簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張菁珊
Chang, Ching-Shan
論文名稱: 考慮機台途程之品質公差設計模式
指導教授: 王泰裕
Wang, Tai-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: 混合二元整數規劃問題機台途程規劃品質公差設計
相關次數: 點閱:47下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   在傳統的產品生命週期劃分下,產品的品質公差設計與機台途程規劃分別隸屬於設計及生產階段,品質公差設計為考慮產品功能與品質損失成本下之最佳化模式;而機台途程規劃則為最小化生產成本或平衡機台負荷之決策模式。傳統上必先完成設計階段之規劃,生產階段規劃接著必須在滿足設計規格的前提下進行決策。依序規劃下常有:製程能力未能達到公差設計規格、為了達到公差規格導致極高的生產成本、公差規格限制下導致超過機台產能造成瓶頸作業……等等問題,設計與生產未能同步則無法提供真正的最佳化模式。因此本研究嘗試建立一個考慮機台途程之品質公差設計模式,模式中考量生產成本(包括:機台製造成本與機台整備成本)、品質損失成本、重工成本、檢測成本、丟棄成本等成本,並依照需求建構其模式,由於本模式為一個NP-hard混合二元整數規劃問題,本研究並以LINGO 8.0求解,同時達到目標要求與機台產能限制,並探討產品良率、重工與丟棄和總成本之影響,提供製造業者有效率之最小化成本決策模式,做為產品發展設計與生產製造之參考。

    none

    目錄 目錄 i 圖目錄 iii 表目錄 iv 符號表 v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究範圍與假設 2 第四節 研究架構 3 第五節 研究論文大綱 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 生產途程規劃 5 第二節 公差的定義與公差成本 8 2.2.1 公差的定義 8 2.2.2 公差成本函數 8 第三節 品質損失函數 10 2.3.1 傳統品質損失函數 11 2.3.2 二次品質損失函數 12 2.3.3 品質損失函數的分類 13 第四節 品質公差設計 16 2.4.1 公差綜合配置模式 18 2.4.2 公差轉換模式 20 第五節 小結 21 第三章 整合品質公差設計與生產途程規劃之最佳化設計 22 第一節 品質公差設計與生產途程規劃之問題 22 3.1.1 品質成本項目 24 3.1.2 生產途程規劃成本項目 26 3.1.3 模式問題描述 26 第二節 單產品最佳化模式 29 第三節 多產品最佳化模式 30 第四節 考慮機台產能之多產品最佳化模式 31 第五節 小結 32 第四章 實例驗證 33 第一節 案例描述 33 第二節 RMA405單產品最佳化模式範例 39 第三節 多產品最佳化模式範例 41 第四節 考慮機台產能之多產品最佳化模式範例 47 第五節 三模式之比較 53 第六節 小結 56 第五章 結論與建議 57 第一節 結論 57 第二節 建議 58 參考文獻 60

    Bastos, J.M., 1988, Batching and routing:two functions in the operational planning of flexible manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.33, pp.230-244.
    Cheng, B.W. and Maghsoodloo, S., 1995, Optimization of Mechanical Assembly Tolerance by Incorporating Taguchi’s Quality Loss Function. Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol.14, pp.264-276.
    Egbelu, P.J., 1996, Integration of operation routing and economic production quantity decision in batch manufacturing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.88, pp.446-463.
    Jeang, A., 2001, Combined parameter and tolerance design optimization with quality and cost. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.39, No.5, pp. 923-952.
    Jeang, A., 1999a, Optimal Process Parameter Determination for Computer-aided Manufacturing. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, Vol.15,pp.3-16.
    Jeang, A., 1999b, Robust Tolerance Design by Response Surface Methodology. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.15, pp. 399-403.
    Jeang, A., 1996, Optimal tolerance design for product life cycle. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.34, No.8, pp. 2187-2209.
    Kapur, K.C., Raman, S. and Pulat, P. S., 1990, Methodology for Tolerance Design Using Quality Loss Function. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 19, No.1-4, pp.254-257

    Kerbache, L. and Smith, J.M., 2000, Multi-objective routing within large scale facilities using open finite queuing network. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.121, pp.105-123.
    Kouikoglou, V.S. and Phillis, Y.A., 2002, Design of product specifications and control policies in a single-stage production system. IIE Transactions, Vol. 34, Iss. 7, pp.591-600
    Lee, Y.H., Wei, C.C., Chen, C.B. and Tsai, C.H., 2000, Minimization of Scrap and Rework Costs by Process Tolerances Allocation. Engineering Optimization, Vol.32, pp.619-633
    Maghsoodloo, S. and Li, M.C., 2000, Optimal asymmetric tolerance design. IIE Transactions, Vol. 32, Iss. 6, pp. 1127-1137
    Ming, X.G., and Mak, K.L., 2001, Intelligent Approaches to Tolerance Allocation and Manufacturing Operations Selection in Process Planning. Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol.117, pp.75-83
    Moskowitz, H., Plante, R. and Duffy, J., 2001, Multivariate tolerance design using quality loss. IIE Transactions, Vol. 33, Iss. 6, pp. 437-448
    Ro, I.K. and Kim, J.I., 1990, “Multi-criteria operational control rules in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS’s). International Journal of Production Research, Vol.28, No.1, pp.47-63
    Roy, U. and Fang, Y.C., 1997, Optimal tolerance re-allocation for the generative process sequence. IIE Transactions, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, pp.37-44
    Singh, N., Aneja, Y.P. , and Rana, S.P., 1990, Multi-objective modelling and analysis of process planning in a manufacturing system. International Journal of System Science, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.621-630
    Singh, N, and Mohanty, B.K., 1991, A fuzzy approach to multi-objective routing problem with application to process planning in manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp.1161-1170.
    Song, S. and Choi, J., 1993, Optimization analysis of flexible cellular manufacturing: Route selection and determining the optimal production conditions for ordered products. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 69, Iss. 3, pp.399-412
    Szadkowski, J., 1971, An approach to machine process optimization. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.9, pp.371-376
    Taguchi, G., Elsayea, E., Hsiang, T., 1989, Quality Engineering in Production Systems (New York: McGraw-Hill).
    Wei, C.C., 1998, Tolerance Design with Concurrent Optimization of Quality Loss and Process Capability. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol.5, pp. 169-174
    Wei, C.C. and Lee, Y.C., 1995, Determining the Process Tolerance Based on the Manufacturing Process Capability. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.10, pp. 416-421.
    Wheeler, D.L., Cavalier, T.M. and Lehtihet, E.A., 1999, An Implicit Enumeration Approach to Probabilistic Tolerance Allocation under Conventional Tolerance Control. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.37, pp.3773-3789
    Wilhelm, W.E. and Shin H.M., 1985, Effective ness of alternate operations in a flexible manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, Vol.23, pp.65-79

    下載圖示 校內:2006-06-27公開
    校外:2006-06-27公開
    QR CODE