簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 成建英
Chen, Chien-Ying
論文名稱: 運用任務導向的閱讀寫作教學法培養國中生英語讀寫能力之個案研究
An Exploratory Study of How EFL Junior High School Students Develop L2 Literacy through Task-Based Reading-to-Writing Instruction
指導教授: 陳璧清
Chen, Pi-Ching
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 外國語文學系碩士在職專班
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 191
中文關鍵詞: 單字習得國中生閱讀寫作教學英語讀寫能力同儕修改作文
外文關鍵詞: Peer Editing, L2 Literacy, Vocabulary Learning, EFL Learners, Reading-to-Writing Instruction
相關次數: 點閱:83下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 論文內容提要:
      本研究主旨在探討融合閱讀與寫作教學對培養國中生英語讀寫能力的學習效益,並針對此課程是否能增加學生的字彙、閱讀、寫作能力作實驗研究。文中除了探討學生透過閱讀簡易短篇故事,學習閱讀與寫作技巧的學習效果,並針對結合英語閱讀與摘要寫作來增強學生單字習得與運用能力的態度及反應作進一步的分析。
      本研究以台南市一所美語補習班六十三位國中一年級學生為研究對象,在五週(十堂課)的研究期間,所有受試者按照每週閱讀課程之進度,閱讀所指定的簡易短篇故事The Phantom of the Opera(歌劇魅影),然後進行小組討論閱讀內容,在團體互動過程中,學生分享其個人對該閱讀內容的想法,並回家完成課後閱讀練習,以期能加強閱讀理解能力。所有受試者自第六堂課開始接受英語寫作教學,並按照寫作課程之進度,每次上課後,在家針對The Phantom of the Opera其中一章分別做初稿五十字、二稿七十字、三稿一百字的摘要練習,然後由老師引導,以「同儕修改作文」的方式,彼此學習寫作過程中相當重要的「修改」技巧,與和諧的同儕互動。在資料分析方面,主要針對學生在五次隨堂考試、後測、和一個月後的單字記憶測驗的表現差異加以比較及分析,並根據學生問卷上對此簡易短篇故事閱讀及寫作課程的回應做質的分析。
      本研究的主要發現如下:
    1. 簡易短篇故事閱讀及寫作課程幫助學生提升英文寫作能力,不論在內容、組織、用字、拼字、句構修辭、標點符號及大小寫都有顯著的進步。
    2. 本課程中閱讀及寫作課程能有效地提升學生英文學習成效,並對其英文寫作有顯著的正面影響。
    3. 閱讀與寫作的結合有助於提升學生英文寫作之能力,因閱讀不僅提供學生許多寫作題材,進而提高學生對英文寫作的信心,而且強化其閱讀與寫作之動機與興趣。
    4. 簡易短篇故事閱讀及寫作課程幫助學生學會透過分組討論運用其思辨的能力及其解決問題的技巧來加強閱讀與寫作的技巧。
    5. 學生喜歡閱讀本課程中所指定的簡易短篇故事,因為該作品可勾起這群青少年讀者內心世界的微妙情感,產生共鳴,並拓展其人生經驗。
    根據以上研究結果,老師可以運用閱讀簡易短篇故事來提升學生的寫作能力,因為透過簡易短篇故事閱讀及摘要寫作教學,可以營造一個有意義且輕鬆愉快的英文學習環境,以提高其英文學習成效,此外老師不僅應關切學生寫作上的困難,更應善用分組討論或同儕修改作文的活動,來激發低學習成就學生的興趣。最重要的是,老師必須在寫作教學前,挑選有趣且適合學生程度的英語讀本,方可讓學生透過閱讀,有效地提升英文寫作能力。

    Abstract

     This study investigates the effects of reading and writing on the L2 literacy development of junior high school students. In addition, the performance between the high-EPL group and the low-EPL group on vocabulary growth was compared in the study. Further, the student responses to reading and then writing about the selected literary text, including their attitudes toward peer-tutored writing activities, were explored and analyzed.
