| 研究生: |
林佑勳 Lin, Yu-Hsun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
廣告訴求與涉入程度對廣告效果的影響
-彩妝品為例- The Influence of Advertisement Style and Involvement on Effect of Advertisement - a case of cosmetics - |
| 指導教授: |
張海青
Chang, Hae-Ching |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 82 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 感性訴求 、彩妝產品 、廣告訴求 、廣告效果 、消費者涉入程度 、理性訴求 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | feeling style, thinking style, customer involvement degree, advertisement effect, advertisement style, cosmetic |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:93 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣不僅在電子、半導體產業為國外知名品牌代工,許多歐、美、日知名品牌化妝品,也由台灣生產製造再行銷全球,台灣彩妝品產業隨著製造技術的成熟,逐漸由代工邁向自有品牌。Vaughn(1980)學者利用FCB模式,認為化妝品可歸類於消費者感性思考決策與高產品涉入之範疇,但隨著彩妝品技術不斷提昇,功能多樣且複合化,本研究想探討彩妝產品搭配何種廣告訴求會有較良好之效果,並了解對不同廣告訴求偏好之消費者其背景資訊,並希望能提供予業界建議。
本研究根據研究動機及目的,加入消費者涉入研究構面,利用因素分析、變異數分析、T檢定、集群分析、卡方檢定,對問卷資料加以分析、歸納與解釋,並得到結論如下:
1、無論在廣告態度、產品態度與購買意願上,理性訴求較感性訴求有顯著之效果。2、產品渉入程度低相較於涉入程度高之消費者,面對不同廣告訴求的操弄有明顯的
喜好反應,代表廣告影響對低涉入消費者有較強烈的影響。
3、利用集群分析對理性廣告訴求持正面態度之消費者與對感性訴求持正面態度之消
費者,兩者在背景構成比例上有顯著的差異,其中在「學歷」、「科系」、「喜
愛的休閒活動」三方面有所發現。
4、由此三項「背景」出發,利用觀察法對人口統計資料做分析,發現受測理性廣告
訴求,有較良好廣告效果者,在「工作需要」、「禮貌端莊」、「加強氣色」、
「朋友影響」這四方面購買彩妝動機,有較高的認同;相反的,受測感性廣告訴
求,有較良好廣告效果者,在「愛美漂亮」、「吸引注意」、「朋友影響」這三
方面購買動機,有較高認同感。
Because the manufacturing techniques gradually mature, the cosmetic industry changes from OEM to OBM. In Vaughn(1980)opinions, cosmetics can be products of feeling decision and high involvement. However because the manufacturing techniques gradually improves, cosmetics become more and more compound functional. As a result this research wants to discuss that what kinds of style of advertisements of collocated with cosmetics will have better effect and understand backgrounds of consumers who have different preference for different styles of advertisements.
This research also adds the consumer involvement facet and gets conclusions as below:
1、Advertisements of thinking style have significant effect than of feeling style on the attitude of advertisement、attitude of product and desire for purchase facets.
2、Consumers of low product involvement facing different styles of advertisement have more obviously affinity than those of high product involvement. It means that the advertisements can influence consumers of low product involvement more powerfully.
3、The 「education」、「major」、「leisure activity」 of consumers who have positive attitudes to advertisements of thinking style are different significantly from those of consumers who have positive attitudes to advertisements of feeling style.
4、The motivations of consumers who have better advertisement response to advertisements of thinking style for buying cosmetics are 「need for work」、「manner」、「enhancing color」 and 「affected by friends」; on the other hand motivations of consumers who have better advertisement response to advertisements of feeling style for buying cosmetics are 「good-looking」、「attracting」、「affected by friend」.
一、中文部分
1、 2005年中國美容市場研究報告,中國投資咨詢網,民國2005 3月
2、 廣告-原理與實務,Well, Burnett,Moriary,第六板
3、 Philip Kotler,方世榮譯,行銷管理學,東華書局,民89,pp.660
4、 小三林太郎,廣告管理的理論與實際,昭和四十三年,pp.3.
