簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高景仲
Kao, Ching-chung
論文名稱: 全球不平等與新自由主義世界秩序
Global Inequality and the Neo-liberal World Order
指導教授: 宋鎮照
Song, Jen-Jew
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 政治經濟研究所
Graduate Institute of Political Economy
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 84
中文關鍵詞: 全球不平等新自由主義世界秩序全球公民社會
外文關鍵詞: global inequality, neo-liberalism, world order, global civil society
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文試圖在「世界秩序(world order)」的架構下,從不同的面向,來探討1970年代以來,「新自由主義(neo-liberalism)」與「全球不平等(global inequality)」的辯證關係。所謂「新自由主義世界秩序」,是指二次戰後建立的世界秩序的最新階段,其崛起約略在1970年代,在1970與1980年代與「新現實主義」爭雄,並在1990年代開始盛行。「全球不平等」則指在這個時空背景下,全球政治、經濟、社會體系的「結構性」不平等。本文指出1970年以來的世界秩序有三個主要面向:新全球政治結構、新全球經濟體、與存在於全球各地的「社會力量( social forces)」。在新自由主義盛行下,全球政治、經濟、社會體系的結構性不平等日益深化,也因而引發不同形式的抵抗;要逆轉這種全球不平等的深化,有賴全球社會力量由下向上作用,形成「轉變式抵抗(transformative resistance)」:這其中包括公民社會(civil society) 的再興與橫向匯聚;以及建立一個以各文明間的互相尊重、和平共處理念為基礎的多元世界(plural world)。

    This paper, employing the structure of ‘ world order’, aims to explore from varying perspectives the dialectical relationships between ‘neo-liberalism’ and ‘global inequality’ from the 1970s onwards. The ‘neo-liberal world order’, which started in the 1970s and was competing with ‘neo-realism’ in the 1970 and 1980s, is the latest stage of the post-Second-World-War world order. While the ‘global inequity’ is the ‘structural’ inequality of global political, economic and social systems during this period. The world order since 1970 contains three main dimensions: New Global Political Structure, New Global Economy, and the Social Forces all over the world. Under the reign of neo-liberalism, the structural inequality of global political, economic, social systems has been intensifying; hence the rise of resistance of various forms. To counteract this deepening of global inequality, global social forces have to take the lead, working bottom up and forming a kind of ‘transformative resistance’, which entails the revival and union of civil societies, as well as establishing a plural world, based on mutual respect and peaceful cohabitation between civilizations.

    第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………….1 第一節 研究目的與目的………………………………………………………….1 第二節 相關文獻回顧與探討…………………………………………………….5 第三節 研究架構與研究方法……………………………………………………16 第二章 不平等與全球政治體系……………………………………………………25 第一節 霸權與霸權危機…………………………………………………………26 第二節 「1989年革命」:歷史已經終結?……………………………………30 第三節 當代美國力量……………………………………………………………35 第四節 小結………………………………………………………………………43 第三章 不平等與全球經濟體………………………………………………………44 第一節 工業╱後工業……………………………………………………………45 第二節 福特╱後福特主義………………………………………………………50 第三節 資本的力量………………………………………………………………53 第四節 小結………………………………………………………………………58 第四章 不平等、公民社會、與文明………………………………………………59 第一節 公民社會的歷史回顧與當代意義………………………………………60 第二節 全球治理的民主赤字……………………………………………………63 第三節 公民社會如何減少民主赤字……………………………………………65 第四節 公民社會在世界各地之運作……………………………………………68 第五節 多元文明共存與多元世界的建立………………………………………74 第五章 結論…………………………………………………………………………76 參考書目……………………………………………………………………..78

    1. Aglietta, M., A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (London:Verso, 1979).

    2. Allen, J., ‘Post-industrialism and Post-fordism,’ in S. Hall, D. Hell and G. McGrew(eds,) Modernity and Its Futures (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992), pp. 169-220.

    3. Appaiah, A., ‘Cosmopalitan Patriots’ in Joshua Cohen (ed,), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism (Cambridge, MA: Beacon Press, 1996).

    4. Baylis, J. and Smith, S. (eds), The Globalization of World Politics (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford, 2001).

    5. Beck U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage, 1992).

    6. Bell, D., The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (New York: Basic Books, 1973).

    7. Bobbio, N., Which Socialism? (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987), pp. 42-4.

    8. Braudel, F., “History and the Social Science: The Longue durée,” in Braudel, On History, trans. Sarah Matthews. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).

    9. Bourdieu, P., Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

    10. Bull, H., The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).

    11. Callinicos, A., The Revenge of History: Marxism and the East European Revolutions (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991), p. 109.

    12. Callinicos, A. Against the Third Way: An Anti-Capitalist Critique (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), pp. 34-35.