     The subjects in this study included 63 seventh-grade students in one English learning center in the Tainan City. A five-week study, composed of 10 eighty-minute classes, was conducted. All the subjects were requested to read the assigned text, The Phantom of the Opera, and then shared their ideas in class. From the sixth class, the beginning of writing treatment, they chose one chapter of the text, respectively writing three summary drafts in response to the selected chapter. Under the teacher’s guidance, all the subjects learned to edit peers’ drafts and respond constructively. At the final stage of writing treatment, all the subjects worked together to produce a class book. In data collection, the students’ performance on five vocabulary quizzes, a post test, and a delayed-recall test, including the student responses to the questionnaires entitled The Scale of Reading and Writing Attitudes (SORWA) were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Based on the data analyses, the findings of the study were summarized as follows:
    1. Although the high-EPL group outperformed the low-EPL group on the five vocabulary quizzes, the post test, and the delayed-recall test, both groups developed a similar pattern of vocabulary learning.
    2. Most of the subjects enjoyed reading the selected text and were interested in writing summaries about the text because they developed personal growth through active interaction between themselves with the characters in the story.
    3. Most of the subjects agreed that the integrative reading-to-writing instruction not only provided them with a helpful source for writing but improved their ability in relation to word choice, sentence structure, punctuation, and rhetorical conventions.
    4. Most of the students had a rather positive attitude toward peer-editing; however, they did not wish to have more opportunities to edit peers’ drafts.
     In sum, the use of simplified short stories can be a powerful pedagogical tool to integrated reading with writing into an EFL classroom and also create a pleasant learning atmosphere. Besides, the application of pair or group discussions and peer editing is worth a try to motivate low EPL students. Most importantly, taken into consideration the successful development of L2 literacy, appropriate reading materials must be carefully selected before proceeding language instruction.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements i Abstract (Chinese) ii Abstract (English) iii Table of Contents v List of Tables x List of Figures xi CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 Background of the Study 1 Motivation 5 Purpose of the Study 8 Research Questions 9 Significance of the Study 11 Limitation of the Study 13 Definition of Terms 14 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 18 The Nature of Reading 18 Models of Second Language Reading Comprehension 21 The Concept of Schemta 21 Bottom-up Reading Models 22 Top-down Reading Models 23 Interactive Reading Models 24 The Role of Vocabulary in Reading Comprehension 27 Vocabulary Instruction 28 Related Studies of the Relationship between Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension 29 The Role of Language Learning Strategies in L2 and EFL 31 The Effects of Vocabulary Processing Strategies on Reading Comprehension 32 The Effects of Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension 33 The Nature of Writing 35 Theories of the Composing Process 37 The Product-based Writing Approach 38 The Process-oriented Writing Approach 39 The Genre Writing Approach 41 A Task-based Approach to Writing 47 Reading and Writing Connection 47 Reading to Write 48 Writing to Read 50 Literary Text Reading-Writing 51 Approaches to Teaching Literary Texts 52 Related Studies of the Teaching of Literary Texts in an EFL Classroom 54 CHAPTER THREE METHODLODGY 57 Subjects 57 Instruction 59 Overview 59 Materials 63 Instruction Procedures 67 Measurements 80 Scoring 80 Questionnaires 81 Analyzing the Results 82 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 83 1. The Effectiveness of the Explicit Vocabulary Instruction 85 Question 1-A 88 Discussion 90 2. Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Reading Treatment on High-EPL and Low-EPL Groups 91 Comparison of Performance on Quiz 1 between High-EPL and Low-EPL Groups in the Reading Treatment 92 Comparison of Performance on Quiz 2-5 between High-EPL and Low-EPL Groups in the Reading Treatment 92 Comparison of Performance on the Post Test between High-EPL and Low-EPL Groups in the Reading Treatment 93 Comparison of Performance on the Delayed-recall Test between High-EPL and Low-EPL Groups after the Reading and Writing Treatments 93 Question 2-A 94 Question 2-B 95 Question 2-C 96 Discussion 97 3. Responses to the Questionnaires 98 Question 3 99 Question 4 102 Question 5 105 Question 5-A 105 Question 5-B 105 Question 5-C 106 Question 5-D 106 Summary 107 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 109 Conclusions 110 Discussion 111 Recommendation 115 Recommendation for Practice 115 Recommendation for Further Studies 116 REFERENCES 118 APPENDIXES Appendix A: The Consent for the Subjects 145 Appendix B: Class Schedule 146 Appendix C: Response Card 148 Appendix D: List of Target Words 149 Appendix E: While-Reading Activities 153 Appendix F: Vocabulary Quizzes, the Post Test, and the Delayed-recall Test 158 Appendix G: After-Reading Activities 166 Appendix H: A Class Book 173 Appendix I: Questionnaire 186 Appendix J: Permission Letter for Use of the SETA 190

    REFERENCES

    Aebersold, J., & Field, M. L. (1997). From reading to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Allison, J. (1997). Dancing into literacy: Multitext inquiry opens doors for urban students. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13, 333-348.
