟的語言修辭。在一段轉化的歷史中,此二者的語言反映面對政治經濟衝突時,國王的管理是否有效率。我主張經濟危機使得理查統治下的政治動盪更形惡化;而亨利四世,作為理查的對照,則因其善用靈活的契約經濟語言修辭,化解政治危機,使他的政權得以鞏固。針對在審判場景及國王與部屬的社會關係所使用的語言加以比較,亦顯示亨利四世是比較有效率的領導者,因此,以文藝復興觀點而言,他也是較有價值的國王。
Shakespeare’s second tetralogy is generally regarded as the Bard’s study of power. Among the various sources of power, the ability to command the language of economic contractualism is depicted as a prominent form of power in this retelling of late fourteenth century and early fifteenth century English history. In Richard II and 1 Henry IV, the value of Richard and Henry IV is strongly related to their in/ability to confront the tension between political power and economic interests. The language employed by Richard II, who relies on his largesse and ceremonial language, and Henry IV, who insists on economic contractual language, during such political and economic crises reflects the effectiveness in the monarch’s stewardship during the period of historic transition. I argue that the political instability under Richard’s reign is further exacerbated by his economic crisis; the economically astute Henry IV, constructed as Richard’s foil, however, avoids his political crisis with the dexterity of the language of economic contractualism and secures his throne. A comparison of the two kings’ language in the trial scenes and their social relationships with their subjects also shows Henry IV the more effective steward, and thus the more worthy king from the Renaissance perspective.
Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA 42.3 (1927): 686–720. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 30 Apr. 2017.
Archer, Ian W. “Economy.” Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford UP. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 1 Jan. 2017.
Ashford, Elizabeth, and Tim Mulgan. “Contractualism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Fall 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta ed.
Baker, Herschel. Introduction. Richard II. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997. 842-46. Print.
---, Introduction. Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997. 884-88. Print.
Berger, Harry, Jr. “The Prince’s Dog: Falstaff and the Perils of Speech-Prefixity.” Shakespeare Quarterly. 49.1 (1998): 40-73. Web. 03 April 2017.
Bevington, David, ed. The Complete Works of Shakespeare. 4th. ed. New York : HarperCollins, 1992. Print.
Brauer, Jurgen, and Hubert Van Tuyll. Castles, Battles, and Bombs: How Economics Explains Military History. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2008. Print.
Bruster, Douglas. “On a Certain Tendency in Economic Criticism of Shakespeare.” Money and the Age of Shakespeare. Ed. Linda Woodbridge. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Print.
Bullough, Geoffrey. Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare. Vol. 3. London: Routledge, 1987. Print.
Cavanagh, Dermot. “The Language of Treason in Richard II.” Shakespeare Studies. 27 (1999): 134-60. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 19 Feb. 2018.
Cherchi, Paolo. “The Knight’s Tale: Line 1774-81.” Modern Philology: A Journal Devoted to Research in Medieval and Modern Literature, 76.1 (1978): 46-48. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 10 Feb. 2018.
Coke, Edward. The Reports of Sir Edward Coke, knt. Great Britain Courts. London: Printed for J. Rivington. 1777. Web. Mar. 11, 2017.
“Contract.” Def. 2a. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.
“Economy.” Def. 4. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.
Edwards, M.J. Plutarch: The Lives of Pompey, Caesar and Cicero. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1991. Print.
Engle, Lars. Shakespearean Pragmatism: Market in His Time. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993. Print.
Evans, G. Blakemore, ed. The Riverside Shakespeare. 2nd. ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997. Print.
Fischer, Sandra K. “‘He Means to Pay’: Value and Metaphor in the Lancastrian Tetralogy.” Shakespeare Quarterly 40.2 (1989): 149-64. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 04 Jul 2016.
Folland, Harold F. “King Richard’s Pallid Victory.” Shakespeare Quarterly 24.4 (1973): 390-399. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 31 Dec. 2017.
Gillingham, John. “The Early Middle Ages.” Morgan 104-165.