5、 田中洋、丸岡吉人,新廣告心理,台北朝陽堂文化版,民國入十二年
6、 何琦瑜,就是要美麗,天下雜誌,民國94
7、 李孟麗 徐村和,廣告學:策略與管理,五南圖書出版社
8、 祝鳳岡,廣告感性訴求之策略分析,廣告學研究,國立政治大學廣告學系,第五集,民 84。
9、 祝鳳岡,廣告理性訴求之策略分析,廣告學研究,國立政治大學廣告學系,第八集,民 85。
10、黃俊英、賴文彬,「涉入的理論發展與實務應用」,管理科學學報,第七卷第一期,pp.15-29,民國79年5月。
11、柳婷,廣告與行銷,五南圖書出版公司
12、黃俊英,行銷研究-管理與技術,民國81年。
13、黃家蔚,促銷方式、產品涉入程度與促銷情境對消費者品牌評價與購買意願之影響,國立成功大學 企業管理所碩士論文,民國92
14、廣告理論與戰略,清水公一,pp.109
二、英文部份
1、 Aaker, D. A. and D. M. Stayman (1990) , “Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Aug), pp. 7-17.
2、 Aaker,D.A.& Norris,D., ”Characteristics of TV Commercials Perceived as Informative, ”Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.22, Iss.2, pp.61-71.
3、 Bridge,H.P., Practical Advertising:A Comprehensive Guide to the Planning and Preparation of Modern Advertising in all of its Phases,N.Y.:Rinehart.
4、 Buchholz, Laura M. and E. S. Robert (1991) , “The Role of Consumer Involvement in Determining Congnitive Response to Broadcast Advertising”, Journal of Advertising, Vol.20, No.1, pp.4-17
5、 Clarke, K. & R. Belk (1978) , “The effects of product involvement and task definition on anticipated consumer effort”, in H. Keith Hunt(ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp.313-325.
6、 Laskey, Henry A, Fox, Richard J, Crask, Melvin R. (1995) , Journal of Advertising Research. New York: Mar, Vol.35, Iss. 2 , pp. 31
7、 Celsi, R. L. and J. C. Olson (1988) , “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, pp.210-244
8、 Davis,D.W. (1955) , Basic Text in Advertising,Pleasantville,N.Y.:Printers Inc.
9、 Ducoffe, R. H. (1996) , “Advertising value and advertising on the web,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, No. 5 (Sept), pp. 21-35.
10、 Donald W. Jugenheimer / Gordon E. White, BASIC ADVERTISING
11、 Fishbein, M. (1967) , “A Behavior Theory approach to the Relations Between Beliefs
About an Object and the attitude Toward the Object,” in Martin Fishbein, ed., Reading in
attitude Theory and Measurement, New York : John Wiley& Sons,pp.389-400
12、 Ferber, R. (1972) , “Family Decision Marketing and Economic Behavior: A Review,” in Family Economic Behavior: Problems and Prospects, Sheldon, L. B., ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, pp. 29-61.
13、 Gloden,L.L.& Johnson,K.A.(1983),”The Impact of Sensory Preference and Thinking Versus Feeling Appeals on Advertising Effectiveness,” Advances in Consumer Research,Vol.10, pp.203-208.
14、 Gorn, G. J. and C. B. Weinberg, (1984) , “The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: some positive Finding,” Journal of Consumer Research Vol. 11, pp.719-727
15、 Hotchkiss,G.B. (1949) ,Advertising Copy,3rd ed.,New York:Harper.
16、 J. Paul Peter, Jerry C. Olson, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 4th ed, (Homewood, Ill.:Irwin, 1996), p.158.
17、 J. Paul Peter, Jerry C. Olson, Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 4th ed, (Homewood, Ill.:Irwin, 1996), p.167-168.
18、 Johar,J.S.& Sirgy,M.J.(1991),”Value-Expressive versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals:When and Why to Use Which Appeal,” Journal of Adertising,Vol.20,No.3,pp.23-33.