    Almog, T., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999). Teachers are peer learners: Professional development in an advanced computer learning environment. In A. M. O’Donnel & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 285-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Al-Nujaidi, A. H. (2003). The relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of EFL learners in Saudi Arabia. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAC 3094023.
    Anderson, J. (2000). Using novels as a text for teaching cross-cultural issues. The Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 138-146). Taipei: Crane.
    Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in second language reading strategies. Paper presented at TESOL Conference, March, New York.
    Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
    Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J., & Shirey, L. I. (1979). Effects of the readers’ schemta at different points in time. Urbana: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading.
    Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In Petrosky & Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing. Eighty-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part 2, Chapter 6, pp. 95-113).
    Aulls, M. W. (1985). Understanding the relationship between reading and writing. Educational Horizons, 64(10), 39-44.
    Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160.
    Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
    Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading. Language in education: Theory and practice, no. 73. CAL/ERIC Series on Languages and Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bassett, J. (Ed.). (2000). The phantom of the opera. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Moon, J., & Duffy-Hester, A. M. (1998). Where are teachers’ voices in the phonics/whole language debate? Results from a survey of U.S. elementary classroom teachers. The Reading Teacher, 51(8), 636-650.
    Bazerman, Charles. (2001). Writing as a development in interpersonal relations. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society, 6(2), 298-302.
    Belcher, D, & Hirvela, A. (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading cmprehension. Journal of Reading Research, 7, 15-32.
    Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional setting. London: Longman.
    Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Needham Heights, MA: Paramount. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Boughey, C. (1997). Learning to write by writing to learn: A group-work approach. ELT Journal, 51(2), 126-135.
    Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating Internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher-to student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology, 6, 87-107.
    Britton, J. (1978). The composing processes and the functions of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
    Brown, J. D. (1991). Do English faculties rate writing samples differently? TESOL Quarterly, 25, 587-603.
    Bruffee, K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46(7), 635-652.
    Brumfit, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Literature and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Cadorath, J., & Harris, S. (1998). Unplanned classroom language and teacher training. ELT Journal, 52(3), 188.
    Carlisle, A. (2000). Reading logs: an application of reader-response theory in ELT. ELT Journal, 54(1), 12-19.
    Carnine, L., Carnine, D., & Gertsen, R. (1984). Analysis of reading errors made by economically disadvantaged students taught with a synthetic-phonics approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 343-356.
    Carrell, P. L. (1984c, March). Facilitating reading comprehension by teaching text structure: What the research shows. Paper presented at the International TESOL Convention, Houston.
    Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 727-752..
    Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 101-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L. (1988b). Interactive approaches to second language reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 1-6). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L. (1988c). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language classrooms. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 239-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1989). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B., & Liberto, J. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-573.
    Carson, J. G., & Leki, I. (1993). Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
    Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. New York: Longman.