    13. Castells, M., The Informational City (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).

    14. Castells, M., The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).

    15. Castells, M., The Power of Identity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).

    16. Castells, M., End of Millennium (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998).

    17. Chomsky, N., The New Military Humanism: Lessons from Kosovo (London: Plute Press, 1999).

    18. Cox, R., Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987).

    19. Cox, R., ‘Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order,’ Review of International Studies, Vol. 25 (1999), pp.3-28.

    20. Cox, R., ‘Political Economy and World Order: Problems of Power and Knowledge at the Turn of the Millennium’, in Stubbs and Underhill (eds.), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order (2000).

    21. Cox, R., The Political Economy of a Plural World: Critical reflections on power, morals and civilization (London: Rouledge, 2002).

    22. Cox, R. and Sinclair, T. J., Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1996).

    23. Croce,B., Politics and Morals (New York: Philosophical Library, 1945), pp. 22-32.

    24. Dahl, R. A., A Preface to Economic Democracy (Cambridge: Polity, 1985).

    25. Derian, J. D., Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network (Boulder CO: Westview Press, 2001).

    26. Derian, J. D. ‘9/11: before, after and between’ in Craig Calhoun, Paul Price and Ashley Timmer, (eds.) Understanding September 11 (New York: New Press, 2002), p. 180.

    27. De Soto, H. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else (London: Black Swam, 2001).

    28. Deutsch, K. et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).

    29. Doyle, M. ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 3, (1983), pp. 205-35, and Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-54.

    30. Fukuyama, F., ‘The end of history,’ The National Interest, No. 18, (1989), pp. 3-18.

    31. Galtung, J., ‘A Structural Theory Imperialism’, International Journal of Peace Research, Vol.8 (1971), pp. 81-118.

    32. Giddens, A., The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

    33. Giddens, A., Reith Lectures (5 pieces) see www.lse.uk/Giddens/reith (1999).

    34. Giddens, A., Director’s Lectures 1999-2000 (5 pieces) see www.lse.uk/Giddens (1999).

    35. Giddens, A., The Third Way and its Critics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).

    36. Gill, S., Power and Resistance in the New World Order (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003).

    37. Gilpin, R., The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987).

    38. Gorz, A., Critique of Economic Reason (London: Verso, 1989).

    39. Gorz, A. Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism, (London: Pluto Press, 1982).

    40. Hall, S., ‘The Question of Cultural Identity’, in Hall et al (eds.) Modernity and Its Futures (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992), pp. 273-326.

    41. Hall, S., ‘The Work of Representation,’ in Hall (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (London: SAGE, 1997), pp. 13-74.

    42. Hardt, M. and Negri, A., Empire (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).

    43. Hass, E., The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958).

    44. Held, D., ‘Liberalism, Marxism and Democracy’, in Stuart Hall, David Held and Tony McGrew (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992), pp. 13-60.

    45. Held, D., Democracy and the Global Order: From State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995).

    46. Held, D. et al., Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).

    47. Held, D. and McGrew, A. (eds), The Global Transformations Readers: An Introduction to the Global Debate (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).

    48. Hellman, J. A., ‘The riddle of new social movements: who they are and what they do’, in S. Halebsky and R. Harris (eds.), Capital, Power, and Inequality in Latin America (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995).

    49. Hertz, N., The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy (London: William Heinemann, 2001).

    50. Higgot, R., ‘Contested globalization: the changing context and normative challenges’ Review of International studies, vol. 26, (2000b), pp. 131-153.

    51. Higgott, R. and Payne, A. (eds), The New Political Economy of Globalization vol.1-2. (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000).

    52. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G., Globalization in Question (2nd, ed,) (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999).

    53. Hout, W., Capitalism and the Third World: Development, Dependence and the World System (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993).

    54. Huntington, S., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Touchstone, 1997).

    55. Hurrel, A. and Woods, N., ‘ Globalisation and Inequality’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 24, No. 3 (1995), pp. 447-70.

    56. Hurrel, A. and Woods, N. (eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (New York: Oxford, 1999).

    57. Hutton, W. and Giddens, A. (eds), On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism (London: Jonathan Cap, 2000).

    58. Jackson, R. and Sorensen, G., Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford, 1999).

    59. Kaldor, M., ‘American power: from “compellance” to cosmopolitanism?’ International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 1, (2003), pp. 1-22.

    60. Keohane, R., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).

    61. Keohane, R. and Nye, J., ‘International Interdependence and Integration’ in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, viii: International Politics. (Reading: Mass.: Assison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 363-414.

    62. Keohane, R. and Nye, J., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. (Boston: Little Brown, 1977), p. 25.

    63. Kingsbury, B., ‘Sovereignty and Inequality,’ in Hurrel and Woods (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (1999), pp. 66-94.