Gordley, James. “Contract Law in the Aristotelian Tradition.” The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays. Ed. Peter Benson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001.265-334. Print.
Greenblatt, Stephen, ed. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. vol. 1, 9th ed. New York: Norton, 2012. Print.
Griffiths, Ralph A. “The Later Middle Ages.” Morgan 166-222.
Hamilton, Donna B. “The State of Law in Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly 34.1 (1983): 5-17. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 29 Sep. 2015.
Holinshed, Raphael. The Holinshed Project. Ed. Paulina Kewes, Ian Archer, Felicity Heal and Henry Summerson. Web. 25 Feb. 2017.
Ibbetson, David. “Sixteenth Century Contract Law: Slade’s Case in Context.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford UP. 4.3 (1984): 295-317. JSTOR. Web 26 Jun. 2018.
“Indent.” Def. I1. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.
Jorgensen, Paul A. “A Formative Shakespearean Legacy: Elizabethan View of God, Fortune, and War.” PMLA 90.2 (1975): 222–233. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 18 Aug. 2014.
Kelly, Faye L. “Oaths in Shakespeare's Henry VI Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 24.4 (1973): 357-71. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 28 May 2016.
Klinck, Dennis R. “Shakespeare’s Richard II as Landlord and Wasting Tenant.” College Literature 25.1 (1998): 21-34. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 6 Nov. 2015.
Levine, Nina. “Extending Credit in the Henry IV Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51.4 (2000): 403-431. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 23 Sep. 2015.
MacDonald, Ronald R. “Uneasy Lies: Language and History in Shakespeare’s Lancastrian Tetralogy.” Shakespeare Quarterly 35.1 (1984): 22-39. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 20 Aug. 2014.
McEleney, Corey. “Bonfire of the Vanities: Pleasure, Theory, Shakespeare.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 24.1 (2013): 137–168. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 12 Nov 2015.
Morgan, Kenneth O., ed. The Oxford Illustrated History of Britain. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. Print.
Muldrew, Craig. The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England. New York: Palgrave, 1998. Print.
Outhwaite, R. B.. “Royal Borrowing in the Reign of Elizabeth I: The Aftermath of Antwerp.” The English Historical Review 86.339 (1971): 251–263. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 30 Apr 2017.
Oman, Charles William Chadwick. A History of England. London: E. Arnold. (1895). Web. 30 Apr 2017.
“Proviso.” Def. 2. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.
Rackin, Phyllis. “Temporality, Anachronism and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, 17 (1986): 101-123. Web. 06 May 2017.
Reumann, John. “’Stewards of God’: Pre-Christian Religious Application of Oikonomos in Greek.” Journal of Biblical Literature, 77.4 (1956): 339-349. Web. 31 May 2018.
Ribner, Irving, and George Lyman Kittredge, ed. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. New York: Wiley, c1971. Print.
Robertson, D. W., Jr. “The Probable Date and Purpose of Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale.” Studies in Philology 84.4 (1987): 418–439. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 26 Dec 2015.
Scott, William O. “Landholding, Leasing, and Inheritance in Richard II.” SEL: Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 42.2 (2002): 275-292. Web. 22 Sep. 2015.
Shell, Marc. Money, Language, and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley: U of California P, 1982. Print.
Spinosa, Charles. “Shylock and Debt and Contract in The Merchant of Venice.” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, 5.1 (1993): 65-85. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 4 Jul. 2016.
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. ed. Edwin Cannan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1976. Print.
Stoljar, Samuel J. A History of Contract at Common Law. Canberra: Australian National UP, 1975. Print.
Tanke, John. “Beowulf, Gold-Luck, and God’s Will.” Studies in Philology, 99.4 (2002): 356-79. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 3 Jul. 2016.
Ure, Peter, ed. King Richard II. Methuen, 1956. London: Routledge, 1991. Print.
“Vanity.” Def. 1b. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Print.
Wilson, Luke. “Ben Jonson and the Law of Contract.” Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, 281 (1993): 281-306. MLA International Bibliography.Web. 4 Jul. 2016.
Wood, Diana. Medieval Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.