    Carter, R., & McRae, J. (Eds.). (1996). Language, literature, and learner. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Chall, J. S. (1987). Two vocabularies for reading: Recognition and meaning. In M. G. Mckeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 7-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills theory and practice (3rd ed.). FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Chen, P. C. (1995). How to close link reading with writing: An integrated instructional approach for the college English reading classes. Selected Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 338-362). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, P. C. (2004). EFL students’ learning styles and attitudes toward technology use. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 302-312). Taipei: Crane.
    Chern, C. (2003). Active learning: Reading, writing, and thinking in EFL classes. Taipei: Taiwan ELT.
    Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 151-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Cleary, B. (1983). Dear Mr. Henshaw. New York: Avon Books.
    Cobine, G. R. (1996). Writing as a response to reading. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-2/writing.html
    Coe, R. M. (1994). Teaching genre as process. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 157-169). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Coe, R. M. (2002). The New Rhetoric of genre: Writing political briefs. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 195-206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 197-205.
    Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Demoulin, D., & Loye, R. D. (1999). Helping children learn to read. Education, 120(1), 40-43.
    Deng, X. (2005). Teaching ESL/EFL writing: Approaches and pedagogical practices. Invited Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
    Dilley, W. (2001). Teaching literature through film: Ang Lee’s The ice storm. The Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 621-634). Taipei: Crane.
    Donelson, K. L. (1967). Variables distinguishing between effective and ineffective writers at the tenth grade. Journal of Experimental Education, 35, 37-41.
    Dubin, F., & Bycina, D. (1991). Academic reading and the ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 195-215). New York: Newbury House/HarperCollins.
    Duffy, G. (1993). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers’ development and their low achievers’ understandings. The Elementary School Journals, 93, 231-247.
    Eckhoff, B. (1983). How reading affects children’s writing. Language Arts, 60, 607-616.
    Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English: A course in learning training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ellis, E. S. (1993). Integrative strategy instruction: A potential model for teaching content area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(6), 358-383. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Ellis, N. C. (1994). Consciousness in second language learning: Psychological perspectives on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review, 11, 37-56.
    Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Englert, C. S. (1990). Unraveling the mysteries of writing through strategy instruction. In T. E. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 186-223). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Feez, S. (2002). Heritage and innovation in second language education. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 47-68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213-245). Alphen a. d. Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
    Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
    Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980a). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp.31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980b). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 31 (4), 365-387.
    Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
    Flower, L. (1989). Cognition, context, and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 22, 365-387.
    Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. SSLA, 21, 225-241.
    Gajdusek, L. (1988). Toward wider use of literature in ESL: Why and how. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 227-257.
    Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
    Gocsik, K. (1997). Teaching writing through literature. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.dartmouth.edu/~cinoise/faculty/pedagogies/thinking.html
    Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame ennui, E. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
    Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126-135.
    Goodman, K. (1970). Reading as a psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddle (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
    Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1983). Reading and writing relationships: Pragmatic functions. Language Arts, 60(5), 590-599.
    Goodman, Y. M. (1986). Children coming to know literacy. In W. H. Teal & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 1-14). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
    Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 33-68). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
    Gove, M. K. (1983). Clarifying teacher’s beliefs about reading. The Reading Teacher, 37, 75-96.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
    Grabe, W. (2001). Reading and writing relations: Theoretical perspectives and instructional practices. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 15-47). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Grabe, W. (2003). Reading and writing relations: Second language perspectives on research and practice. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 242-262). London: Cambridge University Press.
    Greenberg, J., & Rath, C. (1985). Empowering students through writing. Educational Leadership, 45(5).
    Greenfield, Roseanne. (2003). Collaborative E-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 46-70.
    Haastrup, K. (1989). The learner as word processor. AILA Review, 6, 34-46.
    Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
    Hall, C. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across languages. TESOL Quarterly, 24(1), 43-60.
    Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). An interpretation of the functional relationship between language and social structure. In Edward Arnold (Ed.), Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 183-192).
    Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasley, B. (1992). Study writing: A course in written English for academic and professional purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1990). How to increase reading ability. New York: Longman.
    Hart, J. (2005). Thinking, feeling, and writing: How literature moves a student to eloquence. Invited Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
    Heath, S. B. (1992). Sociocultural contexts of language development: Implications for the classroom. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers (pp. 102-125). New York: Longman.
    Heimlich, J. E., & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. Newark, DE: Ablex.
    Heller, M. (1980). The reading-writing connection: An analysis of the written language of university freshmen at two reading levels (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4452 A.
    Hill, J. (1994). Using literature in language teaching. London: Macmillan.
    Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response theory and ELT. ELT Journal, 50(2), 127-134.
    Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
    Hoff, K. E., & Robinson, S. L. (2002). Best practices in peer-mediated interventions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 2, pp. 1555-1567). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
    Holbrook, H. (1984). ERIC/RCS: Pre-reading in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 27, 368-370. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press for the Council of Europe.
    Holt, S. L., & Vacca, J. L. (1984). Reading with a sense of writer: writing with a sense of reader. In J. M. Jensen (Ed.), Composing and comprehending (pp. 177-181). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Hong, L, & Tseng, C. L. (2001)。兒童閱讀的理念認知神經學的觀點,教育資料與研究,38,頁 1- 4。
    Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-121.
    Horner, B. (1997). Students, authorship, and the work of composition. College English, 59(5), 505-529.
    Horowitz, D. (1988). To see our text as others see it: Toward a social sense of coherence. JALT Journal, 10 (2), 91-100.
    Hsieh, L. T. (1998). The use of novels and video in teaching EFL reading and writing. The Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 431-440). Taipei: Crane.
    Hsieh, L. (2001). Teaching English pronunciation at the elementary school: An experimental study. The Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 98-112). Taipei: Crane.
    Hsieh, L. T. (2003). Teaching strategies and applications for western literature. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 371-381). Taipei: Crane.
    Hsu, W. S. (2005). The effects of vocabulary enhancement instruction and reading only instruction on EFL senior high school students’ vocabulary acquisition in the context of a reading program. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cheng Kung, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Hsueh-Chao, Hu, M., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403-430.
    Huang, C. C. (2003). Senior high students’ vocabulary knowledge, content knowledge, and reading comprehension. Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 391-402). Taipei: Crane.
    Huang, Y. L. (2005). The effects of pictures on reading comprehension of third-year junior high school students in reading selections of American festivals. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cheng Kung, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Hulstijn, J., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.
    Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722.
    Icoz, N. (1992). Teaching literature: Why, what, and how. English Teaching Forum, 30, 10-12.
    Jacobson, J. M. (1995). Content area learning and teaching: Integration with the language arts. Delmar Press. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Janopoulos, M. (1986). The relationship of pleasure reading and second language writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 247-265.
    Jerram, H., Glynn, T. & Tuck, B. (1988). Responding to the message: Providing a social context for children learning to write. Educational Psychology, 8(1 & 2), 31-40.
    Jiang, P. S. (2004). The relationship between EFL learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Johns, A. M. (1991). Insights into the reading-writing relationships. Papers presented at the California TESOL Conference (CATESOL), Santa Clara.
    Johns, A. M. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Johnson, D. D., & Baumann, J. E. (1984). Word identification. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
    Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 58(1), 58-66.
    Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
    Kaplan, R. B. (1970). Notes toward an applied rhetoric. In E. Lugton (Ed.), Preparing the EFL teacher: A projection for the seventies (pp. 45-74). Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.
    Kaplan, R. B., & Shaw, P. A. (1983). Exploring academic discourse. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Keer, H. V. (2004). Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 37-70.
    Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 135-149.
    Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
    King, E. (2005). Teaching poetry to ESL students in Taiwan. Caves English Teaching. (2005, December 25). Retrieved December 26, 2005, from http://cet.cavesbooks.com.tw/html
    King, M. L. (1978). Research in composition: A need for theory. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 193-202.