19、 Krugman,Herbert E. (1965) , ”The Impact of Television Adversting Learning without Involvement”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Fall,Vol.29, pp.349-356
20、 Kapferer, J-N & G. Laurent(1985), “Consumer involvement profiles:a new practical approach to consumer involvement”, Journal of AdvertisingResearch , Vol.25(6), pp.48-56.
21、 Kotler,P.(1991),Marketing management:analysis,planning, implementation and control, 7th ed.,NewJersey: Prentice-Hall.
22、 Kolter, Philips (1992), Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning and Control, 7th edition
23、 Lavidge, R.J., & Steiner, C.A. (1961).A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness . Journal of Marketing, 25(4), 59-62.
24、 Lavidge & Steiner, “A model for Predicitive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,”Journal of Marketing, 1961, p. 61
25、 Lastovicka, J. L. and D. M., Gardner, (1978),〝Low Involvement Versus High Involvement Cognitive Structures,〞Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp.87-92.
26、 Levin, Irwin P., Gaeth, Gary J. How Consumers Are Affected By The Framing Of Attribute Info, Journal of Consumer Research. Gainesville: Dec 1988.Vol.15, Iss. 3; pg. 374, 5 pgs
27、 Laczniak、Muehling & Grossbart(1989), ”Manipulating message involvement in advertising research”, Journal of Advertising, Vol.18, No.2,pp.28-38.
28、 MacKenzie, S. B. and R. J. Lutz (1986), “An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, No. 2 (April), pp. 48-65.
29、 McQuarrie(1987). The Zaichkowsky personal involvement inventory: Modification and Extension. Advances in consumer Research, Vol. 14, pp.36~40.
30、 MacInnis, Deborah J. and C. Whan Park(1991), “The Different Role of Characteristics of Consumer Research, 18 (September), pp.161-173
31、 McQuarrie Edward F. and Michael Munson (1992). A revised product involvement inventory: improved usability and validity. Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 19,pp. 108-115.
32、 Pallak,S.R.,Murroin,E.& Koch,J.(1983),”Communicator Attractiveness and Expertise,Emotional versus Rational Appeals,and Persuasion:A Heuristic versus Systematic Processing Interpretation,” Social Cognition,Vol.2, Iss.2,pp.122-141.
33、 Petty, R. E.& Cacioppo, J. T & Schumann, David," Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement" ,Journal of Consumer Research; Gainesville; Sep 1983.
34、 Petty, Richard E. and John T Cacioppo, 1996, Communication and Persuasion, New York:Springer
35、 Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 1962, pp.79-86
36、 Ralph S. Alexander and the Committee on Definitions, Marketing Definitions, (Chicago: American Marketing Association, 1963), p.9.
37、 Robertson et al.,(1985),Consumer Behavior,Illinois:Scott,Foresman and company,p.279
38、 Strong, The Psychology of Selling, 1925, p.9
39、 Sherif,Carolyn W.,et al.,Attitude and Attitude Change:the Social Judgment Involvement Approach,Yale University Press,New Haven,Conn.,1965.
40、 Smith, Robert E. and Shelby D. Hunt, 1978, “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.5, pp.149-158
41、 Shimp,T.A.(1981),”Attitude Toward the Ad. As a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Advertising,Vol.10,Iss.2, pp.9-15.
42、 Schiffman, Leon G. & Leslie Lazar Kanuk (1994), Consumer Behavior, Prentice Hall International, Inc., 5th edition
43、 Vaughn, R., “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model,” Journal of Advertising Research, October 1980, Vol. 20, Iss. 5, pp. 27-33.
44、 Vaughn, R., “How Advertising Works: A Planning Model Revisited,” Journal of Advertising Research, February/March 1986, Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp. 57-63.
45、 Wells W. & LoSciuto L.A. (1966) Direct observation of purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research,3, 227-233.
46、 Wilson, R. Dale, 1976, “An Empirical Evaluation of Compative Advertising Messages: Subjects, Responses on Perceptual Dimensions”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.3, pp.53-57
47、 Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985, “Measuring the Involvement Construct” , Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 12, pp. 341-352
校內:3005-07-10公開