    64. Lindblom, C. E., Politics and Markets: The World’s Political Economic Systems (New York: Basic Books, 1977).

    65. Lynch, C., ‘Social Movements and the Problem of Globalization,’ Alternatives, Vol. 23, (1998), pp.149-73.

    66. MacDonald, L., Supporting Civil Society. The Political Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in Central America (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997).

    67. Miller, D., ‘Justice and Inequality,’ in Hurrel and Woods (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (1999), pp. 187-210.

    68. Mortimer, E., ‘The end of history?’ Marxism Today (Nov. 1989), p. 29.

    69. Nye, J., The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).

    70. Nye, J., ‘The American national interest and global public goods,’ International Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 2, (2002), pp. 233-34.

    71. Ohmae, K., The Borderless World (London: Collins, 1990).

    72. Ohmae, K., The End of the Nation State (New York: Free Press, 1995).

    73. Ollman, B., Dialectical Investigation (London: Routledge, 1993). pp. 9-22.

    74. Oman, C., ‘Globalization, Regionalization, and Inequality in Hurrel and Woods (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (1999), pp. 36-65.

    75. Overbeek, H., ‘Transnational Historical Materialism’, in R. Palan (ed.) Global Political Economy: Contemporary theories (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 168-83.

    76. Palan, R. (ed.), Global Political Economy: Contemporary theories (London: Routledge, 2000).

    77. Pijl, Kees van der., Transnational Classes and International Relations (London: Routledge, 1998).

    78. Rodrik, D., Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (Washington, DC; Institute for International Economics, 1997).

    79. Sakamoto, Y., ‘Civil society and democratic order’ in Gill and Mittelman (eds.) Innovation and Transformaton in International Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

    80. Scholte, J. A., ‘Global Civil Society,’ in N. Woods (ed.) The Political Economy of Globalization (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), pp. 173-201.

    81. Scholte, J. A., ‘Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance,’ Global Governance, Vol. 8, (2002), pp. 283-93.

    82. Seligson, M. A. and Passé-Smith, J. T. (eds.), Development and Underdevelopment: The Political Economy of Inequality (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993).

    83. Sen, A., Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books, 2000).

    84. Shaw, M., Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge, 2000).

    85. Sklair, L., The Transnational Capitalist Class (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001).

    86. Soros. G., The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered (London: Little Brown, 1998).

    87. Spero, J. E. and Hart, J. A. The Politics of International Relations (5th ed.) (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997), pp. 8-48.

    88. Stewart, F. and Berry, A., ‘Globalization, Liberalization, and Inequality’ in Hurrel and Woods (eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (1999), pp. 150-86.

    89. Strange, S., The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1996).

    90. Stubbs, R. and Underhill, G. (eds.), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order (2nd ed.) (Ontario: Oxford, 2000).

    91. Touraine, A., The Post-Industrial Society (New York: Random House, 1971).

    92. Underhill, G., ‘Conceptualizing the Changing Global Order’, in R. Stubbs and G. Underhill,(eds.) Political Economy and the Changing Global Order (2nd ed.) (Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    93. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2002 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 1-11.

    94. Wade, R., ‘Is Globalization Making World Income Distribution More Equal?’, DESTIN Working Paper Series, No.01-01, LSE Development Studies Institute, (2000).

    95. Wade, R., ‘Global Inequality: Winner and Losers’, The Economist, 28 April, (2001), pp. 79-82.

    96. Wade, R., ‘Globalization, Poverty and Income Distribution: Does the Liberal Argument Hold?’ DESTIN Working Paper Series No. 02-33 (London: LSE, 2002).

    97. Wallerstein, I., The Capitalist World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1979).

    98. Wallerstein, I., The Politics of World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1984).

    99. Wallerstein, I., Geopolitics and Geoculture (Cambridge: Cambridge, 1991).

    100. Wallerstein, I., Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization (London: Verso, 1995).

    101. Waltz, K., Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1979).

    102. Woods, N., ‘Order, Globalization, and Inequality in World Politics,’ in A. Hurrell and N. Woods(eds.) Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 8.

    103. Woods, N. (ed.), The Political Economy of Globalization (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000).

    104. Woods, N., ‘International Political Economy in an Age of Globalization’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics (2nd ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 277-98.

    105. Yarbrough, B. and Yarbrough, R. The World Economy: Trade and Finance (4th ed.) (Fort Worth, Tex.: Dryden Press, 1997) p.167.

    106. Young, O., ‘International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions’, World Politics, Vol. 39, No. 1, (1986), pp. 104-22.

    下載圖示 校內:2005-02-17公開
    校外:2006-02-17公開
    QR CODE