    Koch, C., & Brazil, J. M. (1978). Strategies for teaching the composing process. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, theory, and applications. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.
    Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 443-463.
    Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.
    Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Krashen, S. (2005). The composing process and the academic composition process. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 66-78). Taipei: Crane.
    Kuo, F. (2000). The effectiveness of phonics instruction. Selected Papers from the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
    Lai, C. C. (2003). A study of enhancing English reading comprehension through vocabulary instruction for junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
    Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of lexis is essential for comprehension. In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), From human thinking to thinking machines (pp. 126-132). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    Laufer, B. (1992). Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with readers’ general academic ability? Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 95-103.
    Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985a). Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 405-411.
    Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985b). Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of contextual clues in EFL reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 23(2), 7-10.
    Lazer, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lee, J. F., & Riley, G. L. (1990). The effect of pre-reading rhetorically oriented frameworks on the recall of two structurally different expository tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(1), 25-41.
    Legutke, M., & Thomas, H. (1991). Process and experience in the language classroom. New York: Longman.
    Leloup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2005). On the net: Vocabulary support for independent online reading. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 3-7.
    Lesgold, A. M., & Curtis, M. E. (1981). Learning to read words efficiently. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Lessard-Clouston, M. (1997). Language learning strategies: An overview for L2 teachers. Retrieved November 28, 2005, from
    http://iteslj.org/Articles/ Lessard-Clouston-Strategy.html
    Lin, H. C. (2004). Online chatting for EFL writing. Selected Papers from the Thirteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 519-528). Taipei: Crane.
    Lin, H. C., & Sher, H. J. (2000). Reader’s response approach to English poetry teaching. The Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 411-420). Taipei: Crane.
    Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319-326.
    Long, M. (1987). A feeling for language: The multiple values of teaching literature. In C. J. Brumfit & R. A. Carter (Eds.), Literature and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228.
    Lopes, D. (1991). From reading to writing strategies. English Teaching Forum, 29, 42-44.
    Macken, M., Martin, J. R., Kress, G., Kalantzis, M., Rothery, J., & Cope, B. (1989). An approach to writing, K-12: The theory and practice of genre-based writing, Years 3-6. Sydney: Literacy and Education Research Network of the N. S. W. Department of Education, Directorate of Studies.
    Maheady, L. (2001). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions and students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 4-15.
    Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 13-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Mayo, L. (2000). Making the connection: Reading and writing together. English Journal, 89(4), 74-77.
    Medcalf, J., Glynn, T., & Moore, D. (2004). Peer tutoring in writing: A school systems approach. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20(2).
    Meyer, B. J. F. (1982). Reading research and the composition teacher. College Composition and Communication, 33, 37-39.
    Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. (1984). The effects of different discourse types on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121-143.
    Moffat, J. (1968). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton.
    Murdoch, G. (1992). The neglected text—a fresh look at teaching literature. English Teaching Forum, 30, 3-5.
    Murray, D. M. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 85-103). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A. & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253.
    Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil et al., Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language learning, 52, 439-481.
    Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower-level text processing skills in advanced ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12-25.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Massachusettes: Newbury House.
    Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Norris, J. A. & Hoffman, P. R. (2002). Phonemic awareness: A complex developmental process. Topics in Language Disorders, 22, 1-34.
    Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 133-158.
    Nunan, D. (2003). Grammar. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Omaggio-Hadley, A. (2001). Teaching Language in Context (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Oster, J. (1989). Seeing with different eyes: Another view of literature in the ESL class. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 557-584.
    Ostny, P., & Godin, P. (1985). RALEX: An alternative approach to language teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 69, 346-355.
    Ostyn, P., Vandecasteele, M., Deville, G., & Kelly, P. (1985). Towards an optimal programme of EFL vocabulary acquisition. In A. M. Cornu, J. Vanparijs, M. Delaheye, & L. Baten (Eds.), Beads or Bracelets? How do we approach LSP? (pp. 292-305). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
    Oxford, R. L. (1992). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, 2(2), 18-22.
    Oxford, R. L. (Ed.). (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    Oxford, R. L. (1999). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Retrieved November 27, 2005 from http://www.education.umd.edu
    Paesani, K. (2005). Literary texts and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 15-24.
    Pan, S. X. (2002). A study of the effects of summary writing with structure guidelines on the writing of EFL beginning writers. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cheng Kung, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic reader. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
    Perl, S. (1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
    Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 815-860). New York: Longman.
    Pearson, P. D., & Spiro, R. J. (1981). Toward a theory of reading comprehension instruction. Topics in Language Disorders, 1.
    Peyton, J. K. (Ed.). (1990). Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    Pressley, M., & Allington, R. (1999). What should reading instructional research be the research of? Issue in Education, 5, 1-35.
    Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J., & Kurita, J. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
    Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282-307.
    Raimes, A. (1983). Anguish as a second language? Remedies for composition teachers. In A. Freedom, I. Pringle, & J. Yalden (Eds.), Learning to write: First language/second language (pp. 258-272). Harlow, England: Longman.
    Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407-30.
    Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31-73.
    Reid, J. M. (1993a). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Reid, J. M. (1993b). Historical perspectives on writing and reading in the ESL classroom. In J. G. Carson & I. L. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 33-60). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Reid, J. M. (1994). The process of paragraph writing (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Reid, J. M., & Lindstrom, M. (1985). The process of paragraph writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Reynolds, D. W. (2005). Linguistic correlates of second language literacy development: Evidence from middle-age learner essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 19-45.
    Rogers, D. (1995). Business communications: International case studies in English. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Rohman, D. G. (1965). Prewriting: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16, 106-122.
    Rosenblatt, L. (1988). Writing and reading: The transactional theory. Reader, 20, 7-31.
    Routman, R. (1991). Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Concord, Ontario: Irwin. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Rubin, J., & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful language learner (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. E. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Saenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231-247.
    Salinger, J. D. (1951). The catcher in the rye. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
    Sampson, M., Sampson, M. R., & Linek, W. (1994). Circle of questions. The Reading Teacher, 4a(4), 364-365. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Savvidou, C. (2004). An integrated approach to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(12). Retrieved November 28, 2005, from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Savvidou-Literature.html
    Scarcella R., & Oxford, R. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
    Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schouten-van Parreren, C. (1989). Vocabulary learning through reading: Which conditions should be met when presenting words in texts? AILA Review, 6, 75-85.
    Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 119-129.
    Shen, M. Y. (2004). Using simplified texts in literature to encourage EFL learners’ creative writing. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, Vol. 1(2), 81-107.
    Sheridan, J. J. (1992). Skipping on the brink of the abyss: Teaching thinking through writing. In C. A. Barnes (Ed.), Critical thinking: Educational imperative, new directions for community college (p. 77).
    Silberstein, S. (1993). Techniques and resources in teaching reading. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Simmons, D. C., Kameenui, E. J., Dickso, S., Chard, D., Gunn, B., & Baker, S. (1993). Integrating narrative reading comprehension and writing instruction for all learners. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference: Washington, DC.
    Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
    Smith, F. (1983). Reading like a writer. Language Arts, 60, 558-567.
    Sommers, N. (1979). The need for theory in composition research. College Composition and Communication, 30, 46-49.
    Sorrell, A. L. (1990). Three reading comprehension strategies: TELLS, story mapping, and OARS. Academic Therapy, 25(3), 359-367. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~whitten/champaign_project/reading.html
    Stahl, S. A. (1990). Beyond the instrumentalist hypothesis: Some relationships between word meanings and comprehension. Technical report no. 505 of the Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    Sternglass, M. (1986a). Introduction. In B. T. Petersen (Ed.), Convergences: Transactions in reading and writing (pp. 1-11). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Sternglass, M. (1986b). Writing based on reading. In B. T. Petersen (Ed.), Convergences: Transactions in reading and writing (pp. 151-162). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Stoller, F. L. (1997). Project work. A means to promote language content. Forum, 35, 1-10.
    Stoller, F. L. (2002, April). Content-based instruction: A shell for language teaching or a framework for strategic language and content learning? Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, Salt Lake City, UT. Retrieved November 28, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/strategies/stoller.html
    Stotsky, S. (1983). Research on reading/writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions. Language Arts, 60, 627-642.
    Swaffar, J. K. (1988). Readers, texts, and second languages: The interactive process. Modern Language Journal, 72, 123-149.
    Swales, J. M. (1981), Aspects of article introductions (Aston ESP Research Report 1). Birmingham, England: University of Aston in Birmingham, Language Studies Unit.
    Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Swales, J. M., & Freak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Swales, J. M., & Freak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Tai, B. (2003). From word meaning to reading comprehension: A case study of National Chupei Senior High School students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
    Taylor, B., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134-146.
    Tierney, R., & Leys, M. (1986). What is the value connecting reading and writing? In B. T. Petersen (Ed.), Convergences: Transactions in reading and writing (pp. 151-162). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
    Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-355). Parkton, MD: York Press.
    Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centredness as language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Ulijn, J. M. (1984). Reading for professional purposes: Psycholinguistic evidence in a cross-linguistic perspective. In A. K. Pugh & J. M. Ulijn (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes (pp. 66-81). London: Heinemann.
    Van Den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. Van Den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning. Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1-31). New York: Teachers College Press.
    Vandervelden, M., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Phonological recoding and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A developmental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 854-875.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Walberg, H. J., Hare, V. C., & Pulliam, C. A. (1981). Social-psychological perceptions and reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 140-159). Newark, De: International Reading Association.
    Wang, C. O. (2001). The effects of instructing writing formula poems in junior high schools. The Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 621-634). Taipei: Crane.
    Wang, W. L., & He, T. H. (2005). Invented spellings and phonemic awareness of EFL kindergarteners and first graders: A longitudinal study. The Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 318-329). Taipei: Crane.
    Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
    Webster, J. (1912). Daddy-Long-Legs. New York: Penguin Group.
    Wells, M. C. (1993). At the junction of reading and writing. Journal of Reading, 36(4), 294-302.
    West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words. London: Longman.
    Wilson, M. (1981). A review of recent research on the integration of reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 34(8), 896-901.
    Woodward, J. C., & Phillips, A. (1976). Profile of the poor writer – the relationship of selected characteristics to poor writing in college. Research in the Teaching of English, 1, 41-53.
    Wu, J. L. (2004). Effects of adolescent-literature-letter reading and responding on English learning of senior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Kaohsiung Normal, Taiwan, ROC.
    Yang, Y. F. (1996). The differences and similarities of the application of L1 and L2 reading strategies. The Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 127-135). Taipei: Crane.
    Yang, H. H. (2005). Teaching vocabulary on the radio. The Proceedings of 2005 International Conference and Workshops on TEFL & Applied Linguistics (pp. 441-451). Taipei: Crane.
    Yeh, C. Y., & Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 1(2), 1-44.
    Yen, H. Y. (2004). An examination of the effect of explicit phonics instruction and authentic readings on EFL elementary pupils. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cheng Kung, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Young, R. E. (1976). Invention: A topographical survey. In G. Tate (Ed.), Teaching composition: Ten bibliographic essays (pp. 1-43). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
    Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 541-572.
    Zamel, V. (1976). Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: What we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 67-76.
    Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.
    Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-178.
    Zeisere, P. A. (1999). Teaching process and product: Crafting and responding to student writing assignment. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32, 593-595.
    Zhao, G. Z. (2005). Effects of vocabulary level and syntactic competence on English reading comprehension of EFL English-major students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, College of Li De, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
    Zimmerman, C. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121-140.

    下載圖示 校內:2009-02-09公開
    校外:2009-02-09公開
    QR CODE